[DeTomaso] Spring rates
cengles at cox.net
cengles at cox.net
Thu Jan 24 11:49:43 EST 2013
Dear Thomas,
I like the way you think. Your Viking ancestors would be
proud of you.
Warmest regards, Chuck Engles
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Thomas Tornblom wrote:
> My stock GT5 is a bit too soft in the rear, it frequently bottoms out
> in depressions, with spectacular results in the mirrors at night. :)
>
> I should probably replace the dampers and springs sometime...
>
> I have contemplated attaching some titanium blocks under the frame
> rails in the rear, for even more spectacular results. :D
>
> Thomas
>
> 2013-01-24 15:51, Dick Koch skrev:
>> Charles and others, it would be interesting to find out from folks
>> that
>> went to higher spring rates and the effect that had, if any, on the
>> body
>> shell, i. e. cracking at the known weak points of the body shell.
>>
>> When I ever get around to it, I plan to install new "heavier" springs
>> that I bought a while back. I would like to get input from anyone
>> that
>> has gone to stiffer springs, and has not installed additional chassis
>> stiffeners.
>>
>> Dick Koch - Atlanta
>>
>> On 1/23/2013 8:31 PM, Charles Engles wrote:
>>> Dear Bill,
>>>
>>>
>>> You wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "I am quite amazed at the spring rates being used on cars which are
>>> reported to be very nice riding on the street.
>>>
>>> BTW, my car, with 200/350 springs rides like a heavy duty
>>> truck."
>>>
>>>
>>> You've hit upon a Pantera phenomenon, I think. When I
>>> changed my
>>> first Pantera from stock to heavier springs, I thought I would be
>>> cautious
>>> and scale it back a bit from the recommendations of PPC. After the
>>> Konis
>>> and springs, it felt like a new car. The ride was fine, but
>>> pleasantly
>>> firmer than stock.
>>>
>>> Then several years later, I changed the suspension on my
>>> second
>>> Pantera. I was confident enough to go a bit higher than the
>>> recommendations
>>> of PPC. After the new Konis and springs, the second Pantera rode
>>> and
>>> handled as well as the first one. I much prefer the suspension
>>> upgrade to
>>> the stock suspension.
>>>
>>> It is interesting that a large number of Pantera owners
>>> find no
>>> detriment to the ride comfort with multiples of stock spring rates.
>>> I don't
>>> think that we're all deluding ourselves. I would say the phenomenon
>>> is
>>> there. I *think* that it is there due some excellent design
>>> characteristics
>>> of the suspension which obviously tolerates a wide range of higher
>>> spring
>>> rates without a wide range of unhappy owners and drivers. FWIW.
>>>
>>>
>>> Warmest regards, Chuck Engles
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>> Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
>>>
>>> DeTomaso mailing list
>>> DeTomaso at poca.com
>>> http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
>>
>> DeTomaso mailing list
>> DeTomaso at poca.com
>> http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
>>
>> !DSPAM:51014a69256392322922530!
>>
>
>
> --
> Real life: Thomas Törnblom Email: thomas at hax.se
> Snail mail: Banvallsvägen 14 Phone: +46 18 32 31 18
> S - 754 40 Uppsala, Sweden Mobile: +46 76 209 8320
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
>
> DeTomaso mailing list
> DeTomaso at poca.com
> http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
More information about the DeTomaso
mailing list