[DeTomaso] Aluminum Flywheels
MikeLDrew at aol.com
MikeLDrew at aol.com
Tue May 6 23:38:08 EDT 2014
In a message dated 5/6/14 16 18 6, mghibli7 at hotmail.com writes:
> What's the general consensus on Aluminum Flywheels? Are they the way to
> go? Any drawbacks?
>
>>>Like anything else that's "performance", they have advantages and
drawbacks.
Engines have flywheels for a reason. They exist to dampen the pulses from
the ignition cycle, and also to conserve rotational energy so it can be
used when it's needed. When you are setting off from a stop, that conserved
energy is what lets the car start rolling. A car with no flywheel would be
impossible to drive--the engine would stall the moment you tried to ease the
clutch out.
So, flywheel = good.
The problem with a flywheel is that it requires a lot of power (or torque,
if you prefer) to accelerate it. When you are at 2000 rpm and you put your
foot to the floor, the engine is trying to speed up. Part of what is
holding it back is the aerodynamic drag, and the flywheel effect of the wheels
and tires, but part of it is the engine flywheel itself. It 'hurts' you
when you are trying to accelerate the engine.
A lighter-than-stock flywheel (whether it's aluminum or lightened steel)
will allow the engine to accelerate more quickly, which in turn will allow the
car to accelerate more quickly. It will also make the car slightly more
difficult to drive gently, may make it slightly more difficult to downshift
(at least until you get used to it), and will be considerably more difficult
to drive in traffic. Whereas before, if you were creeping along in a line
of traffic, you could let your foot off the clutch and just loaf along at 5
mph in first gear, now the car will buck and snort, and you will have to
constantly dip the clutch, partially engage/slip the clutch, dip the clutch
etc.
So it really depends on how you drive the car. If traffic is no concern,
you might really like it. If you want your Pantera to behave like a
regular car, you might want to save the $500 plus balancing costs and stick with
what you've got.
>
> >If they are recommended, whose are you using and how many miles do you
> have on it?
>
> >>>I don't know what kind of aluminum flywheel I have--I literally found it
in my parts room one day and had no idea how it got there! Apparently it
came to me in a huge stash of other parts and I simply failed to notice it,
or thought it was a stock flywheel at the time. When I had my engine
rebuilt, I switched. Since the entire engine was changed, I can't tell you the
specific effect the flywheel has had. The old engine with the iron was a
fair bit more tractable than the new one, but it also had half as much
horsepower.
Mike
-------------- next part --------------
In a message dated 5/6/14 16 18 6, mghibli7 at hotmail.com writes:
What's the general consensus on Aluminum Flywheels? Are they the way
to go? Any drawbacks?
>>>Like anything else that's "performance", they have advantages and
drawbacks.
Engines have flywheels for a reason. They exist to dampen the pulses
from the ignition cycle, and also to conserve rotational energy so it
can be used when it's needed. When you are setting off from a stop,
that conserved energy is what lets the car start rolling. A car with
no flywheel would be impossible to drive--the engine would stall the
moment you tried to ease the clutch out.
So, flywheel = good.
The problem with a flywheel is that it requires a lot of power (or
torque, if you prefer) to accelerate it. When you are at 2000 rpm and
you put your foot to the floor, the engine is trying to speed up. Part
of what is holding it back is the aerodynamic drag, and the flywheel
effect of the wheels and tires, but part of it is the engine flywheel
itself. It 'hurts' you when you are trying to accelerate the engine.
A lighter-than-stock flywheel (whether it's aluminum or lightened
steel) will allow the engine to accelerate more quickly, which in turn
will allow the car to accelerate more quickly. It will also make the
car slightly more difficult to drive gently, may make it slightly more
difficult to downshift (at least until you get used to it), and will be
considerably more difficult to drive in traffic. Whereas before, if
you were creeping along in a line of traffic, you could let your foot
off the clutch and just loaf along at 5 mph in first gear, now the car
will buck and snort, and you will have to constantly dip the clutch,
partially engage/slip the clutch, dip the clutch etc.
So it really depends on how you drive the car. If traffic is no
concern, you might really like it. If you want your Pantera to behave
like a regular car, you might want to save the $500 plus balancing
costs and stick with what you've got.
>If they are recommended, whose are you using and how many miles do
you have on it?
>>>I don't know what kind of aluminum flywheel I have--I literally
found it in my parts room one day and had no idea how it got there!
Apparently it came to me in a huge stash of other parts and I simply
failed to notice it, or thought it was a stock flywheel at the time.
When I had my engine rebuilt, I switched. Since the entire engine was
changed, I can't tell you the specific effect the flywheel has had.
The old engine with the iron was a fair bit more tractable than the new
one, but it also had half as much horsepower.
Mike
More information about the DeTomaso
mailing list