[DeTomaso] Difference in 'stock' and returned to stock?
Mike Drew
MikeLDrew at aol.com
Wed Oct 15 18:58:00 EDT 2014
Chuck,
It doesn't matter to me. But I know for a fact it matters a lot to people who value originality above everything else. That is a tiny minority among Pantera buyers though.
Mike
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 15, 2014, at 15:49, The DeTomaso Registry Guy <detomasoregistry at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> With the demand for original Panteras leading the value up, consider a
> car `returned' to original.
>
> I'm having a chat with a newbie to the registry regarding an original
> Pantera.
>
>
> I see that there might be a perceived difference in value between a
> Pantera that is stock (from new)
>
> and one that has been `returned' to stock.
>
>
> If a Pantera has been returned to stock condition does that make it
> worth less (or more) that a Pantera
>
> that has always been like it was when new?
>
>
> Take a simplified example, a Pantera that has been well enjoyed. The
> wheels were changed sometime,
>
> along with seats, and some other minor things. Then the car is sold,
> and the new owner repaints the engine,
>
> cleans up a bunch of stuff, finds some stock seats, and installs a set
> of Campy wheels (say even with Arriva tires).
>
>
> So now the car looks much closer to stock (or back to visibly
> all-stock).
>
>
> Just for an example... Say an original Pantera is worth $50,000. What
> is a returned-to-stock Pantera worth?
>
>
> (Keep all other things the same for the sake of this comparison. Same
> mileage, same condition)
>
>
> Does it really matter if it has been `returned'?
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> Chuck
> _______________________________________________
>
> Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
>
> DeTomaso mailing list
> DeTomaso at poca.com
> http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
More information about the DeTomaso
mailing list