[DeTomaso] CHI Dual Plane Intake ?

[Göran Malmberg]

Thats the way I talked about how smaller ports should be located.
But I believe the intake will work on head without port stuffers to,
even if not that good. I have run 48 Webers on 351C with and
without port stuffers and the difference while drivingis not that
big. Weber intake used was made for port stuffers then, port area 2,8"^2.
Goran

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Barry Seib" <oldwheel at mts.net>
To: "DetomasoList" <detomaso at realbig.com>; <doug at silicondesigns.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 10:30 PM
Subject: [DeTomaso] CHI Dual Plane Intake ?


> Hi Doug
>
> I'm pretty sure this is the intake.
> http://351cleveland.wetpaint.com/page/Scott+Cook
>
> The image is named "Scotts manifold" on the site you mentioned too. I 
> think
> Dan Jones has one for testing, so the 70 lb-ft claim will be ........
>
> Barry
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>
> Does anyone have experience with the dual plane manifold at the bottom of
> this John Kaase website page.  I assume its from CHI since that's the 
> title
> of the page but their claim of 70 lb-ft better at 2250 RPM than an 
> Edelbrock
> 2665 Performer is hard to believe but Kaase is supposedly a reputable guy.
>
> www.jonkaaseracingengines.com/component/content/article/201-chi-intake-manif
> olds.html
>
> I also don't see this manifold at CHI's site www.chiheads.com
> or at this Aussie speed shop www.rocketindustries.com.au.
>
> Doug Braun
> blue 73L #5505
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
>
> Archive Search Engine Now Available at http://www.realbig.com/detomaso/
>
> DeTomaso mailing list
> DeTomaso at list.realbig.com
> http://list.realbig.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
>