[DeTomaso] Ford 392 rev limit?
Doug Scott
doug at pickbbs.com
Fri Sep 6 11:02:01 EDT 2013
Ford has known since the early 60s that short stroke, big bore is the recipe
for race engines. Take a look at the bore and stroke of the 427 compared to
the 428. Don't know why they call the 427 a 427 though, the displacement is
closer to a 425.
doug
-----Original Message-----
From: detomaso-bounces at poca.com [mailto:detomaso-bounces at poca.com] On Behalf
Of MikeLDrew at aol.com
Sent: Friday, September 6, 2013 10:50 AM
To: cengles at cox.net
Cc: detomaso at poca.com; pantdino at aol.com; zumzum at cox.net
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Ford 392 rev limit?
In a message dated 9/6/13 6 44 23, cengles at cox.net writes:
> FWIW: on the Speed Talk website Engine Forum, the professional
> machinists and engine builders have commented that the factory crate
> engines have been found to have, ahem, factory seconds used as parts.
> It is perhaps not in all the engines, but it has happened often enough
> that the pros have commented on it.
>
>>>They do make one hell of a spec sheet though:
http://www.fordracingparts.com/parts/part_details.asp?PartKeyField=10757
I don't know if the engine in Jeff's car is *this* 392 or if they sold a
lower-spec version. It appears Ford has gotten out of the 392 business and
gone completely over to 427 Windsors now:
http://www.fordracingparts.com/crateengine/main.asp#tfo
I've heard enough bad things about Ford crate motors from people who have
had them, that I would never get one. They are absolutely fine for street
rods and things like that, or even for a Pantera that will only be driven on
the street, but for a Pantera that would see track duty (abuse) as mine
does, there's just too much likelihood that something would let go....
Mike
_______________________________________________
Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
DeTomaso mailing list
DeTomaso at poca.com
http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
More information about the DeTomaso
mailing list