[DeTomaso] Dual Remote oil filters

michael at michaelshortt.com michael at michaelshortt.com
Sun Jul 6 17:58:38 EDT 2014


I gotta hang out with you, I've only ever seen them on old Ferraris. If
your rednecks are a bunch of beer drinking, flannel shirt wearing, beef
jerky eating, 365 Daytona drivers, I wanna be one.

;-)

Michael
On Jul 6, 2014 5:50 PM, "Will Kooiman" <will.kooiman at gmail.com> wrote:

> I ran dual remote filters for a while.
>
> They were parallel - not series, so they would filter more oil before
> hitting the bypass.
>
> They did not leak.
>
> My reasoning was to do a remote mount to make filter changes easier, and
> as long as I was at it, it made sense to do dual remotes instead of a
> single remote.
>
> I have since switched to a single filter in the stock location.
> Basically, I came to my senses.  Dual remote filters looked too redneck
> (no offense intended to anyone running dual remotes or to rednecks).
>
> On 7/6/14, 1:45 PM, "michael at michaelshortt.com"
> <michael at michaelshortt.com> wrote:
>
> >   In my application, in a series, pressure remains the same, just another
> >   pass through more filter material to catch anything that made it
> >   through the first one, and just because IMHO it looks neat. Detractors
> >   will rightly point out that duplication of connections increases
> >   opportunities for leaks, the expense of an oil change is greater, and
> >   while I would love to point out that aircraft and spacecraft have
> >   duplicates built in, in this case, one is not an alternate for the
> >   other since they share everything ( unless you count a filter element
> >   failure). One might justify a longer interval between oil changes, but
> >   in my case that would be silly since I average like once a year anyway
> >   ( 2,000 miles and 10 quarts of oil, most of it comes out looking brand
> >   new).
> >   Michael A Shortt
> >
> >   On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Mikael <[1]mikael_hass at mail.tele.dk>
> >   wrote:
> >
> >     Forgive my ignorance, but why two? Parallel or in series? In either
> >     case, what does this do to the pressure in the engine? All
> >     consequences understood?
> >     Mvh/Regards
> >     Mikael
> >     -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> >     Fra: [2]michael at michaelshortt.com
> >     [mailto:[3]michael at michaelshortt.com]
> >     Sendt: 3. juli 2014 01:57
> >     Til: [4]detomaso at poca.com
> >     Emne: [DeTomaso] Dual Remote oil filters
> >
> >   Has anyone mounted dual remote oil filters upside down over the
> >   bellhousing before? A I'm thinking about it. The idea of two big Orange
> >   FL-1 and some more AN fittings and more aeroquip hose....hmmmmm tasty
> >   looking. A I already have an oil cooler I would have to incorporate
> >   after filtering.
> >   Michael Shortt
> >   --
> >   Michael L. Shortt
> >   Savannah, Georgia
> >   [5]www.michaelshortt.com
> >   [6]michael at michaelshortt.com
> >   [7]912-232-9390
> >   This email is protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act,
> >   18 U.S.C. Sec. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally
> >   privileged. A If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> >   notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of
> >   this communication is strictly prohibited. A Please reply to the sender
> >   that you have received this message in error, then delete it. A Thank
> >   you
> >
> >   _______________________________________________
> >   Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
> >   DeTomaso mailing list
> >
> >     [8]DeTomaso at poca.com
> >     [9]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
> >
> >   --
> >   Michael L. Shortt
> >   Savannah, Georgia
> >   [10]www.michaelshortt.com
> >   [11]michael at michaelshortt.com
> >   912-232-9390
> >   A
> >   This email is protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy
> >   Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally
> >   privileged.A  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> >   notified
> >   that any retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
> >   communication is strictly prohibited.A  Please reply to the sender that
> >   you
> >   have received this message in error, then delete it.A  Thank you
> >
> >References
> >
> >   1. mailto:mikael_hass at mail.tele.dk
> >   2. mailto:michael at michaelshortt.com
> >   3. mailto:michael at michaelshortt.com
> >   4. mailto:detomaso at poca.com
> >   5. http://www.michaelshortt.com/
> >   6. mailto:michael at michaelshortt.com
> >   7. tel:912-232-9390
> >   8. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
> >   9. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
> >  10. http://www.michaelshortt.com/
> >  11. mailto:michael at michaelshortt.com
> >_______________________________________________
> >
> >Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
> >
> >DeTomaso mailing list
> >DeTomaso at poca.com
> >http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
   I gotta hang out with you, I've only ever seen them on old Ferraris. If
   your rednecks are a bunch of beer drinking, flannel shirt wearing, beef
   jerky eating, 365 Daytona drivers, I wanna be one.

   ;-)

   Michael

   On Jul 6, 2014 5:50 PM, "Will Kooiman" <[1]will.kooiman at gmail.com>
   wrote:

     I ran dual remote filters for a while.
     They were parallel - not series, so they would filter more oil
     before
     hitting the bypass.
     They did not leak.
     My reasoning was to do a remote mount to make filter changes easier,
     and
     as long as I was at it, it made sense to do dual remotes instead of
     a
     single remote.
     I have since switched to a single filter in the stock location.
     Basically, I came to my senses. A Dual remote filters looked too
     redneck
     (no offense intended to anyone running dual remotes or to rednecks).
     On 7/6/14, 1:45 PM, "[2]michael at michaelshortt.com"
     <[3]michael at michaelshortt.com> wrote:
     > A  In my application, in a series, pressure remains the same, just
     another
     > A  pass through more filter material to catch anything that made
     it
     > A  through the first one, and just because IMHO it looks neat.
     Detractors
     > A  will rightly point out that duplication of connections
     increases
     > A  opportunities for leaks, the expense of an oil change is
     greater, and
     > A  while I would love to point out that aircraft and spacecraft
     have
     > A  duplicates built in, in this case, one is not an alternate for
     the
     > A  other since they share everything ( unless you count a filter
     element
     > A  failure). One might justify a longer interval between oil
     changes, but
     > A  in my case that would be silly since I average like once a year
     anyway
     > A  ( 2,000 miles and 10 quarts of oil, most of it comes out
     looking brand
     > A  new).
     > A  Michael A Shortt
     >
     > A  On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Mikael
     <[1][4]mikael_hass at mail.tele.dk>
     > A  wrote:
     >
     > A  A  Forgive my ignorance, but why two? Parallel or in series? In
     either
     > A  A  case, what does this do to the pressure in the engine? All
     > A  A  consequences understood?
     > A  A  Mvh/Regards
     > A  A  Mikael
     > A  A  -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
     > A  A  Fra: [2][5]michael at michaelshortt.com
     > A  A  [mailto:[3][6]michael at michaelshortt.com]
     > A  A  Sendt: 3. juli 2014 01:57
     > A  A  Til: [4][7]detomaso at poca.com
     > A  A  Emne: [DeTomaso] Dual Remote oil filters
     >
     > A  Has anyone mounted dual remote oil filters upside down over the
     > A  bellhousing before? A I'm thinking about it. The idea of two
     big Orange
     > A  FL-1 and some more AN fittings and more aeroquip hose....hmmmmm
     tasty
     > A  looking. A I already have an oil cooler I would have to
     incorporate
     > A  after filtering.
     > A  Michael Shortt
     > A  --
     > A  Michael L. Shortt
     > A  Savannah, Georgia
     > A  [5][8]www.michaelshortt.com
     > A  [6][9]michael at michaelshortt.com
     > A  [7]912-232-9390
     > A  This email is protected by the Electronic Communications
     Privacy Act,
     > A  18 U.S.C. Sec. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally
     > A  privileged. A If you are not the intended recipient, you are
     hereby
     > A  notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution or
     copying of
     > A  this communication is strictly prohibited. A Please reply to
     the sender
     > A  that you have received this message in error, then delete it. A
     Thank
     > A  you
     >
     > A  _______________________________________________
     > A  Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
     > A  DeTomaso mailing list
     >
     > A  A  [8][10]DeTomaso at poca.com
     > A  A  [9][11]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
     >
     > A  --
     > A  Michael L. Shortt
     > A  Savannah, Georgia
     > A  [10][12]www.michaelshortt.com
     > A  [11][13]michael at michaelshortt.com
     > A  [14]912-232-9390
     > A  A
     > A  This email is protected by the Electronic Communications
     Privacy
     > A  Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be
     legally
     > A  privileged.A A If you are not the intended recipient, you are
     hereby
     > A  notified
     > A  that any retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of
     this
     > A  communication is strictly prohibited.A A Please reply to the
     sender that
     > A  you
     > A  have received this message in error, then delete it.A A Thank
     you
     >
     >References
     >
     > A  1. mailto:[15]mikael_hass at mail.tele.dk
     > A  2. mailto:[16]michael at michaelshortt.com
     > A  3. mailto:[17]michael at michaelshortt.com
     > A  4. mailto:[18]detomaso at poca.com
     > A  5. [19]http://www.michaelshortt.com/
     > A  6. mailto:[20]michael at michaelshortt.com
     > A  7. tel:[21]912-232-9390
     > A  8. mailto:[22]DeTomaso at poca.com
     > A  9. [23]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
     > A 10. [24]http://www.michaelshortt.com/
     > A 11. mailto:[25]michael at michaelshortt.com
     >_______________________________________________
     >
     >Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
     >
     >DeTomaso mailing list
     >[26]DeTomaso at poca.com
     >[27]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com

References

   1. mailto:will.kooiman at gmail.com
   2. mailto:michael at michaelshortt.com
   3. mailto:michael at michaelshortt.com
   4. mailto:mikael_hass at mail.tele.dk
   5. mailto:michael at michaelshortt.com
   6. mailto:michael at michaelshortt.com
   7. mailto:detomaso at poca.com
   8. http://www.michaelshortt.com/
   9. mailto:michael at michaelshortt.com
  10. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
  11. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
  12. http://www.michaelshortt.com/
  13. mailto:michael at michaelshortt.com
  14. tel:912-232-9390
  15. mailto:mikael_hass at mail.tele.dk
  16. mailto:michael at michaelshortt.com
  17. mailto:michael at michaelshortt.com
  18. mailto:detomaso at poca.com
  19. http://www.michaelshortt.com/
  20. mailto:michael at michaelshortt.com
  21. tel:912-232-9390
  22. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
  23. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
  24. http://www.michaelshortt.com/
  25. mailto:michael at michaelshortt.com
  26. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
  27. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com


More information about the DeTomaso mailing list