[DeTomaso] NPC (Speeding ticket check returned)

[Mad Dog Antenucci]

HAHAHAHA

 
Mad Dawg Antenucci 
Team Pantera Racing 
The 1st & still the only vintage race team in open road racing 
www.teampanteraracing.com




________________________________
From: Jar <cadhearse60 at verizon.net>
To: detomaso at realbig.com
Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2009 4:12:43 PM
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] NPC (Speeding ticket check returned)

"Traffic Court" is a sham venue operating under unconstitutional  
equity law jurisdiction where the accused have no rights other than  
what is given to them by the corporate state.
It is more akin to military court than a constitutional jury trial.  A  
state issued driver's is the means by which we agree to waive our  
rights in order to not be harassed by law
enforcement officers for operating a motor vehicle to exercise our  
right to move around at will (liberty).  The DMV "Certificate of  
Title" is the means by which we surrender
ownership of our motor vehicle property to the state in order to be  
free of the harassment of law enforcement officers and be allowed to  
operate their property as our own.

Yes, you do not legally own your house, your boat, your car, your  
motorcycle, your earnings etc. etc.   Anything of any real value is  
legally owned by the state and they can take it back
any time you do not pay them "registration fees", "property taxes",  
"licensing fees", "income taxes" etc etc.

"Pay me to leave you alone,"  is what they say.  Or, more deceptively  
"Pay me for protection."  This is what mobsters and street gangs do.  
It is called extortion.

America is not a free country and it never really has been.  The judge  
(?) (don't clerks do this kind of thing?) who sent this check back is  
a horrifying example of the weak-minded,
cold blooded arrogance that infects our social institutions which were  
apparently created to benefit us all but over time have become more  
parasitical than beneficial.

Not only must we pay the extortionists, we must be on our best  
behavior when we do it and not express our discontent.     Shocking!




On Apr 9, 2009, at 3:06 PM, Secondary wrote:

> Asa Jay,  I think you may be confusing the purpose of the hearings  
> where an
> officer must be present.  The first appearance is to enter a plea  
> and ask
> for a trial if you plead not guilty.  The officer is not present for  
> this
> hearing and testimony is not taken.  It is simply an opportunity to  
> meet
> with the prosecutor and plea bargain if you are so inclined.
>
>
>
> If you plead not guilty and request a trial (which will be at a  
> later date)
> the officer MUST appear to give testimony.  His/Her notes can't  
> testify for
> him; additionally, you would be deprived of your right to "confront"  
> your
> accuser and ask questions.  What has changed in some jurisdictions  
> is that
> you no longer have a right to a jury trial for traffic infractions -  
> your
> only option is trial to the court (judge.)
>
>
>
> Terry
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
>
> Archive Search Engine Now Available at http://www.realbig.com/ 
> detomaso/
>
> DeTomaso mailing list
> DeTomaso at list.realbig.com
> http://list.realbig.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso

_______________________________________________

Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA

Archive Search Engine Now Available at http://www.realbig.com/detomaso/

DeTomaso mailing list
DeTomaso at list.realbig.com
http://list.realbig.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso