[DeTomaso] [SPAM]Re: NPC (Speeding ticket check returned)

[Robert Simpson]

Well said.

Bob
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jar" <cadhearse60 at verizon.net>
To: <detomaso at realbig.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 4:12 PM
Subject: [SPAM]Re: [DeTomaso] NPC (Speeding ticket check returned)


> "Traffic Court" is a sham venue operating under unconstitutional  
> equity law jurisdiction where the accused have no rights other than  
> what is given to them by the corporate state.
> It is more akin to military court than a constitutional jury trial.  A  
> state issued driver's is the means by which we agree to waive our  
> rights in order to not be harassed by law
> enforcement officers for operating a motor vehicle to exercise our  
> right to move around at will (liberty).  The DMV "Certificate of  
> Title" is the means by which we surrender
> ownership of our motor vehicle property to the state in order to be  
> free of the harassment of law enforcement officers and be allowed to  
> operate their property as our own.
> 
> Yes, you do not legally own your house, your boat, your car, your  
> motorcycle, your earnings etc. etc.   Anything of any real value is  
> legally owned by the state and they can take it back
> any time you do not pay them "registration fees", "property taxes",  
> "licensing fees", "income taxes" etc etc.
> 
> "Pay me to leave you alone,"  is what they say.  Or, more deceptively  
> "Pay me for protection."  This is what mobsters and street gangs do.   
> It is called extortion.
> 
> America is not a free country and it never really has been.  The judge  
> (?) (don't clerks do this kind of thing?) who sent this check back is  
> a horrifying example of the weak-minded,
> cold blooded arrogance that infects our social institutions which were  
> apparently created to benefit us all but over time have become more  
> parasitical than beneficial.
> 
> Not only must we pay the extortionists, we must be on our best  
> behavior when we do it and not express our discontent.     Shocking!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Apr 9, 2009, at 3:06 PM, Secondary wrote:
> 
>> Asa Jay,  I think you may be confusing the purpose of the hearings  
>> where an
>> officer must be present.  The first appearance is to enter a plea  
>> and ask
>> for a trial if you plead not guilty.  The officer is not present for  
>> this
>> hearing and testimony is not taken.  It is simply an opportunity to  
>> meet
>> with the prosecutor and plea bargain if you are so inclined.
>>
>>
>>
>> If you plead not guilty and request a trial (which will be at a  
>> later date)
>> the officer MUST appear to give testimony.  His/Her notes can't  
>> testify for
>> him; additionally, you would be deprived of your right to "confront"  
>> your
>> accuser and ask questions.  What has changed in some jurisdictions  
>> is that
>> you no longer have a right to a jury trial for traffic infractions -  
>> your
>> only option is trial to the court (judge.)
>>
>>
>>
>> Terry
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
>>
>> Archive Search Engine Now Available at http://www.realbig.com/ 
>> detomaso/
>>
>> DeTomaso mailing list
>> DeTomaso at list.realbig.com
>> http://list.realbig.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
> 
> Archive Search Engine Now Available at http://www.realbig.com/detomaso/
> 
> DeTomaso mailing list
> DeTomaso at list.realbig.com
> http://list.realbig.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso