[DeTomaso] FW: Should we purchase vintage cars for our investment portfolio?

Vinh Ly vinh.d.ly at gmail.com
Tue Aug 18 10:53:05 EDT 2015


Jordan, that was such a great write up that I had to print a hard copy and
file for future reference!

Thanks,
Vinh

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Christopher Kimball <chrisvkimball at msn.com
> wrote:

>    Excellent; thanks!  Good thoughts.
>    Chris
>    Sent from my Windows Phone
>      __________________________________________________________________
>
>    From: [1]Jordan Klein
>    Sent: 8/18/2015 5:44 AM
>    To: [2]detomaso at poca.com
>    Subject: [DeTomaso] FW: Should we purchase vintage cars for our
>    investment portfolio?
>
>    Regarding the Bloomberg article titled "Why A Classic Car Is (Almost)
>    Never A Good Investment"
>    Warning: Editorial
>    The following is just my opinion.
>    I first noticed the article was 'written' by  a generic team called
>    "Bloomberg News" which probably means several wordsmiths got assigned
>    the topic.  Interpretation: NOT car people.  Writers baffled by the
>    complexities of the collector car world.
>    Unfortunately, the article fails to ask the most fundamental question:
>    What creates enthusiast value in the collector car market?
>    Failing to explore this question leaves these 'authors' assuming the
>    game can't be understood; therefore collector cars depreciate and are
>    "(almost)" always a bad investments.
>    Well, it should be obvious even to the couch potato watching Mecum on
>    TV; not all cars are a bad investments, as some cars are now worth
>    millions, so somebody made some $Bank$ and did alright.
>    It would have been helpful had the authors explored the difference
>    between nostalgia, historical, enthusiast, cult, legend, rare, and
>    bluechip cars.  So yeah, these authors shouldn't consider classic car
>    ownership as an appreciating investment.  They simply don't understand
>    what they're writing about.
>    Let me explain;
>    Nostalgia cars rarely have value except for the person who holds the
>    memory.  Perhaps it's just like dad's car, or it's just like the car in
>    the poster, or the one on his first date, etc.  With perhaps rare
>    exceptions, these types of nostalgia cars should not be considered
>    collector cars.
>    Historical cars, also known as vintage cars, or perceived as milestone
>    car; all contributed in some significant way to the craft of automobile
>    engineering and/or design.  Examples span the range from the Curved
>    Dash Olds, the Model T, the supercharged Cord, the guilded-age
>    Duesenbergs, the rear-engined Tucker, to the maverick advertising
>    genius of John DeLorean and his GTO, the Zora Arkus-Dontov Air Box
>    Corvettes, or the ourtrageously beautiful 1949 Delahaye 175 S Saoutchik
>    Roadster.  These cars tend to be museum cars and show cars, and can be
>    worth millions.
>    Enthusiast cars have fetish appeal; like the fin cars of the late 50s,
>    the bubble-tops, and the go-fast muscle cars like the 442, the GTO, the
>    Yenko 427, the 455SD or GTO Ram Air IV cars, and Hemi cars, winged
>    cars, and homologated race cars for the street.  Enthusiasts value
>    style AND function; therefore value is proportional to the thrill of
>    owning, showing, driving and being seen and admired.  I think Panteras
>    are quickly becoming A to B grade enthusiast collector cars.
>    Cult cars can have significant value, but generally only to those
>    absorbed in that particular cult.  Examples include movIe cars like the
>    'Bullet' Mustang, the Eleanor Mustang, to George Barris customs, or
>    even the Sonny & Cher customized Mustangs.  Some might argue the Shelby
>    Mustang is yesterday's cult car, since young kids are suddenly all into
>    Vaughn Gittin's Mustang RTR.  So be forewarned; cult cars tend to flash
>    hot then fall out of favor, replaced by next months hot new trendy fad
>    of the moment.  The value if these cars can sometimes be like trying to
>    catch a falling sword.
>    Legend cars, sometimes called Pedigree cars or "provenance" cars can
>    also have significant value; like Carroll Shelby's personal
>    twin-supercharged Cobra, or the LeMans winning GT40 driven to victory
>    by Dan Gurney & AJ Foyt, or the custom factory pink 59 Pontiac
>    Bonneville convertible ordered by Harley Earl for his wife.  This
>    category should probably include one-off factory styling exercises and
>    the Autorama show cars.  It's not so much as the car, it's the fact
>    there's only one.
>    Legendary Pantera's might include Alejandro DeTomaso's personal
>    Pantera, the Elvis 'bullet hole' Pantera, the one-off notched flying
>    buttress Pantera, Tom Tjaarda's styling exercise Pantera, and for
>    morbid curiosity, the wrecked Panteras of Moetley Cruee's Vince Neil or
>    Toronto Maple Leaf's Tim Horton.  The value of these cars is
>    proportional to the intrigue of the fabled owner, and the thoroughness
>    of the paperwork to prove pedigree or provenance.
>    Rare cars have value simply because of supply vs. demand.  Since
>    Plymouth only built 11-1971 Hemi Cuda Convertibles, these cars are
>    prized more by collectors than there are cars.  Competition for
>    ownership
>    sets value, often much higher than the price to build a visually and
>    mechanically identical "tribute" car.
>    So what makes a truly "Blue Chip" collectible?  Competition for
>    ownership!  It takes more than one interested buyer to drive price.
>    Buyer motivations are unique and often unknowable; but whatever their
>    motivation, the more interest, the more bidders driving bid competition
>    that determines sale price.
>    Discerning collector car 'investors' are not ignorant of these
>    motivations, and exploit opportunities to capitalize within the hobby.
>    They often do quite well.  For example, Dana Mecum has done all right
>    for himself and contributed significantly to the hobby.  Of course
>    there are many others...
>    The increasing value of Pantera's is directly proportional to:
>    #1) the quality and frequency of public exposure creating new
>    enthusiasts with favorable and admiring perceptions and memories,
>    #2) the exceptional support we enjoy from the numerous quality vendors,
>    club publications, and chapter tech sessions; that helps keep or cars
>    running and looking gorgeous,
>    #3) the camaraderie enjoyed by club membership, forming lasting
>    friendships over common interests.  This includes the enthusiasm and
>    creativity exhibited by chapter leaders to those who diligently produce
>    informative articles online and in print.
>    #4) and finally, we all benefit by having club members who are also
>    seriously gifted automotive and aerospace engineers; who's skills
>    significantly contribute to design understanding and refinements far
>    beyond the capabilities of the amateur enthusiast.
>    For these reasons, I think we should expect the DeTomaso mark to
>    continue increasing in value as we as a car club promote the
>    desirability and camaraderie of ownership.  Currently, $70k seems to be
>    fair market value for an average to clean and attractive Pantera; $100k
>    plus for an exceptional example.  Look at the prices of a Boss 302
>    Mustangs, or one of my favorites --the Intermeccanica Italia.  When
>    compared to other collectables, current Pantera valuations may still be
>    on the affordable side of the market.  After all, a new Corvette is
>    $80k on up, I even looked at a $55k pick-up truck last week!  Then I
>    realized, the Pantera hasn't inflated in value, it's our money that's
>    lost value.
>    Without considering monetary devaluation or future value projections,
>    the Pantera has been a good investment, i.e., it's kept its value on
>    par with modern sporty type cars, plus I get to drive it, admire it,
>    and wrench on it.  In simple math, it's value is about 3 to 4 times
>    what I paid for it, minus the cost of insurance, tags, replacement
>    parts, oil change, etc.  It may be stylish artwork, but it's more than
>    a picture hanging on a wall.  So with these factors in mind, what other
>    car might provide even a fraction of the enjoyment while maintaining
>    good value.  That's a question the article's authors couldn't even
>    fathom.  From that perspective, the Pantera is one of the best
>    automotive value investments available to the common man.
>    Before I bought my Pantera, I was also looking for a Dino 246 Spyder,
>    as they were about the same price way back then.  Today, the 246 is
>    easily worth double the Pantera.  But if you consider the cost of
>    ownership, i.e., service & parts, I still think the Pantera is a better
>    investment.
>    Jordan Klein
>    7314
>    PS: Obviously not intended to be a comprehensive dissertation.  Just
>    rambling thoughts about the collector car hobby and valuations.
>    > To: DeTomaso at poca.com
>    > From: jtaphorn at kingwoodcable.com
>    > Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 18:03:21 -0500
>    > Subject: [DeTomaso] Should we purchase vintage cars for our
>    investment        portfolio?
>    >
>    > This Bloomberg story greeted me at my office this morning. Here is
>    one
>    > person's opinion on vintage cars as an investment.  Would you agree?
>    >
>    >
>    [3]http://www.fa-mag.com/news/why-a-classic-car-is--almost--never-a-goo
>    d-investment-22791.html?utm_source=PW+Subscribers&utm_campaign=f7ee052d
>    6d-PWN_PW+News_081715&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_1899ce8517-f7ee052d6d
>    -232404493
>    >
>    > JT
>    >
>    > _______________________________________________
>    >
>    > Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
>    > Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes
>    > DeTomaso mailing list
>    > DeTomaso at poca.com
>    > [4]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
>    >
>    > To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.)
>    use the links above.
>
> References
>
>    1. mailto:ohjordan at hotmail.com
>    2. mailto:detomaso at poca.com
>    3.
> http://www.fa-mag.com/news/why-a-classic-car-is--almost--never-a-good-investment-22791.html?utm_source=PW+Subscribers&utm_campaign=f7ee052d6d-PWN_PW+News_081715&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_1899ce8517-f7ee052d6d-232404493
>    4. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
> Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes
> DeTomaso mailing list
> DeTomaso at poca.com
> http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
>
> To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) use
> the links above.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
   Jordan, that was such a great write up that I had to print a hard copy
   and file for future reference!
   Thanks,
   Vinh

   On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Christopher Kimball
   <[1]chrisvkimball at msn.com> wrote:

     A  A Excellent; thanks!A  Good thoughts.
     A  A Chris
     A  A Sent from my Windows Phone
     A  A
     A __________________________________________________________________
     A  A From: [1]Jordan Klein
     A  A Sent: 8/18/2015 5:44 AM
     A  A To: [2][2]detomaso at poca.com

   A  A Subject: [DeTomaso] FW: Should we purchase vintage cars for our
   A  A investment portfolio?
   A  A Regarding the Bloomberg article titled "Why A Classic Car Is
   (Almost)
   A  A Never A Good Investment"
   A  A Warning: Editorial
   A  A The following is just my opinion.
   A  A I first noticed the article was 'written' byA  a generic team
   called
   A  A "Bloomberg News" which probably means several wordsmiths got
   assigned
   A  A the topic.A  Interpretation: NOT car people.A  Writers baffled by
   the
   A  A complexities of the collector car world.
   A  A Unfortunately, the article fails to ask the most fundamental
   question:
   A  A What creates enthusiast value in the collector car market?
   A  A Failing to explore this question leaves these 'authors' assuming
   the
   A  A game can't be understood; therefore collector cars depreciate and
   are
   A  A "(almost)" always a bad investments.
   A  A Well, it should be obvious even to the couch potato watching Mecum
   on
   A  A TV; not all cars are a bad investments, as some cars are now worth
   A  A millions, so somebody made some $Bank$ and did alright.
   A  A It would have been helpful had the authors explored the difference
   A  A between nostalgia, historical, enthusiast, cult, legend, rare, and
   A  A bluechip cars.A  So yeah, these authors shouldn't consider classic
   car
   A  A ownership as an appreciating investment.A  They simply don't
   understand
   A  A what they're writing about.
   A  A Let me explain;
   A  A Nostalgia cars rarely have value except for the person who holds
   the
   A  A memory.A  Perhaps it's just like dad's car, or it's just like the
   car in
   A  A the poster, or the one on his first date, etc.A  With perhaps rare
   A  A exceptions, these types of nostalgia cars should not be considered
   A  A collector cars.
   A  A Historical cars, also known as vintage cars, or perceived as
   milestone
   A  A car; all contributed in some significant way to the craft of
   automobile
   A  A engineering and/or design.A  Examples span the range from the
   Curved
   A  A Dash Olds, the Model T, the supercharged Cord, the guilded-age
   A  A Duesenbergs, the rear-engined Tucker, to the maverick advertising
   A  A genius of John DeLorean and his GTO, the Zora Arkus-Dontov Air Box
   A  A Corvettes, or the ourtrageously beautiful 1949 Delahaye 175 S
   Saoutchik
   A  A Roadster.A  These cars tend to be museum cars and show cars, and
   can be
   A  A worth millions.
   A  A Enthusiast cars have fetish appeal; like the fin cars of the late
   50s,
   A  A the bubble-tops, and the go-fast muscle cars like the 442, the
   GTO, the
   A  A Yenko 427, the 455SD or GTO Ram Air IV cars, and Hemi cars, winged
   A  A cars, and homologated race cars for the street.A  Enthusiasts
   value
   A  A style AND function; therefore value is proportional to the thrill
   of
   A  A owning, showing, driving and being seen and admired.A  I think
   Panteras
   A  A are quickly becoming A to B grade enthusiast collector cars.
   A  A Cult cars can have significant value, but generally only to those
   A  A absorbed in that particular cult.A  Examples include movIe cars
   like the
   A  A 'Bullet' Mustang, the Eleanor Mustang, to George Barris customs,
   or
   A  A even the Sonny & Cher customized Mustangs.A  Some might argue the
   Shelby
   A  A Mustang is yesterday's cult car, since young kids are suddenly all
   into
   A  A Vaughn Gittin's Mustang RTR.A  So be forewarned; cult cars tend to
   flash
   A  A hot then fall out of favor, replaced by next months hot new trendy
   fad
   A  A of the moment.A  The value if these cars can sometimes be like
   trying to
   A  A catch a falling sword.
   A  A Legend cars, sometimes called Pedigree cars or "provenance" cars
   can
   A  A also have significant value; like Carroll Shelby's personal
   A  A twin-supercharged Cobra, or the LeMans winning GT40 driven to
   victory
   A  A by Dan Gurney & AJ Foyt, or the custom factory pink 59 Pontiac
   A  A Bonneville convertible ordered by Harley Earl for his wife.A  This
   A  A category should probably include one-off factory styling exercises
   and
   A  A the Autorama show cars.A  It's not so much as the car, it's the
   fact
   A  A there's only one.
   A  A Legendary Pantera's might include Alejandro DeTomaso's personal
   A  A Pantera, the Elvis 'bullet hole' Pantera, the one-off notched
   flying
   A  A buttress Pantera, Tom Tjaarda's styling exercise Pantera, and for
   A  A morbid curiosity, the wrecked Panteras of Moetley Cruee's Vince
   Neil or
   A  A Toronto Maple Leaf's Tim Horton.A  The value of these cars is
   A  A proportional to the intrigue of the fabled owner, and the
   thoroughness
   A  A of the paperwork to prove pedigree or provenance.
   A  A Rare cars have value simply because of supply vs. demand.A  Since
   A  A Plymouth only built 11-1971 Hemi Cuda Convertibles, these cars are
   A  A prized more by collectors than there are cars.A  Competition for
   A  A ownership
   A  A sets value, often much higher than the price to build a visually
   and
   A  A mechanically identical "tribute" car.
   A  A So what makes a truly "Blue Chip" collectible?A  Competition for
   A  A ownership!A  It takes more than one interested buyer to drive
   price.
   A  A Buyer motivations are unique and often unknowable; but whatever
   their
   A  A motivation, the more interest, the more bidders driving bid
   competition
   A  A that determines sale price.
   A  A Discerning collector car 'investors' are not ignorant of these
   A  A motivations, and exploit opportunities to capitalize within the
   hobby.
   A  A They often do quite well.A  For example, Dana Mecum has done all
   right
   A  A for himself and contributed significantly to the hobby.A  Of
   course
   A  A there are many others...
   A  A The increasing value of Pantera's is directly proportional to:
   A  A #1) the quality and frequency of public exposure creating new
   A  A enthusiasts with favorable and admiring perceptions and memories,
   A  A #2) the exceptional support we enjoy from the numerous quality
   vendors,
   A  A club publications, and chapter tech sessions; that helps keep or
   cars
   A  A running and looking gorgeous,
   A  A #3) the camaraderie enjoyed by club membership, forming lasting
   A  A friendships over common interests.A  This includes the enthusiasm
   and
   A  A creativity exhibited by chapter leaders to those who diligently
   produce
   A  A informative articles online and in print.
   A  A #4) and finally, we all benefit by having club members who are
   also
   A  A seriously gifted automotive and aerospace engineers; who's skills
   A  A significantly contribute to design understanding and refinements
   far
   A  A beyond the capabilities of the amateur enthusiast.
   A  A For these reasons, I think we should expect the DeTomaso mark to
   A  A continue increasing in value as we as a car club promote the
   A  A desirability and camaraderie of ownership.A  Currently, $70k seems
   to be
   A  A fair market value for an average to clean and attractive Pantera;
   $100k
   A  A plus for an exceptional example.A  Look at the prices of a Boss
   302
   A  A Mustangs, or one of my favorites --the Intermeccanica Italia.A
   When
   A  A compared to other collectables, current Pantera valuations may
   still be
   A  A on the affordable side of the market.A  After all, a new Corvette
   is
   A  A $80k on up, I even looked at a $55k pick-up truck last week!A
   Then I
   A  A realized, the Pantera hasn't inflated in value, it's our money
   that's
   A  A lost value.
   A  A Without considering monetary devaluation or future value
   projections,
   A  A the Pantera has been a good investment, i.e., it's kept its value
   on
   A  A par with modern sporty type cars, plus I get to drive it, admire
   it,
   A  A and wrench on it.A  In simple math, it's value is about 3 to 4
   times
   A  A what I paid for it, minus the cost of insurance, tags, replacement
   A  A parts, oil change, etc.A  It may be stylish artwork, but it's more
   than
   A  A a picture hanging on a wall.A  So with these factors in mind, what
   other
   A  A car might provide even a fraction of the enjoyment while
   maintaining
   A  A good value.A  That's a question the article's authors couldn't
   even
   A  A fathom.A  From that perspective, the Pantera is one of the best
   A  A automotive value investments available to the common man.
   A  A Before I bought my Pantera, I was also looking for a Dino 246
   Spyder,
   A  A as they were about the same price way back then.A  Today, the 246
   is
   A  A easily worth double the Pantera.A  But if you consider the cost of
   A  A ownership, i.e., service & parts, I still think the Pantera is a
   better
   A  A investment.
   A  A Jordan Klein
   A  A 7314
   A  A PS: Obviously not intended to be a comprehensive dissertation.A
   Just
   A  A rambling thoughts about the collector car hobby and valuations.

     A  A > To: [3]DeTomaso at poca.com
     A  A > From: [4]jtaphorn at kingwoodcable.com
     A  A > Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 18:03:21 -0500
     A  A > Subject: [DeTomaso] Should we purchase vintage cars for our
     A  A investmentA  A  A  A  portfolio?
     A  A >
     A  A > This Bloomberg story greeted me at my office this morning.
     Here is
     A  A one
     A  A > person's opinion on vintage cars as an investment.A  Would
     you agree?
     A  A >
     A  A >
     A
     A [3][5]http://www.fa-mag.com/news/why-a-classic-car-is--almost--nev
     er-a-goo
     A
     A d-investment-22791.html?utm_source=PW+Subscribers&utm_campaign=f7e
     e052d
     A
     A 6d-PWN_PW+News_081715&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_1899ce8517-f7ee0
     52d6d
     A  A -232404493
     A  A >
     A  A > JT
     A  A >
     A  A > _______________________________________________
     A  A >
     A  A > Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
     A  A > Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes
     A  A > DeTomaso mailing list
     A  A > [6]DeTomaso at poca.com
     A  A > [4][7]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
     A  A >
     A  A > To manage your subscription (change email address,
     unsubscribe, etc.)
     A  A use the links above.
     References
     A  A 1. mailto:[8]ohjordan at hotmail.com
     A  A 2. mailto:[9]detomaso at poca.com
     A  A 3.
     [10]http://www.fa-mag.com/news/why-a-classic-car-is--almost--never-a
     -good-investment-22791.html?utm_source=PW+Subscribers&utm_campaign=f
     7ee052d6d-PWN_PW+News_081715&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_1899ce8517-
     f7ee052d6d-232404493
     A  A 4. [11]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
     _______________________________________________
     Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
     Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes
     DeTomaso mailing list
     [12]DeTomaso at poca.com
     [13]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
     To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe,
     etc.) use the links above.

References

   1. mailto:chrisvkimball at msn.com
   2. mailto:detomaso at poca.com
   3. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
   4. mailto:jtaphorn at kingwoodcable.com
   5. http://www.fa-mag.com/news/why-a-classic-car-is--almost--never-a-goo
   6. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
   7. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
   8. mailto:ohjordan at hotmail.com
   9. mailto:detomaso at poca.com
  10. http://www.fa-mag.com/news/why-a-classic-car-is--almost--never-a-good-investment-22791.html?utm_source=PW+Subscribers&utm_campaign=f7ee052d6d-PWN_PW+News_081715&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_1899ce8517-f7ee052d6d-232404493
  11. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
  12. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
  13. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com


More information about the DeTomaso mailing list