[DeTomaso] LPC: Radar in the rain
Will Kooiman
will.kooiman at gmail.com
Mon Dec 15 21:35:13 EST 2014
The article was from 2011, and since we haven’t heard any reports of tanks
blowing up in Florida, I’d say they aren’t being used.
The article was so old, I couldn’t find any fact check information on it.
If you’ve ever seen an Apache, you’d realize just how ridiculous this story
is. An Apache is a tank killer, and it is a super bad at ss one at that. It
has no place in civilian use.
If the evidence is real (8 helicopters at $18M each), then maybe it is a
coverup for something else like embezzlement. That makes a lot more sense
than civilian attack helicopters.
From: Boyd Casey <boyd411 at gmail.com>
Date: Monday, December 15, 2014 at 11:29 AM
To: Will Kooiman <will.kooiman at gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Drew <MikeLDrew at aol.com>, "detomaso at poca.com" <detomaso at poca.com>,
Larry Finch <fresnofinches at aol.com>
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] LPC: Radar in the rain
The article said they received 8 Apaches which suggest to me that their
plans are for more then a "static display".
As I pointed out in my post I have no verification of this information so we
don't know if it is factual or not.
Boyd
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Will Kooiman <will.kooiman at gmail.com>
wrote:
> I don¹t think they get military surplus because they need it.
>
> They accept the surplus because the military wants to get rid of their
> surplus.
>
> Now, whether they accepted an Apache or not, I rather doubt it. Aircraft
> are expensive to maintain. They wouldn¹t accept an Apache unless they
> planned on turning it into a non-functioning display. That¹s more likely
> Internet garbage.
>
> On 12/14/14, 1:13 PM, "Boyd Casey" <boyd411 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> > The current reality makes George Orwell's "1984" look like a fairy
>> > tale, and I'm afraid it's only going to get worse. I'm all for "the
>> > rule of law" andA "Law and Order" but America was never supposed to be
>> > about living in a police state. I recently read that a municipal police
>> > department obtained some surplus Apache helicopters from the D.O.D.,(
>> > Knowing you can't take what you read as fact ,) it still begs the
>> > question What does a police department in America need with Apache
>> > helicopters designed to take out tanks ( hellfire missiles and Gatling
>> > cannon that fire depleted uranium armor piercing shells?) What are they
>> > planning for or what do they expect? The prospects of what's around the
>> > corner are very frightening. The continued push to upscale the armament
>> > levels of the police and the attemptA to disarm the public makes theA
>> > 2nd amendment fringe groups seem like they are not as far out on the
>> > fringe as the media attempts to portray.
>> > I feel safe in saying this is not what the members of my family who
>> > dedicated large parts of their lives (or gave their lives) had in mind
>> > nor do I suspect did you when you put on the uniform.
>> > Hugh
>> >
>> > On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Mike Drew <[1]MikeLDrew at aol.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > Boyd,
>> > All it would take would be one public-spirited citizen with a big
>> > shotgun or rifle to put those speed cameras right and then all would
>> > be good in your corner of the world. :)
>> > England is especially fond of speed cameras. For awhile, charitable
>> > people were hanging old tires from the camera boxes, pouring gas
>> > into them and then setting them on fire. While these Robin Hoods
>> > were celebrated by the people, the government didn't have much of a
>> > sense of humor about it, and a few people got very long prison
>> > sentences (5-10 yrs maybe?) after the cops set up cameras to look AT
>> > the cameras and used those to track down the rebels. Once word got
>> > out about that, the practice pretty much died out....
>> > Mike
>> > Sent from my iPhone
>> > On Dec 14, 2014, at 11:18, Boyd Casey <[2]boyd411 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >A A The benefit (to the police) of the radar gun is it's "instant
>> > on" which
>>> > >A A makes a radar detector all but useless. (unless as Larry said
>> > you are
>>> > >A A fortunate enough to have the police try to get someone in
>> > front of you
>>> > >A A and your detector picks up the residual signal. Other wise by
>> > the time
>>> > >A A you hear the warning you have already been clocked!
>>> > >A A A A A A A AA On a side note there has been a recent
>> > development here on
>>> > >A A long Island concerning photo radar. Apparently the authorities
>>> > >A A installed a bunch of photo radar traps in the area while I was
>> > in the
>>> > >A A hospital.They neglected to put up any warning signs. With in a
>> > two
>>> > >A A weeks of my release from the hospital I got to school zone
>> > tickets 31
>>> > >A A in a 20 and 33 in a 20 $80 each (no points or any other
>> > penalty just
>>> > >A A cash).
>>> > >A A The area where I got nailed is at the same high school I
>> > graduated from
>>> > >A A and it has a huge piece of property with several acres
>> > containing a
>>> > >A A baseball diamond , a football field (with stands) a soccer
>> > field , it's
>>> > >A A huge! The school zone signs don't encompass the entire
>> > property. The
>>> > >A A end around a 1/4 of a mile past the intersection near the
>> > school's main
>>> > >A A entrance. The road that runs along the athletic fields (that
>> > has no
>>> > >A A intersections and people generally drive around 40 mph) is
>> > where they
>>> > >A A installed to Photo radar array. This is the spot where they
>> > got me.
>>> > >A A Apparently this has happened all over the county and the
>> > public has
>>> > >A A freaked out. So last week they announced that signs would be
>> > going up
>>> > >A A and anybody that was ticketed before the signage was in place
>> > will be
>>> > >A A getting their tickets rescinded and their fines refunded. So
>> > that was
>>> > >A A good news for me!
>>> > >A A Boyd
>>> > >
>>> > >A A On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Larry Finch via DeTomaso
>>> > >A A <[1][3]detomaso at poca.com> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >A A A AA A Tomas wrote -
>>> > >A A A I know that the camera boxes use radar but does anyone use
>>> > >A A A manually operated radar anymore? I thought they had all
>> > changed to
>>> > >A A A laser guns.
>>> > >A A A -----
>>> > >A A A Here in CA, the CHP uses radar (Ka band) and laser.
>>> > >A A A As I understand it, laser must be from a stationary
>> > position and
>>> > >A A A very close to a
>>> > >A A A A straight (not from an angle) shot at the target.
>> >
>>> > >A A A I've seen them hiding on highway overpasses to get that
>> > position.
>>> > >A A A Radar now all appears to be instant-on, though some officers
>> > drive
>>> > >A A A with it alway
>>> > >A A A s on.
>>> > >A A A Radar is not as picky about the aim of the signal, and works
>> > just
>>> > >A A A fine from a mo
>>> > >A A A ving vehicle.
>>> > >A A A With my Valentine, I find that as long as there is an
>>> > >A A A ahead-of-me-rabbit to moti
>>> > >A A A vate a Chipie to hit his instant-on, the scatter from that
>> > radar
>>> > >A A A burst
>>> > >A A A will trip my detector up to over two miles ahead.
>>> > >A A A Same benefit from a radar sitiuated behind you, and with the
>>> > >A A A Valentine you'll kn
>>> > >A A A ow the direction to look.
>>> > >A A A Headed up the 101 years ago to a PCNC meeting, moving at a
>> > 'brisk'
>>> > >A A A rate, the rea
>>> > >A A A r arrows lit up with plenty of time
>>> > >A A A to slow down and thus frustrate the CHP motorcycle officer who
>> > paced
>>> > >A A A in my RH bl
>>> > >A A A ind spot for several miles until he finally gave up
>>> > >A A A and moved ahead of me.
>>> > >A A A Cat and mouse at its finest. :-)
>>> > >A A A YMMV
>>> > >A A A Larry - "Why no, officer, I don't know why you pulled me over,
>>> > >A A A Perhaps you thoug
>>> > >A A A ht I had some donuts?"
>>> > >A A A _______________________________________________
>>> > >A A A Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
>>> > >A A A DeTomaso mailing list
>> >
>>> > >A A A [2][4]DeTomaso at poca.com
>>> > >A A A [3][5]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
>>> > >
>>> > > References
>>> > >
>>> > >A A 1. mailto:[6]detomaso at poca.com
>>> > >A A 2. mailto:[7]DeTomaso at poca.com
>>> > >A A 3. [8]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
>> >
>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> > >
>>> > > Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
>>> > >
>>> > > DeTomaso mailing list
>>> > > [9]DeTomaso at poca.com
>>> > > [10]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
>> >
>> >References
>> >
>> > 1. mailto:MikeLDrew at aol.com
>> > 2. mailto:boyd411 at gmail.com
>> > 3. mailto:detomaso at poca.com
>> > 4. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
>> > 5. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
>> > 6. mailto:detomaso at poca.com
>> > 7. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
>> > 8. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
>> > 9. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
>> > 10. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >
>> >Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
>> >
>> >DeTomaso mailing list
>> >DeTomaso at poca.com
>> >http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
The article was from 2011, and since we haven't heard any reports of
tanks blowing up in Florida, I'd say they aren't being used.
The article was so old, I couldn't find any fact check information on
it.
If you've ever seen an Apache, you'd realize just how ridiculous this
story is. An Apache is a tank killer, and it is a super bad at ss one at
that. It has no place in civilian use.
If the evidence is real (8 helicopters at $18M each), then maybe it is
a coverup for something else - like embezzlement. That makes a lot
more sense than civilian attack helicopters.
From: Boyd Casey <[1]boyd411 at gmail.com>
Date: Monday, December 15, 2014 at 11:29 AM
To: Will Kooiman <[2]will.kooiman at gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Drew <[3]MikeLDrew at aol.com>, "[4]detomaso at poca.com"
<[5]detomaso at poca.com>, Larry Finch <[6]fresnofinches at aol.com>
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] LPC: Radar in the rain
The article said they received 8 Apaches which suggest to me that
their plans are for more then a "static display".
As I pointed out in my post I have no verification of this information
so we don't know if it is factual or not.
Boyd
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Will Kooiman
<[7]will.kooiman at gmail.com> wrote:
I don(c)oet think they get military surplus because they need it.
They accept the surplus because the military wants to get rid of
their
surplus.
Now, whether they accepted an Apache or not, I rather doubt it.
Aircraft
are expensive to maintain. They wouldn(c)oet accept an Apache
unless they
planned on turning it into a non-functioning display. That(c)oes
more likely
Internet garbage.
On 12/14/14, 1:13 PM, "Boyd Casey" <[8]boyd411 at gmail.com> wrote:
> The current reality makes George Orwell's "1984" look like a
fairy
> tale, and I'm afraid it's only going to get worse. I'm all for
"the
> rule of law" andA "Law and Order" but America was never
supposed to be
> about living in a police state. I recently read that a municipal
police
> department obtained some surplus Apache helicopters from the
D.O.D.,(
> Knowing you can't take what you read as fact ,) it still begs
the
> question What does a police department in America need with
Apache
> helicopters designed to take out tanks ( hellfire missiles and
Gatling
> cannon that fire depleted uranium armor piercing shells?) What
are they
> planning for or what do they expect? The prospects of what's
around the
> corner are very frightening. The continued push to upscale the
armament
> levels of the police and the attemptA to disarm the public
makes theA
> 2nd amendment fringe groups seem like they are not as far out on
the
> fringe as the media attempts to portray.
> I feel safe in saying this is not what the members of my family
who
> dedicated large parts of their lives (or gave their lives) had
in mind
> nor do I suspect did you when you put on the uniform.
> Hugh
>
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Mike Drew
<[1][9]MikeLDrew at aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> Boyd,
> All it would take would be one public-spirited citizen with a
big
> shotgun or rifle to put those speed cameras right and then all
would
> be good in your corner of the world. :)
> England is especially fond of speed cameras. For awhile,
charitable
> people were hanging old tires from the camera boxes, pouring
gas
> into them and then setting them on fire. While these Robin
Hoods
> were celebrated by the people, the government didn't have much
of a
> sense of humor about it, and a few people got very long prison
> sentences (5-10 yrs maybe?) after the cops set up cameras to
look AT
> the cameras and used those to track down the rebels. Once word
got
> out about that, the practice pretty much died out....
> Mike
> Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 14, 2014, at 11:18, Boyd Casey
<[2][10]boyd411 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >A A The benefit (to the police) of the radar gun is it's
"instant
> on" which
> >A A makes a radar detector all but useless. (unless as Larry
said
> you are
> >A A fortunate enough to have the police try to get someone
in
> front of you
> >A A and your detector picks up the residual signal. Other
wise by
> the time
> >A A you hear the warning you have already been clocked!
> >A A A A A A A AA On a side note there has been a recent
> development here on
> >A A long Island concerning photo radar. Apparently the
authorities
> >A A installed a bunch of photo radar traps in the area while
I was
> in the
> >A A hospital.They neglected to put up any warning signs.
With in a
> two
> >A A weeks of my release from the hospital I got to school
zone
> tickets 31
> >A A in a 20 and 33 in a 20 $80 each (no points or any other
> penalty just
> >A A cash).
> >A A The area where I got nailed is at the same high school I
> graduated from
> >A A and it has a huge piece of property with several acres
> containing a
> >A A baseball diamond , a football field (with stands) a
soccer
> field , it's
> >A A huge! The school zone signs don't encompass the entire
> property. The
> >A A end around a 1/4 of a mile past the intersection near
the
> school's main
> >A A entrance. The road that runs along the athletic fields
(that
> has no
> >A A intersections and people generally drive around 40 mph)
is
> where they
> >A A installed to Photo radar array. This is the spot where
they
> got me.
> >A A Apparently this has happened all over the county and the
> public has
> >A A freaked out. So last week they announced that signs
would be
> going up
> >A A and anybody that was ticketed before the signage was in
place
> will be
> >A A getting their tickets rescinded and their fines
refunded. So
> that was
> >A A good news for me!
> >A A Boyd
> >
> >A A On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Larry Finch via
DeTomaso
> >A A <[1][3][11]detomaso at poca.com> wrote:
> >
> >A A A AA A Tomas wrote -
> >A A A I know that the camera boxes use radar but does
anyone use
> >A A A manually operated radar anymore? I thought they had
all
> changed to
> >A A A laser guns.
> >A A A -----
> >A A A Here in CA, the CHP uses radar (Ka band) and laser.
> >A A A As I understand it, laser must be from a stationary
> position and
> >A A A very close to a
> >A A A A straight (not from an angle) shot at the target.
>
> >A A A I've seen them hiding on highway overpasses to get that
> position.
> >A A A Radar now all appears to be instant-on, though some
officers
> drive
> >A A A with it alway
> >A A A s on.
> >A A A Radar is not as picky about the aim of the signal, and
works
> just
> >A A A fine from a mo
> >A A A ving vehicle.
> >A A A With my Valentine, I find that as long as there is an
> >A A A ahead-of-me-rabbit to moti
> >A A A vate a Chipie to hit his instant-on, the scatter from
that
> radar
> >A A A burst
> >A A A will trip my detector up to over two miles ahead.
> >A A A Same benefit from a radar sitiuated behind you, and
with the
> >A A A Valentine you'll kn
> >A A A ow the direction to look.
> >A A A Headed up the 101 years ago to a PCNC meeting, moving
at a
> 'brisk'
> >A A A rate, the rea
> >A A A r arrows lit up with plenty of time
> >A A A to slow down and thus frustrate the CHP motorcycle
officer who
> paced
> >A A A in my RH bl
> >A A A ind spot for several miles until he finally gave up
> >A A A and moved ahead of me.
> >A A A Cat and mouse at its finest. :-)
> >A A A YMMV
> >A A A Larry - "Why no, officer, I don't know why you pulled
me over,
> >A A A Perhaps you thoug
> >A A A ht I had some donuts?"
> >A A A _______________________________________________
> >A A A Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
> >A A A DeTomaso mailing list
>
> >A A A [2][4][12]DeTomaso at poca.com
> >A A A
[3][5][13]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
> >
> > References
> >
> >A A 1. [14]mailto:[6][15]detomaso at poca.com
> >A A 2. [16]mailto:[7][17]DeTomaso at poca.com
> >A A 3.
[8][18]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
>
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
> >
> > DeTomaso mailing list
> > [9][19]DeTomaso at poca.com
> > [10][20]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
>
>References
>
> 1. mailto:[21]MikeLDrew at aol.com
> 2. mailto:[22]boyd411 at gmail.com
> 3. mailto:[23]detomaso at poca.com
> 4. mailto:[24]DeTomaso at poca.com
> 5. [25]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
> 6. mailto:[26]detomaso at poca.com
> 7. mailto:[27]DeTomaso at poca.com
> 8. [28]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
> 9. mailto:[29]DeTomaso at poca.com
> 10. [30]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
>_______________________________________________
>
>Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
>
>DeTomaso mailing list
>[31]DeTomaso at poca.com
>[32]http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
References
1. mailto:boyd411 at gmail.com
2. mailto:will.kooiman at gmail.com
3. mailto:MikeLDrew at aol.com
4. mailto:detomaso at poca.com
5. mailto:detomaso at poca.com
6. mailto:fresnofinches at aol.com
7. mailto:will.kooiman at gmail.com
8. mailto:boyd411 at gmail.com
9. mailto:MikeLDrew at aol.com
10. mailto:boyd411 at gmail.com
11. mailto:detomaso at poca.com
12. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
13. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
14. mailto:[6]
15. mailto:detomaso at poca.com
16. mailto:[7]
17. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
18. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
19. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
20. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
21. mailto:MikeLDrew at aol.com
22. mailto:boyd411 at gmail.com
23. mailto:detomaso at poca.com
24. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
25. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
26. mailto:detomaso at poca.com
27. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
28. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
29. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
30. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
31. mailto:DeTomaso at poca.com
32. http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com
More information about the DeTomaso
mailing list