[DeTomaso] 351w or 351c

Ken Green kenn_green at yahoo.com
Thu Jan 10 16:07:03 EST 2013


I hate the details...   I'd have to defer to someone who knows more than I do on this, but I think within limitations, you can play with the firing order without changing the crank, but you can only swap the compression and exhaust strokes between cylinders???
 
Ken


________________________________
From: "michael at michaelshortt.com" <michaelsavga at gmail.com>
To: Ken Green <kenn_green at yahoo.com> 
Cc: "detomaso at poca.com" <detomaso at poca.com>; Ed Mendez <edducati at mac.com> 
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] 351w or 351c

I think the cranks are really different and that would prevent changing the
firing order.

Michael



On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Ken Green <kenn_green at yahoo.com> wrote:

> I thought the sound might be different because different SBFs can have
> different firing orders?  If that is what creates the difference in sound,
> is there any reason why you can't use the 351C firing order in a custom
> built 351W?  Other than firing order, it seems like the cam, heads,
> headers, etc. will determine how the car sounds regardless of having a
> Cleveland or Windsor block.
>
> Ken
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: LS <lashdeep at yahoo.com>
> To: Ed Mendez <edducati at mac.com>; "detomaso at poca.com" <detomaso at poca.com>
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 12:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] 351w or 351c
>
> Have you driven the car at all with the Cleveland?
>
> You may like the characteristics and power delivery of one over the
> other...and then there's the difference in sound...
>
>
>
>
>
>
> central
> wines-spirits  est 1934
>
>
> 625 e street nw
>
> washington, dc 20004
>
> centralwines.com
>
>
> facebook.com/CentralLiquors
>
>
> 202-737-2800
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Ed Mendez <edducati at mac.com>
> To: "detomaso at poca.com" <detomaso at poca.com>
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 2:40 PM
> Subject: [DeTomaso] 351w or 351c
>
> Hi all,
>
> My 71 Pantera has a built 351c in it now, I know the builder who did it
> and the previous owner (one of my best friends) so I know it is a well
> built engine and pretty radical, but it was done about 18 years ago and
> only broke in and started in the car but never driven; car has been in
> garage and off the road for 28 years. Also has a flat tapper cam. Neither
> of them can honestly remember what the internals or specs are, but knowing
> them it is as radical as you can get 18 years ago.
>
> I am sure it's a great motor, but I have the chance right now to obtain a
> fully built 351w new Dart Sportsman block (4 bolt splayed mains) and Dart
> Pro 1 CNC aluminum heads, Dart manifold and stroked to 427ci all scat
> internals with h-beam rods and full hydraulic roller motor. 634hp. I have
> an engine credit at a well established engine shop, so not going to cost me
> anything.
>
> My car is at a point that I can pull the motor now and do this.
>
> So, should I pull the trigger on the Winsor or just stay with the
> Cleveland?
>
> Does a Windsor decrease the value? Is it a good upgrade for value on the
> car?
>
> Or the other option is pull the Cleveland stroke it to 408, aluminum heads
> and roll prize it.
>
> If I do the Windsor should I keep or sell the Cleveland?
>
> So just want to get opinions for you guys.
>
> Thanks Ed
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
> _______________________________________________
>
> Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
>
> DeTomaso mailing list
> DeTomaso at poca.com
> http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
> _______________________________________________
>
> Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
>
> DeTomaso mailing list
> DeTomaso at poca.com
> http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
> _______________________________________________
>
> Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
>
> DeTomaso mailing list
> DeTomaso at poca.com
> http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
>



-- 







Michael L. Shortt
Savannah, Georgia
http://www.michaelshortt.com/
michael at michaelshortt.com
912-232-9390


This email is protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy
Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally
privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you
have received this message in error, then delete it.  Thank you
_______________________________________________

Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA

DeTomaso mailing list
DeTomaso at poca.com
http://poca.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso


More information about the DeTomaso mailing list