[DeTomaso] Disappearing posts

[MikeLDrew at aol.com]

In a message dated 5/4/14 17 09 48, asajay at asajay.com writes:


> I saw them both, but don't remember if it was via the archives.  Since I 
> can't get to my email account at work, I scan the archives.  I do remember 
> seeing them both and I don't have "reject" messages from the admin 
> account.   Why you didn't get them, I don't know.
> 
>>>My question is--did anybody else get them?   Apparently they did.
> 
> >No, there is no way to have the server "re-send" them without more 
> trouble than you just re-posting them.
> 
> >>>Good point--others say they received them, so that's good.   Maybe I 
just deleted my own posts and didn't remember?   Could be...

> >Mailman is more designed as a textual mail relay.  The whole allowing 
> attachments part is highly shunned by most of the Mailman community.  I have 
> tried to configure it the best I can within the limitations available.  
> It's not optimum unfortunately.
> 
>>>Well, it's far better than nothing, and I for one appreciate it greatly! 
  I don't mind the old technique of having a link to a photo hosted on the 
POCA gallery.
> 
> >Whoever manages the POCA web site should investigate alternative methods 
> that might be more in tune with today's mailers.  Mailman is 20 years old 
> or better, though it does get regular updates, it's not for things like 
> making it easier to attach photos and such.
> 

>>>Yes, true I suppose!

Thanks!

Mike
-------------- next part --------------
   In a message dated 5/4/14 17 09 48, asajay at asajay.com writes:

     I saw them both, but don't remember if it was via the archives.
     Since I can't get to my email account at work, I scan the archives.
     I do remember seeing them both and I don't have "reject" messages
     from the admin account.   Why you didn't get them, I don't know.

   >>>My question is--did anybody else get them?  Apparently they did.

     >No, there is no way to have the server "re-send" them without more
     trouble than you just re-posting them.

   >>>Good point--others say they received them, so that's good.  Maybe I
   just deleted my own posts and didn't remember?  Could be...

     >Mailman is more designed as a textual mail relay.  The whole
     allowing attachments part is highly shunned by most of the Mailman
     community.  I have tried to configure it the best I can within the
     limitations available.  It's not optimum unfortunately.

   >>>Well, it's far better than nothing, and I for one appreciate it
   greatly!  I don't mind the old technique of having a link to a photo
   hosted on the POCA gallery.

     >Whoever manages the POCA web site should investigate alternative
     methods that might be more in tune with today's mailers.  Mailman is
     20 years old or better, though it does get regular updates, it's not
     for things like making it easier to attach photos and such.

   >>>Yes, true I suppose!
   Thanks!
   Mike