[DeTomaso] Fw: To thermostat or not to thermostat

Will Demelo wdemelo at cogeco.ca
Wed May 21 06:01:05 EDT 2008


I don't think that fluid can flow too quickly in a rad. It's still in 
contact with all the surfaces, but there definately be an issue if it ran 
too slow. I also agree that you must run a stat on a street cat to get it to 
proper operating temps.
Will
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Will Kooiman" <wkooiman at earthlink.net>
To: <detomaso at realbig.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 10:57 PM
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] To thermostat or not to thermostat


>I agree with Mikey about running the Robert Shaw 333-180 thermostat.  There
> aren't any downsides to running a thermostat - unless you get a cheapo
> thermostat - which the Robert Shaw is not.
>
> I don't buy the idea that you have to slow down the water or it won't cool
> enough.  It makes more sense to me that if you don't restrict the water,
> it'll cool too much.  So, in other words, if you're not running a
> thermostat, and the engine is running too cool, put a smaller restrictor 
> in
> place.  This only makes sense in a controlled environment - like dirt 
> track
> racing.
>
> This is one of those topics that, in my opinion, we over analyze.  Use a
> proper thermostat so it'll stay hot enough.  Get rid of the air in the
> system.  Make sure the fans are working properly.  That's all it takes. 
> Oh
> yeah, stainless pipes/tanks and green stripe hoses, but that's more for
> corrosion/leak protection - not cooling.
>
> By the way, I haven't had a high pressure/swirl tank in over 4 years.  I
> haven't put many miles on my car the last year (mostly due to traveling 
> for
> work), but before that I drove it 1,000 miles a month.  The only time it
> overheated was when the fans stopped working - and that was in 100+ degree
> weather in stop/go traffic, up hill, with no shoes on.
>
> Will.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: detomaso-bounces at realbig.com [mailto:detomaso-bounces at realbig.com] 
> On
> Behalf Of MikeLDrew at aol.com
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 9:22 PM
> To: jimgray at cableone.net; detomaso at realbig.com
> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] To thermostat or not to thermostat
>
>
> In a message dated 5/20/08 18 45 54, jimgray at cableone.net writes:
>
>
>> My question is, since we always make a big deal about using the correct
>> Cleveland style thermostat, what happens when there is no "hat" on a
>> thermostat to close off the warm-up passages? Does the water just go
> around
>> and around in the engine?
>>
>
> Yes, unless it is blocked off.   Some aftermarket pumps block off that
> passage.   Some engine builders will hammer a plug into the orifice 
> normally
> blocked
> by the 'hat'.   In both cases, that then allows you to run a Windsor
> thermostat.
>
> Although thermostats are a possible failure point, a good quality 
> thermostat
>
> rarely fails, and their benefits far outweigh their liabilities IMHO.   As
> your engine builder pointed out, you can't run NOTHING there; a restrictor
> of
> some sort is needed to maintain appropriate pressure/volume.
>
> I would suggest running a top-quality RobertShaw 351C thermostat (part
> number
> 333-180 for a 180-degree unit), available from Summit and others.
>
> Mike
>
>
> **************
> Wondering what's for Dinner Tonight? Get new twists on
> family favorites at AOL Food.
>
> (http://food.aol.com/dinner-tonight?NCID=aolfod00030000000001)
> _______________________________________________
>
> Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
>
> Archive Search Engine Now Available at http://www.realbig.com/detomaso/
>
> DeTomaso mailing list
> DeTomaso at list.realbig.com
> http://list.realbig.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
>
> Archive Search Engine Now Available at http://www.realbig.com/detomaso/
>
> DeTomaso mailing list
> DeTomaso at list.realbig.com
> http://list.realbig.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso 




More information about the DeTomaso mailing list