[DeTomaso] Show Car Crashed...

[michael@michaelshortt.com]

I had a client who was hit head on in his C6 vette, the F-250 did exactly
that, used the car like a ramp and rolled over his car.

He was beat up and cut a bit on his scalp, but not too hurt aside from the
bloody mess.

The car was replaced with a Hummer H2 SUT.

Michael




On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:32 PM, michael at michaelshortt.com <
michaelsavga at gmail.com> wrote:

> "dunpers" are bumpers in my alternative late night, stressed and exhausted
> state.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:28 PM, michael at michaelshortt.com <
> michaelsavga at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I would hate to be hit in a T-bone situation in my car ( red light runner
>> for example) , the doors offer no side impact protection to speak of, esp as
>> low as the car is low and dunper heights have risen ( my car is esp low ).
>> as far as the front and rear crumple zones, it appears to be fine for the
>> time period of design, but seriuosly, would you want an Expedition, Explorer
>> or Excursion to T-Bone you in your car?
>>
>> Michael
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:49 PM, <MikeLDrew at aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> In a message dated 3/22/10 12 55 52, michaelsavga at gmail.com writes:
>>>
>>>
>>> I was told that his leg was crushed in the accident, from the looks of
>>> the
>>> damage he seems to be lucky that most of the force was forward of the
>>> cockpit area, esp since we all know the doors are to keep water spray off
>>> the drivers and not much else.
>>>
>>>
>>> What on earth do you base that on?
>>>
>>> Panteras actually performed very well in crash tests, once the chassis
>>> was beefed up (they initially failed).  There have been numerous real-world
>>> crashes where the front or the rear of the car was totally demolished, but
>>> the cabin remained intact.  While they may not perform as well as a modern
>>> car in side impacts, in frontal or rear collisions they do much better than
>>> you'd have any right to expect.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Michael L. Shortt
>> Savannah, Georgia
>> www.michaelshortt.com
>> michael at michaelshortt.com
>> 912-232-9390
>>
>>
>> This email is protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy
>> Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
>> notified
>> that any retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
>> communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you
>> have received this message in error, then delete it.  Thank you
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Michael L. Shortt
> Savannah, Georgia
> www.michaelshortt.com
> michael at michaelshortt.com
> 912-232-9390
>
>
> This email is protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy
> Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally
> privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that any retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
> communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you
> have received this message in error, then delete it.  Thank you
>



-- 







Michael L. Shortt
Savannah, Georgia
www.michaelshortt.com
michael at michaelshortt.com
912-232-9390


This email is protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy
Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally
privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you
have received this message in error, then delete it.  Thank you