[DeTomaso] Mangusta Rumors.....

[ProvaMo.com]

I don't know about exactly which 289 (HiPo or a lesser) but a number of Mangustas
in the Registry are listed as having (or came with) a 289.  Generally they were all
or mostly all Euro-delivery Mangustas.

Chuck


-----Original Message-----
From: detomaso-bounces at realbig.com [mailto:detomaso-bounces at realbig.com] On Behalf Of
steven.liebenow at att.net
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 3:59 PM
To: detomaso, mailing list
Subject: [DeTomaso] Mangusta Rumors.....

Mike wrote earlier:
 
>>>The early Euro Mangustas used a Shelby-spec 289, but most Mangustas were 
equipped with a very weedy 230-horsepower 302.

What he meant to say, was that at least one early Mangusta #508 (was local to club
here, may still be!) is indeed equipped with a HIPO 289.  I wouldn't go so far as to
call it Shelby spec'd....  There were HiPo 289 Mustangs in production.....so did
Shelby put the package together, or did Ford....and one borrowed from the other????

REGARDLESS, apparently a couple of Mangustas were undoubtedly build with the higher
winding 289.  What is completely unknown, is just how many were built with it.........

My thoughts are that Alejandro, being the tight screw that he was, put the 302 in,
because it was cheap. Cheaper than the 289, and available, because 289 production was
waning for the new 302 design.  Regular 289's eventually ceased being installed in
production cars in 1969.  

HiPo's carried special cylinder heads with built in valve spring pockets, adjustable
rocker arms, dual point distributor, beefier main bearing caps, and a slightly larger
Autolite carb, plus some specially treated rods/bolts, and a crank that was selected
from production units to have a minimum Brinell(sp?) rating for strength.  (True hipo
cranks will have a dimple on one of the main throws indicating that it had been
tested....)   Oh, and of course, it had the monster front harmonic balancer!  Can't
recall if it was a solid lifter cam or not..... All this special stuff adds up to $$$.

Anyway, the 302 never wound as tight as the 289, and the "story" goes that buyers were
upset because their car didn't wind to 6K+ rpms.  The rumor mill would have DeT
installing new cranks, cam, and valve springs  (destroke the 302 to a 289?) in order
to appease the high winding buyers that complained.

In reality, my guess is that they got new valve springs and a taller cam....and were
sent down the road "thinking" they had a formula 1 motor in the car now.....able to
take on Ferraris and stomp them into the dirt....... or something like that.  They
would have still been somewhat rpm limited by the stock cast iron intake of the days
and the small (exhaust) port headers. Probably around 6K....before HP dropped off.

I have always tried to find early Goose owners that could confirm or deny the
existence of 289's in their cars, but have come up with a giant Goose egg (HAH!) for
now, other than the one car that I have seen in person and verified.

If any of you Goose owners HAVE a HP289 car, please pipe up!

Ciao!
Steve



_______________________________________________

Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA

Archive Search Engine Now Available at http://www.realbig.com/detomaso/

DeTomaso mailing list
DeTomaso at list.realbig.com
http://list.realbig.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.7.0/1683 - Release Date: 9/21/2008 10:10 AM