[DeTomaso] NPC: Tesla in space

Himes, Terry (397C) terry.himes at jpl.nasa.gov
Mon Feb 12 15:43:50 EST 2018


Wow!  I love it!  Anything (even Elon) that gets people THAT interested and doing research is AWESOME! 
(being a spacenut myself)

PROS:
We (NASA) just got our budget passed for 2019. The more enthusiasm that is generated, the more we will
continue funding NASA. “Reinforcing our core exploration mission and the many ways that we return value 
to the U.S. through knowledge and discoveries, strengthening our economy and security, deepening partnerships 
with other nations, providing solutions to tough problems, and inspiring the next generation. “  Robert Lightfoot.

CONS:
While we, and most of NASA vendors (Lockheed, Orbital, Ball, SSL Boeing, etc), follow our NASA Planetary Protection
guidelines, SpaceX does not.  There is a good book out there (? Finding Life on Other Planets Before It’s Too Late) which
addresses this issue. We may find life on another planet, only to discover we brought it there!

Anyway, I am really happy people are getting excited about space again. Especially deep space.  ;-)

Terry





"A Purple Heart proves you were smart enough to hatch a plan,
 stupid enough to try it and lucky enough to survive!"
 
Terry W. Himes 
JPL Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Dawn Spacecraft Team
Rosetta Sequence Team Lead
Phone: (818) 393-6261
Cell:     (818) 653-8213
thimes at jpl.nasa.gov
🇺🇸
 

On 2/12/18, 12:00 PM, "DeTomaso on behalf of Julian Kift" <detomaso-bounces at server.detomasolist.com on behalf of julian_kift at hotmail.com> wrote:

    Charlie,
    
    
    Not too loudly, this is a Pantera forum and some people will adopt that mantra for their restoration ala Gas Monkey Garage!
    
    
    All I could envisage when reading the article was an open top car with stereo blazing Elton John's 'Rocket Man'; then sanity struck and I remembered sound doesn't travel in a vacuum...
    
    
    You have to admit there is a certain irony in how much energy was expended and fossil fuel (Rocket propellant RP-1) burned to put a zero emission vehicle in space that will ultimately disintegrate and pollute the non-atmosphere!
    
    Julian
    
    ________________________________
    From: DeTomaso <detomaso-bounces at server.detomasolist.com> on behalf of Charles McCall <charlesmccall at gmail.com>
    Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 11:47 AM
    To: 'Larry-Ohio Time Corp'; detomaso at server.detomasolist.com
    Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] NPC: Tesla in space
    
    I agree with Dr. Chuck... interesting reading.
    
    Hey, if you have the $$, why not, even if you don't know how it'll turn out?
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: DeTomaso [mailto:detomaso-bounces at server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf
    Of Larry-Ohio Time Corp
    Sent: lunes, 12 de febrero de 2018 20:14
    To: detomaso at server.detomasolist.com
    Subject: [DeTomaso] NPC: Tesla in space
    
    If the SpaceX  <https://newatlas.com/falcon-heavy-launch/53258/> Falcon
    Heavy is the world's most powerful rocket, then the Tesla Roadster that it
    shot into interplanetary space holds the record for the fastest car in
    history. This cosmic convertible will orbit around the Sun once every 1.6
    years, but how long will it continue to do so, and what will be its fate?
    Will it still look as pristine a billion years from now as it did in the
    videos beamed back to Earth? Probably not.
    
    
    
    At the moment, there are five US spacecraft speeding out of our Solar
    System, never to return. Billions of years from now, when our Sun has turned
    into a red giant and engulfed the Earth in nuclear fire, the Pioneer,
    <https://newatlas.com/voyager-40th-anniversary-retrospective-gallery/50744/>
    Voyager, and  <https://newatlas.com/new-horizons-pluto-flyby-nasa/34777/>
    New Horizons probes will still be traveling through our galaxy like a
    quintet of robotic Odysseus's.
    
    Even back in our system and revolving about our Earth are satellites that
    will still be around for many millions of years. For example, one
    Earth-orbiting satellite,  <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LAGEOS> LAGEOS-1,
    is a passive laser reflector satellite that will not only remain circling
    our planet for 8.4 million years, but will remain functional for most of
    that time.
    
     <javascript:void(0)>
    
    
    
    With a track record like that, it looks as if the Tesla Roadster that
    rocketed into space on February 6, 2018 will be cruising happily among the
    stars as a permanent monument to the early days of commercial deep space
    travel. It's a nice thought that the Starman mannequin driver and his cherry
    red ride will still be around long after the pyramids have crumbled to sand.
    
    Except that's not going to happen. In fact, the Starman and the Roadster are
    in for a very unpleasant time and may not be in very good shape after a few
    years. And their lifespan, while huge by human standards, may be rather
    limited.
    
    At the moment, the Falcon Heavy second stage and the Roadster attached to it
    are in an orbit that
    <https://mobile.twitter.com/planet4589/status/961394843648954368> Jonathan
    McDowell of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics has recalculated
    from Elon Musk's rather generous
    <https://newatlas.com/spacex-images-starman-asteroid/53301/> rough estimate
    of a few hours after liftoff. According to McDowell, the second stage is a
    Hohmann transfer orbit, which is most economical orbit in terms of energy
    for going from one place to another.
    
     <javascript:void(0)>
    
    
    
    Where Musk estimated that the second stage was circling the Sun at a
    distance between 91 million mi (150 million km) and 240 million mi (390
    million km) with an inclination of 29º to the ecliptic, McDowell calculates
    that its orbit is between 92 million mi (148 million km) and 158 million mi
    (255 million km) with an inclination of 1.1º and a period of about 1.6
    years. This puts its farthest distance from the sun just beyond the orbit of
    Mars.
    
    The popular idea is that the Roadster will orbit the Sun for hundreds of
    millions, if not billions of years, but that isn't the case. The second
    stage and Roadster are now essentially a
    <http://www.science20.com/robert_walker/will_elon_musks_cherry_red_tesla_roa
    dster_orbit_for_a_billion_years_falcon_heavy_test_launch-230358> near-Earth
    object (NEO), much like the asteroids that space agencies keep an eye on
    just in case a large one is going to hit the Earth.
    
    One thing that marks NEOs is that they don't have very long careers. They're
    interplanetary jaywalkers with all the hazards that implies. Planets and
    asteroids in circular orbits stay out of each other's way and are relatively
    stable, but NEOs, and the Roadster, are in eccentric orbits that cross the
    orbits of the planets. This makes their trajectories very unstable.
    
     <javascript:void(0)>
    
    
    
    The second stage will cross the orbits of Earth and Mars and its trajectory
    will certainly be perturbed by Jupiter's gravitational field, so there is a
    small chance that it might strike Earth or Mars many thousands of years from
    now, though it's so small that it will burn up in the atmosphere. Another
    possibility is that it might get flung out past Jupiter or inward past
    Venus. It might even be propelled into the Sun, as happens to many
    near-Earth asteroids after a few tens of millions of years. The orbital
    mechanics are very complex, so it's difficult to predict, but the upshot is
    that the Roadster won't be roaming the Solar System for as long as its
    neighbors.
    
    Another problem is that with the Roadster so close to the plane of the
    ecliptic, it's in danger of being struck by cosmic debris. There is a very
    small chance that it might be hit by a large object like an asteroid, but
    the greater threat is from micrometeoroids, which over the millennia will
    hit the car time and again. Each of these will cause small and not-so-small
    amounts of damage, until it could one day look like it's been shot at by a
    cannon filled with sand and gravel.
    
    But the much greater problem is that the Roadster isn't a purpose-built
    spacecraft. It's a production electric car, which means it's as suitable for
    surviving the environment of space as a chocolate Easter bunny in a
    convection oven.
    
     <javascript:void(0)>
    
     <javascript:void(0)> The Roadster passing the terminator
    
    
    
    We're used to stories of interplanetary spacecraft functioning long past the
    predicted end of their service life. Mars rovers expected to operate for 90
    days are still rolling after many years, and the Voyager probes are still
    working 40 years after their launch. Even the defunct machines, like the
    <https://newatlas.com/kepler-recovery-emergency-mode/42756/> Kepler Space
    Telescope, can be expected to be around for many millions of years in a
    relatively intact condition. Why not the roadster, then?
    
    The answer is very simple. Space engineers have spent decades studying how
    to build spacecraft and especially which materials to build them out of.
    They know which ones can withstand the extreme heat and cold of space, the
    hard ultraviolet (UV) radiation, as well as the X-rays, gamma rays, and
    cosmic rays that are constantly bombarding our technology outside the
    protection of Earth's atmosphere and Van Allen belts.
    
    The Tesla Roadster, on the other hand, was designed to drive on Earthside
    roads, not galavant between the Earth and Mars. It was made to be light and
    fast, and have good road handling. That may be fine on the twisting roads of
    Italy, but the engineering that went into the Roadster is now a positive
    detriment in space.
    
    The biggest problem is that the Roadster, and Starman, and made up largely
    of rubber, plastics, and carbon composites, which consist of long chain
    organic molecules that include epoxy resins, polypropylene, polystyrene,
    polyvinyl chloride, nylon, and many others. These make up the carbon
    composite car body, the fabrics in the interior, the cushions in the seats,
    electrical insulation, and a myriad of fasteners, fairings, and adhesive
    compounds. Starman and his suit are made almost entirely out of organic
    polymers and even the safety glass in the car's windscreen is a plastic
    laminate.
    
    All of these, at this very moment, are being subjected to dangerously high
    temperature variations as the sunlit areas heat to 260º F (127º C) and the
    shaded areas plunging to -280º F (-173º C). Fortunately, the second stage is
    slowly rotating, so the car is being evenly baked like a rotisserie chicken,
    but as the vehicle orbits toward and away from the Sun, it will produce
    strong thermal stresses that will produce all manner of material fatigue.
    Also, the rotation means that anything that comes loose can fly away.
    
    But the worst is all that radiation hitting those long polymer chain
    molecules. As the rays strike, they will break down the molecules bit by
    bit, converting them into free radicals. The same goes for the pigments used
    to give the Roadster its red color. Eventually, the car will become
    bleached, then everything made of polymers will disintegrate and crumble
    into dust.
    
    It's all happened before and it doesn't take very long. If you look at
    pictures of the old Apollo moon missions of the late 1960s and early 70s,
    you'll be familiar with the images of spacesuited American astronauts
    saluting the  <https://newatlas.com/apollo-moon-flags-standing/23523/> flag
    and the Lunar Module wrapped in gold Mylar foil to keep it cool under the
    harsh lunar sun. If you were to go back to those landing sites, you'd find
    the flag poles empty and the descent stage of the module largely unclad
    because half a century of radiation has done its work.
    
    So what will the Tesla Roadster look like in a couple of centuries? The most
    obvious thing will be that the carbon composite body will be gone as the
    epoxy resins have all broken down and the carbon fibers fallen apart. The
    rubber tires on the wheels won't be there either.
    
    Many other bits will have come loose as the adhesives turned brittle and
    ceased to stick. Even the windscreen will have a yellowy opaque look,
    provided the laminate hasn't failed completely or a meteoroid hasn't slammed
    into it. In the cockpit, Starman is now reduced to a few metal joints. The
    seats are bare metal frames with the fabric covers now powder, and the foam
    rubber cushions long gone.
    
    Other materials in the car will also suffer over time. Any lubricants will
    have frozen or boiled away. Those that remain will degrade like the
    plastics, turning into a brittle mess. If any graphite was used for
    lubricant, the water molecules that make graphite powder slippery will
    evaporate and the carbon molecules left behind will now have the property of
    jeweler's polish.
    
    It's very likely that the 6,831 lithium-ion cells that powered the Roadster
    will have been removed before leaving Earth. The FAA probably wouldn't have
    been too happy about 700 lb (317 kg) of fire-prone batteries sitting atop
    the Falcon Heavy, turning into a very large bomb. However, there was a
    battery aboard to run the cameras that beamed back video to Earth. That
    battery may, depending on its design, start to generate gas and may one day
    explode. Meanwhile, the electronics used to transmit video will very soon be
    fried by the radiation as the delicate micro circuits are destroyed bit by
    bit.
    
    Even the metals in the car will be affected. The roadster uses advanced
    alloys – some of which might start to outgas. Radiation will eventually
    affect the crystalline structure of the alloys and may give them a patina,
    such as is sometimes found on metallic objects in very dry deserts. Over
    millions of years, some may become brittle. Some may develop something
    similar to tin pest, where tin alters its structure at very low temperatures
    and appears to rot.
    
    In the end, if some distant future expedition does retrieve the Roadster, it
    will be in a sorry state – a battered, bare metal frame with a few pockets
    of organic chemical dust. But maybe that won't be so bad. Maybe it will give
    it the right air of romance, like the Parthenon or Stonehenge. Or maybe it
    will be regarded as a challenge by the finders, who may embark on the
    greatest car restoration project in history.
    
    Let's hope they get the paint job right.
    
     Larry (too used for me) - Cleveland
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    
    
    Detomaso Email List is not managed by POCA
    Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes
    DeTomaso mailing list
    DeTomaso at server.detomasolist.com
    http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
    
    To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) use the links above.
    
    Members who post to this list grant license to the list to forward any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of the list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an archive or approve the archiving of list messages.
    



More information about the DeTomaso mailing list