[DeTomaso] NPC: REALLY NO PANTERA CONTENT, US Auto Industry Bailout OPINION
j g
notstock at yahoo.com
Mon Dec 8 14:09:18 EST 2008
man are you wrong about unions.
Unions came about because management historicaly has always exploited workers for the managements benefit and could care less how many undesirable workers died or suffered because of their greed . That still goes on today under the outsourcing and visa programs for workers from underdeveloped countries . Why did Boeing and other aircraft companies end up with unionized engineers?? because the workers were being abused mentally ,economically and in some cases physically ,this lead to collective bargaining and helped produce a fair wage and safe working conditions that are just moraly right .
I worked for the big three at one time . The attitude from management was all about how much they could extract in blood from the worker , Still is that way in most companies based on the English model of accounting , (remember Bob Cratchit from a Christmas carol that has been and still is the exploitive issue rather then the moraly correct way to deal with employees) that is why jobs are exported to countries where the worker can become exploited for managements bonus gain , now they are faceless. That is also why companies Like Sun micro, microsoft, hewlett packard, Texas instruments, all use H1bs and L1A visas and import slave labor (legal by congress and taking well paid, educated US jobs i might add, not like the poor less than minumum wage guy from south of the border doing jobs no one wants) FACT Sun and Others were actually found in court to be purposely violating US law with regards to age and visas and fined as a result .
jg
--- On Mon, 12/8/08, michael at michaelshortt.com <michael at michaelshortt.com> wrote:
> From: michael at michaelshortt.com <michael at michaelshortt.com>
> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] NPC: REALLY NO PANTERA CONTENT, US Auto Industry Bailout OPINION
> To: kenn_green at yahoo.com
> Cc: "Pantera Forum" <detomaso at realbig.com>, "Asa Jay Laughton" <asajay at asajay.com>, notstock at yahoo.com
> Date: Monday, December 8, 2008, 11:19 AM
> Even the movie business has been hit hard, so many
> productions in Canada,
> Romania, etc.
> and unless your state is willing to pay these MF's with
> incentives, you can
> forget them coming to your town.
> So many of the stars could stop it, Tom Selleck shoots all
> those cowboy
> films in Canada, all he would have to do is say NO, but he
> doesn't.
> The entire movie, Cold Mountain with Jude Law and N. Kidman
> was shot in
> Romania, supposed to be the South during the civil war.
> They could have
> said no, but they didn't.
>
> The fact is that Movies get 6-75% of their revenue outside
> the USA now, it
> is a world market and the minute that these idiots opened
> up Red China and
> then compounded it with NAFTA, we were screwed.
>
> You can't buy an American Made TV, haven't been
> able to do that is 25 years.
>
> Sooner or later it will be cars and most other appliances,
> shipping costs
> are the hold up, nothing more, let then develop nuke
> container ships and we
> are so F^%$ked it won't be funny!
>
> High Point, NC is the world Furniture Capital in name only,
> most of it is
> now made overseas, only upholstered goods are still made
> here and only
> because shipping is too expensive ).
>
> The unions have killed the car industry and for them to
> make "Concessions is
> a freaking joke, they are simply NO LONGER NEEDED, theses
> companies need to
> bust the unions and Bankruptcy can do that, but the unions
> give big to the
> politicos and that ain't gonna happen.
> so these loans are just toilet paper money going down the
> drain.
>
> After these idiots pump trillions into the economy by
> printing more money
> with nothing to back it up, look for runaway inflation in
> the next few
> years, remember Carter ( loser, worst president ever ) ,
> when a car loan was
> 15%-22% if you had GOOD CREDIT.
>
> It's coming.
>
> This is a service economy, if you make something ( aside
> from big jets and
> military equipment), you are screwed! If you provide a
> service, you might
> have a chance.
>
> Save this email, I told you so.
>
> BTW, this is always followed by a war to thin the herd and
> cause a demand
> for more stuff to fix the stuff that got blown TFU. Of
> course, we'll fit
> the bill for that too, and then even little Paki kids will
> have better
> water, schools, books and communications than those who
> live in New Mexico
> and West Virginia.
>
> Michael in Savannah
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Ken Green
> <kenn_green at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > By "gut reaction" I was only referring to
> closing the borders to foreign
> > products. Most of my engineering career was in
> aerospace, and the secutity
> > clearances pretty much blocked foreign employment, at
> least where I worked,
> > although the jobs that only required a confidential
> clearance were probably
> > open to non-citizens.
> >
> > I agree with you that there is a big problem, and I
> mostly blame it on the
> > bean counters running companies here, The gal (Carly
> Fiorina) recently
> > booted from HP had a degree in philosophy?? Figure
> that one out. The board
> > said she did a great job, the stock only lost half
> it's value and laid off a
> > bunch of employees under her leadership. I can't
> see that as success, I
> > still can't understand why McCain thought she was
> so great???
> >
> > I think most of the people running the biggest
> companies don't even think
> > of themselves as American any more. They view the
> companies they run as
> > global, and if they can move a job outside the US, and
> increase their mega
> > buck bonus as a result, it's off to China.
> >
> > If anything saves our country, I think it will be
> small to medium size
> > businesses where the owners (or at least those with
> still a controlling
> > share of the stock) care about building something and
> creating jobs.
> >
> > Ken
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- On Mon, 12/8/08, j g <notstock at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > From: j g <notstock at yahoo.com>
> > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] NPC: REALLY NO PANTERA
> CONTENT, US Auto Industry
> > Bailout OPINION
> > To: "Pantera Forum"
> <detomaso at realbig.com>, "Asa Jay Laughton"
> <
> > asajay at asajay.com>, kenn_green at yahoo.com
> > Date: Monday, December 8, 2008, 8:05 AM
> >
> > This is more than Gut reaction , I have particularly
> been present to
> > discussions by government representatives that have
> said ,to general
> > managers
> > and personel managers how to hire hib or l1a jobs
> and how to skirt the
> > law
> > requiring a U.S. posting and review. The worst i have
> ever heard said "is
> > by hireing l1a or h1b visas you can at any time
> terminate the sponcership
> > so the
> > worker can be controlled to work the hours and
> conditions that benefit the
> > company and if they complain the company just pulls
> the sponcership to
> > eliminate a problematic worker." I have seen a
> document by the defense
> > logistics arm Of the Gao that particularly tells
> defence contractors to
> > hire
> > irish and english engineers over US born because they
> are easy to get
> > clearences
> > and since they do not know the real economic situation
> in the US are
> > willing to
> > relocate at half the US pay rate , speak english and
> become at the graces
> > of the
> > company so do not complain about the harsh
> > working conditions or wages that a US born free agent
> would for fear of
> > deportation , This allows defence contractors to
> reduce their labor rate on
> > government bids.
> >
> > Jg
> >
> >
> > --- On Mon, 12/8/08, Ken Green
> <kenn_green at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Ken Green <kenn_green at yahoo.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] NPC: REALLY NO PANTERA
> CONTENT, US Auto Industry
> > Bailout OPINION
> > > To: "Pantera Forum"
> <detomaso at realbig.com>, "Asa Jay
> > Laughton" <asajay at asajay.com>,
> notstock at yahoo.com
> > > Date: Monday, December 8, 2008, 9:23 AM
> > > I think most of us have the same gut reaction
> that you do,
> > > but the big problem I see was shown by the cars
> that US
> > > auto makers made before the Japanese raised the
> bar. I
> > > don't know how you protect American jobs and
> industry
> > > without corporations (run by the bean counters)
> settling
> > > into mediocrity. But it does seem that the
> global economy
> > > has not benefited the American worker much.
> > >
> > > Ken
> > >
> > > --- On Mon, 12/8/08, j g
> <notstock at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: j g <notstock at yahoo.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] NPC: REALLY NO PANTERA
> CONTENT, US
> > > Auto Industry Bailout OPINION
> > > To: "Pantera Forum"
> <detomaso at realbig.com>,
> > > "Asa Jay Laughton"
> <asajay at asajay.com>
> > > Date: Monday, December 8, 2008, 6:06 AM
> > >
> > > how about we cancel all h1b and L1a visas, all
> green cards
> > > , then force
> > > "made in the usa" content legislation
> for all
> > > industries just like
> > > europe, china, india, japan and all of asia do as
> well .
> > > i know that here in dallas 30 plus percent of
> texas
> > > instruments engineering
> > > jobs are l1a or h1b visas yet we have enough us
> born
> > > engineers to fill the same
> > > positions that are qualified out of work.
> > > to say restructure is jargon for "build
> overseas
> > > " and put americans
> > > out of work.
> > >
> > > How about full employement for americans first .
> > >
> > > that will put jobs back here in the usa and kepp
> our
> > > economy moving,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- On Fri, 12/5/08, Asa Jay Laughton
> > > <asajay at asajay.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Asa Jay Laughton
> <asajay at asajay.com>
> > > > Subject: [DeTomaso] NPC: REALLY NO PANTERA
> CONTENT,
> > > US Auto Industry
> > > Bailout OPINION
> > > > To: "Pantera Forum"
> > > <detomaso at realbig.com>
> > > > Date: Friday, December 5, 2008, 10:21 PM
> > > > This is POLITICAL, but NON- PARTISAN. (no
> stumping
> > > > candidates, not
> > > > speeches, no jokes)
> > > > If this gets me banned... oh well, I've
> said my
> > > peace.
> > > > This is -MY- opinion. If you AGREE, I would
> strongly
> > > > encourage you to
> > > > WRITE your congressman (or woman)
> > > > This is about the AUTO BAILOUT being
> considered in the
> > > U.S.
> > > > Congress
> > > > If you are NOT INTERESTED, DELETE NOW
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> ***************************************************************
> > > > The REAL way to Bailout the Auto industry:
> > > >
> > > > Two sections:
> > > > - Why Congress should NOT give any money to
> the
> > > automakers
> > > > directly
> > > > - How the money -should- be put to use and
> why
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Why Congress SHOULD NOT give any money
> directly to the
> > > > automakers:
> > > > - This will only put money in -their-
> pockets
> > > > - It will NOT reduce inventories
> > > > - It will NOT make room for more
> manufacturing
> > > > - It will NOT benefit anyone down-line
> > > (dealerships,
> > > > parts makers, etc.)
> > > > - It will NOT prevent layoffs
> > > > - It WILL ALLOW the Big Three to payoff
> the unions
> > > even
> > > > if it can't
> > > > give out work.
> > > > - It WILL ALLOW high level corporate
> employees,
> > > > CEO's, etc. to
> > > > BAILOUT of the company with high dollar
> pensions,
> > > bonuses
> > > > and severance
> > > > packages. (It happend with the banking
> bailout, what
> > > makes
> > > > you think it
> > > > won't with the auto makers?)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - How the money -should- be put to use and
> why:
> > > > - GIVE THE MONEY TO THE TAXPAYERS
> > > > - A sight-draft type of check
> > > > - Can ONLY be cashed in at a Big
> Three auto
> > > dealer
> > > > - May NOT be used to buy a foreign
> car (made
> > > by
> > > > anyone other
> > > > than a big three company)
> > > > - May NOT be cashed at a bank
> > > > - Transferable (in case the taxpayer
> does not
> > > or
> > > > can not drive)
> > > > - Auto makers and dealers may NOT
> manipulate
> > > MSRP
> > > > - Who get's them?
> > > > - Impractical for every taxpayer
> > > > - 140 million taxpayers as of
> 2007 (IRS
> > > data)
> > > > - $25 billion divided by 140
> million is
> > > $178
> > > > per person.
> > > > - Eligible group must be narrowed:
> > > > - $25 billion divided by a
> $20,000
> > > sight-draft
> > > > per person is
> > > > 1,250,000 recipients
> > > > - The number of recipients goes
> up if
> > > Congress
> > > > approves more.
> > > > - Possible eligibility by income
> level?
> > > > - To what income bracket
> will
> > > 1,250,000
> > > > checks be used up?
> > > > - Possible first come, first
> served
> > > > - Apply with U.S. Government
> > > > - Web site or phone line
> > > > - similar to the TV
> Converter
> > > coupons
> > > > - Must be an eligible
> Taxpayer
> > > > - Must be registered to vote
> > > > - voters are the people
> who should
> > > have
> > > > a say in this
> > > > - Must have valid drivers
> license
> > > > - Only ONE per eligible
> person or
> > > family
> > > > (household)
> > > > - U.S. Government verifies
> eligibility
> > > and
> > > > issues
> > > > sight-draft
> > > > - The dealer completes the sight-draft
> check with
> > > a
> > > > valid VIN and
> > > > presents it for payment.
> > > > - The dealer pays the Big Three auto
> maker
> > > > - And thus, they get their bailout
> money
> > > > - Benefits the Tax payer
> > > > - They can get a new car increasing
> personal
> > > > equity, mobility, etc.
> > > > - Benefits the environment
> > > > - New cars are more efficient
> > > > - Many buyers will most likely get
> rid of
> > > their
> > > > older car
> > > > - Benefits the dealership
> > > > - They sell the cars, stimulating
> local
> > > economies
> > > > - Benefits the Big Three auto makers
> > > > - They get rid of inventories
> > > > - It makes room for more
> manufacturing
> > > > - Benefits the auto parts industry
> > > > - The Big Three will need more parts
> to build
> > > more
> > > > cars
> > > > - People will need spares or
> replacements for
> > > parts
> > > > that break
> > > > - Benefits local governments
> > > > - Sales taxes, license fees, etc.
> > > > - Keeps more people employed
> > > > - See the benefits listed above
> > > >
> > > > Think about it for a minute, it makes more
> sense.
> > > Giving
> > > > the auto
> > > > makers the money doesn't stimulate local
> > > economies. It
> > > > just lets them
> > > > continue with the status quo; supplying
> overpriced
> > > benefits
> > > > and inflated
> > > > wages to union employees, building more cars
> in an
> > > already
> > > > super-saturated market. In addition, not
> many people
> > > are
> > > > buying new cars
> > > > right now, so if you give the auto makers
> the money,
> > > it may
> > > > just put
> > > > more unsold inventory into the pipeline
> which in turn
> > > > increases the
> > > > entire problem they have in the first place.
> > > >
> > > > Who says giving the auto makers the money
> will change
> > > their
> > > > strategy?
> > > > If I had been a CEO of a major auto maker, I
> would
> > > have
> > > > been re-thinking
> > > > business strategy years ago, not living with
> razor
> > > thin
> > > > profits, or even
> > > > losses. You don't run a successful
> business that
> > > way.
> > > > I wasn't too
> > > > surprised when they showed up in Congress
> the first
> > > time
> > > > with no plan,
> > > > and frankly if they had a plan they
> wouldn't need
> > > the
> > > > money in the first
> > > > place. So if Congress wants to bail them
> out by
> > > giving
> > > > them money,
> > > > fine, but let them get it as they deserve,
> from the
> > > > taxpayers and not
> > > > directly from Congress. Give the bailout
> money to the
> > > > taxpayer and let
> > > > the taxpayer make the choice of who they
> bailout by
> > > > exercising their tax
> > > > money as a vote when they buy a car.
> > > >
> > > > It's an all around better idea.
> > > >
> > > > Write your congressman (or woman)
> > > >
> > > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > >
> > > > Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
> > > >
> > > > Archive Search Engine Now Available at
> > > > http://www.realbig.com/detomaso/
> > > >
> > > > DeTomaso mailing list
> > > > DeTomaso at list.realbig.com
> > > >
> http://list.realbig.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
> > > _______________________________________________
> > >
> > > Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
> > >
> > > Archive Search Engine Now Available at
> > > http://www.realbig.com/detomaso/
> > >
> > > DeTomaso mailing list
> > > DeTomaso at list.realbig.com
> > > http://list.realbig.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
> > > _______________________________________________
> > >
> > > Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
> > >
> > > Archive Search Engine Now Available at
> > > http://www.realbig.com/detomaso/
> > >
> > > DeTomaso mailing list
> > > DeTomaso at list.realbig.com
> > > http://list.realbig.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
> >
> > Archive Search Engine Now Available at
> http://www.realbig.com/detomaso/
> >
> > DeTomaso mailing list
> > DeTomaso at list.realbig.com
> > http://list.realbig.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > Detomaso Forum Managed by POCA
> >
> > Archive Search Engine Now Available at
> http://www.realbig.com/detomaso/
> >
> > DeTomaso mailing list
> > DeTomaso at list.realbig.com
> > http://list.realbig.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Michael L. Shortt
> Savannah, Georgia
> www.michaelshortt.com
> michael at michaelshortt.com
> 912-232-9390
>
>
> This email is protected by the Electronic Communications
> Privacy
> Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be
> legally
> privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified
> that any retention, dissemination, distribution or copying
> of this
> communication is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the
> sender that you
> have received this message in error, then delete it. Thank
> you
More information about the DeTomaso
mailing list