[DeTomaso] Definition of Ins. EE response

Larry - Ohio Time Corp larry at ohiotimecorp.com
Mon Dec 20 13:45:48 EST 2010


<< Santa left pyschotropic stockings at a few houses early this year>>

Hmmm do you think it was the mushrooms or the frogs?

Larry (tie dieing the x) - Cleveland

-----Original Message-----
From: detomaso-bounces at realbig.com [mailto:detomaso-bounces at realbig.com] On
Behalf Of michael at michaelshortt.com
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 1:38 PM
To: Dave Londry; DeTomaso Forum
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Definition of Ins. EE response

I think. Santa left pyschotropic stockings at a few houses early this year.
Michael Shortt
On Dec 20, 2010 12:25 PM, "Dave Londry" <davel at emspace.com> wrote:
> Hey John
> How did you pick that number.
> - solar escape velocity?
> - base solar wind velocity?
> - our orbital velocity around the galactic centre?
> Because it's all those things, or was it something farther out?
> dave
>
>
> On 12/20/2010 9:14 AM, John Bentley wrote:
>> Larry,
>>
>> no, they point north to eliminate the timing error associated with the
rotation of the Earth. Since the Earth rotates from West to East, if you
were to race East, your combine velocity would be faster than if you raced
West. Running North eliminates and problem.
>>
>> JB - of course, another load....heading towards Virgo at about 210 miles
per second
>>
>>
>> --- On Mon, 12/20/10, Larry - Ohio Time Corp<larry at ohiotimecorp.com>
wrote:
>>
>> From: Larry - Ohio Time Corp<larry at ohiotimecorp.com>
>> Subject: RE: [DeTomaso] Definition of Ins. EE response
>> To: "'John Bentley'"<gndplne at yahoo.com>
>> Cc: detomaso at realbig.com
>> Date: Monday, December 20, 2010, 6:39 AM
>>
>> << magnetic field of the Earth and increases the output>>
>>
>> John,
>>
>> Do you think this is the reason drag strips always point north?
>>
>> Larry (points SE) - Cleveland
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: detomaso-bounces at realbig.com [mailto:detomaso-bounces at realbig.com]
On
>> Behalf Of John Bentley
>> Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 10:27 PM
>> To: chrisvkimball at msn.com; persocaddy at aol.com; detomaso at realbig.com;
>> MikeLDrew at aol.com
>> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Definition of Ins. EE response
>>
>> yes, when you mount the coil vertically, the energy in the coil combines
>> with the magnetic field of the Earth and increases the output energy by
>> about 15%. This typically means about another 8-12 HP, so I think its
worth
>> it.
>>
>> JB - just kidding, it actually makes no difference. Mount it anywhere you
>> want.
>>
>>
>>
>> --- On Sun, 12/19/10, MikeLDrew at aol.com<MikeLDrew at aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: MikeLDrew at aol.com<MikeLDrew at aol.com>
>> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Definition of Ins. EE response
>> To: chrisvkimball at msn.com, persocaddy at aol.com, detomaso at realbig.com
>> Date: Sunday, December 19, 2010, 6:15 PM
>>
>>
>> In a message dated 12/19/10 18 08 34, chrisvkimball at msn.com writes:
>>
>>
>>> I also read somewhere that the coil should be vertical--mine is
virtually
>>> horizontal--does that in fact make any difference?
>>>
>> Dunno. The OEM coil location on the Mustang was mounted horizontally in a
>> bracket bolted to the top of the intake manifold.
>>
>>
http://www.allfordmustangs.com/photopost/data/3234/medium/1972FordMustangCou
>> peEngine.jpg
>>
>> But I have heard lots of "they say" talk that vertically is better. So
>> all mine are mounted vertically...
>>
>> Mike
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
>
> Archive Search Engine Now Available at http://www.realbig.com/detomaso/
>
> DeTomaso mailing list
> DeTomaso at list.realbig.com
> http://list.realbig.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
_______________________________________________

Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA

Archive Search Engine Now Available at http://www.realbig.com/detomaso/

DeTomaso mailing list
DeTomaso at list.realbig.com
http://list.realbig.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso




More information about the DeTomaso mailing list