[DeTomaso] NPC - Machine Shop Practices

Guido deTomaso guido_detomaso at prodigy.net
Wed Nov 11 13:20:26 EST 2015


Okay, the thread's gone in a different direction ... how precisely are these flywheels and vibration dampers providing that 28.2 oz-in, can you swap these parts later without throwing off the crankshaft balance?
Or do the vibration damper, crank and flywheel become a "set" once balanced?
Alternately, can that 28.2 oz-in be verified on the flywheel or vibration damper alone?
Maybe the biggest problem, I can easily imagine the guy behind the counter not grasping any of this...
Thanks,
GD

       From: Daniel C Jones <daniel.c.jones2 at gmail.com>
 To: 
Cc: "detomaso at poca.com" <detomaso at poca.com> 
 Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 6:39 AM
 Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] NPC - Machine Shop Practices
   
  A
  A No.A  It's a balance factor with the units of oz-in and is the
  product of a mass and a distance (radially away from the crank
  centerline).A  Also, it's 28.2 oz-in at each end.A  When someone says
  my flywheel balance is 28 ounces it sounds as moronic as saying I have
  450 feet of torque :-)
  A
  A Dan Jones

  On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Sean Korb <[1]spkorb at gmail.com> wrote:

    A  A Always wanted to know, but was afraid to ask... and this seems
    like the
    A  A place to do it:
    A  A If my motor is 28oz external balance, is that 14 at the
    harmonic
    A  A balancer and 14 at the flywheel?AA  Could you put all 28 on one
    end or
    A  A is that a "bad thing"?AA  Asking for a friend ;)
    A  A sean
    A  A On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 6:51 AM, JEFFREY COBB
    <[1][2]jeffcobb1 at me.com>
    A  A wrote:
    A  A  A GD, you are correct that machining a block and crank based
    on known
    A  A  A piston and big end size is the best and most intelligent way
    to
    A  A  A create a tight fast and secure short block.
    A  A  A AA  A So it appears that the margin of error needs to be in
    place so
    A  A  A as to support the reality of new bearings and cranks having
    a
    A  A  A tolerance variation which as Tim says, stacks up to your end
    A  A  A clearance and production run variances, I agree to that.
    A  A  A Of course it is better to machine a crank and block to its
    recip
    A  A  A parts; pistons and big ends.
    A  A  A AA  A Though that creates a problem later on if rework
    without
    A  A  A machining is done and diff brand parts are used that will
    then
    A  A  A damage your initial perfect job clearance results, now too
    loose or
    A  A  A tight.
    A  A  A AA  I have found with our matchining that the clearances
    made no real
    A  A  A difference unless it was on a Benz turbo diesel or a high
    output
    A  A  A high rpm engine. The oil pump, oil and block temperature
    tends to
    A  A  A cover different clearance issues until you stress it out and
    the
    A  A  A ugly knock or bang changes your day.
    A  A  A AA  A So in closing, we always machine our block and crank
    according
    A  A  A to known static size values because we care about this
    engine today
    A  A  A not a run of production engines tomorrow.
    A  A  A AA  A And the best of clearance jobs will always be
    destroyed by a
    A  A  A not perfect balance of reciprocating mass. Balance is
    critical,
    A  A  A maybe more than clearances.
    A  A  A AA  A Static neutral balance is the first and only step way
    to go if
    A  A  A then the rotating mass is spun to check out its dynamic
    secondary
    A  A  A harmonic balance results. Which can then be fine tuned.
    A  A  A Now your have proper dynamic balance spinning in its own
    correct
    A  A  A clearances. She will last a long time.
    A  A  A Bad harmonics, just like how an off key tenor will kill a
    Pucinni
    A  A  A opera, will also kill a fine engine.
    A  A  A Take care,
    A  A  A Jeff Cobb- I pad
    A  A  A W-[2]225-343-7525
    A  A  A C-[3]225-907-4514
    A  A  A Jeff Cobb Auto Works
    A  A  A 1316 S. Acadian Thruway
    A  A  A Baton Rouge, La.
    A  A  A 70806
    A  A  A [4][3]www.LiveOakConcours.org
    A  A On Nov 10, 2015, at 9:51 PM, [5][4]fordmachinist at gmail.com
    wrote:
    A  A > We will grind a crankshaft at time with the bearings
    installed in the
    A  A block and the rods. There are time we see tolerance stack.
    A  A > But true, most shops will grind a shaft according to the spec
    size.
    A  A Typically +/- .0004"
    A  A > Performance may favor the low end of spec. But see do see
    that many
    A  A aftermarket cranks are not that great.
    A  A > Start miking the bearings. That starts to get scary. we will
    find
    A  A .0002-.0004 difference in brands.
    A  A >
    A  A > I worked for a production builder, and I bored blocks all
    day.
    A  A > Didn't have any pistons in my hand. Just bored it to a
    nominal size
    A  A plus maybe .0005" and that was it. Never saw an issue.
    A  A >
    A  A > Neutral balance does not require balancer or flywheel. All
    the weight
    A  A is on the inside.
    A  A > If the engine was a neutral balance design, you would balance
    the
    A  A rotating assy first, then add the flywheel and balancer. If it
    is
    A  A neutral balance, the balancer and flywheel could be balanced
    all by
    A  A them self also.
    A  A >
    A  A > Tim Meyer
    A  A > TMeyer Inc.
    A  A > [6][5]www.tmeyerinc.com
    A  A >
    A  A > Sent from my iPad
    A  A >
    A  A >> On Nov 10, 2015, at 8:04 PM, Guido deTomaso
    A  A <[7][6]guido_detomaso at prodigy.net> wrote:
    A  A >>
    A  A >>AA  Not sure why this is on my mind today, but:
    A  A >>AA  It's common in my experience to provide a piston when a
    cylinder
    A  A is
    A  A >>AA  bored, so the bore provides a known clearance to that
    piston.
    A  A >>AA  Does anyone do this with crankshafts, use the actual
    connecting
    A  A rod
    A  A >>AA  bearing ID and turn the crank to match?AA  By the time
    you get out
    A  A the
    A  A >>AA  plastigage, it's too late if the clearance isn't what you
    A  A wanted.AA  But
    A  A >>AA  I've never heard of anyone doing anything with a
    crankshaft other
    A  A than
    A  A >>AA  turn it down to some arbitrary diameter.
    A  A >>AA  Similarly, from what I've observed on YouTube, it ought
    to be
    A  A >>AA  technically possible to balance a crankshaft alone, then
    add
    A  A flywheel
    A  A >>AA  and balance it, then the pressure plate, then the
    harmonic
    A  A balancer.
    A  A >>AA  This would make all those bolt-on items "neutrally
    balanced" and
    A  A they
    A  A >>AA  could be replaced or swapped from engine to engine.
    A  A >>AA  What I suspect usually happens instead is, all the parts
    are
    A  A bolted
    A  A >>AA  together and balanced in one shot, making a set which
    cannot be
    A  A broken
    A  A >>AA  without upsetting the achieved balance.
    A  A >>AA  So, if I asked that a crank be turned to match the rod
    bearings,
    A  A or
    A  A >>AA  that the bottom end NOT be turned into a matched set, am
    I likely
    A  A to be
    A  A >>AA  shown the door?
    A  A >>AA  Thanks,
    A  A >>AA  GD
    A  A >> _______________________________________________
    A  A >>
    A  A >> Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
    A  A >> Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes
    A  A >> DeTomaso mailing list
    A  A >> [8][7]DeTomaso at poca.com
    A  A >> [9][8]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
    A  A >>
    A  A >> To manage your subscription (change email address,
    unsubscribe,
    A  A etc.) use the links above.
    A  A >
    A  A > _______________________________________________
    A  A >
    A  A > Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
    A  A > Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes
    A  A > DeTomaso mailing list
    A  A > [10][9]DeTomaso at poca.com
    A  A > [11][10]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
    A  A >
    A  A > To manage your subscription (change email address,
    unsubscribe, etc.)
    A  A use the links above.
    A  A _______________________________________________
    A  A Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
    A  A Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes
    A  A DeTomaso mailing list
    A  A [12][11]DeTomaso at poca.com
    A  A [13][12]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
    A  A To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe,
    etc.)
    A  A use the links above.
    A  A --
    A  A Sean Korb [14][13]spkorb at spkorb.org
    [15][14]http://www.spkorb.org
    A  A '65,'68 Mustangs,'68 Cougar,'78 R100/7,'60 Metro,'59 A35,'71
    Pantera
    A  A #1382
    A  A "The more you drive, the less intelligent you get" --Miller
    A  A "Computers are useless.AA  They can only give you answers." -P.
    Picasso
    References
    A  A 1. mailto:[15]jeffcobb1 at me.com
    A  A 2. tel:225-343-7525
    A  A 3. tel:225-907-4514
    A  A 4. [16]http://www.LiveOakConcours.org/
    A  A 5. mailto:[17]fordmachinist at gmail.com
    A  A 6. [18]http://www.tmeyerinc.com/
    A  A 7. mailto:[19]guido_detomaso at prodigy.net
    A  A 8. mailto:[20]DeTomaso at poca.com
    A  A 9. [21]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
    A  10. mailto:[22]DeTomaso at poca.com
    A  11. [23]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
    A  12. mailto:[24]DeTomaso at poca.com
    A  13. [25]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
    A  14. mailto:[26]spkorb at spkorb.org
    A  15. [27]http://www.spkorb.org/
    _______________________________________________
    Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
    Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes
    DeTomaso mailing list
    [28]DeTomaso at poca.com
    [29]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
    To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe,
    etc.) use the links above.

References

  1. mailto:spkorb at gmail.com
  2. mailto:jeffcobb1 at me.com
  3. http://www.LiveOakConcours.org/
  4. mailto:fordmachinist at gmail.com
  5. http://www.tmeyerinc.com/
  6. mailto:guido_detomaso at prodigy.net
  7. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
  8. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
  9. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
  10. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
  11. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
  12. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
  13. mailto:spkorb at spkorb.org
  14. http://www.spkorb.org/
  15. mailto:jeffcobb1 at me.com
  16. http://www.LiveOakConcours.org/
  17. mailto:fordmachinist at gmail.com
  18. http://www.tmeyerinc.com/
  19. mailto:guido_detomaso at prodigy.net
  20. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
  21. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
  22. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
  23. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
  24. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
  25. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
  26. mailto:spkorb at spkorb.org
  27. http://www.spkorb.org/
  28. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
  29. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com



_______________________________________________

Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes
DeTomaso mailing list
DeTomaso at poca.com
http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com

To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) use the links above.


  
-------------- next part --------------
   Okay, the thread's gone in a different direction ... how precisely are
   these flywheels and vibration dampers providing that 28.2 oz-in, can
   you swap these parts later without throwing off the crankshaft balance?
   Or do the vibration damper, crank and flywheel become a "set" once
   balanced?
   Alternately, can that 28.2 oz-in be verified on the flywheel or
   vibration damper alone?
   Maybe the biggest problem, I can easily imagine the guy behind the
   counter not grasping any of this...
   Thanks,
   GD
     __________________________________________________________________

   From: Daniel C Jones <daniel.c.jones2 at gmail.com>
   To:
   Cc: "detomaso at poca.com" <detomaso at poca.com>
   Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 6:39 AM
   Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] NPC - Machine Shop Practices
     A
     A No.A  It's a balance factor with the units of oz-in and is the
     product of a mass and a distance (radially away from the crank
     centerline).A  Also, it's 28.2 oz-in at each end.A  When someone says
     my flywheel balance is 28 ounces it sounds as moronic as saying I
   have
     450 feet of torque :-)
     A
     A Dan Jones
     On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Sean Korb <[1][1]spkorb at gmail.com>
   wrote:
       A  A Always wanted to know, but was afraid to ask... and this seems
       like the
       A  A place to do it:
       A  A If my motor is 28oz external balance, is that 14 at the
       harmonic
       A  A balancer and 14 at the flywheel?AA  Could you put all 28 on
   one
       end or
       A  A is that a "bad thing"?AA  Asking for a friend ;)
       A  A sean
       A  A On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 6:51 AM, JEFFREY COBB
       <[1][2][2]jeffcobb1 at me.com>
       A  A wrote:
       A  A  A GD, you are correct that machining a block and crank based
       on known
       A  A  A piston and big end size is the best and most intelligent
   way
       to
       A  A  A create a tight fast and secure short block.
       A  A  A AA  A So it appears that the margin of error needs to be in
       place so
       A  A  A as to support the reality of new bearings and cranks having
       a
       A  A  A tolerance variation which as Tim says, stacks up to your
   end
       A  A  A clearance and production run variances, I agree to that.
       A  A  A Of course it is better to machine a crank and block to its
       recip
       A  A  A parts; pistons and big ends.
       A  A  A AA  A Though that creates a problem later on if rework
       without
       A  A  A machining is done and diff brand parts are used that will
       then
       A  A  A damage your initial perfect job clearance results, now too
       loose or
       A  A  A tight.
       A  A  A AA  I have found with our matchining that the clearances
       made no real
       A  A  A difference unless it was on a Benz turbo diesel or a high
       output
       A  A  A high rpm engine. The oil pump, oil and block temperature
       tends to
       A  A  A cover different clearance issues until you stress it out
   and
       the
       A  A  A ugly knock or bang changes your day.
       A  A  A AA  A So in closing, we always machine our block and crank
       according
       A  A  A to known static size values because we care about this
       engine today
       A  A  A not a run of production engines tomorrow.
       A  A  A AA  A And the best of clearance jobs will always be
       destroyed by a
       A  A  A not perfect balance of reciprocating mass. Balance is
       critical,
       A  A  A maybe more than clearances.
       A  A  A AA  A Static neutral balance is the first and only step way
       to go if
       A  A  A then the rotating mass is spun to check out its dynamic
       secondary
       A  A  A harmonic balance results. Which can then be fine tuned.
       A  A  A Now your have proper dynamic balance spinning in its own
       correct
       A  A  A clearances. She will last a long time.
       A  A  A Bad harmonics, just like how an off key tenor will kill a
       Pucinni
       A  A  A opera, will also kill a fine engine.
       A  A  A Take care,
       A  A  A Jeff Cobb- I pad
       A  A  A W-[2]225-343-7525
       A  A  A C-[3]225-907-4514
       A  A  A Jeff Cobb Auto Works
       A  A  A 1316 S. Acadian Thruway
       A  A  A Baton Rouge, La.
       A  A  A 70806
       A  A  A [4][3]www.LiveOakConcours.org
       A  A On Nov 10, 2015, at 9:51 PM, [5][4][3]fordmachinist at gmail.com
       wrote:
       A  A > We will grind a crankshaft at time with the bearings
       installed in the
       A  A block and the rods. There are time we see tolerance stack.
       A  A > But true, most shops will grind a shaft according to the
   spec
       size.
       A  A Typically +/- .0004"
       A  A > Performance may favor the low end of spec. But see do see
       that many
       A  A aftermarket cranks are not that great.
       A  A > Start miking the bearings. That starts to get scary. we will
       find
       A  A .0002-.0004 difference in brands.
       A  A >
       A  A > I worked for a production builder, and I bored blocks all
       day.
       A  A > Didn't have any pistons in my hand. Just bored it to a
       nominal size
       A  A plus maybe .0005" and that was it. Never saw an issue.
       A  A >
       A  A > Neutral balance does not require balancer or flywheel. All
       the weight
       A  A is on the inside.
       A  A > If the engine was a neutral balance design, you would
   balance
       the
       A  A rotating assy first, then add the flywheel and balancer. If it
       is
       A  A neutral balance, the balancer and flywheel could be balanced
       all by
       A  A them self also.
       A  A >
       A  A > Tim Meyer
       A  A > TMeyer Inc.
       A  A > [6][5]www.tmeyerinc.com
       A  A >
       A  A > Sent from my iPad
       A  A >
       A  A >> On Nov 10, 2015, at 8:04 PM, Guido deTomaso
       A  A <[7][6][4]guido_detomaso at prodigy.net> wrote:
       A  A >>
       A  A >>AA  Not sure why this is on my mind today, but:
       A  A >>AA  It's common in my experience to provide a piston when a
       cylinder
       A  A is
       A  A >>AA  bored, so the bore provides a known clearance to that
       piston.
       A  A >>AA  Does anyone do this with crankshafts, use the actual
       connecting
       A  A rod
       A  A >>AA  bearing ID and turn the crank to match?AA  By the time
       you get out
       A  A the
       A  A >>AA  plastigage, it's too late if the clearance isn't what
   you
       A  A wanted.AA  But
       A  A >>AA  I've never heard of anyone doing anything with a
       crankshaft other
       A  A than
       A  A >>AA  turn it down to some arbitrary diameter.
       A  A >>AA  Similarly, from what I've observed on YouTube, it ought
       to be
       A  A >>AA  technically possible to balance a crankshaft alone, then
       add
       A  A flywheel
       A  A >>AA  and balance it, then the pressure plate, then the
       harmonic
       A  A balancer.
       A  A >>AA  This would make all those bolt-on items "neutrally
       balanced" and
       A  A they
       A  A >>AA  could be replaced or swapped from engine to engine.
       A  A >>AA  What I suspect usually happens instead is, all the parts
       are
       A  A bolted
       A  A >>AA  together and balanced in one shot, making a set which
       cannot be
       A  A broken
       A  A >>AA  without upsetting the achieved balance.
       A  A >>AA  So, if I asked that a crank be turned to match the rod
       bearings,
       A  A or
       A  A >>AA  that the bottom end NOT be turned into a matched set, am
       I likely
       A  A to be
       A  A >>AA  shown the door?
       A  A >>AA  Thanks,
       A  A >>AA  GD
       A  A >> _______________________________________________
       A  A >>
       A  A >> Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
       A  A >> Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes
       A  A >> DeTomaso mailing list
       A  A >> [8][7][5]DeTomaso at poca.com
       A  A >> [9][8][6]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
       A  A >>
       A  A >> To manage your subscription (change email address,
       unsubscribe,
       A  A etc.) use the links above.
       A  A >
       A  A > _______________________________________________
       A  A >
       A  A > Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
       A  A > Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes
       A  A > DeTomaso mailing list
       A  A > [10][9][7]DeTomaso at poca.com
       A  A >
   [11][10][8]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
       A  A >
       A  A > To manage your subscription (change email address,
       unsubscribe, etc.)
       A  A use the links above.
       A  A _______________________________________________
       A  A Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
       A  A Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes
       A  A DeTomaso mailing list
       A  A [12][11][9]DeTomaso at poca.com
       A  A [13][12][10]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
       A  A To manage your subscription (change email address,
   unsubscribe,
       etc.)
       A  A use the links above.
       A  A --
       A  A Sean Korb [14][13][11]spkorb at spkorb.org
       [15][14][12]http://www.spkorb.org
       A  A '65,'68 Mustangs,'68 Cougar,'78 R100/7,'60 Metro,'59 A35,'71
       Pantera
       A  A #1382
       A  A "The more you drive, the less intelligent you get" --Miller
       A  A "Computers are useless.AA  They can only give you answers."
   -P.
       Picasso
       References
       A  A 1. mailto:[15][13]jeffcobb1 at me.com
       A  A 2. tel:225-343-7525
       A  A 3. tel:225-907-4514
       A  A 4. [16][14]http://www.LiveOakConcours.org/
       A  A 5. mailto:[17][15]fordmachinist at gmail.com
       A  A 6. [18][16]http://www.tmeyerinc.com/
       A  A 7. mailto:[19][17]guido_detomaso at prodigy.net
       A  A 8. mailto:[20][18]DeTomaso at poca.com
       A  A 9. [21][19]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
       A  10. mailto:[22][20]DeTomaso at poca.com
       A  11. [23][21]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
       A  12. mailto:[24][22]DeTomaso at poca.com
       A  13. [25][23]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
       A  14. mailto:[26][24]spkorb at spkorb.org
       A  15. [27][25]http://www.spkorb.org/
       _______________________________________________
       Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
       Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes
       DeTomaso mailing list
       [28][26]DeTomaso at poca.com
       [29][27]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
       To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe,
       etc.) use the links above.
   References
     1. mailto:[28]spkorb at gmail.com
     2. mailto:[29]jeffcobb1 at me.com
     3. [30]http://www.LiveOakConcours.org/
     4. mailto:[31]fordmachinist at gmail.com
     5. [32]http://www.tmeyerinc.com/
     6. mailto:[33]guido_detomaso at prodigy.net
     7. mailto:[34]DeTomaso at poca.com
     8. [35]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
     9. mailto:[36]DeTomaso at poca.com
     10. [37]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
     11. mailto:[38]DeTomaso at poca.com
     12. [39]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
     13. mailto:[40]spkorb at spkorb.org
     14. [41]http://www.spkorb.org/
     15. mailto:[42]jeffcobb1 at me.com
     16. [43]http://www.LiveOakConcours.org/
     17. mailto:[44]fordmachinist at gmail.com
     18. [45]http://www.tmeyerinc.com/
     19. mailto:[46]guido_detomaso at prodigy.net
     20. mailto:[47]DeTomaso at poca.com
     21. [48]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
     22. mailto:[49]DeTomaso at poca.com
     23. [50]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
     24. mailto:[51]DeTomaso at poca.com
     25. [52]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
     26. mailto:[53]spkorb at spkorb.org
     27. [54]http://www.spkorb.org/
     28. mailto:[55]DeTomaso at poca.com
     29. [56]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
   _______________________________________________
   Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
   Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes
   DeTomaso mailing list
   [57]DeTomaso at poca.com
   [58]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
   To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.)
   use the links above.

References

   1. mailto:spkorb at gmail.com
   2. mailto:jeffcobb1 at me.com
   3. mailto:fordmachinist at gmail.com
   4. mailto:guido_detomaso at prodigy.net
   5. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
   6. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
   7. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
   8. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
   9. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
  10. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
  11. mailto:spkorb at spkorb.org
  12. http://www.spkorb.org/
  13. mailto:jeffcobb1 at me.com
  14. http://www.liveoakconcours.org/
  15. mailto:fordmachinist at gmail.com
  16. http://www.tmeyerinc.com/
  17. mailto:guido_detomaso at prodigy.net
  18. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
  19. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
  20. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
  21. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
  22. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
  23. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
  24. mailto:spkorb at spkorb.org
  25. http://www.spkorb.org/
  26. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
  27. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
  28. mailto:spkorb at gmail.com
  29. mailto:jeffcobb1 at me.com
  30. http://www.liveoakconcours.org/
  31. mailto:fordmachinist at gmail.com
  32. http://www.tmeyerinc.com/
  33. mailto:guido_detomaso at prodigy.net
  34. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
  35. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
  36. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
  37. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
  38. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
  39. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
  40. mailto:spkorb at spkorb.org
  41. http://www.spkorb.org/
  42. mailto:jeffcobb1 at me.com
  43. http://www.liveoakconcours.org/
  44. mailto:fordmachinist at gmail.com
  45. http://www.tmeyerinc.com/
  46. mailto:guido_detomaso at prodigy.net
  47. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
  48. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
  49. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
  50. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
  51. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
  52. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
  53. mailto:spkorb at spkorb.org
  54. http://www.spkorb.org/
  55. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
  56. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
  57. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
  58. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com


More information about the DeTomaso mailing list