[DeTomaso] Ride height
Pantdino
pantdino at aol.com
Fri Oct 22 21:53:14 EDT 2010
The Pantera is a unibody car and as such does not have a frame per se, but I think John is correct in saying the cars were not perfectly symmetric when they were made .
I believe the body parts were made by stamping machines (unlike my Dino, whose panels were made by pounding metal on a wooden buck and are WAY asymmetric), but when the panels were assembled a "that's close enough" Italian mentality was used. Hence the asymmetry in fender height.
Personally since I can't look at both rear or both front fender / tire gaps simultaneously anyway, I don't care if the car is perfectly symmetric and would not want to sacrifice handling to make it so.
-----Original Message-----
From: John Taphorn <jtaphorn at kingwoodcable.com>
To: michael at michaelshortt.com; Don Franck <panteradon at gmail.com>
Cc: Forest Goodhart <forestg at att.net>; DeTomaso Forum <detomaso at realbig.com>
Sent: Fri, Oct 22, 2010 3:28 pm
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Ride height
Michael has got it right on this case.
When measuring from the ground to the top of the rear fender arch on a
antera, I find the passenger side to generally be higher off the ground.
n my 73, the difference is about 3/4". It is NOT due to the shocks or a
ifference in spring perch; rather, it is due to the body being offset on
he frame. Don, your car is a GT5 conversion; so, who knows what reference
oint was used to set the fenders.
I've addressed this issue years ago. I realize this condition is fairly
ommon to Panteras in the Space City Chapter: I've checked them. If others
n the list are willing. Please measure your cars from floor to top of rear
ender arch on each side and let us know what you see.
I played with my adjustable shocks to learn what would be necessary to level
he body and it would have significantly compromised the corner weighting of
he car. In fact the rear lower a-arms would have been at visually obvious
ifferent angles off the chassis.
While it is possible that your springs have sagged, my money is on a body
ffset to the frame. That said, I would also feel compelled to switch the
hocks side to side to see whether there is a difference for peace of mind
I would not advise using adjustable ride height shocks to correct the
ilment. That would compromise your handling.
JT
---- Original Message -----
rom: "michael at michaelshortt.com" <michaelsavga at gmail.com>
o: "Don Franck" <panteradon at gmail.com>
c: "Forest Goodhart" <forestg at att.net>; "DeTomaso Forum"
detomaso at realbig.com>
ent: Friday, October 22, 2010 1:57 PM
ubject: Re: [DeTomaso] Ride height
When the time comes for you to actually set your ride height, get a front
end alignment, etc.
If you want it done right, place your weight in the driver's seat and
driver's floor area,
So of you weight 235 lbs, go borrow some weights, bags of play sand, etc.
and put them in the car.
If you normally have a co-pilot, do the same for that side, I normally
don't, so I leave it empty.
That's what we always did for race cars and it's the only way to really
make
it correct, track true and be
balanced.
Having said that, have 1/2 a tank of gas, that way, you're equally wrong
at
full and empty.
plus all the BS that you might carry in the front trunk and the luggage
area.
Michael
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Don Franck <panteradon at gmail.com> wrote:
> Now we are getting somewhere. Thanks guys.
>
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Forest Goodhart <forestg at att.net> wrote:
>
>> Don,
>> The problem would not be with the shocks themselves but rather the
>> springs
>> mounted on them. I had the same experience as Will and drove with one of
>> the
>> thinner front spacers on the left rear for 13 years with no issues.
>> Forest
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Don Franck <panteradon at gmail.com>
>> *To:* michael at michaelshortt.com
>> *Cc:* DeTomaso Forum <detomaso at realbig.com>
>> *Sent:* Fri, October 22, 2010 11:24:12 AM
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [DeTomaso] Ride height
>>
>> Thanks, I suppose it is worth a try. anyone know about new shocks?
>> cost?
>> where to buy???
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:23 PM, michael at michaelshortt.com <
>> michaelsavga at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I agree with Mike on this one, see if the shocks are indeed the
>> > problem.
>> >
>> > If they are, then replacing all four with regular shocks is a less
>> > expensive alternative than more $$ adjustable shocks unless you are
>> looking
>> > for the performance advantage as well.
>> >
>> > Simply changing them side to side should quickly indicate whether the
>> > shocks are the culprit, if not, then you'll need to look at other
>> causes,
>> > better to know what the problem is exactly before you start throwing
>> money
>> > at it.
>> >
>> > Michael
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Don Franck <panteradon at gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> Wow, an underwhelming response. I suppose I am the first to
>> experience
>> >> this
>> >> condition.
>> >>
>> >> Don
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:10 AM, <MikeLDrew at aol.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > In a message dated 10/22/10 9 04 54, panteradon at gmail.com writes:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > I just measured my car and I am a full inch lower on the drivers
>> side.
>> >> > Should I assume the only real way to fix this is with ride height
>> >> > adjustable
>> >> > shocks?
>> >> >
>> >> > What is the recommended shock? Where should I get them?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks for any suggestions.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > The budget idea would be to swap your existing shocks side-to-side
>> and
>> >> see
>> >> > if that makes any difference?
>> >> >
>> >> > Mike
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Don
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >>
>> >> Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
>> >>
>> >> Archive Search Engine Now Available at
>> http://www.realbig.com/detomaso/
>> >>
>> >> DeTomaso mailing list
>> >> DeTomaso at list.realbig.com
>> >> http://list.realbig.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Michael L. Shortt
>> > Savannah, Georgia
>> > www.michaelshortt.com
>> > michael at michaelshortt.com
>> > 912-232-9390
>> >
>> >
>> > This email is protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy
>> > Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally
>> > privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
>> notified
>> > that any retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
>> > communication is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender that
>> you
>> > have received this message in error, then delete it. Thank you
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Don
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
>>
>> Archive Search Engine Now Available at http://www.realbig.com/detomaso/
>>
>> DeTomaso mailing list
>> DeTomaso at list.realbig.com
>> http://list.realbig.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Don
>
--
Michael L. Shortt
Savannah, Georgia
www.michaelshortt.com
michael at michaelshortt.com
912-232-9390
This email is protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy
Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified
that any retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender that you
have received this message in error, then delete it. Thank you
_______________________________________________
Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
Archive Search Engine Now Available at http://www.realbig.com/detomaso/
DeTomaso mailing list
DeTomaso at list.realbig.com
http://list.realbig.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
_______________________________________________
Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
Archive Search Engine Now Available at http://www.realbig.com/detomaso/
DeTomaso mailing list
eTomaso at list.realbig.com
ttp://list.realbig.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
More information about the DeTomaso
mailing list