[DeTomaso] Marti Compilation Results Updated 11-6-2013

P6746 at aol.com P6746 at aol.com
Thu Nov 7 13:51:22 EST 2013


Gray:  You maybe on to something  here.  Our car was built in November 
1973, but was titled and  registered as a '74.  Bob Reid
 
 
In a message dated 11/6/2013 5:21:15 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
rgg at gregorycook.com writes:

 
That  seems odd to me too and not only is it showing the same number built 
but the  standard and GTS numbers are exactly the same?  
Any  chance that the 74 report you have is actually for a car made in 73 
but sold  as a 74 and thus the report is listing 73 production numbers? Or 
possibly the  73 car was originally sold and titled as a 74 but later retitled 
as a 73 and  report is listing the 74 production numbers? I remember a while 
back there  were several guys looking to do this in order get the cars 
exempt from smog  checks? 
Gray 
From: DeTomaso  [mailto:detomaso-bounces at poca.com] On Behalf Of  
michael at michaelshortt.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013  3:58 PM
To: detomaso at poca.com
Subject: [DeTomaso] Marti  Compilation Results Updated 11-6-2013 
 
 
 
I have only received FOUR so far 
 

 
Here are some numbers
 

 


1971      743 Produced        120 in May            ALL Standard    87 were 
Lime  Green
 
1972   2,131 Produced         445  in July            ALL Standard      558 
were Yellow
 
1973   1,112 Produced *          65 in Aug            962 Standard    151 
were Red
 
1974   1,112 Produced *          39 in Feb           150 were GTS      60 
were Blk/Silver
 

 
Total    5,098 Produced
 

 

 
If  you have a MartiReport, please  send.
 

 

 
Michael Shortt
 

 
* Seems very odd to me that exactly the same number were  built in two 
different years
-- 







Michael L.  Shortt
Savannah, Georgia
_www.michaelshortt.com_ (http://www.michaelshortt.com/) 
_michael at michaelshortt.com_ (mailto:michael at michaelshortt.com) 
_912-232-9390_ (tel:912-232-9390) 


This  email is protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy
Act, 18 U.S.C.  Sec. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally
privileged.  If you  are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any retention,  dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly  prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you
have received this  message in error, then delete it.  Thank you  






-- 







Michael L.  Shortt
Savannah, Georgia
_www.michaelshortt.com_ (http://www.michaelshortt.com/) 
_michael at michaelshortt.com_ (mailto:michael at michaelshortt.com) 
912-232-9390


This  email is protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy
Act, 18 U.S.C.  Sec. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally
privileged.  If you  are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any retention,  dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly  prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you
have received this  message in error, then delete it.  Thank you  



_______________________________________________

Detomaso  Forum Managed by POCA

DeTomaso mailing  list
DeTomaso at poca.com
http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso_poca.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://server.detomasolist.com/pipermail/detomaso/attachments/20131107/278a707c/attachment.html>


More information about the DeTomaso mailing list