[DeTomaso] Kalifornia Again NPC

[michael@michaelshortt.com]

Well it's almost May, guess it will soon be time for the California May Day
Parade where
the communist regime will line up all the recycling trucks, save the whale
mobile billboards, mobile Birkenstock vendors
and Green Tea Super tankers and do a slow drive down the 405 flipping the
bird to all the taxpayers.

WTF is wrong with you people, you get the government you deserve.

Gary Coleman and the Stripper would have run the state better.

It's time to top off the magazines fellas and take back your state.

Michael "Speed Tax Registered and Certified" Shortt
3000 miles is not far enough away in Savannah




On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Rick <rwgushue at verizon.net> wrote:

> Street racing and carbon footprints.  Wonder if "speed enhanced" on a
> Pantera's regs would be a bad thing.
>
> Legislative Quick Hits
>
> California Street Racing: Existing law in California allows law
> enforcement to arrest and take into custody a person determined to have
> been engaged in street racing. The law also provides for the removal and
> seizure of the motor vehicle used in the contest. A vehicle impounded
> under these provisions is required to be impounded for not more than 30
> days. New legislation being considered in the state would require
> vehicles to be inspected by the state police to determine whether the
> vehicle has been modified for speed enhancement beyond the
> manufacturer’s original equipment specifications. The bill would also
> require that an additional registration fee of $30 be collected for a
> motor vehicle so seized and that the motor vehicle be designated as
> speed enhanced on the certificate of registration for that motor
> vehicle. The SAN is working with the bill’s sponsor to mitigate the
> inadvertent effects of this bill on law-abiding motorists.
>
> California “Gas Guzzlers”: In an attempt to reduce greenhouse gas
> emissions, legislation has been reintroduced in California to authorize
> the establishment of a purchase surcharge for some new motor vehicles
> based on state calculations of carbon emissions. Funds collected under
> the program would be used in part to fund rebates for vehicles,
> including hybrid and electric cars. If this effort is successful, the
> effects on consumers’ ability to purchase the vehicle of choice, not to
> mention vehicle safety, could be dramatic. The SAN is opposing the bill
> because it would make popular performance and luxury cars, as well as
> SUVs, light trucks and minivans, substantially more expensive to own.
> The measure also will not necessarily curtail greenhouse gas emissions,
> which depend on a host of other factors, such as total miles traveled.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
>
> Archive Search Engine Now Available at http://www.realbig.com/detomaso/
>
> DeTomaso mailing list
> DeTomaso at list.realbig.com
> http://list.realbig.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
>



-- 







Michael L. Shortt
Savannah, Georgia
www.michaelshortt.com
michael at michaelshortt.com
912-232-9390


This email is protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy
Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally
privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you
have received this message in error, then delete it.  Thank you