[DeTomaso] Aluminum Flywheels
Will Kooiman
will.kooiman at gmail.com
Wed May 7 08:08:23 EDT 2014
The pressure plate is pretty heavy. I weighed all of my parts a few years
back. The net of Fidanza + diaphragm clutch/pressure plate was less than
stock, but not that much.
I imagine the effect would be more pronounced in something like drag
racing, where you launch better with a heavier flywheel. But for my
street driving, it really didn¹t make a difference - no more bucking or
snorting. I have to do that myself.
Emiliano - I bought mine from one of the Mustang stores - probably
Mustangs Unlimited. I have also seen them on ebay, which should be okay,
since it would be new either way.
--
Will
On 5/7/14 5:44 AM, "Charles McCall" <charlesmccall at gmail.com> wrote:
> The bucking and snorting that MIke mentions as a downside to an
> Aluminum flywheel might be more pronounced with a super-lightweight
> unit, but I have not noticed any decrease in driveability with my
> Fidanza flywheel.
> A
> I also didn't notice a huge difference in speed of revving. Perhaps an
> even lighter aluminum unit would be more noticeable, and would also
> introduce difficulty in driveability since the two things are directly
> related.
>
> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 5:38 AM, <[1]MikeLDrew at aol.com> wrote:
>
> A A In a message dated 5/6/14 16 18 6, [2]mghibli7 at hotmail.com
> writes:
> A A A What's the general consensus on Aluminum Flywheels? Are they
> the way
> A A A to go? Any drawbacks?
> A A >>>Like anything else that's "performance", they have
> advantages and
> A A drawbacks.
> A A Engines have flywheels for a reason. A They exist to dampen the
> pulses
> A A from the ignition cycle, and also to conserve rotational energy
> so it
> A A can be used when it's needed. A When you are setting off from a
> stop,
> A A that conserved energy is what lets the car start rolling. A A
> car with
> A A no flywheel would be impossible to drive--the engine would
> stall the
> A A moment you tried to ease the clutch out.
> A A So, flywheel = good.
> A A The problem with a flywheel is that it requires a lot of power
> (or
> A A torque, if you prefer) to accelerate it. A When you are at 2000
> rpm and
> A A you put your foot to the floor, the engine is trying to speed
> up. A Part
> A A of what is holding it back is the aerodynamic drag, and the
> flywheel
> A A effect of the wheels and tires, but part of it is the engine
> flywheel
> A A itself. A It 'hurts' you when you are trying to accelerate the
> engine.
> A A A lighter-than-stock flywheel (whether it's aluminum or
> lightened
> A A steel) will allow the engine to accelerate more quickly, which
> in turn
> A A will allow the car to accelerate more quickly. A It will also
> make the
> A A car slightly more difficult to drive gently, may make it
> slightly more
> A A difficult to downshift (at least until you get used to it), and
> will be
> A A considerably more difficult to drive in traffic. A Whereas
> before, if
> A A you were creeping along in a line of traffic, you could let
> your foot
> A A off the clutch and just loaf along at 5 mph in first gear, now
> the car
> A A will buck and snort, and you will have to constantly dip the
> clutch,
> A A partially engage/slip the clutch, dip the clutch etc.
> A A So it really depends on how you drive the car. A If traffic is
> no
> A A concern, you might really like it. A If you want your Pantera
> to behave
> A A like a regular car, you might want to save the $500 plus
> balancing
> A A costs and stick with what you've got.
> A A A >If they are recommended, whose are you using and how many
> miles do
> A A A you have on it?
> A A >>>I don't know what kind of aluminum flywheel I have--I
> literally
> A A found it in my parts room one day and had no idea how it got
> there!
> A A Apparently it came to me in a huge stash of other parts and I
> simply
> A A failed to notice it, or thought it was a stock flywheel at the
> time.
> A A When I had my engine rebuilt, I switched. A Since the entire
> engine was
> A A changed, I can't tell you the specific effect the flywheel has
> had.
> A A The old engine with the iron was a fair bit more tractable than
> the new
> A A one, but it also had half as much horsepower.
> A A Mike
> _______________________________________________
> Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
> DeTomaso mailing list
> [3]DeTomaso at poca.com
> [4]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
>
>References
>
> 1. mailto:MikeLDrew at aol.com
> 2. mailto:mghibli7 at hotmail.com
> 3. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
> 4. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
>_______________________________________________
>
>Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
>
>DeTomaso mailing list
>DeTomaso at poca.com
>http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
More information about the DeTomaso
mailing list