[DeTomaso] Engine Bay Brace question
jderyke at aol.com
jderyke at aol.com
Tue Dec 22 15:09:11 EST 2009
.....'separation' of the braces?
OK. Remember, all this is 'theoretical' since no one ever actually did
full-scale stiffness tests. Both Goran, Dick Koch and I all agree that the
connector-tubes between the upper and lower tubes should ideally contact the
upper tube AT THE FENDER ENDS of the upper horizontal tube, so as to not input
bending in this tube which does take substantial side-loads. Since I doubt
if there's any real force on the lower horizontal tube, the cross-braces can
be tied in pretty much anywhere with about the same results.
BTW, nice craftsmanship on your inner fender plate welding, Gary. Someone
spent some quality time doing this!
On the factory GR-4s, the cabin-cage tie bars passed thru holes cut right
through the rear window to attach to the upper inner fender panels very near
the shock towers, which were then taking loads from many directions! All
the ones I've seen used bolt-in tie-bars going through holes cut in a Lexan
window. Dunno what the LeMans cars used for a rear window; plexiglas was not
homologated, so maybe that area was free.....
FWIW, the best 'theoretical' bay-brace design I ever saw was many years ago
by Ron Siple in NV for a customer. It was about a 4" wide box-section
fiberglas or carbon-fiber fabrication that covered the entire area between the
upper brace-mounts on the inner fenders and ran all the way down to tie-points
on the tops of the subframe rails- not to the backside of the a-arms. It
had arch-buttressesvuilt in above the bellhousing/ZF for minimum clearance. I
can't remember how the adjustment clevis was attached or if it even had one.
I never got any in-use results so it may have been yet another idea 'not
quite ready for prime-time'..... or maybe on a street Pantera that really
didn't need it.
FWIW- J Deryke
More information about the DeTomaso
mailing list