[DeTomaso] Harmonic balancer

Boyd Casey boyd411 at gmail.com
Tue May 6 11:21:51 EDT 2014


Thanks to everyone that supplied information  and opinions , your
contribution to my continuing mechanics education ( on the fly) home study
program is greatly appreciated!

Boyd


On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 9:42 AM, <cengles at cox.net> wrote:

> Dear Boyd,
>
>
>               About eighteen years ago, I recall that I replaced a bad
> stock balancer with a similar balancer.   I was able to accomplish that
> with the engine in place using some anti seize and the balancer bolt to
> push it on.   I have since learned that is not the best technique although
> it is a common one.   Also the space constraints of an in situ balancer
> change may limit the options ton only the suboptimal balancer bolt.
>
>
>
>                            Warmest regards, Chuck Engles
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Boyd Casey wrote:
>
>  I just did some reading up on harmonic balancers and the post i read said
>> the the balancer had to be press fit onto the crank. Can this be done with
>> the motor in the car?
>> Boyd
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Boyd Casey <boyd411 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>  The Romac is SFI rated. Is it unconventional? I afraid my knowledge of
>>> them is very limited. I know there are internal balanced and external
>>> balanced , SFI-rated and non rated. What are the differences and what do
>>> they mean as far as performance or other factors that would be important
>>> ?
>>> Boyd
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Tony DiGiovanna <tonydigi at optonline.net
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>>  I think a good consideration is an SFI-rated conventional harmonic
>>>> balancer.  Like the one from Pioneer for $176.  See summit racing.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: DeTomaso [mailto:detomaso-bounces at poca.com] On Behalf Of Boyd
>>>> Casey
>>>> Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 12:59 PM
>>>> To: detomaso at poca.com
>>>> Subject: [DeTomaso] Harmonic balancer
>>>>
>>>> I just found out that my Harmonic balancer is shot. I have noticed a
>>>> wide
>>>> range of prices from just over $100 to close to $500 ( I'm sure if i
>>>> tried
>>>> I could find some that were even more expensive. What is the consensus
>>>> as
>>>> far as the harmonic balancer best suited to a Pantera with 351 Cleveland
>>>> that has been mildly modified? I don't want to spend more money then is
>>>> necessary  , but I also don't want junk. Any pointers or suggestions?
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Boyd
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>      ------------------------------
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
>>
>> DeTomaso mailing list
>> DeTomaso at poca.com
>> http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
   Thanks to everyone that supplied information A and opinions , your
   contribution to my continuing mechanics education ( on the fly) home
   study program is greatly appreciated!A
   Boyd

   On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 9:42 AM, <[1]cengles at cox.net> wrote:

     Dear Boyd,
     A  A  A  A  A  A  A  About eighteen years ago, I recall that I
     replaced a bad stock balancer with a similar balancer. A  I was able
     to accomplish that with the engine in place using some anti seize
     and the balancer bolt to push it on. A  I have since learned that is
     not the best technique although it is a common one. A  Also the
     space constraints of an in situ balancer change may limit the
     options ton only the suboptimal balancer bolt.
     A  A  A  A  A  A  A  A  A  A  A  A  A  A Warmest regards, Chuck
     Engles

   On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Boyd Casey wrote:

   I just did some reading up on harmonic balancers and the post i read
   said
   the the balancer had to be press fit onto the crank. Can this be done
   with
   the motor in the car?
   Boyd

   On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Boyd Casey <[2]boyd411 at gmail.com>
   wrote:

   The Romac is SFI rated. Is it unconventional? I afraid my knowledge of
   them is very limited. I know there are internal balanced and external
   balanced , SFI-rated and non rated. What are the differences and what
   do
   they mean as far as performance or other factors that would be
   important ?
   Boyd

     On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Tony DiGiovanna
     <[3]tonydigi at optonline.net>wrote:

   I think a good consideration is an SFI-rated conventional harmonic

     balancer. A Like the one from Pioneer for $176. A See summit racing.

   -----Original Message-----
   From: DeTomaso [mailto:[4]detomaso-bounces at poca.com] On Behalf Of Boyd
   Casey
   Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 12:59 PM

   To: [5]detomaso at poca.com
   Subject: [DeTomaso] Harmonic balancer
   I just found out that my Harmonic balancer is shot. I have noticed a
   wide
   range of prices from just over $100 to close to $500 ( I'm sure if i
   tried
   I could find some that were even more expensive. What is the consensus
   as
   far as the harmonic balancer best suited to a Pantera with 351
   Cleveland
   that has been mildly modified? I don't want to spend more money then is

     necessary A , but I also don't want junk. Any pointers or
     suggestions?
     Thanks,
     Boyd

     A  A  A ------------------------------

   _______________________________________________
   Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
   DeTomaso mailing list
   [6]DeTomaso at poca.com
   [7]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com

References

   1. mailto:cengles at cox.net
   2. mailto:boyd411 at gmail.com
   3. mailto:tonydigi at optonline.net
   4. mailto:detomaso-bounces at poca.com
   5. mailto:detomaso at poca.com
   6. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
   7. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com


More information about the DeTomaso mailing list