[DeTomaso] F1 comments

[David in Durango]

Agreed, if you would just read what I wrote!

"I personally believe Kimi could outperform Alonso in equal cars."  Could?  but would he?  I say Kimi MIGHT outperform well, anyone.  Whether he is so motivated is the question.

Enough of this pissing in the wind . . . . 

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: LS 
  To: David in Durango ; Panteras 
  Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 2:20 PM
  Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] F1 comments


  David, here are the facts:

  Alonso and Kimi are both world champions and very successful as their records show.

  Kimi and Hamilton are okay in person. (I have not met Alonso personally)

  Bernie has ruined F1 by making it more entertainment and less sport.

  Opinion:

  I personally believe Kimi could outperform Alonso in equal cars.

  LS








  central 
  wines-spirits   est 1934



  625 e street nw

  washington, dc 20004


  centralwines.com



  facebook.com/CentralLiquors 



  202-737-2800







------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: David in Durango <adin at frontier.net>
  To: Panteras <detomaso at poca.com> 
  Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2013 4:03 PM
  Subject: [DeTomaso] F1 comments


  Right on Darryl!

  Funny, I am NO Alonso fan, but Darryl is correct on this.  I like to see Kimi "blow Alonso's socks off" anywhere.  Kimi has, or had, and attitude problem and thus he may or may not perform up to potential on a given day.  How many times have we seen Kimi cruise until the last few laps only to turn it on for a fastest lap?

  We have seen Alonso perform well in that POS (certainly not up to Red Bull standards) red car many times. 

  Those with selective memory should review the facts, IMO.

  _______________________________________________

  Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA

  DeTomaso mailing list
  DeTomaso at poca.com
  http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso





__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 8522 (20130703) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com