[DeTomaso] Photo of stock luggage area

Thomas Törnblom tipo874 at gmail.com
Thu Sep 10 02:49:52 EDT 2015


Are you saying the inflatable spare for later cars doesn't fit the front 
trunk?

When I bought my 1984 GT the spare was in the front, and there is no 
evidence that it had ever been installed in the rear tub. There is no 
fastening provisions and there were no visible wear on the carpet that 
suggests it had been installed in the rear.

Thomas

Den 2015-09-10 05:39, Mike Drew via DeTomaso skrev:
>     In a message dated 9/9/15 20 01 22, michaelsavga at gmail.com writes:
>
>       Does anybody have a photo of a stock front boot and rear luggage
>       area.
>       1660 has the rear insert without a spare tire area and,I recently
>       acquired
>       one with the spare inset.
>       I have an orginal spare, there is no way it would fit in that
>       recess.
>       Lastly, where were the tool kit and air cannister stored, upfront or
>       in the
>       back?
>
>     >>>Michael,
>     You'd be surprised.  The spare tire is a perfect fit in the right rear
>     corner of the trunk.  It doesn't fit inside the depression, but rather
>     on top of it.  Just drop the trunk into your own car, then rest the
>     spare in position and you'll see how perfect it is.
>     The depression is designed to hold the inflation canister, plus
>     whatever else you care to throw in there.  I believe conventionally the
>     tool kit was carried up front, but there is no specific 'home' for it
>     as there is for the spare.
>     The early Euro cars carried the spare up front.  Interestingly, they
>     were about an inch narrower than the spares fitted to the '72-74 cars,
>     and those later spares are too tall to fit up front.  I can only assume
>     that the early US cars, which had no specific provisions for the spare
>     in the rear, were equipped like the Euro cars?
>     I presume you have one or more of the 'Brooklands' paperback books on
>     the Pantera, which compile period magazine articles.  You can see that
>     in the tests of the very early cars, the spare is in the front, while
>     the later cars show it in the rear....
>     Mike
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
> Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes
> DeTomaso mailing list
> DeTomaso at poca.com
> http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
>
> To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) use the links above.

-------------- next part --------------
   Are you saying the inflatable spare for later cars doesn't fit the
   front trunk?
   When I bought my 1984 GT the spare was in the front, and there is no
   evidence that it had ever been installed in the rear tub. There is no
   fastening provisions and there were no visible wear on the carpet that
   suggests it had been installed in the rear.
   Thomas
   Den 2015-09-10 05:39, Mike Drew via DeTomaso skrev:

   In a message dated 9/9/15 20 01 22, [1]michaelsavga at gmail.com writes:

     Does anybody have a photo of a stock front boot and rear luggage
     area.
     1660 has the rear insert without a spare tire area and,I recently
     acquired
     one with the spare inset.
     I have an orginal spare, there is no way it would fit in that
     recess.
     Lastly, where were the tool kit and air cannister stored, upfront or
     in the
     back?

   >>>Michael,
   You'd be surprised.  The spare tire is a perfect fit in the right rear
   corner of the trunk.  It doesn't fit inside the depression, but rather
   on top of it.  Just drop the trunk into your own car, then rest the
   spare in position and you'll see how perfect it is.
   The depression is designed to hold the inflation canister, plus
   whatever else you care to throw in there.  I believe conventionally the
   tool kit was carried up front, but there is no specific 'home' for it
   as there is for the spare.
   The early Euro cars carried the spare up front.  Interestingly, they
   were about an inch narrower than the spares fitted to the '72-74 cars,
   and those later spares are too tall to fit up front.  I can only assume
   that the early US cars, which had no specific provisions for the spare
   in the rear, were equipped like the Euro cars?
   I presume you have one or more of the 'Brooklands' paperback books on
   the Pantera, which compile period magazine articles.  You can see that
   in the tests of the very early cars, the spare is in the front, while
   the later cars show it in the rear....
   Mike


_______________________________________________

Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes
DeTomaso mailing list
[2]DeTomaso at poca.com
[3]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com

To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) use the li
nks above.

References

   1. mailto:michaelsavga at gmail.com
   2. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
   3. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com


More information about the DeTomaso mailing list