
Hey Michael, I think the best way to put this controversy to bed is if you or your dad could speak about not being cooperative in regards to the the use of another printer that supposedly afforded the club an $8,000 savings. That really seems to be the only issue that continues this controversy and I still haven't heard either of you discuss the allegation. I'm sure your response will cut this thread for good and allow us all to move on with the rebuilding of this great club. Marshall SmithPresident, San Diego Panteras Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Michael Haney <paso750@gmail.com> Date: 8/15/16 10:36 PM (GMT-08:00) To: 'Judith McCartney' <jpoca2@hotmail.com>, 'Effie Richards' <erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>, 'Julian Kift' <julian_kift@hotmail.com> Cc: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com, 'laurie Basile' <laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Thank you very much, Judy. I really wish this thread would just die. I know that this isn't the answer you're fishing for, but it'll have to do since it's the truth. Nancy quit and took her associate (me) with her because she was tired of hearing from me all about Shortt's efforts to take over every aspect of POCA. I didn't fight her decision because I was in turn tired of Shortt's intimidation and bullying tactics. Frankly, being on the Board wasn't fun anymore and I was also very tired of Shortt's constant preening. As a matter of record, I resigned from the Board BEFORE Profiles #3 even went to the printer. I had nearly finished it and decided that I didn't want to let the POCA members down. I really didn't want to contribute any more to Shortt's regime, but my conscience won. Even after I sent the magazine in, I still had to deal with Shortt. He decided to interfere with the printer, sent them a database with a whole bunch of problematic info and threaten nonpayment if he didn't get preliminary proofs. How do I know this? I received a call while I was at work from the woman working in Allegra Printing's mail room. She called Shortt and he wouldn't help her with the database and ignored her questions. Having no one else to call, she called me. I in turn contacted Judy, our Membership Director, who fixed the problems that Shortt created. Regarding Shortt's allegations of graft, if anyone can find a connection between my family and anyone who EVER worked at Allegra Printing in Reno, Nevada, (or indeed any of Allegra's branches) please let me know. My Dad might respond as well, but he's been pretty busy caring for my SERIOUSLY ill Mom who was in the hospital for the last two weeks and who might finally be able to come back home in a couple more. Now, can we finally put this "controversy" to rest? Mike Haney -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Judith McCartney Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 PM To: Effie Richards; Julian Kift Cc: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Mike Haney gave his resignation months way head of Jacks, two diff reasons. Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator.
From: erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:43:43 -0700 To: julian_kift@hotmail.com CC: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurieferrari@aol.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
Julian these are the same questions some of us have had and have been waiting for a reply or statement. I'm willing to give the board some time to come up with one.
Sent from Effie's iPad
On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Julian Kift <julian_kift@hotmail.com> wrote:
I have digested all the emails on this topic and to be honest it still doesn't sit well in my gut.
Presumably the BOD voted in favor of changing printers based upon the quotes presented. Did they not have all the facts and if not why did they not question further? Did Jack have all the facts w hen he resigned or were his and Mike Haney's resignations simply an outright stand against changing printer?
Why did Michael push to change printer if he knew there was only pennies between it?
Julian __________________________________________________________________
From: DeTomaso <detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> on behalf of marshall smith <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:11 AM To: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurieferrari@aol.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
I find it funny that three months after the Fun Rally we are now hearing that Shortt's bid for printing did not include shipping. Shortt is a lot of things but a mistake like this...? I was listening in on this meeting also and I know what I heard. Apparently, the board convinced 'some' members of this so-called discrepancy month's ago. Why wasn't this information, if it exists, relayed to ALL of us in a timely manner? Marshall
-------------------------------------------- On Mon, 8/15/16, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote: Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations To: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Date: Monday, August 15, 2016, 9:57 AM
Dear AJ,
I have always respected you and your opinions but in this case you are incorrect as far as the resignation of Jack DeRyke. I was on the Board of Directors' conference call where he was asked to stay and he adamantly refused to if the printer changed. Jack's resignation was specifically because of the change in printer! You can go research that phone conference call, or the minutes of the meeting, as the facts are saved. As far as Mike Haney's resignation, that was done by his Mrs. for their reasons which most likely were aligned with their parents.
Laurie
In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? [1]asajay@asajay.com writes: The last? I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was interested in doing a? -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for me, it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out on full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss.? However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs properly.? I? have more faith that the present board members will properly investigate? and sort it out for everyone. I am on-board with electronic delivery,? though I do admit it's nice to just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? It's also easier to hand-off to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do you really fix that? I would think (and I don't? know), that the ClubExpress membership database might be able to include a? "preference" as part of the member's profile or details.? Just as I? can set an address and phone number, if I could check a box for Electronic? delivery or paper copies, or both, and select whatever I wanted for each? item (Profiles versus Newsletter), that might be ideal. However,? I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well could be? that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to print 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the board will? look at as well. Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have? heard (from more than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign? "because POCA changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter? content that in essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For? a guy that appeared to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the? by-laws (and it's unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't? feel they applied to him. For the record, as I understand it, POCA? has changed printers -twice- since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related? to the DeRykes) got out of the business.? So the "family tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not a factor in the resignations. Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) Asa? Jay Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired &? Shelley? Mar
-----Original Message----- From: detomaso-request <detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com> To: detomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> Sent: Mon, Aug 15, 2016 9:00 am Subject: DeTomaso Digest, Vol 146, Issue 20 Send DeTomaso mailing list submissions to [2]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit [3]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to detomaso-[4]request@server.detomasolist.com You can reach the person managing the list at detomaso-[5]owner@server.detomasolist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of DeTomaso digest..." Daily Detomaso List Digest Today's Topics: 1. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic (marshallgsmith) 2. Re: De Tomaso Pantera GTS on eBay! again $250K!! (Michael Cox) 3. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic (Stephen)
--- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:27:43 -0700 From: marshallgsmith <[6]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> To: [7]P6746@aol.com, [8]asajay@asajay.com, [9]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic Message-ID: <[10]sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I have a couple questions Bob:
Calling this situation "multiple dues levels" seems to be making the issue too complex. There are some members that are opting to not have printed magazines mailed which should make those members eligible for a discount because of the savings. What is your estimate of the length of time that it would take the board to arrange for a vote of the membership to change the bylaws to allow for this discount? Who specifically made that apples-to-apples comparison you refer to? I agree that the editors should have the most influence ?on the process. ?However, our editors of both publications seem to have a hard time reporting to the members about ANY issues pertaining to the publication's themselves. Might that change in the near future or will radio silence be the norm here? Marshall Smith Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: P6746--- via DeTomaso <[11]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> Date: 8/14/16 3:10 PM (GMT-08:00) To: [12]asajay@asajay.com, [13]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic To use a cliche, we're working on it.? Most of what has been mentioned is in the pipeline.?? However, there are restrictions, particularly with the By-Laws as they currently? stand.? There are no provisions for multiple dues levels,? particularly pertaining to how a member elects to have their club? publications delivered, etc.? That will take time as any changes or? amendments must be approved by the whole membership. The consensus seems to be that the Profiles would? continue as a print publication for all except foreign members who elect to? receive it digitally.? As far as printing is concerned, it is that first copy that is? so expensive, it is the subsequent copies that bring down the per unit? cost.? So as fewer units are produced and shipped, the cost per unit? increases but not proportionately.?? An apples to apples comparison was made between an online? printer and the current printer for both printing and mailing and the difference? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but for the whole run.? As far as I am concerned, it is the editors who should have? the most influence as to how and where their product is produced.? They are? the ones who must work with the printers and mailing houses on a regular? basis. Bob Reid? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? [14]asajay@asajay.com writes: The last? I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was interested in doing a? -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for me, it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out on full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss.? However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs properly.? I? have more faith that the present board members will properly investigate? and sort it out for everyone. I am on-board with electronic delivery,? though I do admit it's nice to just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? It's also easier to hand-off to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do you really fix that? I would think (and I don't? know), that the ClubExpress membership database might be able to include a? "preference" as part of the member's profile or details.? Just as I? can set an address and phone number, if I could check a box for Electronic? delivery or paper copies, or both, and select whatever I wanted for each? item (Profiles versus Newsletter), that might be ideal. However,? I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well could be? that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to print 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the board will? look at as well. Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have? heard (from more than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign? "because POCA changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter? content that in essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For? a guy that appeared to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the? by-laws (and it's unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't? feel they applied to him. For the record, as I understand it, POCA? has changed printers -twice- since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related? to the DeRykes) got out of the business.? So the "family tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not a factor in the resignations. Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) Asa? Jay Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired &? Shelley? Marie Spokane,? WA ****************************** [15]http://w7tsc.org [16]http://www.teampanteraracing.com _______________________________________________ Detomaso? Email List is not managed by POCA Posted emails must not exceed 1.5? Megabytes DeTomaso mailing? list [17]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com [18]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso To? manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) use the? links above. Members who post to this list grant license to the list to? forward any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of the? list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an archive or? approve the archiving of list? messages. ?? To use a cliche, we're working on it. ?? Most of what has been mentioned is in the pipeline.? However, there are ?? restrictions, particularly with the By-Laws as they currently stand. ?? There are no provisions for multiple dues levels, ?? particularly pertaining to how a member elects to have their club ?? publications delivered, etc.? That will take time as any changes or ?? amendments must be approved by the whole membership. ?? The consensus seems to be that the Profiles would continue as a print ?? publication for all except foreign members who elect to receive it ?? digitally. ?? As far as printing is concerned, it is that first copy that is so ?? expensive, it is the subsequent copies that bring down the per unit ?? cost.? So as fewer units are produced and shipped, the cost per unit ?? increases but not proportionately. ?? An apples to apples comparison was made between an online printer and ?? the current printer for both printing and mailing and the difference ?? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but for the whole run. ?? As far as I am concerned, it is the editors who should have the most ?? influence as to how and where their product is produced.? They are the ?? ones who must work with the printers and mailing houses on a regular ?? basis. ?? Bob Reid ?? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, ?? [19]asajay@asajay.com writes: ???? The last I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was ???? interested ???? in doing a -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for ???? me, ???? it's a wait and see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out ???? on ???? full-color and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss. ???? However, I also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs ???? properly.? I have more faith that the present board members will ???? properly investigate and sort it out for everyone. ???? I am on-board with electronic delivery, though I do admit it's nice ???? to ???? just sit back and read a paper copy too.? It's also easier to ???? hand-off ???? to Sam so he can read it later.? How do you really fix that? ???? I would think (and I don't know), that the ClubExpress membership ???? database might be able to include a "preference" as part of the ???? member's ???? profile or details.? Just as I can set an address and phone number, ???? if I ???? could check a box for Electronic delivery or paper copies, or both, ???? and ???? select whatever I wanted for each item (Profiles versus Newsletter), ???? that might be ideal. ???? However, I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well ???? could be that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to ???? print ???? 50, or 10 (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the ???? board will look at as well. ???? Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have heard (from ???? more ???? than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign "because POCA ???? changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter content that ???? in ???? essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For a guy that ???? appeared ???? to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the by-laws (and ???? it's ???? unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't feel they ???? applied ???? to him. ???? For the record, as I understand it, POCA has changed printers ???? -twice- ???? since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related to the DeRykes) got out ???? of ???? the business.? So the "family tie-in" previously eluded to, was not ???? a ???? factor in the resignations. ???? Just my $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) ???? Asa? Jay ???? Asa Jay Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired ???? &? Shelley Marie ???? Spokane, WA ???? ****************************** ???? [20]http://w7tsc.org ???? [21]http://www.teampanteraracing.com ???? _______________________________________________ ???? Detomaso Email List is not managed by POCA ???? Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes ???? DeTomaso mailing list ???? [22]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com ???? [23]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso ???? To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, ???? etc.) use the links above. ???? Members who post to this list grant license to the list to forward ???? any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of ???? the list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an ???? archive or approve the archiving of list messages. _______________________________________________ Detomaso Email List is not managed by POCA Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes DeTomaso mailing list [24]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com [25]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) use the links above. Members who post to this list grant license to the list to forward any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of the list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an archive or approve the archiving of list messages.
From: erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:43:43 -0700 To: julian_kift@hotmail.com CC: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurieferrari@aol.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
Julian these are the same questions some of us have had and have been waiting for a reply or statement. I'm willing to give the board some time to come up with one.
Sent from Effie's iPad
On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Julian Kift <julian_kift@hotmail.com> wrote:
I have digested all the emails on this topic and to be honest it still doesn't sit well in my gut.
Presumably the BOD voted in favor of changing printers based upon
Hey Michael, I think the best way to put this controversy to bed is if you or your dad could speak about not being cooperative in regards to the the use of another printer that supposedly afforded the club an $8,000 savings. That really seems to be the only issue that continues this controversy and I still haven't heard either of you discuss the allegation. I'm sure your response will cut this thread for good and allow us all to move on with the rebuilding of this great club. Marshall Smith President, San Diego Panteras Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Michael Haney <paso750@gmail.com> Date: 8/15/16 10:36 PM (GMT-08:00) To: 'Judith McCartney' <jpoca2@hotmail.com>, 'Effie Richards' <erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>, 'Julian Kift' <julian_kift@hotmail.com> Cc: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com, 'laurie Basile' <laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Thank you very much, Judy. I really wish this thread would just die. I know that this isn't the answer you're fishing for, but it'll have to do since it's the truth. Nancy quit and took her associate (me) with her because she was tired of hearing from me all about Shortt's efforts to take over every aspect of POCA. I didn't fight her decision because I was in turn tired of Shortt's intimidation and bullying tactics. Frankly, being on the Board wasn't fun anymore and I was also very tired of Shortt's constant preening. As a matter of record, I resigned from the Board BEFORE Profiles #3 even went to the printer. I had nearly finished it and decided that I didn't want to let the POCA members down. I really didn't want to contribute any more to Shortt's regime, but my conscience won. Even after I sent the magazine in, I still had to deal with Shortt. He decided to interfere with the printer, sent them a database with a whole bunch of problematic info and threaten nonpayment if he didn't get preliminary proofs. How do I know this? I received a call while I was at work from the woman working in Allegra Printing's mail room. She called Shortt and he wouldn't help her with the database and ignored her questions. Having no one else to call, she called me. I in turn contacted Judy, our Membership Director, who fixed the problems that Shortt created. Regarding Shortt's allegations of graft, if anyone can find a connection between my family and anyone who EVER worked at Allegra Printing in Reno, Nevada, (or indeed any of Allegra's branches) please let me know. My Dad might respond as well, but he's been pretty busy caring for my SERIOUSLY ill Mom who was in the hospital for the last two weeks and who might finally be able to come back home in a couple more. Now, can we finally put this "controversy" to rest? Mike Haney -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Judith McCartney Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 PM To: Effie Richards; Julian Kift Cc: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Mike Haney gave his resignation months way head of Jacks, two diff reasons. Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator. the
quotes presented. Did they not have all the facts and if not why did they not question further? Did Jack have all the facts w hen he resigned or were his and Mike Haney's resignations simply an outright stand against changing printer?
Why did Michael push to change printer if he knew there was only pennies between it?
Julian
From: DeTomaso <detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> on
behalf of
marshall smith <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:11 AM To: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurieferrari@aol.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
I find it funny that three months after the Fun Rally we are now hearing that Shortt's bid for printing did not include shipping. Shortt is a lot of things but a mistake like this...? I was listening in on this meeting also and I know what I heard. Apparently, the board convinced 'some' members of this so-called discrepancy month's ago. Why wasn't this information, if it exists, relayed to ALL of us in a timely manner? Marshall
-------------------------------------------- On Mon, 8/15/16, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote: Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations To: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Date: Monday, August 15, 2016, 9:57 AM
Dear AJ,
I have always respected you and your opinions but in this case you are incorrect as far as the resignation of Jack DeRyke. I was on the Board of Directors' conference call where he was asked to stay and he adamantly refused to if the printer changed. Jack's resignation was specifically because of the change in printer! You can go research that phone conference call, or the minutes of the meeting, as the facts are saved. As far as Mike Haney's resignation, that was done by his Mrs. for their reasons which most likely were aligned with their parents.
Laurie
In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? [1]asajay@asajay.com writes: The last? I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was interested in doing a? -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for me, it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out on full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss.? However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs properly.? I? have more faith that the present board members will properly investigate? and sort it out for everyone. I am on-board with electronic delivery,? though I do admit it's nice to just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? It's also easier to hand-off to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do you really fix that? I would think (and I don't? know), that the ClubExpress membership database might be able to include a? "preference" as part of the member's profile or details.? Just as I? can set an address and phone number, if I could check a box for Electronic? delivery or paper copies, or both, and select whatever I wanted for each? item (Profiles versus Newsletter), that might be ideal. However,? I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well could be? that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to print 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the board will? look at as well. Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have? heard (from more than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign? "because POCA changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter? content that in essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For? a guy that appeared to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the? by-laws (and it's unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't? feel they applied to him. For the record, as I understand it, POCA? has changed printers -twice- since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related? to the DeRykes) got out of the business.? So the "family tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not a factor in the resignations. Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) Asa? Jay Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired &? Shelley? Mar
-----Original Message----- From: detomaso-request <detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com> To: detomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> Sent: Mon, Aug 15, 2016 9:00 am Subject: DeTomaso Digest, Vol 146, Issue 20 Send DeTomaso mailing list submissions to [2]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit [3]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to detomaso-[4]request@server.detomasolist.com You can reach the person managing the list at detomaso-[5]owner@server.detomasolist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of DeTomaso digest..." Daily Detomaso List Digest Today's Topics: 1. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic (marshallgsmith) 2. Re: De Tomaso Pantera GTS on eBay! again $250K!! (Michael Cox) 3. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic (Stephen)
--- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:27:43 -0700 From: marshallgsmith <[6]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> To: [7]P6746@aol.com, [8]asajay@asajay.com, [9]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic Message-ID:
<[10]sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com>
Calling this situation "multiple dues levels" seems to be making the issue too complex. There are some members
What is your estimate of the length of time that it would take the board to arrange for a vote of the membership to change the bylaws to allow for this discount? Who specifically made that apples-to-apples comparison you refer to? I agree that the editors should have
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I have a couple questions Bob: that are opting to not have printed magazines mailed which should make those members eligible for a discount because of the savings. the most influence ?on the process. ?However, our editors of both publications seem to have a hard time reporting to the members about ANY issues pertaining to the publication's themselves. Might that change in the near future or will radio silence be the norm here? Marshall Smith Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: P6746--- via DeTomaso
<[11]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>
Date: 8/14/16 3:10 PM (GMT-08:00) To: [12]asajay@asajay.com, [13]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic To use a cliche, we're working on it.? Most of what has been mentioned is in the pipeline.?? However, there are restrictions, particularly with the By-Laws as they currently? stand.? There are no provisions for multiple dues levels,? particularly pertaining to how a member elects to have their club? publications delivered, etc.? That will take time as any changes or? amendments must be approved by the whole membership. The consensus seems to be that the Profiles would? continue as a print publication for all except foreign members who elect to? receive it digitally.? As far as printing is concerned, it is that first copy that is? so expensive, it is the subsequent copies that bring down the per unit? cost.? So as fewer units are produced and shipped, the cost per unit? increases but not proportionately.?? An apples to apples comparison was made between an online? printer and the current printer for both printing and mailing and the difference? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but for the whole run.? As far as I am concerned, it is the editors who should have? the most influence as to how and where their product is produced.? They are? the ones who must work with the printers and mailing houses on a regular? basis. Bob Reid? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? [14]asajay@asajay.com writes: The last? I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was interested in doing a? -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for me, it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out on full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss.? However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs properly.? I? have more faith that the present board members will properly investigate? and sort it out for everyone. I am on-board with electronic delivery,? though I do admit it's nice to just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? It's also easier to hand-off to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do you really fix that? I would think (and I don't? know), that the ClubExpress membership database might be able to include a? "preference" as part of the member's profile or details.? Just as I? can set an address and phone number, if I could check a box for Electronic? delivery or paper copies, or both, and select whatever I wanted for each? item (Profiles versus Newsletter), that might be ideal. However,? I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well could be? that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to print 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the board will? look at as well. Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have? heard (from more than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign? "because POCA changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter? content that in essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For? a guy that appeared to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the? by-laws (and it's unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't? feel they applied to him. For the record, as I understand it, POCA? has changed printers -twice- since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related? to the DeRykes) got out of the business.? So the "family tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not a factor in the resignations. Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) Asa? Jay Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired &? Shelley? Marie Spokane,? WA ****************************** [15]http://w7tsc.org [16]http://www.teampanteraracing.com _______________________________________________ Detomaso? Email List is not managed by POCA Posted emails must not exceed 1.5? Megabytes DeTomaso mailing? list [17]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com [18]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso To? manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) use the? links above. Members who post to this list grant license to the list to? forward any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of the? list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an archive or? approve the archiving of list? messages. ?? To use a cliche, we're working on it. ?? Most of what has been mentioned is in the pipeline.? However, there are ?? restrictions, particularly with the By-Laws as they currently stand. ?? There are no provisions for multiple dues levels, ?? particularly pertaining to how a member elects to have their club ?? publications delivered, etc.? That will take time as any changes or ?? amendments must be approved by the whole membership. ?? The consensus seems to be that the Profiles would continue as a print ?? publication for all except foreign members who elect to receive it ?? digitally. ?? As far as printing is concerned, it is that first copy that is so ?? expensive, it is the subsequent copies that bring down the per unit ?? cost.? So as fewer units are produced and shipped, the cost per unit ?? increases but not proportionately. ?? An apples to apples comparison was made between an online printer and ?? the current printer for both printing and mailing and the difference ?? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but for the whole run. ?? As far as I am concerned, it is the editors who should have the most ?? influence as to how and where their product is produced.? They are the ?? ones who must work with the printers and mailing houses on a regular ?? basis. ?? Bob Reid ?? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, ?? [19]asajay@asajay.com writes: ???? The last I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was ???? interested ???? in doing a -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for ???? me, ???? it's a wait and see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out ???? on ???? full-color and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss. ???? However, I also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs ???? properly.? I have more faith that the present board members will ???? properly investigate and sort it out for everyone. ???? I am on-board with electronic delivery, though I do admit it's nice ???? to ???? just sit back and read a paper copy too.? It's also easier to ???? hand-off ???? to Sam so he can read it later.? How do you really fix that? ???? I would think (and I don't know), that the ClubExpress membership ???? database might be able to include a "preference" as part of the ???? member's ???? profile or details.? Just as I can set an address and phone number, ???? if I ???? could check a box for Electronic delivery or paper copies, or both, ???? and ???? select whatever I wanted for each item (Profiles versus Newsletter), ???? that might be ideal. ???? However, I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well ???? could be that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to ???? print ???? 50, or 10 (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the ???? board will look at as well. ???? Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have heard (from ???? more ???? than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign "because POCA ???? changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter content that ???? in ???? essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For a guy that ???? appeared ???? to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the by-laws (and ???? it's ???? unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't feel they ???? applied ???? to him. ???? For the record, as I understand it, POCA has changed printers ???? -twice- ???? since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related to the DeRykes) got out ???? of ???? the business.? So the "family tie-in" previously eluded to, was not ???? a ???? factor in the resignations. ???? Just my $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) ???? Asa? Jay ???? Asa Jay Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired ???? &? Shelley Marie ???? Spokane, WA ???? ****************************** ???? [20]http://w7tsc.org ???? [21]http://www.teampanteraracing.com ???? _______________________________________________ ???? Detomaso Email List is not managed by POCA ???? Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes ???? DeTomaso mailing list ???? [22]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com ????
[23]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
???? To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, ???? etc.) use the links above. ???? Members who post to this list grant license to the list to forward ???? any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of ???? the list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an ???? archive or approve the archiving of list messages. _______________________________________________ Detomaso Email List is not managed by POCA Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes DeTomaso mailing list [24]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com [25]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) use the links above. Members who post to this list grant license to the list to forward any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of the list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an archive or approve the archiving of list messages.

Mike, I concur with Laurie's and Marshall's points and look forward to an explanation on this subject. That will really help many of us who have been wondering, asking and waiting. Thank you! Effie Sent from Effie's iPad
On Aug 15, 2016, at 11:20 PM, marshallgsmith <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Hey Michael,
I think the best way to put this controversy to bed is if you or your dad could speak about not being cooperative in regards to the the use of another printer that supposedly afforded the club an $8,000 savings. That really seems to be the only issue that continues this controversy and I still haven't heard either of you discuss the allegation. I'm sure your response will cut this thread for good and allow us all to move on with the rebuilding of this great club.
Marshall Smith President, San Diego Panteras
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message -------- From: Michael Haney <paso750@gmail.com> Date: 8/15/16 10:36 PM (GMT-08:00) To: 'Judith McCartney' <jpoca2@hotmail.com>, 'Effie Richards' <erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>, 'Julian Kift' <julian_kift@hotmail.com> Cc: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com, 'laurie Basile' <laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
Thank you very much, Judy. I really wish this thread would just die. I know that this isn't the answer you're fishing for, but it'll have to do since it's the truth. Nancy quit and took her associate (me) with her because she was tired of hearing from me all about Shortt's efforts to take over every aspect of POCA. I didn't fight her decision because I was in turn tired of Shortt's intimidation and bullying tactics. Frankly, being on the Board wasn't fun anymore and I was also very tired of Shortt's constant preening. As a matter of record, I resigned from the Board BEFORE Profiles #3 even went to the printer. I had nearly finished it and decided that I didn't want to let the POCA members down. I really didn't want to contribute any more to Shortt's regime, but my conscience won. Even after I sent the magazine in, I still had to deal with Shortt. He decided to interfere with the printer, sent them a database with a whole bunch of problematic info and threaten nonpayment if he didn't get preliminary proofs. How do I know this? I received a call while I was at work from the woman working in Allegra Printing's mail room. She called Shortt and he wouldn't help her with the database and ignored her questions. Having no one else to call, she called me. I in turn contacted Judy, our Membership Director, who fixed the problems that Shortt created. Regarding Shortt's allegations of graft, if anyone can find a connection between my family and anyone who EVER worked at Allegra Printing in Reno, Nevada, (or indeed any of Allegra's branches) please let me know. My Dad might respond as well, but he's been pretty busy caring for my SERIOUSLY ill Mom who was in the hospital for the last two weeks and who might finally be able to come back home in a couple more. Now, can we finally put this "controversy" to rest? Mike Haney
-----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Judith McCartney Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 PM To: Effie Richards; Julian Kift Cc: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
Mike Haney gave his resignation months way head of Jacks, two diff reasons.
Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator.
From: erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:43:43 -0700 To: julian_kift@hotmail.com CC: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurieferrari@aol.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
Julian these are the same questions some of us have had and have been waiting for a reply or statement. I'm willing to give the board some time to come up with one.
Sent from Effie's iPad
On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Julian Kift <julian_kift@hotmail.com> wrote:
I have digested all the emails on this topic and to be honest it still doesn't sit well in my gut.
Presumably the BOD voted in favor of changing printers based upon the quotes presented. Did they not have all the facts and if not why did they not question further? Did Jack have all the facts w hen he resigned or were his and Mike Haney's resignations simply an outright stand against changing printer?
Why did Michael push to change printer if he knew there was only pennies between it?
Julian __________________________________________________________________
From: DeTomaso <detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> on behalf of marshall smith <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:11 AM To: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurieferrari@aol.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
I find it funny that three months after the Fun Rally we are now hearing that Shortt's bid for printing did not include shipping. Shortt is a lot of things but a mistake like this...? I was listening in on this meeting also and I know what I heard. Apparently, the board convinced 'some' members of this so-called discrepancy month's ago. Why wasn't this information, if it exists, relayed to ALL of us in a timely manner? Marshall
-------------------------------------------- On Mon, 8/15/16, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote: Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations To: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Date: Monday, August 15, 2016, 9:57 AM
Dear AJ,
I have always respected you and your opinions but in this case you are incorrect as far as the resignation of Jack DeRyke. I was on the Board of Directors' conference call where he was asked to stay and he adamantly refused to if the printer changed. Jack's resignation was specifically because of the change in printer! You can go research that phone conference call, or the minutes of the meeting, as the facts are saved. As far as Mike Haney's resignation, that was done by his Mrs. for their reasons which most likely were aligned with their parents.
Laurie
In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? [1]asajay@asajay.com writes: The last? I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was interested in doing a? -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for me, it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out on full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss.? However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs properly.? I? have more faith that the present board members will properly investigate? and sort it out for everyone. I am on-board with electronic delivery,? though I do admit it's nice to just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? It's also easier to hand-off to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do you really fix that? I would think (and I don't? know), that the ClubExpress membership database might be able to include a? "preference" as part of the member's profile or details.? Just as I? can set an address and phone number, if I could check a box for Electronic? delivery or paper copies, or both, and select whatever I wanted for each? item (Profiles versus Newsletter), that might be ideal. However,? I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well could be? that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to print 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the board will? look at as well. Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have? heard (from more than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign? "because POCA changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter? content that in essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For? a guy that appeared to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the? by-laws (and it's unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't? feel they applied to him. For the record, as I understand it, POCA? has changed printers -twice- since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related? to the DeRykes) got out of the business.? So the "family tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not a factor in the resignations. Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) Asa? Jay Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired &? Shelley? Mar
-----Original Message----- From: detomaso-request <detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com> To: detomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> Sent: Mon, Aug 15, 2016 9:00 am Subject: DeTomaso Digest, Vol 146, Issue 20 Send DeTomaso mailing list submissions to [2]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit [3]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to detomaso-[4]request@server.detomasolist.com You can reach the person managing the list at detomaso-[5]owner@server.detomasolist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of DeTomaso digest..." Daily Detomaso List Digest Today's Topics: 1. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic (marshallgsmith) 2. Re: De Tomaso Pantera GTS on eBay! again $250K!! (Michael Cox) 3. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic (Stephen)
Calling this situation "multiple dues levels" seems to be making the issue too complex. There are some members
What is your estimate of the length of time that it would take the board to arrange for a vote of the membership to change the bylaws to allow for this discount? Who specifically made that apples-to-apples comparison you refer to? I agree that the editors should have
--- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:27:43 -0700 From: marshallgsmith <[6]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> To: [7]P6746@aol.com, [8]asajay@asajay.com, [9]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic Message-ID: <[10]sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I have a couple questions Bob: that are opting to not have printed magazines mailed which should make those members eligible for a discount because of the savings. the most influence ?on the process. ?However, our editors of both publications seem to have a hard time reporting to the members about ANY issues pertaining to the publication's themselves. Might that change in the near future or will radio silence be the norm here? Marshall Smith Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: P6746--- via DeTomaso <[11]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> Date: 8/14/16 3:10 PM (GMT-08:00) To: [12]asajay@asajay.com, [13]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic To use a cliche, we're working on it.? Most of what has been mentioned is in the pipeline.?? However, there are restrictions, particularly with the By-Laws as they currently? stand.? There are no provisions for multiple dues levels,? particularly pertaining to how a member elects to have their club? publications delivered, etc.? That will take time as any changes or? amendments must be approved by the whole membership. The consensus seems to be that the Profiles would? continue as a print publication for all except foreign members who elect to? receive it digitally.? As far as printing is concerned, it is that first copy that is? so expensive, it is the subsequent copies that bring down the per unit? cost.? So as fewer units are produced and shipped, the cost per unit? increases but not proportionately.?? An apples to apples comparison was made between an online? printer and the current printer for both printing and mailing and the difference? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but for the whole run.? As far as I am concerned, it is the editors who should have? the most influence as to how and where their product is produced.? They are? the ones who must work with the printers and mailing houses on a regular? basis. Bob Reid? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? [14]asajay@asajay.com writes: The last? I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was interested in doing a? -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for me, it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out on full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss.? However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs properly.? I? have more faith that the present board members will properly investigate? and sort it out for everyone. I am on-board with electronic delivery,? though I do admit it's nice to just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? It's also easier to hand-off to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do you really fix that? I would think (and I don't? know), that the ClubExpress membership database might be able to include a? "preference" as part of the member's profile or details.? Just as I? can set an address and phone number, if I could check a box for Electronic? delivery or paper copies, or both, and select whatever I wanted for each? item (Profiles versus Newsletter), that might be ideal. However,? I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well could be? that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to print 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the board will? look at as well. Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have? heard (from more than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign? "because POCA changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter? content that in essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For? a guy that appeared to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the? by-laws (and it's unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't? feel they applied to him. For the record, as I understand it, POCA? has changed printers -twice- since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related? to the DeRykes) got out of the business.? So the "family tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not a factor in the resignations. Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) Asa? Jay Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired &? Shelley? Marie Spokane,? WA ****************************** [15]http://w7tsc.org [16]http://www.teampanteraracing.com _______________________________________________ Detomaso? Email List is not managed by POCA Posted emails must not exceed 1.5? Megabytes DeTomaso mailing? list [17]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com [18]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso To? manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) use the? links above. Members who post to this list grant license to the list to? forward any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of the? list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an archive or? approve the archiving of list? messages. ?? To use a cliche, we're working on it. ?? Most of what has been mentioned is in the pipeline.? However, there are ?? restrictions, particularly with the By-Laws as they currently stand. ?? There are no provisions for multiple dues levels, ?? particularly pertaining to how a member elects to have their club ?? publications delivered, etc.? That will take time as any changes or ?? amendments must be approved by the whole membership. ?? The consensus seems to be that the Profiles would continue as a print ?? publication for all except foreign members who elect to receive it ?? digitally. ?? As far as printing is concerned, it is that first copy that is so ?? expensive, it is the subsequent copies that bring down the per unit ?? cost.? So as fewer units are produced and shipped, the cost per unit ?? increases but not proportionately. ?? An apples to apples comparison was made between an online printer and ?? the current printer for both printing and mailing and the difference ?? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but for the whole run. ?? As far as I am concerned, it is the editors who should have the most ?? influence as to how and where their product is produced.? They are the ?? ones who must work with the printers and mailing houses on a regular ?? basis. ?? Bob Reid ?? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, ?? [19]asajay@asajay.com writes: ???? The last I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was ???? interested ???? in doing a -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for ???? me, ???? it's a wait and see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out ???? on ???? full-color and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss. ???? However, I also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs ???? properly.? I have more faith that the present board members will ???? properly investigate and sort it out for everyone. ???? I am on-board with electronic delivery, though I do admit it's nice ???? to ???? just sit back and read a paper copy too.? It's also easier to ???? hand-off ???? to Sam so he can read it later.? How do you really fix that? ???? I would think (and I don't know), that the ClubExpress membership ???? database might be able to include a "preference" as part of the ???? member's ???? profile or details.? Just as I can set an address and phone number, ???? if I ???? could check a box for Electronic delivery or paper copies, or both, ???? and ???? select whatever I wanted for each item (Profiles versus Newsletter), ???? that might be ideal. ???? However, I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well ???? could be that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to ???? print ???? 50, or 10 (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the ???? board will look at as well. ???? Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have heard (from ???? more ???? than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign "because POCA ???? changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter content that ???? in ???? essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For a guy that ???? appeared ???? to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the by-laws (and ???? it's ???? unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't feel they ???? applied ???? to him. ???? For the record, as I understand it, POCA has changed printers ???? -twice- ???? since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related to the DeRykes) got out ???? of ???? the business.? So the "family tie-in" previously eluded to, was not ???? a ???? factor in the resignations. ???? Just my $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) ???? Asa? Jay ???? Asa Jay Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired ???? &? Shelley Marie ???? Spokane, WA ???? ****************************** ???? [20]http://w7tsc.org ???? [21]http://www.teampanteraracing.com ???? _______________________________________________ ???? Detomaso Email List is not managed by POCA ???? Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes ???? DeTomaso mailing list ???? [22]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com ???? [23]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso ???? To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, ???? etc.) use the links above. ???? Members who post to this list grant license to the list to forward ???? any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of ???? the list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an ???? archive or approve the archiving of list messages. _______________________________________________ Detomaso Email List is not managed by POCA Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes DeTomaso mailing list [24]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com [25]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) use the links above. Members who post to this list grant license to the list to forward any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of the list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an archive or approve the archiving of list messages.
Mike, I concur with Laurie's and Marshall's points and look forward to an explanation on this subject. That will really help many of us who have been wondering, asking and waiting. Thank you! Effie Sent from Effie's iPad On Aug 15, 2016, at 11:20 PM, marshallgsmith <[1]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Hey Michael, I think the best way to put this controversy to bed is if you or your dad could speak about not being cooperative in regards to the the use of another printer that supposedly afforded the club an $8,000 savings. That really seems to be the only issue that continues this controversy and I still haven't heard either of you discuss the allegation. I'm sure your response will cut this thread for good and allow us all to move on with the rebuilding of this great club. Marshall Smith President, San Diego Panteras Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Michael Haney <[2]paso750@gmail.com> Date: 8/15/16 10:36 PM (GMT-08:00) To: 'Judith McCartney' <[3]jpoca2@hotmail.com>, 'Effie Richards' <[4]erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>, 'Julian Kift' <[5]julian_kift@hotmail.com> Cc: [6]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com, 'laurie Basile' <[7]laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Thank you very much, Judy. I really wish this thread would just die. I know that this isn't the answer you're fishing for, but it'll have to do since it's the truth. Nancy quit and took her associate (me) with her because she was tired of hearing from me all about Shortt's efforts to take over every aspect of POCA. I didn't fight her decision because I was in turn tired of Shortt's intimidation and bullying tactics. Frankly, being on the Board wasn't fun anymore and I was also very tired of Shortt's constant preening. As a matter of record, I resigned from the Board BEFORE Profiles #3 even went to the printer. I had nearly finished it and decided that I didn't want to let the POCA members down. I really didn't want to contribute any more to Shortt's regime, but my conscience won. Even after I sent the magazine in, I still had to deal with Shortt. He decided to interfere with the printer, sent them a database with a whole bunch of problematic info and threaten nonpayment if he didn't get preliminary proofs. How do I know this? I received a call while I was at work from the woman working in Allegra Printing's mail room. She called Shortt and he wouldn't help her with the database and ignored her questions. Having no one else to call, she called me. I in turn contacted Judy, our Membership Director, who fixed the problems that Shortt created. Regarding Shortt's allegations of graft, if anyone can find a connection between my family and anyone who EVER worked at Allegra Printing in Reno, Nevada, (or indeed any of Allegra's branches) please let me know. My Dad might respond as well, but he's been pretty busy caring for my SERIOUSLY ill Mom who was in the hospital for the last two weeks and who might finally be able to come back home in a couple more. Now, can we finally put this "controversy" to rest? Mike Haney -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [[8]mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Judith McCartney Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 PM To: Effie Richards; Julian Kift Cc: [9]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Mike Haney gave his resignation months way head of Jacks, two diff reasons. Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator. > From: [10]erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com > Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:43:43 -0700 > To: [11]julian_kift@hotmail.com > CC: [12]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; [13]laurieferrari@aol.com > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations > > Julian these are the same questions some of us have had and have been waiting for a reply or statement. I'm willing to give the board some time to come up with one. > > Sent from Effie's iPad > > > On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Julian Kift <[14]julian_kift@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > I have digested all the emails on this topic and to be honest it still > > doesn't sit well in my gut. > > > > > > Presumably the BOD voted in favor of changing printers based upon the > > quotes presented. Did they not have all the facts and > > if not why did they not question further? Did Jack have all the facts w > > hen he resigned or were his and Mike Haney's resignations simply an > > outright stand against changing printer? > > > > > > Why did Michael push to change printer if he knew there was only > > pennies between it? > > > > > > Julian > > __________________________________________________________________ > > > > From: DeTomaso <[15]detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> on behalf of > > marshall smith <[16]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> > > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:11 AM > > To: [17]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; [18]laurieferrari@aol.com > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations > > > > I find it funny that three months after the Fun Rally we are now > > hearing that Shortt's bid for printing did not include shipping. Shortt > > is a lot of things but a mistake like this...? > > I was listening in on this meeting also and I know what I heard. > > Apparently, the board convinced 'some' members of this so-called > > discrepancy month's ago. Why wasn't this information, if it exists, > > relayed to ALL of us in a timely manner? > > Marshall > > > > -------------------------------------------- > > On Mon, 8/15/16, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso > > <[19]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote: > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations > > To: [20]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > Date: Monday, August 15, 2016, 9:57 AM > > > > Dear AJ, > > > > I have always respected you and your > > opinions but in this case you are > > incorrect as far as the resignation of > > Jack DeRyke. I was on the Board > > of Directors' conference call where he was > > asked to stay and he > > adamantly refused to if the printer > > changed. Jack's resignation was > > specifically because of the change in > > printer! You can go research > > that phone conference call, or the minutes > > of the meeting, as the facts > > are saved. As far as Mike Haney's > > resignation, that was done by his > > Mrs. for their reasons which most likely > > were aligned with their > > parents. > > > > Laurie > > > > In a message dated 8/13/2016 > > 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? > > [1][21]asajay@asajay.com > > writes: > > The last? I heard (and I may have > > heard wrong), the board was > > interested > > in doing a? -real- accounting > > comparison of printing costs, so for > > me, > > it's a wait and? see kind of > > thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing > > out on > > full-color? and paying $8,000 more > > for B/W then something is amiss.? > > However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt > > didn't account for all costs > > properly.? I? have more faith that > > the present board members will > > properly investigate? and sort it > > out for everyone. > > I am on-board with electronic > > delivery,? though I do admit it's nice > > to > > just sit back and read a paper > > copy? too.? It's also easier to > > hand-off > > to Sam so he can read it? later.? > > How do you really fix that? > > I would think (and I don't? know), > > that the ClubExpress membership > > database might be able to include > > a? "preference" as part of the > > member's > > profile or details.? Just as I? can > > set an address and phone number, > > if I > > could check a box for Electronic? > > delivery or paper copies, or both, > > and > > select whatever I wanted for each? > > item (Profiles versus > > Newsletter), > > that might be ideal. > > However,? I'm also familiar with > > quantity discounting.? It very well > > could be? that it costs the same > > amount to print 500 as it does to > > print > > 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I > > imagine those are considerations the > > board will? look at as well. > > Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie > > has claimed, I have? heard (from > > more > > than one person), that Jack and > > Mike did not resign? "because POCA > > changed printers;" it was over > > "control" of newsletter? content that > > in > > essence fell outside the bounds of > > the by-laws.? For? a guy that > > appeared > > to try very hard to get everyone > > else to follow the? by-laws (and > > it's > > unwritten code of ethics), Mr. > > Shortt certainly didn't? feel they > > applied > > to him. > > For the record, as I understand it, > > POCA? has changed printers > > -twice- > > since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were > > related? to the DeRykes) got out > > of > > the business.? So the "family > > tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not > > a > > factor in the resignations. > > Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted > > for inflation) > > Asa? Jay > > Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, > > USAFR, Retired > > &? Shelley? Mar > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: detomaso-request <[22]detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com> > > To: detomaso <[23]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> > > Sent: Mon, Aug 15, 2016 9:00 am > > Subject: DeTomaso Digest, Vol 146, Issue > > 20 > > Send DeTomaso mailing list submissions to > > [2][24]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World > > Wide Web, visit > > [3][25]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso > > or, via email, send a message with subject > > or body 'help' to > > detomaso-[4][26]request@server.detomasolist.com > > You can reach the person managing the list > > at > > detomaso-[5][27]owner@server.detomasolist.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject > > line so it is more specific > > than "Re: Contents of DeTomaso digest..." > > Daily Detomaso List Digest > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. > > electronic (marshallgsmith) > > 2. Re: De Tomaso Pantera GTS on eBay! > > again $250K!! (Michael Cox) > > 3. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. > > electronic (Stephen) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > --- > > Message: 1 > > Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:27:43 -0700 > > From: marshallgsmith <[6][28]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> > > To: [7][29]P6746@aol.com, [8][30]asajay@asajay.com, > > [9][31]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, > > paper vs. electronic > > Message-ID: > > <[10][32]sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I have a couple questions Bob: > >> Calling this situation "multiple dues > > levels" seems to be making the > > issue too complex. There are some members > > that are opting to not have > > printed magazines mailed which should make > > those members eligible for a > > discount because of the savings. > >> What is your estimate of the length > > of time that it would take the > > board to arrange for a vote of the > > membership to change the bylaws to > > allow for this discount? > >> Who specifically made that > > apples-to-apples comparison you refer to? > >> I agree that the editors should have > > the most influence ?on the > > process. ?However, our editors of both > > publications seem to have a hard > > time reporting to the members about ANY > > issues pertaining to the > > publication's themselves. Might that > > change in the near future or will > > radio silence be the norm here? > > Marshall Smith > > Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone > > -------- Original message -------- > > From: P6746--- via DeTomaso <[11][33]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> > > Date: 8/14/16 3:10 PM (GMT-08:00) > > To: [12][34]asajay@asajay.com, > > [13][35]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, > > paper vs. electronic > > To use a cliche, we're working on it.? > > Most of what has been mentioned is in the > > pipeline.?? However, there > > are > > restrictions, particularly with the > > By-Laws as they currently? stand.? > > There > > are no provisions for multiple dues > > levels,? particularly pertaining to > > how a > > member elects to have their club? > > publications delivered, etc.? That > > will > > take time as any changes or? amendments > > must be approved by the whole > > membership. > > The consensus seems to be that the > > Profiles would? continue as a print > > publication for all except foreign members > > who elect to? receive it > > digitally.? > > As far as printing is concerned, it is > > that first copy that is? so > > expensive, it is the subsequent copies > > that bring down the per unit? > > cost.? So as > > fewer units are produced and shipped, the > > cost per unit? increases but > > not > > proportionately.?? > > An apples to apples comparison was made > > between an online? printer and > > the > > current printer for both printing and > > mailing and the difference? was > > pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but > > for the whole run.? > > As far as I am concerned, it is the > > editors who should have? the most > > influence as to how and where their > > product is produced.? They are? the > > ones who > > must work with the printers and mailing > > houses on a regular? basis. > > Bob Reid? > > In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. > > Eastern Daylight Time,? > > [14][36]asajay@asajay.com > > writes: > > The last? I heard (and I may have heard > > wrong), the board was > > interested > > in doing a? -real- accounting comparison > > of printing costs, so for me, > > it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I > > agree, if POCA was missing out > > on > > full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W > > then something is amiss.? > > However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't > > account for all costs > > properly.? I? have more faith that the > > present board members will > > properly investigate? and sort it out for > > everyone. > > I am on-board with electronic delivery,? > > though I do admit it's nice to > > just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? > > It's also easier to hand-off > > to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do > > you really fix that? > > I would think (and I don't? know), that > > the ClubExpress membership > > database might be able to include a? > > "preference" as part of the > > member's > > profile or details.? Just as I? can set an > > address and phone number, if > > I > > could check a box for Electronic? delivery > > or paper copies, or both, > > and > > select whatever I wanted for each? item > > (Profiles versus Newsletter), > > that might be ideal. > > However,? I'm also familiar with quantity > > discounting.? It very well > > could be? that it costs the same amount to > > print 500 as it does to > > print > > 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine > > those are considerations the > > board will? look at as well. > > Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has > > claimed, I have? heard (from > > more > > than one person), that Jack and Mike did > > not resign? "because POCA > > changed printers;" it was over "control" > > of newsletter? content that in > > essence fell outside the bounds of the > > by-laws.? For? a guy that > > appeared > > to try very hard to get everyone else to > > follow the? by-laws (and it's > > unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt > > certainly didn't? feel they > > applied > > to him. > > For the record, as I understand it, POCA? > > has changed printers -twice- > > since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were > > related? to the DeRykes) got out of > > the business.? So the "family tie-in"? > > previously eluded to, was not a > > factor in the resignations. > > Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for > > inflation) > > Asa? Jay > > Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, > > Retired > > &? Shelley? Marie > > Spokane,? WA > > ****************************** > > [15][37]http://w7tsc.org > > [16][38]http://www.teampanteraracing.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Detomaso? Email List is not managed by > > POCA > > Posted emails must not exceed 1.5? > > Megabytes > > DeTomaso mailing? list > > [17][39]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > [18][40]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso > > To? manage your subscription (change email > > address, unsubscribe, etc.) > > use > > the? links above. > > Members who post to this list grant > > license to the list to? forward any > > message posted here to all past, current, > > or future members of the? > > list. They > > also grant the list owner permission to > > maintain an archive or? approve > > the > > archiving of list? messages. > > ?? To use a cliche, we're working on it. > > ?? Most of what has been mentioned is in > > the pipeline.? However, there > > are > > ?? restrictions, particularly with the > > By-Laws as they currently stand. > > ?? There are no provisions for multiple > > dues levels, > > ?? particularly pertaining to how a member > > elects to have their club > > ?? publications delivered, etc.? That will > > take time as any changes or > > ?? amendments must be approved by the > > whole membership. > > ?? The consensus seems to be that the > > Profiles would continue as a > > print > > ?? publication for all except foreign > > members who elect to receive it > > ?? digitally. > > ?? As far as printing is concerned, it is > > that first copy that is so > > ?? expensive, it is the subsequent copies > > that bring down the per unit > > ?? cost.? So as fewer units are produced > > and shipped, the cost per unit > > ?? increases but not proportionately. > > ?? An apples to apples comparison was made > > between an online printer > > and > > ?? the current printer for both printing > > and mailing and the difference > > ?? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per > > unit but for the whole run. > > ?? As far as I am concerned, it is the > > editors who should have the most > > ?? influence as to how and where their > > product is produced.? They are > > the > > ?? ones who must work with the printers > > and mailing houses on a regular > > ?? basis. > > ?? Bob Reid > > ?? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 > > P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > > ?? [19][41]asajay@asajay.com > > writes: > > ???? The last I heard (and I may have > > heard wrong), the board was > > ???? interested > > ???? in doing a -real- accounting > > comparison of printing costs, so for > > ???? me, > > ???? it's a wait and see kind of thing.? I > > agree, if POCA was missing > > out > > ???? on > > ???? full-color and paying $8,000 more for > > B/W then something is amiss. > > ???? However, I also believe Mr. Shortt > > didn't account for all costs > > ???? properly.? I have more faith that the > > present board members will > > ???? properly investigate and sort it out > > for everyone. > > ???? I am on-board with electronic > > delivery, though I do admit it's > > nice > > ???? to > > ???? just sit back and read a paper copy > > too.? It's also easier to > > ???? hand-off > > ???? to Sam so he can read it later.? How > > do you really fix that? > > ???? I would think (and I don't know), > > that the ClubExpress membership > > ???? database might be able to include a > > "preference" as part of the > > ???? member's > > ???? profile or details.? Just as I can > > set an address and phone > > number, > > ???? if I > > ???? could check a box for Electronic > > delivery or paper copies, or > > both, > > ???? and > > ???? select whatever I wanted for each > > item (Profiles versus > > Newsletter), > > ???? that might be ideal. > > ???? However, I'm also familiar with > > quantity discounting.? It very > > well > > ???? could be that it costs the same > > amount to print 500 as it does to > > ???? print > > ???? 50, or 10 (but I doubt it).? I > > imagine those are considerations > > the > > ???? board will look at as well. > > ???? Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie > > has claimed, I have heard (from > > ???? more > > ???? than one person), that Jack and Mike > > did not resign "because POCA > > ???? changed printers;" it was over > > "control" of newsletter content > > that > > ???? in > > ???? essence fell outside the bounds of > > the by-laws.? For a guy that > > ???? appeared > > ???? to try very hard to get everyone else > > to follow the by-laws (and > > ???? it's > > ???? unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt > > certainly didn't feel they > > ???? applied > > ???? to him. > > ???? For the record, as I understand it, > > POCA has changed printers > > ???? -twice- > > ???? since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were > > related to the DeRykes) got > > out > > ???? of > > ???? the business.? So the "family tie-in" > > previously eluded to, was > > not > > ???? a > > ???? factor in the resignations. > > ???? Just my $1.50? (two cents adjusted > > for inflation) > > ???? Asa? Jay > > ???? Asa Jay Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, > > USAFR, Retired > > ???? &? Shelley Marie > > ???? Spokane, WA > > ???? ****************************** > > ???? [20][42]http://w7tsc.org > > ???? [21][43]http://www.teampanteraracing.com > > ???? > > _______________________________________________ > > ???? Detomaso Email List is not managed by > > POCA > > ???? Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 > > Megabytes > > ???? DeTomaso mailing list > > ???? [22][44]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > ???? [23][45]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso > > ???? To manage your subscription (change > > email address, unsubscribe, > > ???? etc.) use the links above. > > ???? Members who post to this list grant > > license to the list to forward > > ???? any message posted here to all past, > > current, or future members of > > ???? the list. They also grant the list > > owner permission to maintain an > > ???? archive or approve the archiving of > > list messages. > > _______________________________________________ > > Detomaso Email List is not managed by > > POCA > > Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 > > Megabytes > > DeTomaso mailing list > > [24][46]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > [25][47]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso > > To manage your subscription (change email > > address, unsubscribe, etc.) > > use the links above. > > Members who post to this list grant > > license to the list to forward any > > message posted here to all past, current, > > or future members of the > > list. They also grant the list owner > > permission to maintain an archive > > or approve the archiving of list > > messages. > >

You did all read the info sent by Judy McCartney last week with Jack's explanation? Re-sent here in case you didn't see it. Please open the attachment - I promise no viruses are included On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:20 AM, marshallgsmith < marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Hey Michael,
I think the best way to put this controversy to bed is if you or your dad could speak about not being cooperative in regards to the the use of another printer that supposedly afforded the club an $8,000 savings. That really seems to be the only issue that continues this controversy and I still haven't heard either of you discuss the allegation. I'm sure your response will cut this thread for good and allow us all to move on with the rebuilding of this great club.
Marshall Smith
President, San Diego Panteras
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone
From: erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:43:43 -0700 To: julian_kift@hotmail.com CC: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurieferrari@aol.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
Julian these are the same questions some of us have had and have been waiting for a reply or statement. I'm willing to give the board some time to come up with one.
Sent from Effie's iPad
On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Julian Kift <julian_kift@hotmail.com> wrote:
I have digested all the emails on this topic and to be honest it still doesn't sit well in my gut.
Presumably the BOD voted in favor of changing printers based upon
-------- Original message -------- From: Michael Haney <paso750@gmail.com> Date: 8/15/16 10:36 PM (GMT-08:00) To: 'Judith McCartney' <jpoca2@hotmail.com>, 'Effie Richards' <erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>, 'Julian Kift' <julian_kift@hotmail.com> Cc: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com, 'laurie Basile' <laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Thank you very much, Judy. I really wish this thread would just die. I know that this isn't the answer you're fishing for, but it'll have to do since it's the truth. Nancy quit and took her associate (me) with her because she was tired of hearing from me all about Shortt's efforts to take over every aspect of POCA. I didn't fight her decision because I was in turn tired of Shortt's intimidation and bullying tactics. Frankly, being on the Board wasn't fun anymore and I was also very tired of Shortt's constant preening. As a matter of record, I resigned from the Board BEFORE Profiles #3 even went to the printer. I had nearly finished it and decided that I didn't want to let the POCA members down. I really didn't want to contribute any more to Shortt's regime, but my conscience won. Even after I sent the magazine in, I still had to deal with Shortt. He decided to interfere with the printer, sent them a database with a whole bunch of problematic info and threaten nonpayment if he didn't get preliminary proofs. How do I know this? I received a call while I was at work from the woman working in Allegra Printing's mail room. She called Shortt and he wouldn't help her with the database and ignored her questions. Having no one else to call, she called me. I in turn contacted Judy, our Membership Director, who fixed the problems that Shortt created. Regarding Shortt's allegations of graft, if anyone can find a connection between my family and anyone who EVER worked at Allegra Printing in Reno, Nevada, (or indeed any of Allegra's branches) please let me know. My Dad might respond as well, but he's been pretty busy caring for my SERIOUSLY ill Mom who was in the hospital for the last two weeks and who might finally be able to come back home in a couple more. Now, can we finally put this "controversy" to rest? Mike Haney -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Judith McCartney Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 PM To: Effie Richards; Julian Kift Cc: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Mike Haney gave his resignation months way head of Jacks, two diff reasons. Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator. the
quotes presented. Did they not have all the facts and if not why did they not question further? Did Jack have all the facts w hen he resigned or were his and Mike Haney's resignations simply an outright stand against changing printer?
Why did Michael push to change printer if he knew there was only pennies between it?
Julian
From: DeTomaso <detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> on
behalf of
marshall smith <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:11 AM To: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurieferrari@aol.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
I find it funny that three months after the Fun Rally we are now hearing that Shortt's bid for printing did not include shipping. Shortt is a lot of things but a mistake like this...? I was listening in on this meeting also and I know what I heard. Apparently, the board convinced 'some' members of this so-called discrepancy month's ago. Why wasn't this information, if it exists, relayed to ALL of us in a timely manner? Marshall
-------------------------------------------- On Mon, 8/15/16, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote: Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations To: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Date: Monday, August 15, 2016, 9:57 AM
Dear AJ,
I have always respected you and your opinions but in this case you are incorrect as far as the resignation of Jack DeRyke. I was on the Board of Directors' conference call where he was asked to stay and he adamantly refused to if the printer changed. Jack's resignation was specifically because of the change in printer! You can go research that phone conference call, or the minutes of the meeting, as the facts are saved. As far as Mike Haney's resignation, that was done by his Mrs. for their reasons which most likely were aligned with their parents.
Laurie
In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? [1]asajay@asajay.com writes: The last? I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was interested in doing a? -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for me, it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out on full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss.? However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs properly.? I? have more faith that the present board members will properly investigate? and sort it out for everyone. I am on-board with electronic delivery,? though I do admit it's nice to just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? It's also easier to hand-off to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do you really fix that? I would think (and I don't? know), that the ClubExpress membership database might be able to include a? "preference" as part of the member's profile or details.? Just as I? can set an address and phone number, if I could check a box for Electronic? delivery or paper copies, or both, and select whatever I wanted for each? item (Profiles versus Newsletter), that might be ideal. However,? I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well could be? that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to print 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the board will? look at as well. Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have? heard (from more than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign? "because POCA changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter? content that in essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For? a guy that appeared to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the? by-laws (and it's unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't? feel they applied to him. For the record, as I understand it, POCA? has changed printers -twice- since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related? to the DeRykes) got out of the business.? So the "family tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not a factor in the resignations. Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) Asa? Jay Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired &? Shelley? Mar
-----Original Message----- From: detomaso-request <detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com> To: detomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> Sent: Mon, Aug 15, 2016 9:00 am Subject: DeTomaso Digest, Vol 146, Issue 20 Send DeTomaso mailing list submissions to [2]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit [3]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to detomaso-[4]request@server.detomasolist.com You can reach the person managing the list at detomaso-[5]owner@server.detomasolist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of DeTomaso digest..." Daily Detomaso List Digest Today's Topics: 1. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic (marshallgsmith) 2. Re: De Tomaso Pantera GTS on eBay! again $250K!! (Michael Cox) 3. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic (Stephen)
--- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:27:43 -0700 From: marshallgsmith <[6]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> To: [7]P6746@aol.com, [8]asajay@asajay.com, [9]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic Message-ID:
<[10]sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com>
Calling this situation "multiple dues levels" seems to be making the issue too complex. There are some members
What is your estimate of the length of time that it would take the board to arrange for a vote of the membership to change the bylaws to allow for this discount? Who specifically made that apples-to-apples comparison you refer to? I agree that the editors should have
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I have a couple questions Bob: that are opting to not have printed magazines mailed which should make those members eligible for a discount because of the savings. the most influence ?on the process. ?However, our editors of both publications seem to have a hard time reporting to the members about ANY issues pertaining to the publication's themselves. Might that change in the near future or will radio silence be the norm here? Marshall Smith Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: P6746--- via DeTomaso
<[11]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>
Date: 8/14/16 3:10 PM (GMT-08:00) To: [12]asajay@asajay.com, [13]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic To use a cliche, we're working on it.? Most of what has been mentioned is in the pipeline.?? However, there are restrictions, particularly with the By-Laws as they currently? stand.? There are no provisions for multiple dues levels,? particularly pertaining to how a member elects to have their club? publications delivered, etc.? That will take time as any changes or? amendments must be approved by the whole membership. The consensus seems to be that the Profiles would? continue as a print publication for all except foreign members who elect to? receive it digitally.? As far as printing is concerned, it is that first copy that is? so expensive, it is the subsequent copies that bring down the per unit? cost.? So as fewer units are produced and shipped, the cost per unit? increases but not proportionately.?? An apples to apples comparison was made between an online? printer and the current printer for both printing and mailing and the difference? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but for the whole run.? As far as I am concerned, it is the editors who should have? the most influence as to how and where their product is produced.? They are? the ones who must work with the printers and mailing houses on a regular? basis. Bob Reid? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? [14]asajay@asajay.com writes: The last? I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was interested in doing a? -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for me, it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out on full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss.? However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs properly.? I? have more faith that the present board members will properly investigate? and sort it out for everyone. I am on-board with electronic delivery,? though I do admit it's nice to just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? It's also easier to hand-off to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do you really fix that? I would think (and I don't? know), that the ClubExpress membership database might be able to include a? "preference" as part of the member's profile or details.? Just as I? can set an address and phone number, if I could check a box for Electronic? delivery or paper copies, or both, and select whatever I wanted for each? item (Profiles versus Newsletter), that might be ideal. However,? I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well could be? that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to print 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the board will? look at as well. Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have? heard (from more than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign? "because POCA changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter? content that in essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For? a guy that appeared to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the? by-laws (and it's unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't? feel they applied to him. For the record, as I understand it, POCA? has changed printers -twice- since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related? to the DeRykes) got out of the business.? So the "family tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not a factor in the resignations. Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) Asa? Jay Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired &? Shelley? Marie Spokane,? WA ****************************** [15]http://w7tsc.org [16]http://www.teampanteraracing.com _______________________________________________ Detomaso? Email List is not managed by POCA Posted emails must not exceed 1.5? Megabytes DeTomaso mailing? list [17]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com [18]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso To? manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) use the? links above. Members who post to this list grant license to the list to? forward any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of the? list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an archive or? approve the archiving of list? messages. ?? To use a cliche, we're working on it. ?? Most of what has been mentioned is in the pipeline.? However, there are ?? restrictions, particularly with the By-Laws as they currently stand. ?? There are no provisions for multiple dues levels, ?? particularly pertaining to how a member elects to have their club ?? publications delivered, etc.? That will take time as any changes or ?? amendments must be approved by the whole membership. ?? The consensus seems to be that the Profiles would continue as a print ?? publication for all except foreign members who elect to receive it ?? digitally. ?? As far as printing is concerned, it is that first copy that is so ?? expensive, it is the subsequent copies that bring down the per unit ?? cost.? So as fewer units are produced and shipped, the cost per unit ?? increases but not proportionately. ?? An apples to apples comparison was made between an online printer and ?? the current printer for both printing and mailing and the difference ?? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but for the whole run. ?? As far as I am concerned, it is the editors who should have the most ?? influence as to how and where their product is produced.? They are the ?? ones who must work with the printers and mailing houses on a regular ?? basis. ?? Bob Reid ?? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, ?? [19]asajay@asajay.com writes: ???? The last I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was ???? interested ???? in doing a -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for ???? me, ???? it's a wait and see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out ???? on ???? full-color and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss. ???? However, I also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs ???? properly.? I have more faith that the present board members will ???? properly investigate and sort it out for everyone. ???? I am on-board with electronic delivery, though I do admit it's nice ???? to ???? just sit back and read a paper copy too.? It's also easier to ???? hand-off ???? to Sam so he can read it later.? How do you really fix that? ???? I would think (and I don't know), that the ClubExpress membership ???? database might be able to include a "preference" as part of the ???? member's ???? profile or details.? Just as I can set an address and phone number, ???? if I ???? could check a box for Electronic delivery or paper copies, or both, ???? and ???? select whatever I wanted for each item (Profiles versus Newsletter), ???? that might be ideal. ???? However, I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well ???? could be that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to ???? print ???? 50, or 10 (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the ???? board will look at as well. ???? Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have heard (from ???? more ???? than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign "because POCA ???? changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter content that ???? in ???? essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For a guy that ???? appeared ???? to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the by-laws (and ???? it's ???? unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't feel they ???? applied ???? to him. ???? For the record, as I understand it, POCA has changed printers ???? -twice- ???? since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related to the DeRykes) got out ???? of ???? the business.? So the "family tie-in" previously eluded to, was not ???? a ???? factor in the resignations. ???? Just my $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) ???? Asa? Jay ???? Asa Jay Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired ???? &? Shelley Marie ???? Spokane, WA ???? ****************************** ???? [20]http://w7tsc.org ???? [21]http://www.teampanteraracing.com ???? _______________________________________________ ???? Detomaso Email List is not managed by POCA ???? Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes ???? DeTomaso mailing list ???? [22]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com ????
[23]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
???? To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, ???? etc.) use the links above. ???? Members who post to this list grant license to the list to forward ???? any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of ???? the list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an ???? archive or approve the archiving of list messages. _______________________________________________ Detomaso Email List is not managed by POCA Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes DeTomaso mailing list [24]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com [25]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) use the links above. Members who post to this list grant license to the list to forward any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of the list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an archive or approve the archiving of list messages.
You did all read the info sent by Judy McCartney last week with Jack's explanation? Re-sent here in case you didn't see it. Please open the attachment - I promise no viruses are included On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:20 AM, marshallgsmith <[1]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> wrote: A A Hey Michael, A A I think the best way to put this controversy to bed is if you or your A A dad could speak about not being cooperative in regards to the the use A A of another printer that supposedly afforded the club an $8,000 savings. A A That really seems to be the only issue that continues this controversy A A and I still haven't heard either of you discuss the allegation. I'm A A sure your response will cut this thread for good and allow us all to A A move on with the rebuilding of this great club. A A Marshall Smith A A President, San Diego Panteras A A Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone A A -------- Original message -------- A A From: Michael Haney <[2]paso750@gmail.com> A A Date: 8/15/16 10:36 PM (GMT-08:00) A A To: 'Judith McCartney' <[3]jpoca2@hotmail.com>, 'Effie Richards' A A <[4]erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>, 'Julian Kift' A A <[5]julian_kift@hotmail.com> A A Cc: [6]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com, 'laurie Basile' A A <[7]laurieferrari@aol.com> A A Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations A A Thank you very much, Judy. A A I really wish this thread would just die. A A I know that this isn't the answer you're fishing for, but it'll have to A A do A A since it's the truth. A A Nancy quit and took her associate (me) with her because she was tired A A of A A hearing from me all about Shortt's efforts to take over every aspect of A A POCA. A A I didn't fight her decision because I was in turn tired of Shortt's A A intimidation and bullying tactics. Frankly, being on the Board wasn't A A fun A A anymore and I was also very tired of Shortt's constant preening. A A As a matter of record, I resigned from the Board BEFORE Profiles #3 A A even A A went to the printer. I had nearly finished it and decided that I didn't A A want A A to let the POCA members down. I really didn't want to contribute any A A more to A A Shortt's regime, but my conscience won. A A Even after I sent the magazine in, I still had to deal with Shortt. He A A decided to interfere with the printer, sent them a database with a A A whole A A bunch of problematic info and threaten nonpayment if he didn't get A A preliminary proofs. How do I know this? I received a call while I was A A at A A work from the woman working in Allegra Printing's mail room. She called A A Shortt and he wouldn't help her with the database and ignored her A A questions. A A Having no one else to call, she called me. I in turn contacted Judy, A A our A A Membership Director, who fixed the problems that Shortt created. A A Regarding Shortt's allegations of graft, if anyone can find a A A connection A A between my family and anyone who EVER worked at Allegra Printing in A A Reno, A A Nevada, (or indeed any of Allegra's branches) please let me know. A A My Dad might respond as well, but he's been pretty busy caring for my A A SERIOUSLY ill Mom who was in the hospital for the last two weeks and A A who A A might finally be able to come back home in a couple more. A A Now, can we finally put this "controversy" to rest? A A Mike Haney A A -----Original Message----- A A From: DeTomaso [mailto:[8]detomaso-bounces@ server.detomasolist.com] On A A Behalf A A Of Judith McCartney A A Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 PM A A To: Effie Richards; Julian Kift A A Cc: [9]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurie Basile A A Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations A A Mike Haney gave his resignation months way head of Jacks, two diff A A reasons. A A Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator. A A > From: [10]erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com A A > Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:43:43 -0700 A A > To: [11]julian_kift@hotmail.com A A > CC: [12]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; [13]laurieferrari@aol.com A A > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations A A > A A > Julian these are the same questions some of us have had and have been A A waiting for a reply or statement. I'm willing to give the board some A A time to A A come up with one. A A > A A > Sent from Effie's iPad A A > A A > > On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Julian Kift <[14]julian_kift@hotmail.com> A A wrote: A A > > A A > >A A I have digested all the emails on this topic and to be honest it A A still A A > >A A doesn't sit well in my gut. A A > > A A > > A A > >A A Presumably the BOD voted in favor of changing printers based upon A A the A A > >A A quotes presented. Did they not have all the facts and A A > >A A if not why did they not question further? Did Jack have all the A A facts A A w A A > >A A hen he resigned or were his and Mike Haney's resignations simply A A an A A > >A A outright stand against changing printer? A A > > A A > > A A > >A A Why did Michael push to change printer if he knew there was only A A > >A A pennies between it? A A > > A A > > A A > >A A Julian A A > > A A __________________________________________________________________ A A > > A A > >A A From: DeTomaso <[15]detomaso-bounces@server. detomasolist.com> on A A behalf of A A > >A A marshall smith <[16]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> A A > >A A Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:11 AM A A > >A A To: [17]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; [18]laurieferrari@aol.com A A > >A A Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations A A > > A A > >A A I find it funny that three months after the Fun Rally we are now A A > >A A hearing that Shortt's bid for printing did not include shipping. A A Shortt A A > >A A is a lot of things but a mistake like this...? A A > >A A I was listening in on this meeting also and I know what I heard. A A > >A A Apparently, the board convinced 'some' members of this so-called A A > >A A discrepancy month's ago. Why wasn't this information, if it A A exists, A A > >A A relayed to ALL of us in a timely manner? A A > >A A Marshall A A > > A A > >A A -------------------------------------------- A A > >A A On Mon, 8/15/16, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso A A > >A A <[19]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote: A A > >A A Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations A A > >A A To: [20]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com A A > >A A Date: Monday, August 15, 2016, 9:57 AM A A > > A A > >A A A A Dear AJ, A A > > A A > >A A A A I have always respected you and your A A > >A A opinions but in this case you are A A > >A A A A incorrect as far as the resignation of A A > >A A Jack DeRyke.A I was on the Board A A > >A A A A of Directors' conference call where he was A A > >A A asked to stay and he A A > >A A A A adamantly refused to if the printer A A > >A A changed.A Jack's resignation was A A > >A A A A specifically because of the change in A A > >A A printer!A You can go research A A > >A A A A that phone conference call, or the minutes A A > >A A of the meeting, as the facts A A > >A A A A are saved.A As far as Mike Haney's A A > >A A resignation, that was done by his A A > >A A A A Mrs. for their reasons which most likely A A > >A A were aligned with their A A > >A A A A parents. A A > > A A > >A A A A Laurie A A > > A A > >A A A A A In a message dated 8/13/2016 A A > >A A 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? A A > >A A A A A [1][21]asajay@asajay.com A A > >A A writes: A A > >A A A A A The last? I heard (and I may have A A > >A A heard wrong), the board was A A > >A A A A A interested A A > >A A A A A in doing a? -real- accounting A A > >A A comparison of printing costs, so for A A > >A A A A A me, A A > >A A A A A it's a wait and? see kind of A A > >A A thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing A A > >A A A A A out on A A > >A A A A A full-color? and paying $8,000 more A A > >A A for B/W then something is amiss.? A A > >A A A A A However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt A A > >A A didn't account for all costs A A > >A A A A A properly.? I? have more faith that A A > >A A the present board members will A A > >A A A A A properly investigate? and sort it A A > >A A out for everyone. A A > >A A A A A I am on-board with electronic A A > >A A delivery,? though I do admit it's nice A A > >A A A A A to A A > >A A A A A just sit back and read a paper A A > >A A copy? too.? It's also easier to A A > >A A A A A hand-off A A > >A A A A A to Sam so he can read it? later.? A A > >A A How do you really fix that? A A > >A A A A A I would think (and I don't? know), A A > >A A that the ClubExpress membership A A > >A A A A A database might be able to include A A > >A A a? "preference" as part of the A A > >A A A A A member's A A > >A A A A A profile or details.? Just as I? can A A > >A A set an address and phone number, A A > >A A A A A if I A A > >A A A A A could check a box for Electronic? A A > >A A delivery or paper copies, or both, A A > >A A A A A and A A > >A A A A A select whatever I wanted for each? A A > >A A item (Profiles versus A A > >A A A A A Newsletter), A A > >A A A A A that might be ideal. A A > >A A A A A However,? I'm also familiar with A A > >A A quantity discounting.? It very well A A > >A A A A A could be? that it costs the same A A > >A A amount to print 500 as it does to A A > >A A A A A print A A > >A A A A A 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I A A > >A A imagine those are considerations the A A > >A A A A A board will? look at as well. A A > >A A A A A Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie A A > >A A has claimed, I have? heard (from A A > >A A A A A more A A > >A A A A A than one person), that Jack and A A > >A A Mike did not resign? "because POCA A A > >A A A A A changed printers;" it was over A A > >A A "control" of newsletter? content that A A > >A A A A A in A A > >A A A A A essence fell outside the bounds of A A > >A A the by-laws.? For? a guy that A A > >A A A A A appeared A A > >A A A A A to try very hard to get everyone A A > >A A else to follow the? by-laws (and A A > >A A A A A it's A A > >A A A A A unwritten code of ethics), Mr. A A > >A A Shortt certainly didn't? feel they A A > >A A A A A applied A A > >A A A A A to him. A A > >A A A A A For the record, as I understand it, A A > >A A POCA? has changed printers A A > >A A A A A -twice- A A > >A A A A A since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were A A > >A A related? to the DeRykes) got out A A > >A A A A A of A A > >A A A A A the business.? So the "family A A > >A A tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not A A > >A A A A A a A A > >A A A A A factor in the resignations. A A > >A A A A A Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted A A > >A A for inflation) A A > >A A A A A Asa? Jay A A > >A A A A A Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, A A > >A A USAFR, Retired A A > >A A A A A &? Shelley? Mar A A > > A A > >A A A A -----Original Message----- A A > >A A A A From: detomaso-request A A <[22]detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com> A A > >A A A A To: detomaso <[23]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> A A > >A A A A Sent: Mon, Aug 15, 2016 9:00 am A A > >A A A A Subject: DeTomaso Digest, Vol 146, Issue A A > >A A 20 A A > >A A A A Send DeTomaso mailing list submissions to A A > >A A A A [2][24]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com A A > >A A A A To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World A A > >A A Wide Web, visit A A > >A A A A [3][25]http://server.detomasolist. com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso A A > >A A A A or, via email, send a message with subject A A > >A A or body 'help' to A A > >A A A A detomaso-[4][26]request@server.detomasolist.com A A > >A A A A You can reach the person managing the list A A > >A A at A A > >A A A A detomaso-[5][27]owner@server.detomasolist.com A A > >A A A A When replying, please edit your Subject A A > >A A line so it is more specific A A > >A A A A than "Re: Contents of DeTomaso digest..." A A > >A A A A Daily Detomaso List Digest A A > >A A A A Today's Topics: A A > >A A A A 1. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. A A > >A A electronic (marshallgsmith) A A > >A A A A 2. Re: De Tomaso Pantera GTS on eBay! A A > >A A again $250K!! (Michael Cox) A A > >A A A A 3. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. A A > >A A electronic (Stephen) A A > > A A ------------------------------------------------------------ ------- A A > >A A --- A A > >A A A A Message: 1 A A > >A A A A Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:27:43 -0700 A A > >A A A A From: marshallgsmith <[6][28]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> A A > >A A A A To: [7][29]P6746@aol.com, [8][30]asajay@asajay.com, A A > >A A A A [9][31]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com A A > >A A A A Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, A A > >A A paper vs. electronic A A > >A A A A Message-ID: A A > > A A <[10][32]sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com> A A > >A A A A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" A A > >A A A A I have a couple questions Bob: A A > >> Calling this situation "multiple dues A A > >A A levels" seems to be making the A A > >A A A A issue too complex. There are some members A A > >A A that are opting to not have A A > >A A A A printed magazines mailed which should make A A > >A A those members eligible for a A A > >A A A A discount because of the savings. A A > >> What is your estimate of the length A A > >A A of time that it would take the A A > >A A A A board to arrange for a vote of the A A > >A A membership to change the bylaws to A A > >A A A A allow for this discount? A A > >> Who specifically made that A A > >A A apples-to-apples comparison you refer to? A A > >> I agree that the editors should have A A > >A A the most influence ?on the A A > >A A A A process. ?However, our editors of both A A > >A A publications seem to have a hard A A > >A A A A time reporting to the members about ANY A A > >A A issues pertaining to the A A > >A A A A publication's themselves. Might that A A > >A A change in the near future or will A A > >A A A A radio silence be the norm here? A A > >A A A A Marshall Smith A A > >A A A A Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone A A > >A A A A -------- Original message -------- A A > >A A A A From: P6746--- via DeTomaso A A <[11][33]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> A A > >A A A A Date: 8/14/16 3:10 PM (GMT-08:00) A A > >A A A A To: [12][34]asajay@asajay.com, A A > >A A [13][35]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com A A > >A A A A Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, A A > >A A paper vs. electronic A A > >A A A A To use a cliche, we're working on it.? A A > >A A A A Most of what has been mentioned is in the A A > >A A pipeline.?? However, there A A > >A A A A are A A > >A A A A restrictions, particularly with the A A > >A A By-Laws as they currently? stand.? A A > >A A A A There A A > >A A A A are no provisions for multiple dues A A > >A A levels,? particularly pertaining to A A > >A A A A how a A A > >A A A A member elects to have their club? A A > >A A publications delivered, etc.? That A A > >A A A A will A A > >A A A A take time as any changes or? amendments A A > >A A must be approved by the whole A A > >A A A A membership. A A > >A A A A The consensus seems to be that the A A > >A A Profiles would? continue as a print A A > >A A A A publication for all except foreign members A A > >A A who elect to? receive it A A > >A A A A digitally.? A A > >A A A A As far as printing is concerned, it is A A > >A A that first copy that is? so A A > >A A A A expensive, it is the subsequent copies A A > >A A that bring down the per unit? A A > >A A A A cost.? So as A A > >A A A A fewer units are produced and shipped, the A A > >A A cost per unit? increases but A A > >A A A A not A A > >A A A A proportionately.?? A A > >A A A A An apples to apples comparison was made A A > >A A between an online? printer and A A > >A A A A the A A > >A A A A current printer for both printing and A A > >A A mailing and the difference? was A A > >A A A A pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but A A > >A A for the whole run.? A A > >A A A A As far as I am concerned, it is the A A > >A A editors who should have? the most A A > >A A A A influence as to how and where their A A > >A A product is produced.? They are? the A A > >A A A A ones who A A > >A A A A must work with the printers and mailing A A > >A A houses on a regular? basis. A A > >A A A A Bob Reid? A A > >A A A A In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. A A > >A A Eastern Daylight Time,? A A > >A A A A [14][36]asajay@asajay.com A A > >A A writes: A A > >A A A A The last? I heard (and I may have heard A A > >A A wrong), the board was A A > >A A A A interested A A > >A A A A in doing a? -real- accounting comparison A A > >A A of printing costs, so for me, A A > >A A A A it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I A A > >A A agree, if POCA was missing out A A > >A A A A on A A > >A A A A full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W A A > >A A then something is amiss.? A A > >A A A A However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't A A > >A A account for all costs A A > >A A A A properly.? I? have more faith that the A A > >A A present board members will A A > >A A A A properly investigate? and sort it out for A A > >A A everyone. A A > >A A A A I am on-board with electronic delivery,? A A > >A A though I do admit it's nice to A A > >A A A A just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? A A > >A A It's also easier to hand-off A A > >A A A A to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do A A > >A A you really fix that? A A > >A A A A I would think (and I don't? know), that A A > >A A the ClubExpress membership A A > >A A A A database might be able to include a? A A > >A A "preference" as part of the A A > >A A A A member's A A > >A A A A profile or details.? Just as I? can set an A A > >A A address and phone number, if A A > >A A A A I A A > >A A A A could check a box for Electronic? delivery A A > >A A or paper copies, or both, A A > >A A A A and A A > >A A A A select whatever I wanted for each? item A A > >A A (Profiles versus Newsletter), A A > >A A A A that might be ideal. A A > >A A A A However,? I'm also familiar with quantity A A > >A A discounting.? It very well A A > >A A A A could be? that it costs the same amount to A A > >A A print 500 as it does to A A > >A A A A print A A > >A A A A 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine A A > >A A those are considerations the A A > >A A A A board will? look at as well. A A > >A A A A Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has A A > >A A claimed, I have? heard (from A A > >A A A A more A A > >A A A A than one person), that Jack and Mike did A A > >A A not resign? "because POCA A A > >A A A A changed printers;" it was over "control" A A > >A A of newsletter? content that in A A > >A A A A essence fell outside the bounds of the A A > >A A by-laws.? For? a guy that A A > >A A A A appeared A A > >A A A A to try very hard to get everyone else to A A > >A A follow the? by-laws (and it's A A > >A A A A unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt A A > >A A certainly didn't? feel they A A > >A A A A applied A A > >A A A A to him. A A > >A A A A For the record, as I understand it, POCA? A A > >A A has changed printers -twice- A A > >A A A A since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were A A > >A A related? to the DeRykes) got out of A A > >A A A A the business.? So the "family tie-in"? A A > >A A previously eluded to, was not a A A > >A A A A factor in the resignations. A A > >A A A A Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for A A > >A A inflation) A A > >A A A A Asa? Jay A A > >A A A A Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, A A > >A A Retired A A > >A A A A &? Shelley? Marie A A > >A A A A Spokane,? WA A A > >A A A A ****************************** A A > >A A A A [15][37]http://w7tsc.org A A > >A A A A [16][38]http://www.teampanteraracing.com A A > >A A A A _______________________________________________ A A > >A A A A Detomaso? Email List is not managed by A A > >A A POCA A A > >A A A A Posted emails must not exceed 1.5? A A > >A A Megabytes A A > >A A A A DeTomaso mailing? list A A > >A A A A [17][39]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com A A > >A A A A [18][40]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/ listinfo/detomaso A A > >A A A A To? manage your subscription (change email A A > >A A address, unsubscribe, etc.) A A > >A A A A use A A > >A A A A the? links above. A A > >A A A A Members who post to this list grant A A > >A A license to the list to? forward any A A > >A A A A message posted here to all past, current, A A > >A A or future members of the? A A > >A A A A list. They A A > >A A A A also grant the list owner permission to A A > >A A maintain an archive or? approve A A > >A A A A the A A > >A A A A archiving of list? messages. A A > >A A A A ?? To use a cliche, we're working on it. A A > >A A A A ?? Most of what has been mentioned is in A A > >A A the pipeline.? However, there A A > >A A A A are A A > >A A A A ?? restrictions, particularly with the A A > >A A By-Laws as they currently stand. A A > >A A A A ?? There are no provisions for multiple A A > >A A dues levels, A A > >A A A A ?? particularly pertaining to how a member A A > >A A elects to have their club A A > >A A A A ?? publications delivered, etc.? That will A A > >A A take time as any changes or A A > >A A A A ?? amendments must be approved by the A A > >A A whole membership. A A > >A A A A ?? The consensus seems to be that the A A > >A A Profiles would continue as a A A > >A A A A print A A > >A A A A ?? publication for all except foreign A A > >A A members who elect to receive it A A > >A A A A ?? digitally. A A > >A A A A ?? As far as printing is concerned, it is A A > >A A that first copy that is so A A > >A A A A ?? expensive, it is the subsequent copies A A > >A A that bring down the per unit A A > >A A A A ?? cost.? So as fewer units are produced A A > >A A and shipped, the cost per unit A A > >A A A A ?? increases but not proportionately. A A > >A A A A ?? An apples to apples comparison was made A A > >A A between an online printer A A > >A A A A and A A > >A A A A ?? the current printer for both printing A A > >A A and mailing and the difference A A > >A A A A ?? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per A A > >A A unit but for the whole run. A A > >A A A A ?? As far as I am concerned, it is the A A > >A A editors who should have the most A A > >A A A A ?? influence as to how and where their A A > >A A product is produced.? They are A A > >A A A A the A A > >A A A A ?? ones who must work with the printers A A > >A A and mailing houses on a regular A A > >A A A A ?? basis. A A > >A A A A ?? Bob Reid A A > >A A A A ?? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 A A > >A A P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, A A > >A A A A ?? [19][41]asajay@asajay.com A A > >A A writes: A A > >A A A A ???? The last I heard (and I may have A A > >A A heard wrong), the board was A A > >A A A A ???? interested A A > >A A A A ???? in doing a -real- accounting A A > >A A comparison of printing costs, so for A A > >A A A A ???? me, A A > >A A A A ???? it's a wait and see kind of thing.? I A A > >A A agree, if POCA was missing A A > >A A A A out A A > >A A A A ???? on A A > >A A A A ???? full-color and paying $8,000 more for A A > >A A B/W then something is amiss. A A > >A A A A ???? However, I also believe Mr. Shortt A A > >A A didn't account for all costs A A > >A A A A ???? properly.? I have more faith that the A A > >A A present board members will A A > >A A A A ???? properly investigate and sort it out A A > >A A for everyone. A A > >A A A A ???? I am on-board with electronic A A > >A A delivery, though I do admit it's A A > >A A A A nice A A > >A A A A ???? to A A > >A A A A ???? just sit back and read a paper copy A A > >A A too.? It's also easier to A A > >A A A A ???? hand-off A A > >A A A A ???? to Sam so he can read it later.? How A A > >A A do you really fix that? A A > >A A A A ???? I would think (and I don't know), A A > >A A that the ClubExpress membership A A > >A A A A ???? database might be able to include a A A > >A A "preference" as part of the A A > >A A A A ???? member's A A > >A A A A ???? profile or details.? Just as I can A A > >A A set an address and phone A A > >A A A A number, A A > >A A A A ???? if I A A > >A A A A ???? could check a box for Electronic A A > >A A delivery or paper copies, or A A > >A A A A both, A A > >A A A A ???? and A A > >A A A A ???? select whatever I wanted for each A A > >A A item (Profiles versus A A > >A A A A Newsletter), A A > >A A A A ???? that might be ideal. A A > >A A A A ???? However, I'm also familiar with A A > >A A quantity discounting.? It very A A > >A A A A well A A > >A A A A ???? could be that it costs the same A A > >A A amount to print 500 as it does to A A > >A A A A ???? print A A > >A A A A ???? 50, or 10 (but I doubt it).? I A A > >A A imagine those are considerations A A > >A A A A the A A > >A A A A ???? board will look at as well. A A > >A A A A ???? Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie A A > >A A has claimed, I have heard (from A A > >A A A A ???? more A A > >A A A A ???? than one person), that Jack and Mike A A > >A A did not resign "because POCA A A > >A A A A ???? changed printers;" it was over A A > >A A "control" of newsletter content A A > >A A A A that A A > >A A A A ???? in A A > >A A A A ???? essence fell outside the bounds of A A > >A A the by-laws.? For a guy that A A > >A A A A ???? appeared A A > >A A A A ???? to try very hard to get everyone else A A > >A A to follow the by-laws (and A A > >A A A A ???? it's A A > >A A A A ???? unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt A A > >A A certainly didn't feel they A A > >A A A A ???? applied A A > >A A A A ???? to him. A A > >A A A A ???? For the record, as I understand it, A A > >A A POCA has changed printers A A > >A A A A ???? -twice- A A > >A A A A ???? since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were A A > >A A related to the DeRykes) got A A > >A A A A out A A > >A A A A ???? of A A > >A A A A ???? the business.? So the "family tie-in" A A > >A A previously eluded to, was A A > >A A A A not A A > >A A A A ???? a A A > >A A A A ???? factor in the resignations. A A > >A A A A ???? Just my $1.50? (two cents adjusted A A > >A A for inflation) A A > >A A A A ???? Asa? Jay A A > >A A A A ???? Asa Jay Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, A A > >A A USAFR, Retired A A > >A A A A ???? &? Shelley Marie A A > >A A A A ???? Spokane, WA A A > >A A A A ???? ****************************** A A > >A A A A ???? [20][42]http://w7tsc.org A A > >A A A A ???? [21][43]http://www.teampanteraracing.com A A > >A A A A ???? A A > >A A _______________________________________________ A A > >A A A A ???? Detomaso Email List is not managed by A A > >A A POCA A A > >A A A A ???? Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 A A > >A A Megabytes A A > >A A A A ???? DeTomaso mailing list A A > >A A A A ???? [22][44]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com A A > >A A A A ???? A A [23][45]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso A A > >A A A A ???? To manage your subscription (change A A > >A A email address, unsubscribe, A A > >A A A A ???? etc.) use the links above. A A > >A A A A ???? Members who post to this list grant A A > >A A license to the list to forward A A > >A A A A ???? any message posted here to all past, A A > >A A current, or future members of A A > >A A A A ???? the list. They also grant the list A A > >A A owner permission to maintain an A A > >A A A A ???? archive or approve the archiving of A A > >A A list messages. A A > >A A A A _______________________________________________ A A > >A A A A Detomaso Email List is not managed by A A > >A A POCA A A > >A A A A Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 A A > >A A Megabytes A A > >A A A A DeTomaso mailing list A A > >A A A A [24][46]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com A A > >A A A A [25][47]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/ listinfo/detomaso A A > >A A A A To manage your subscription (change email A A > >A A address, unsubscribe, etc.) A A > >A A A A use the links above. A A > >A A A A Members who post to this list grant A A > >A A license to the list to forward any A A > >A A A A message posted here to all past, current, A A > >A A or future members of the A A > >A A A A list. They also grant the list owner A A > >A A permission to maintain an archive A A > >A A A A or approve the archiving of list A A > >A A messages. A A > >A A A A

PS - if you read the attachment, you'll see that there is basically NO savings by changing printers. According to the quotes received, the $8000 savings was not correct. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Charles McCall <charlesmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
You did all read the info sent by Judy McCartney last week with Jack's explanation?
Re-sent here in case you didn't see it. Please open the attachment - I promise no viruses are included
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:20 AM, marshallgsmith < marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Hey Michael,
I think the best way to put this controversy to bed is if you or your dad could speak about not being cooperative in regards to the the use of another printer that supposedly afforded the club an $8,000 savings. That really seems to be the only issue that continues this controversy and I still haven't heard either of you discuss the allegation. I'm sure your response will cut this thread for good and allow us all to move on with the rebuilding of this great club.
Marshall Smith
President, San Diego Panteras
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone
From: erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:43:43 -0700 To: julian_kift@hotmail.com CC: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurieferrari@aol.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
Julian these are the same questions some of us have had and have been waiting for a reply or statement. I'm willing to give the board some time to come up with one.
Sent from Effie's iPad
On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Julian Kift <julian_kift@hotmail.com> wrote:
I have digested all the emails on this topic and to be honest it still doesn't sit well in my gut.
Presumably the BOD voted in favor of changing printers based upon
-------- Original message -------- From: Michael Haney <paso750@gmail.com> Date: 8/15/16 10:36 PM (GMT-08:00) To: 'Judith McCartney' <jpoca2@hotmail.com>, 'Effie Richards' <erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>, 'Julian Kift' <julian_kift@hotmail.com> Cc: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com, 'laurie Basile' <laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Thank you very much, Judy. I really wish this thread would just die. I know that this isn't the answer you're fishing for, but it'll have to do since it's the truth. Nancy quit and took her associate (me) with her because she was tired of hearing from me all about Shortt's efforts to take over every aspect of POCA. I didn't fight her decision because I was in turn tired of Shortt's intimidation and bullying tactics. Frankly, being on the Board wasn't fun anymore and I was also very tired of Shortt's constant preening. As a matter of record, I resigned from the Board BEFORE Profiles #3 even went to the printer. I had nearly finished it and decided that I didn't want to let the POCA members down. I really didn't want to contribute any more to Shortt's regime, but my conscience won. Even after I sent the magazine in, I still had to deal with Shortt. He decided to interfere with the printer, sent them a database with a whole bunch of problematic info and threaten nonpayment if he didn't get preliminary proofs. How do I know this? I received a call while I was at work from the woman working in Allegra Printing's mail room. She called Shortt and he wouldn't help her with the database and ignored her questions. Having no one else to call, she called me. I in turn contacted Judy, our Membership Director, who fixed the problems that Shortt created. Regarding Shortt's allegations of graft, if anyone can find a connection between my family and anyone who EVER worked at Allegra Printing in Reno, Nevada, (or indeed any of Allegra's branches) please let me know. My Dad might respond as well, but he's been pretty busy caring for my SERIOUSLY ill Mom who was in the hospital for the last two weeks and who might finally be able to come back home in a couple more. Now, can we finally put this "controversy" to rest? Mike Haney -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Judith McCartney Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 PM To: Effie Richards; Julian Kift Cc: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Mike Haney gave his resignation months way head of Jacks, two diff reasons. Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator. the
quotes presented. Did they not have all the facts and if not why did they not question further? Did Jack have all the facts w hen he resigned or were his and Mike Haney's resignations simply an outright stand against changing printer?
Why did Michael push to change printer if he knew there was only pennies between it?
Julian
From: DeTomaso <detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> on
behalf of
marshall smith <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:11 AM To: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurieferrari@aol.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
I find it funny that three months after the Fun Rally we are now hearing that Shortt's bid for printing did not include shipping. Shortt is a lot of things but a mistake like this...? I was listening in on this meeting also and I know what I heard. Apparently, the board convinced 'some' members of this so-called discrepancy month's ago. Why wasn't this information, if it exists, relayed to ALL of us in a timely manner? Marshall
-------------------------------------------- On Mon, 8/15/16, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote: Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations To: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Date: Monday, August 15, 2016, 9:57 AM
Dear AJ,
I have always respected you and your opinions but in this case you are incorrect as far as the resignation of Jack DeRyke. I was on the Board of Directors' conference call where he was asked to stay and he adamantly refused to if the printer changed. Jack's resignation was specifically because of the change in printer! You can go research that phone conference call, or the minutes of the meeting, as the facts are saved. As far as Mike Haney's resignation, that was done by his Mrs. for their reasons which most likely were aligned with their parents.
Laurie
In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? [1]asajay@asajay.com writes: The last? I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was interested in doing a? -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for me, it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out on full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss.? However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs properly.? I? have more faith that the present board members will properly investigate? and sort it out for everyone. I am on-board with electronic delivery,? though I do admit it's nice to just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? It's also easier to hand-off to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do you really fix that? I would think (and I don't? know), that the ClubExpress membership database might be able to include a? "preference" as part of the member's profile or details.? Just as I? can set an address and phone number, if I could check a box for Electronic? delivery or paper copies, or both, and select whatever I wanted for each? item (Profiles versus Newsletter), that might be ideal. However,? I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well could be? that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to print 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the board will? look at as well. Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have? heard (from more than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign? "because POCA changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter? content that in essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For? a guy that appeared to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the? by-laws (and it's unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't? feel they applied to him. For the record, as I understand it, POCA? has changed printers -twice- since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related? to the DeRykes) got out of the business.? So the "family tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not a factor in the resignations. Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) Asa? Jay Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired &? Shelley? Mar
-----Original Message----- From: detomaso-request <detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com> To: detomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> Sent: Mon, Aug 15, 2016 9:00 am Subject: DeTomaso Digest, Vol 146, Issue 20 Send DeTomaso mailing list submissions to [2]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit [3]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to detomaso-[4]request@server.detomasolist.com You can reach the person managing the list at detomaso-[5]owner@server.detomasolist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of DeTomaso digest..." Daily Detomaso List Digest Today's Topics: 1. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic (marshallgsmith) 2. Re: De Tomaso Pantera GTS on eBay! again $250K!! (Michael Cox) 3. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic (Stephen)
--- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:27:43 -0700 From: marshallgsmith <[6]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> To: [7]P6746@aol.com, [8]asajay@asajay.com, [9]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic Message-ID:
<[10]sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com>
Calling this situation "multiple dues levels" seems to be making the issue too complex. There are some members
What is your estimate of the length of time that it would take the board to arrange for a vote of the membership to change the bylaws to allow for this discount? Who specifically made that apples-to-apples comparison you refer to? I agree that the editors should have
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I have a couple questions Bob: that are opting to not have printed magazines mailed which should make those members eligible for a discount because of the savings. the most influence ?on the process. ?However, our editors of both publications seem to have a hard time reporting to the members about ANY issues pertaining to the publication's themselves. Might that change in the near future or will radio silence be the norm here? Marshall Smith Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: P6746--- via DeTomaso
<[11]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>
Date: 8/14/16 3:10 PM (GMT-08:00) To: [12]asajay@asajay.com, [13]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic To use a cliche, we're working on it.? Most of what has been mentioned is in the pipeline.?? However, there are restrictions, particularly with the By-Laws as they currently? stand.? There are no provisions for multiple dues levels,? particularly pertaining to how a member elects to have their club? publications delivered, etc.? That will take time as any changes or? amendments must be approved by the whole membership. The consensus seems to be that the Profiles would? continue as a print publication for all except foreign members who elect to? receive it digitally.? As far as printing is concerned, it is that first copy that is? so expensive, it is the subsequent copies that bring down the per unit? cost.? So as fewer units are produced and shipped, the cost per unit? increases but not proportionately.?? An apples to apples comparison was made between an online? printer and the current printer for both printing and mailing and the difference? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but for the whole run.? As far as I am concerned, it is the editors who should have? the most influence as to how and where their product is produced.? They are? the ones who must work with the printers and mailing houses on a regular? basis. Bob Reid? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? [14]asajay@asajay.com writes: The last? I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was interested in doing a? -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for me, it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out on full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss.? However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs properly.? I? have more faith that the present board members will properly investigate? and sort it out for everyone. I am on-board with electronic delivery,? though I do admit it's nice to just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? It's also easier to hand-off to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do you really fix that? I would think (and I don't? know), that the ClubExpress membership database might be able to include a? "preference" as part of the member's profile or details.? Just as I? can set an address and phone number, if I could check a box for Electronic? delivery or paper copies, or both, and select whatever I wanted for each? item (Profiles versus Newsletter), that might be ideal. However,? I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well could be? that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to print 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the board will? look at as well. Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have? heard (from more than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign? "because POCA changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter? content that in essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For? a guy that appeared to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the? by-laws (and it's unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't? feel they applied to him. For the record, as I understand it, POCA? has changed printers -twice- since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related? to the DeRykes) got out of the business.? So the "family tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not a factor in the resignations. Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) Asa? Jay Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired &? Shelley? Marie Spokane,? WA ****************************** [15]http://w7tsc.org [16]http://www.teampanteraracing.com _______________________________________________ Detomaso? Email List is not managed by POCA Posted emails must not exceed 1.5? Megabytes DeTomaso mailing? list [17]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com [18]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso To? manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) use the? links above. Members who post to this list grant license to the list to? forward any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of the? list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an archive or? approve the archiving of list? messages. ?? To use a cliche, we're working on it. ?? Most of what has been mentioned is in the pipeline.? However, there are ?? restrictions, particularly with the By-Laws as they currently stand. ?? There are no provisions for multiple dues levels, ?? particularly pertaining to how a member elects to have their club ?? publications delivered, etc.? That will take time as any changes or ?? amendments must be approved by the whole membership. ?? The consensus seems to be that the Profiles would continue as a print ?? publication for all except foreign members who elect to receive it ?? digitally. ?? As far as printing is concerned, it is that first copy that is so ?? expensive, it is the subsequent copies that bring down the per unit ?? cost.? So as fewer units are produced and shipped, the cost per unit ?? increases but not proportionately. ?? An apples to apples comparison was made between an online printer and ?? the current printer for both printing and mailing and the difference ?? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but for the whole run. ?? As far as I am concerned, it is the editors who should have the most ?? influence as to how and where their product is produced.? They are the ?? ones who must work with the printers and mailing houses on a regular ?? basis. ?? Bob Reid ?? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, ?? [19]asajay@asajay.com writes: ???? The last I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was ???? interested ???? in doing a -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for ???? me, ???? it's a wait and see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out ???? on ???? full-color and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss. ???? However, I also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs ???? properly.? I have more faith that the present board members will ???? properly investigate and sort it out for everyone. ???? I am on-board with electronic delivery, though I do admit it's nice ???? to ???? just sit back and read a paper copy too.? It's also easier to ???? hand-off ???? to Sam so he can read it later.? How do you really fix that? ???? I would think (and I don't know), that the ClubExpress membership ???? database might be able to include a "preference" as part of the ???? member's ???? profile or details.? Just as I can set an address and phone number, ???? if I ???? could check a box for Electronic delivery or paper copies, or both, ???? and ???? select whatever I wanted for each item (Profiles versus Newsletter), ???? that might be ideal. ???? However, I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well ???? could be that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to ???? print ???? 50, or 10 (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the ???? board will look at as well. ???? Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have heard (from ???? more ???? than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign "because POCA ???? changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter content that ???? in ???? essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For a guy that ???? appeared ???? to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the by-laws (and ???? it's ???? unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't feel they ???? applied ???? to him. ???? For the record, as I understand it, POCA has changed printers ???? -twice- ???? since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related to the DeRykes) got out ???? of ???? the business.? So the "family tie-in" previously eluded to, was not ???? a ???? factor in the resignations. ???? Just my $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) ???? Asa? Jay ???? Asa Jay Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired ???? &? Shelley Marie ???? Spokane, WA ???? ****************************** ???? [20]http://w7tsc.org ???? [21]http://www.teampanteraracing.com ???? _______________________________________________ ???? Detomaso Email List is not managed by POCA ???? Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes ???? DeTomaso mailing list ???? [22]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com ????
[23]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
???? To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, ???? etc.) use the links above. ???? Members who post to this list grant license to the list to forward ???? any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of ???? the list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an ???? archive or approve the archiving of list messages. _______________________________________________ Detomaso Email List is not managed by POCA Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes DeTomaso mailing list [24]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com [25]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) use the links above. Members who post to this list grant license to the list to forward any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of the list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an archive or approve the archiving of list messages.
PS - if you read the attachment, you'll see that there is basically NO savings by changing printers.A According to the quotes received, the $8000 savings was not correct.A On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Charles McCall <[1]charlesmccall@gmail.com> wrote: You did all read the info sent by Judy McCartney last week with Jack's explanation? Re-sent here in case you didn't see it. Please open the attachment - I promise no viruses are included On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:20 AM, marshallgsmith <[2]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> wrote: A A Hey Michael, A A I think the best way to put this controversy to bed is if you or your A A dad could speak about not being cooperative in regards to the the use A A of another printer that supposedly afforded the club an $8,000 savings. A A That really seems to be the only issue that continues this controversy A A and I still haven't heard either of you discuss the allegation. I'm A A sure your response will cut this thread for good and allow us all to A A move on with the rebuilding of this great club. A A Marshall Smith A A President, San Diego Panteras A A Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone A A -------- Original message -------- A A From: Michael Haney <[3]paso750@gmail.com> A A Date: 8/15/16 10:36 PM (GMT-08:00) A A To: 'Judith McCartney' <[4]jpoca2@hotmail.com>, 'Effie Richards' A A <[5]erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>, 'Julian Kift' A A <[6]julian_kift@hotmail.com> A A Cc: [7]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com, 'laurie Basile' A A <[8]laurieferrari@aol.com> A A Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations A A Thank you very much, Judy. A A I really wish this thread would just die. A A I know that this isn't the answer you're fishing for, but it'll have to A A do A A since it's the truth. A A Nancy quit and took her associate (me) with her because she was tired A A of A A hearing from me all about Shortt's efforts to take over every aspect of A A POCA. A A I didn't fight her decision because I was in turn tired of Shortt's A A intimidation and bullying tactics. Frankly, being on the Board wasn't A A fun A A anymore and I was also very tired of Shortt's constant preening. A A As a matter of record, I resigned from the Board BEFORE Profiles #3 A A even A A went to the printer. I had nearly finished it and decided that I didn't A A want A A to let the POCA members down. I really didn't want to contribute any A A more to A A Shortt's regime, but my conscience won. A A Even after I sent the magazine in, I still had to deal with Shortt. He A A decided to interfere with the printer, sent them a database with a A A whole A A bunch of problematic info and threaten nonpayment if he didn't get A A preliminary proofs. How do I know this? I received a call while I was A A at A A work from the woman working in Allegra Printing's mail room. She called A A Shortt and he wouldn't help her with the database and ignored her A A questions. A A Having no one else to call, she called me. I in turn contacted Judy, A A our A A Membership Director, who fixed the problems that Shortt created. A A Regarding Shortt's allegations of graft, if anyone can find a A A connection A A between my family and anyone who EVER worked at Allegra Printing in A A Reno, A A Nevada, (or indeed any of Allegra's branches) please let me know. A A My Dad might respond as well, but he's been pretty busy caring for my A A SERIOUSLY ill Mom who was in the hospital for the last two weeks and A A who A A might finally be able to come back home in a couple more. A A Now, can we finally put this "controversy" to rest? A A Mike Haney A A -----Original Message----- A A From: DeTomaso [mailto:[9]detomaso-bounces@serve r.detomasolist.com] On A A Behalf A A Of Judith McCartney A A Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 PM A A To: Effie Richards; Julian Kift A A Cc: [10]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurie Basile A A Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations A A Mike Haney gave his resignation months way head of Jacks, two diff A A reasons. A A Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator. A A > From: [11]erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com A A > Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:43:43 -0700 A A > To: [12]julian_kift@hotmail.com A A > CC: [13]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; [14]laurieferrari@aol.com A A > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations A A > A A > Julian these are the same questions some of us have had and have been A A waiting for a reply or statement. I'm willing to give the board some A A time to A A come up with one. A A > A A > Sent from Effie's iPad A A > A A > > On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Julian Kift <[15]julian_kift@hotmail.com> A A wrote: A A > > A A > >A A I have digested all the emails on this topic and to be honest it A A still A A > >A A doesn't sit well in my gut. A A > > A A > > A A > >A A Presumably the BOD voted in favor of changing printers based upon A A the A A > >A A quotes presented. Did they not have all the facts and A A > >A A if not why did they not question further? Did Jack have all the A A facts A A w A A > >A A hen he resigned or were his and Mike Haney's resignations simply A A an A A > >A A outright stand against changing printer? A A > > A A > > A A > >A A Why did Michael push to change printer if he knew there was only A A > >A A pennies between it? A A > > A A > > A A > >A A Julian A A > > A A __________________________________________________________________ A A > > A A > >A A From: DeTomaso <[16]detomaso-bounces@server.detom asolist.com> on A A behalf of A A > >A A marshall smith <[17]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> A A > >A A Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:11 AM A A > >A A To: [18]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; [19]laurieferrari@aol.com A A > >A A Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations A A > > A A > >A A I find it funny that three months after the Fun Rally we are now A A > >A A hearing that Shortt's bid for printing did not include shipping. A A Shortt A A > >A A is a lot of things but a mistake like this...? A A > >A A I was listening in on this meeting also and I know what I heard. A A > >A A Apparently, the board convinced 'some' members of this so-called A A > >A A discrepancy month's ago. Why wasn't this information, if it A A exists, A A > >A A relayed to ALL of us in a timely manner? A A > >A A Marshall A A > > A A > >A A -------------------------------------------- A A > >A A On Mon, 8/15/16, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso A A > >A A <[20]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote: A A > >A A Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations A A > >A A To: [21]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com A A > >A A Date: Monday, August 15, 2016, 9:57 AM A A > > A A > >A A A A Dear AJ, A A > > A A > >A A A A I have always respected you and your A A > >A A opinions but in this case you are A A > >A A A A incorrect as far as the resignation of A A > >A A Jack DeRyke.A I was on the Board A A > >A A A A of Directors' conference call where he was A A > >A A asked to stay and he A A > >A A A A adamantly refused to if the printer A A > >A A changed.A Jack's resignation was A A > >A A A A specifically because of the change in A A > >A A printer!A You can go research A A > >A A A A that phone conference call, or the minutes A A > >A A of the meeting, as the facts A A > >A A A A are saved.A As far as Mike Haney's A A > >A A resignation, that was done by his A A > >A A A A Mrs. for their reasons which most likely A A > >A A were aligned with their A A > >A A A A parents. A A > > A A > >A A A A Laurie A A > > A A > >A A A A A In a message dated 8/13/2016 A A > >A A 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? A A > >A A A A A [1][22]asajay@asajay.com A A > >A A writes: A A > >A A A A A The last? I heard (and I may have A A > >A A heard wrong), the board was A A > >A A A A A interested A A > >A A A A A in doing a? -real- accounting A A > >A A comparison of printing costs, so for A A > >A A A A A me, A A > >A A A A A it's a wait and? see kind of A A > >A A thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing A A > >A A A A A out on A A > >A A A A A full-color? and paying $8,000 more A A > >A A for B/W then something is amiss.? A A > >A A A A A However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt A A > >A A didn't account for all costs A A > >A A A A A properly.? I? have more faith that A A > >A A the present board members will A A > >A A A A A properly investigate? and sort it A A > >A A out for everyone. A A > >A A A A A I am on-board with electronic A A > >A A delivery,? though I do admit it's nice A A > >A A A A A to A A > >A A A A A just sit back and read a paper A A > >A A copy? too.? It's also easier to A A > >A A A A A hand-off A A > >A A A A A to Sam so he can read it? later.? A A > >A A How do you really fix that? A A > >A A A A A I would think (and I don't? know), A A > >A A that the ClubExpress membership A A > >A A A A A database might be able to include A A > >A A a? "preference" as part of the A A > >A A A A A member's A A > >A A A A A profile or details.? Just as I? can A A > >A A set an address and phone number, A A > >A A A A A if I A A > >A A A A A could check a box for Electronic? A A > >A A delivery or paper copies, or both, A A > >A A A A A and A A > >A A A A A select whatever I wanted for each? A A > >A A item (Profiles versus A A > >A A A A A Newsletter), A A > >A A A A A that might be ideal. A A > >A A A A A However,? I'm also familiar with A A > >A A quantity discounting.? It very well A A > >A A A A A could be? that it costs the same A A > >A A amount to print 500 as it does to A A > >A A A A A print A A > >A A A A A 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I A A > >A A imagine those are considerations the A A > >A A A A A board will? look at as well. A A > >A A A A A Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie A A > >A A has claimed, I have? heard (from A A > >A A A A A more A A > >A A A A A than one person), that Jack and A A > >A A Mike did not resign? "because POCA A A > >A A A A A changed printers;" it was over A A > >A A "control" of newsletter? content that A A > >A A A A A in A A > >A A A A A essence fell outside the bounds of A A > >A A the by-laws.? For? a guy that A A > >A A A A A appeared A A > >A A A A A to try very hard to get everyone A A > >A A else to follow the? by-laws (and A A > >A A A A A it's A A > >A A A A A unwritten code of ethics), Mr. A A > >A A Shortt certainly didn't? feel they A A > >A A A A A applied A A > >A A A A A to him. A A > >A A A A A For the record, as I understand it, A A > >A A POCA? has changed printers A A > >A A A A A -twice- A A > >A A A A A since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were A A > >A A related? to the DeRykes) got out A A > >A A A A A of A A > >A A A A A the business.? So the "family A A > >A A tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not A A > >A A A A A a A A > >A A A A A factor in the resignations. A A > >A A A A A Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted A A > >A A for inflation) A A > >A A A A A Asa? Jay A A > >A A A A A Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, A A > >A A USAFR, Retired A A > >A A A A A &? Shelley? Mar A A > > A A > >A A A A -----Original Message----- A A > >A A A A From: detomaso-request A A <[23]detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com> A A > >A A A A To: detomaso <[24]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> A A > >A A A A Sent: Mon, Aug 15, 2016 9:00 am A A > >A A A A Subject: DeTomaso Digest, Vol 146, Issue A A > >A A 20 A A > >A A A A Send DeTomaso mailing list submissions to A A > >A A A A [2][25]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com A A > >A A A A To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World A A > >A A Wide Web, visit A A > >A A A A [3][26]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/ listinfo/detomaso A A > >A A A A or, via email, send a message with subject A A > >A A or body 'help' to A A > >A A A A detomaso-[4][27]request@server.detomasolist.com A A > >A A A A You can reach the person managing the list A A > >A A at A A > >A A A A detomaso-[5][28]owner@server.detomasolist.com A A > >A A A A When replying, please edit your Subject A A > >A A line so it is more specific A A > >A A A A than "Re: Contents of DeTomaso digest..." A A > >A A A A Daily Detomaso List Digest A A > >A A A A Today's Topics: A A > >A A A A 1. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. A A > >A A electronic (marshallgsmith) A A > >A A A A 2. Re: De Tomaso Pantera GTS on eBay! A A > >A A again $250K!! (Michael Cox) A A > >A A A A 3. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. A A > >A A electronic (Stephen) A A > > A A ----------------------------------------------------------- -------- A A > >A A --- A A > >A A A A Message: 1 A A > >A A A A Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:27:43 -0700 A A > >A A A A From: marshallgsmith <[6][29]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> A A > >A A A A To: [7][30]P6746@aol.com, [8][31]asajay@asajay.com, A A > >A A A A [9][32]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com A A > >A A A A Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, A A > >A A paper vs. electronic A A > >A A A A Message-ID: A A > > A A <[10][33]sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com> A A > >A A A A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" A A > >A A A A I have a couple questions Bob: A A > >> Calling this situation "multiple dues A A > >A A levels" seems to be making the A A > >A A A A issue too complex. There are some members A A > >A A that are opting to not have A A > >A A A A printed magazines mailed which should make A A > >A A those members eligible for a A A > >A A A A discount because of the savings. A A > >> What is your estimate of the length A A > >A A of time that it would take the A A > >A A A A board to arrange for a vote of the A A > >A A membership to change the bylaws to A A > >A A A A allow for this discount? A A > >> Who specifically made that A A > >A A apples-to-apples comparison you refer to? A A > >> I agree that the editors should have A A > >A A the most influence ?on the A A > >A A A A process. ?However, our editors of both A A > >A A publications seem to have a hard A A > >A A A A time reporting to the members about ANY A A > >A A issues pertaining to the A A > >A A A A publication's themselves. Might that A A > >A A change in the near future or will A A > >A A A A radio silence be the norm here? A A > >A A A A Marshall Smith A A > >A A A A Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone A A > >A A A A -------- Original message -------- A A > >A A A A From: P6746--- via DeTomaso A A <[11][34]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> A A > >A A A A Date: 8/14/16 3:10 PM (GMT-08:00) A A > >A A A A To: [12][35]asajay@asajay.com, A A > >A A [13][36]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com A A > >A A A A Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, A A > >A A paper vs. electronic A A > >A A A A To use a cliche, we're working on it.? A A > >A A A A Most of what has been mentioned is in the A A > >A A pipeline.?? However, there A A > >A A A A are A A > >A A A A restrictions, particularly with the A A > >A A By-Laws as they currently? stand.? A A > >A A A A There A A > >A A A A are no provisions for multiple dues A A > >A A levels,? particularly pertaining to A A > >A A A A how a A A > >A A A A member elects to have their club? A A > >A A publications delivered, etc.? That A A > >A A A A will A A > >A A A A take time as any changes or? amendments A A > >A A must be approved by the whole A A > >A A A A membership. A A > >A A A A The consensus seems to be that the A A > >A A Profiles would? continue as a print A A > >A A A A publication for all except foreign members A A > >A A who elect to? receive it A A > >A A A A digitally.? A A > >A A A A As far as printing is concerned, it is A A > >A A that first copy that is? so A A > >A A A A expensive, it is the subsequent copies A A > >A A that bring down the per unit? A A > >A A A A cost.? So as A A > >A A A A fewer units are produced and shipped, the A A > >A A cost per unit? increases but A A > >A A A A not A A > >A A A A proportionately.?? A A > >A A A A An apples to apples comparison was made A A > >A A between an online? printer and A A > >A A A A the A A > >A A A A current printer for both printing and A A > >A A mailing and the difference? was A A > >A A A A pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but A A > >A A for the whole run.? A A > >A A A A As far as I am concerned, it is the A A > >A A editors who should have? the most A A > >A A A A influence as to how and where their A A > >A A product is produced.? They are? the A A > >A A A A ones who A A > >A A A A must work with the printers and mailing A A > >A A houses on a regular? basis. A A > >A A A A Bob Reid? A A > >A A A A In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. A A > >A A Eastern Daylight Time,? A A > >A A A A [14][37]asajay@asajay.com A A > >A A writes: A A > >A A A A The last? I heard (and I may have heard A A > >A A wrong), the board was A A > >A A A A interested A A > >A A A A in doing a? -real- accounting comparison A A > >A A of printing costs, so for me, A A > >A A A A it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I A A > >A A agree, if POCA was missing out A A > >A A A A on A A > >A A A A full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W A A > >A A then something is amiss.? A A > >A A A A However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't A A > >A A account for all costs A A > >A A A A properly.? I? have more faith that the A A > >A A present board members will A A > >A A A A properly investigate? and sort it out for A A > >A A everyone. A A > >A A A A I am on-board with electronic delivery,? A A > >A A though I do admit it's nice to A A > >A A A A just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? A A > >A A It's also easier to hand-off A A > >A A A A to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do A A > >A A you really fix that? A A > >A A A A I would think (and I don't? know), that A A > >A A the ClubExpress membership A A > >A A A A database might be able to include a? A A > >A A "preference" as part of the A A > >A A A A member's A A > >A A A A profile or details.? Just as I? can set an A A > >A A address and phone number, if A A > >A A A A I A A > >A A A A could check a box for Electronic? delivery A A > >A A or paper copies, or both, A A > >A A A A and A A > >A A A A select whatever I wanted for each? item A A > >A A (Profiles versus Newsletter), A A > >A A A A that might be ideal. A A > >A A A A However,? I'm also familiar with quantity A A > >A A discounting.? It very well A A > >A A A A could be? that it costs the same amount to A A > >A A print 500 as it does to A A > >A A A A print A A > >A A A A 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine A A > >A A those are considerations the A A > >A A A A board will? look at as well. A A > >A A A A Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has A A > >A A claimed, I have? heard (from A A > >A A A A more A A > >A A A A than one person), that Jack and Mike did A A > >A A not resign? "because POCA A A > >A A A A changed printers;" it was over "control" A A > >A A of newsletter? content that in A A > >A A A A essence fell outside the bounds of the A A > >A A by-laws.? For? a guy that A A > >A A A A appeared A A > >A A A A to try very hard to get everyone else to A A > >A A follow the? by-laws (and it's A A > >A A A A unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt A A > >A A certainly didn't? feel they A A > >A A A A applied A A > >A A A A to him. A A > >A A A A For the record, as I understand it, POCA? A A > >A A has changed printers -twice- A A > >A A A A since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were A A > >A A related? to the DeRykes) got out of A A > >A A A A the business.? So the "family tie-in"? A A > >A A previously eluded to, was not a A A > >A A A A factor in the resignations. A A > >A A A A Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for A A > >A A inflation) A A > >A A A A Asa? Jay A A > >A A A A Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, A A > >A A Retired A A > >A A A A &? Shelley? Marie A A > >A A A A Spokane,? WA A A > >A A A A ****************************** A A > >A A A A [15][38]http://w7tsc.org A A > >A A A A [16][39]http://www.teampanteraracing.com A A > >A A A A _______________________________________________ A A > >A A A A Detomaso? Email List is not managed by A A > >A A POCA A A > >A A A A Posted emails must not exceed 1.5? A A > >A A Megabytes A A > >A A A A DeTomaso mailing? list A A > >A A A A [17][40]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com A A > >A A A A [18][41]http://server.detomasolis t.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso A A > >A A A A To? manage your subscription (change email A A > >A A address, unsubscribe, etc.) A A > >A A A A use A A > >A A A A the? links above. A A > >A A A A Members who post to this list grant A A > >A A license to the list to? forward any A A > >A A A A message posted here to all past, current, A A > >A A or future members of the? A A > >A A A A list. They A A > >A A A A also grant the list owner permission to A A > >A A maintain an archive or? approve A A > >A A A A the A A > >A A A A archiving of list? messages. A A > >A A A A ?? To use a cliche, we're working on it. A A > >A A A A ?? Most of what has been mentioned is in A A > >A A the pipeline.? However, there A A > >A A A A are A A > >A A A A ?? restrictions, particularly with the A A > >A A By-Laws as they currently stand. A A > >A A A A ?? There are no provisions for multiple A A > >A A dues levels, A A > >A A A A ?? particularly pertaining to how a member A A > >A A elects to have their club A A > >A A A A ?? publications delivered, etc.? That will A A > >A A take time as any changes or A A > >A A A A ?? amendments must be approved by the A A > >A A whole membership. A A > >A A A A ?? The consensus seems to be that the A A > >A A Profiles would continue as a A A > >A A A A print A A > >A A A A ?? publication for all except foreign A A > >A A members who elect to receive it A A > >A A A A ?? digitally. A A > >A A A A ?? As far as printing is concerned, it is A A > >A A that first copy that is so A A > >A A A A ?? expensive, it is the subsequent copies A A > >A A that bring down the per unit A A > >A A A A ?? cost.? So as fewer units are produced A A > >A A and shipped, the cost per unit A A > >A A A A ?? increases but not proportionately. A A > >A A A A ?? An apples to apples comparison was made A A > >A A between an online printer A A > >A A A A and A A > >A A A A ?? the current printer for both printing A A > >A A and mailing and the difference A A > >A A A A ?? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per A A > >A A unit but for the whole run. A A > >A A A A ?? As far as I am concerned, it is the A A > >A A editors who should have the most A A > >A A A A ?? influence as to how and where their A A > >A A product is produced.? They are A A > >A A A A the A A > >A A A A ?? ones who must work with the printers A A > >A A and mailing houses on a regular A A > >A A A A ?? basis. A A > >A A A A ?? Bob Reid A A > >A A A A ?? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 A A > >A A P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, A A > >A A A A ?? [19][42]asajay@asajay.com A A > >A A writes: A A > >A A A A ???? The last I heard (and I may have A A > >A A heard wrong), the board was A A > >A A A A ???? interested A A > >A A A A ???? in doing a -real- accounting A A > >A A comparison of printing costs, so for A A > >A A A A ???? me, A A > >A A A A ???? it's a wait and see kind of thing.? I A A > >A A agree, if POCA was missing A A > >A A A A out A A > >A A A A ???? on A A > >A A A A ???? full-color and paying $8,000 more for A A > >A A B/W then something is amiss. A A > >A A A A ???? However, I also believe Mr. Shortt A A > >A A didn't account for all costs A A > >A A A A ???? properly.? I have more faith that the A A > >A A present board members will A A > >A A A A ???? properly investigate and sort it out A A > >A A for everyone. A A > >A A A A ???? I am on-board with electronic A A > >A A delivery, though I do admit it's A A > >A A A A nice A A > >A A A A ???? to A A > >A A A A ???? just sit back and read a paper copy A A > >A A too.? It's also easier to A A > >A A A A ???? hand-off A A > >A A A A ???? to Sam so he can read it later.? How A A > >A A do you really fix that? A A > >A A A A ???? I would think (and I don't know), A A > >A A that the ClubExpress membership A A > >A A A A ???? database might be able to include a A A > >A A "preference" as part of the A A > >A A A A ???? member's A A > >A A A A ???? profile or details.? Just as I can A A > >A A set an address and phone A A > >A A A A number, A A > >A A A A ???? if I A A > >A A A A ???? could check a box for Electronic A A > >A A delivery or paper copies, or A A > >A A A A both, A A > >A A A A ???? and A A > >A A A A ???? select whatever I wanted for each A A > >A A item (Profiles versus A A > >A A A A Newsletter), A A > >A A A A ???? that might be ideal. A A > >A A A A ???? However, I'm also familiar with A A > >A A quantity discounting.? It very A A > >A A A A well A A > >A A A A ???? could be that it costs the same A A > >A A amount to print 500 as it does to A A > >A A A A ???? print A A > >A A A A ???? 50, or 10 (but I doubt it).? I A A > >A A imagine those are considerations A A > >A A A A the A A > >A A A A ???? board will look at as well. A A > >A A A A ???? Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie A A > >A A has claimed, I have heard (from A A > >A A A A ???? more A A > >A A A A ???? than one person), that Jack and Mike A A > >A A did not resign "because POCA A A > >A A A A ???? changed printers;" it was over A A > >A A "control" of newsletter content A A > >A A A A that A A > >A A A A ???? in A A > >A A A A ???? essence fell outside the bounds of A A > >A A the by-laws.? For a guy that A A > >A A A A ???? appeared A A > >A A A A ???? to try very hard to get everyone else A A > >A A to follow the by-laws (and A A > >A A A A ???? it's A A > >A A A A ???? unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt A A > >A A certainly didn't feel they A A > >A A A A ???? applied A A > >A A A A ???? to him. A A > >A A A A ???? For the record, as I understand it, A A > >A A POCA has changed printers A A > >A A A A ???? -twice- A A > >A A A A ???? since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were A A > >A A related to the DeRykes) got A A > >A A A A out A A > >A A A A ???? of A A > >A A A A ???? the business.? So the "family tie-in" A A > >A A previously eluded to, was A A > >A A A A not A A > >A A A A ???? a A A > >A A A A ???? factor in the resignations. A A > >A A A A ???? Just my $1.50? (two cents adjusted A A > >A A for inflation) A A > >A A A A ???? Asa? Jay A A > >A A A A ???? Asa Jay Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, A A > >A A USAFR, Retired A A > >A A A A ???? &? Shelley Marie A A > >A A A A ???? Spokane, WA A A > >A A A A ???? ****************************** A A > >A A A A ???? [20][43]http://w7tsc.org A A > >A A A A ???? [21][44]http://www.teampanteraracing.com A A > >A A A A ???? A A > >A A _______________________________________________ A A > >A A A A ???? Detomaso Email List is not managed by A A > >A A POCA A A > >A A A A ???? Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 A A > >A A Megabytes A A > >A A A A ???? DeTomaso mailing list A A > >A A A A ???? [22][45]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com A A > >A A A A ???? A A [23][46]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso A A > >A A A A ???? To manage your subscription (change A A > >A A email address, unsubscribe, A A > >A A A A ???? etc.) use the links above. A A > >A A A A ???? Members who post to this list grant A A > >A A license to the list to forward A A > >A A A A ???? any message posted here to all past, A A > >A A current, or future members of A A > >A A A A ???? the list. They also grant the list A A > >A A owner permission to maintain an A A > >A A A A ???? archive or approve the archiving of A A > >A A list messages. A A > >A A A A _______________________________________________ A A > >A A A A Detomaso Email List is not managed by A A > >A A POCA A A > >A A A A Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 A A > >A A Megabytes A A > >A A A A DeTomaso mailing list A A > >A A A A [24][47]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com A A > >A A A A [25][48]http://server.detomasolis t.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso A A > >A A A A To manage your subscription (change email A A > >A A address, unsubscribe, etc.) A A > >A A A A use the links above. A A > >A A A A Members who post to this list grant A A > >A A license to the list to forward any A A > >A A A A message posted here to all past, current, A A > >A A or future members of the A A > >A A A A list. They also grant the list owner A A > >A A permission to maintain an archive A A > >A A A A or approve the archiving of list A A > >A A messages. A A > >A A A A

From: erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:43:43 -0700 To: julian_kift@hotmail.com CC: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurieferrari@aol.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
Julian these are the same questions some of us have had and have been waiting for a reply or statement. I'm willing to give the board some time to come up with one.
Sent from Effie's iPad
On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Julian Kift <julian_kift@hotmail.com> wrote:
I have digested all the emails on this topic and to be honest it still doesn't sit well in my gut.
Presumably the BOD voted in favor of changing printers based upon
To Charles, Sorry but just hard to believe. There was no benefit to MS to change.. he was a bargain hunter. How could a digital on line printer cost the same? The way I understood it there were to be templates to use to facilitate layouts and thus save time and money; the plus was color! I'm not as convinced as you considering the resistance to change through the years, and another sharing that he had quotes for half as much for his event printing, and said the Board refused to entertain it. I am sorry to be this skeptical but I just don't believe that such a great amount of savings from the new printer was a false and made up figure or carelessly misquoted. That would have been out of character. If no one brought it up, all would go along in the merry old way, paying the same, and getting the same product as we've had. You have to admit that seeing our cars in all color would be beautiful, even though you and I are white. I really believe this should be researched fairly. L. -----Original Message----- From: Charles McCall <charlesmccall@gmail.com> To: marshallgsmith <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> Cc: Michael Haney <paso750@gmail.com>; Judith McCartney <jpoca2@hotmail.com>; Effie Richards <erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>; Julian Kift <julian_kift@hotmail.com>; detomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>; laurie Basile <laurieferrari@aol.com> Sent: Tue, Aug 16, 2016 2:22 am Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations PS - if you read the attachment, you'll see that there is basically NO savings by changing printers. According to the quotes received, the $8000 savings was not correct. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Charles McCall <charlesmccall@gmail.com> wrote: You did all read the info sent by Judy McCartney last week with Jack's explanation? Re-sent here in case you didn't see it. Please open the attachment - I promise no viruses are included On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:20 AM, marshallgsmith <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Hey Michael, I think the best way to put this controversy to bed is if you or your dad could speak about not being cooperative in regards to the the use of another printer that supposedly afforded the club an $8,000 savings. That really seems to be the only issue that continues this controversy and I still haven't heard either of you discuss the allegation. I'm sure your response will cut this thread for good and allow us all to move on with the rebuilding of this great club. Marshall Smith President, San Diego Panteras Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Michael Haney <paso750@gmail.com> Date: 8/15/16 10:36 PM (GMT-08:00) To: 'Judith McCartney' <jpoca2@hotmail.com>, 'Effie Richards' <erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>, 'Julian Kift' <julian_kift@hotmail.com> Cc: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com, 'laurie Basile' <laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Thank you very much, Judy. I really wish this thread would just die. I know that this isn't the answer you're fishing for, but it'll have to do since it's the truth. Nancy quit and took her associate (me) with her because she was tired of hearing from me all about Shortt's efforts to take over every aspect of POCA. I didn't fight her decision because I was in turn tired of Shortt's intimidation and bullying tactics. Frankly, being on the Board wasn't fun anymore and I was also very tired of Shortt's constant preening. As a matter of record, I resigned from the Board BEFORE Profiles #3 even went to the printer. I had nearly finished it and decided that I didn't want to let the POCA members down. I really didn't want to contribute any more to Shortt's regime, but my conscience won. Even after I sent the magazine in, I still had to deal with Shortt. He decided to interfere with the printer, sent them a database with a whole bunch of problematic info and threaten nonpayment if he didn't get preliminary proofs. How do I know this? I received a call while I was at work from the woman working in Allegra Printing's mail room. She called Shortt and he wouldn't help her with the database and ignored her questions. Having no one else to call, she called me. I in turn contacted Judy, our Membership Director, who fixed the problems that Shortt created. Regarding Shortt's allegations of graft, if anyone can find a connection between my family and anyone who EVER worked at Allegra Printing in Reno, Nevada, (or indeed any of Allegra's branches) please let me know. My Dad might respond as well, but he's been pretty busy caring for my SERIOUSLY ill Mom who was in the hospital for the last two weeks and who might finally be able to come back home in a couple more. Now, can we finally put this "controversy" to rest? Mike Haney -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Judith McCartney Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 PM To: Effie Richards; Julian Kift Cc: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Mike Haney gave his resignation months way head of Jacks, two diff reasons. Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator. the
quotes presented. Did they not have all the facts and if not why did they not question further? Did Jack have all the facts w hen he resigned or were his and Mike Haney's resignations simply an outright stand against changing printer?
Why did Michael push to change printer if he knew there was only pennies between it?
Julian
From: DeTomaso <detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> on
behalf of
marshall smith <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:11 AM To: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurieferrari@aol.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
I find it funny that three months after the Fun Rally we are now hearing that Shortt's bid for printing did not include shipping. Shortt is a lot of things but a mistake like this...? I was listening in on this meeting also and I know what I heard. Apparently, the board convinced 'some' members of this so-called discrepancy month's ago. Why wasn't this information, if it exists, relayed to ALL of us in a timely manner? Marshall
-------------------------------------------- On Mon, 8/15/16, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote: Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations To: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Date: Monday, August 15, 2016, 9:57 AM
Dear AJ,
I have always respected you and your opinions but in this case you are incorrect as far as the resignation of Jack DeRyke. I was on the Board of Directors' conference call where he was asked to stay and he adamantly refused to if the printer changed. Jack's resignation was specifically because of the change in printer! You can go research that phone conference call, or the minutes of the meeting, as the facts are saved. As far as Mike Haney's resignation, that was done by his Mrs. for their reasons which most likely were aligned with their parents.
Laurie
In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? [1]asajay@asajay.com writes: The last? I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was interested in doing a? -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for me, it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out on full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss.? However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs properly.? I? have more faith that the present board members will properly investigate? and sort it out for everyone. I am on-board with electronic delivery,? though I do admit it's nice to just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? It's also easier to hand-off to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do you really fix that? I would think (and I don't? know), that the ClubExpress membership database might be able to include a? "preference" as part of the member's profile or details.? Just as I? can set an address and phone number, if I could check a box for Electronic? delivery or paper copies, or both, and select whatever I wanted for each? item (Profiles versus Newsletter), that might be ideal. However,? I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well could be? that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to print 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the board will? look at as well. Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have? heard (from more than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign? "because POCA changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter? content that in essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For? a guy that appeared to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the? by-laws (and it's unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't? feel they applied to him. For the record, as I understand it, POCA? has changed printers -twice- since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related? to the DeRykes) got out of the business.? So the "family tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not a factor in the resignations. Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) Asa? Jay Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired &? Shelley? Mar
-----Original Message----- From: detomaso-request <detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com> To: detomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> Sent: Mon, Aug 15, 2016 9:00 am Subject: DeTomaso Digest, Vol 146, Issue 20 Send DeTomaso mailing list submissions to [2]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit [3]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to detomaso-[4]request@server.detomasolist.com You can reach the person managing the list at detomaso-[5]owner@server.detomasolist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of DeTomaso digest..." Daily Detomaso List Digest Today's Topics: 1. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic (marshallgsmith) 2. Re: De Tomaso Pantera GTS on eBay! again $250K!! (Michael Cox) 3. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic (Stephen)
--- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:27:43 -0700 From: marshallgsmith <[6]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> To: [7]P6746@aol.com, [8]asajay@asajay.com, [9]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic Message-ID:
<[10]sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com>
Calling this situation "multiple dues levels" seems to be making the issue too complex. There are some members
What is your estimate of the length of time that it would take the board to arrange for a vote of the membership to change the bylaws to allow for this discount? Who specifically made that apples-to-apples comparison you refer to? I agree that the editors should have
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I have a couple questions Bob: that are opting to not have printed magazines mailed which should make those members eligible for a discount because of the savings. the most influence ?on the process. ?However, our editors of both publications seem to have a hard time reporting to the members about ANY issues pertaining to the publication's themselves. Might that change in the near future or will radio silence be the norm here? Marshall Smith Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: P6746--- via DeTomaso
<[11]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>
Date: 8/14/16 3:10 PM (GMT-08:00) To: [12]asajay@asajay.com, [13]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic To use a cliche, we're working on it.? Most of what has been mentioned is in the pipeline.?? However, there are restrictions, particularly with the By-Laws as they currently? stand.? There are no provisions for multiple dues levels,? particularly pertaining to how a member elects to have their club? publications delivered, etc.? That will take time as any changes or? amendments must be approved by the whole membership. The consensus seems to be that the Profiles would? continue as a print publication for all except foreign members who elect to? receive it digitally.? As far as printing is concerned, it is that first copy that is? so expensive, it is the subsequent copies that bring down the per unit? cost.? So as fewer units are produced and shipped, the cost per unit? increases but not proportionately.?? An apples to apples comparison was made between an online? printer and the current printer for both printing and mailing and the difference? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but for the whole run.? As far as I am concerned, it is the editors who should have? the most influence as to how and where their product is produced.? They are? the ones who must work with the printers and mailing houses on a regular? basis. Bob Reid? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? [14]asajay@asajay.com writes: The last? I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was interested in doing a? -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for me, it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out on full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss.? However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs properly.? I? have more faith that the present board members will properly investigate? and sort it out for everyone. I am on-board with electronic delivery,? though I do admit it's nice to just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? It's also easier to hand-off to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do you really fix that? I would think (and I don't? know), that the ClubExpress membership database might be able to include a? "preference" as part of the member's profile or details.? Just as I? can set an address and phone number, if I could check a box for Electronic? delivery or paper copies, or both, and select whatever I wanted for each? item (Profiles versus Newsletter), that might be ideal. However,? I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well could be? that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to print 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the board will? look at as well. Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have? heard (from more than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign? "because POCA changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter? content that in essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For? a guy that appeared to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the? by-laws (and it's unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't? feel they applied to him. For the record, as I understand it, POCA? has changed printers -twice- since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related? to the DeRykes) got out of the business.? So the "family tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not a factor in the resignations. Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) Asa? Jay Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired &? Shelley? Marie Spokane,? WA ****************************** [15]http://w7tsc.org [16]http://www.teampanteraracing.com _______________________________________________ Detomaso? Email List is not managed by POCA Posted emails must not exceed 1.5? Megabytes DeTomaso mailing? list [17]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com [18]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso To? manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) use the? links above. Members who post to this list grant license to the list to? forward any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of the? list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an archive or? approve the archiving of list? messages. ?? To use a cliche, we're working on it. ?? Most of what has been mentioned is in the pipeline.? However, there are ?? restrictions, particularly with the By-Laws as they currently stand. ?? There are no provisions for multiple dues levels, ?? particularly pertaining to how a member elects to have their club ?? publications delivered, etc.? That will take time as any changes or ?? amendments must be approved by the whole membership. ?? The consensus seems to be that the Profiles would continue as a print ?? publication for all except foreign members who elect to receive it ?? digitally. ?? As far as printing is concerned, it is that first copy that is so ?? expensive, it is the subsequent copies that bring down the per unit ?? cost.? So as fewer units are produced and shipped, the cost per unit ?? increases but not proportionately. ?? An apples to apples comparison was made between an online printer and ?? the current printer for both printing and mailing and the difference ?? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but for the whole run. ?? As far as I am concerned, it is the editors who should have the most ?? influence as to how and where their product is produced.? They are the ?? ones who must work with the printers and mailing houses on a regular ?? basis. ?? Bob Reid ?? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, ?? [19]asajay@asajay.com writes: ???? The last I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was ???? interested ???? in doing a -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for ???? me, ???? it's a wait and see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out ???? on ???? full-color and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss. ???? However, I also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs ???? properly.? I have more faith that the present board members will ???? properly investigate and sort it out for everyone. ???? I am on-board with electronic delivery, though I do admit it's nice ???? to ???? just sit back and read a paper copy too.? It's also easier to ???? hand-off ???? to Sam so he can read it later.? How do you really fix that? ???? I would think (and I don't know), that the ClubExpress membership ???? database might be able to include a "preference" as part of the ???? member's ???? profile or details.? Just as I can set an address and phone number, ???? if I ???? could check a box for Electronic delivery or paper copies, or both, ???? and ???? select whatever I wanted for each item (Profiles versus Newsletter), ???? that might be ideal. ???? However, I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well ???? could be that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to ???? print ???? 50, or 10 (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the ???? board will look at as well. ???? Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have heard (from ???? more ???? than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign "because POCA ???? changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter content that ???? in ???? essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For a guy that ???? appeared ???? to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the by-laws (and ???? it's ???? unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't feel they ???? applied ???? to him. ???? For the record, as I understand it, POCA has changed printers ???? -twice- ???? since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related to the DeRykes) got out ???? of ???? the business.? So the "family tie-in" previously eluded to, was not ???? a ???? factor in the resignations. ???? Just my $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) ???? Asa? Jay ???? Asa Jay Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired ???? &? Shelley Marie ???? Spokane, WA ???? ****************************** ???? [20]http://w7tsc.org ???? [21]http://www.teampanteraracing.com ???? _______________________________________________ ???? Detomaso Email List is not managed by POCA ???? Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes ???? DeTomaso mailing list ???? [22]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com ????
[23]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
???? To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, ???? etc.) use the links above. ???? Members who post to this list grant license to the list to forward ???? any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of ???? the list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an ???? archive or approve the archiving of list messages. _______________________________________________ Detomaso Email List is not managed by POCA Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes DeTomaso mailing list [24]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com [25]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) use the links above. Members who post to this list grant license to the list to forward any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of the list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an archive or approve the archiving of list messages.
To Charles, Sorry but just hard to believe. There was no benefit to MS to change.. he was a bargain hunter. How could a digital on line printer cost the same? The way I understood it there were to be templates to use to facilitate layouts and thus save time and money; the plus was color! I'm not as convinced as you considering the resistance to change through the years, and another sharing that he had quotes for half as much for his event printing, and said the Board refused to entertain it. I am sorry to be this skeptical but I just don't believe that such a great amount of savings from the new printer was a false and made up figure or carelessly misquoted. That would have been out of character. If no one brought it up, all would go along in the merry old way, paying the same, and getting the same product as we've had. You have to admit that seeing our cars in all color would be beautiful, even though you and I are white. I really believe this should be researched fairly. L. -----Original Message----- From: Charles McCall <charlesmccall@gmail.com> To: marshallgsmith <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> Cc: Michael Haney <paso750@gmail.com>; Judith McCartney <jpoca2@hotmail.com>; Effie Richards <erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>; Julian Kift <julian_kift@hotmail.com>; detomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>; laurie Basile <laurieferrari@aol.com> Sent: Tue, Aug 16, 2016 2:22 am Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations PS - if you read the attachment, you'll see that there is basically NO savings by changing printers. According to the quotes received, the $8000 savings was not correct. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Charles McCall <charlesmccall@gmail.com> wrote: You did all read the info sent by Judy McCartney last week with Jack's explanation? Re-sent here in case you didn't see it. Please open the attachment - I promise no viruses are included On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:20 AM, marshallgsmith <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Hey Michael, I think the best way to put this controversy to bed is if you or your dad could speak about not being cooperative in regards to the the use of another printer that supposedly afforded the club an $8,000 savings. That really seems to be the only issue that continues this controversy and I still haven't heard either of you discuss the allegation. I'm sure your response will cut this thread for good and allow us all to move on with the rebuilding of this great club. Marshall Smith President, San Diego Panteras Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Michael Haney <paso750@gmail.com> Date: 8/15/16 10:36 PM (GMT-08:00) To: 'Judith McCartney' <jpoca2@hotmail.com>, 'Effie Richards' <erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>, 'Julian Kift' <julian_kift@hotmail.com> Cc: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com, 'laurie Basile' <laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Thank you very much, Judy. I really wish this thread would just die. I know that this isn't the answer you're fishing for, but it'll have to do since it's the truth. Nancy quit and took her associate (me) with her because she was tired of hearing from me all about Shortt's efforts to take over every aspect of POCA. I didn't fight her decision because I was in turn tired of Shortt's intimidation and bullying tactics. Frankly, being on the Board wasn't fun anymore and I was also very tired of Shortt's constant preening. As a matter of record, I resigned from the Board BEFORE Profiles #3 even went to the printer. I had nearly finished it and decided that I didn't want to let the POCA members down. I really didn't want to contribute any more to Shortt's regime, but my conscience won. Even after I sent the magazine in, I still had to deal with Shortt. He decided to interfere with the printer, sent them a database with a whole bunch of problematic info and threaten nonpayment if he didn't get preliminary proofs. How do I know this? I received a call while I was at work from the woman working in Allegra Printing's mail room. She called Shortt and he wouldn't help her with the database and ignored her questions. Having no one else to call, she called me. I in turn contacted Judy, our Membership Director, who fixed the problems that Shortt created. Regarding Shortt's allegations of graft, if anyone can find a connection between my family and anyone who EVER worked at Allegra Printing in Reno, Nevada, (or indeed any of Allegra's branches) please let me know. My Dad might respond as well, but he's been pretty busy caring for my SERIOUSLY ill Mom who was in the hospital for the last two weeks and who might finally be able to come back home in a couple more. Now, can we finally put this "controversy" to rest? Mike Haney -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Judith McCartney Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 PM To: Effie Richards; Julian Kift Cc: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Mike Haney gave his resignation months way head of Jacks, two diff reasons. Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator. > From: erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com > Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:43:43 -0700 > To: julian_kift@hotmail.com > CC: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurieferrari@aol.com > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations > > Julian these are the same questions some of us have had and have been waiting for a reply or statement. I'm willing to give the board some time to come up with one. > > Sent from Effie's iPad > > > On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Julian Kift <julian_kift@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > I have digested all the emails on this topic and to be honest it still > > doesn't sit well in my gut. > > > > > > Presumably the BOD voted in favor of changing printers based upon the > > quotes presented. Did they not have all the facts and > > if not why did they not question further? Did Jack have all the facts w > > hen he resigned or were his and Mike Haney's resignations simply an > > outright stand against changing printer? > > > > > > Why did Michael push to change printer if he knew there was only > > pennies between it? > > > > > > Julian > > __________________________________________________________________ > > > > From: DeTomaso <detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> on behalf of > > marshall smith <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> > > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:11 AM > > To: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurieferrari@aol.com > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations > > > > I find it funny that three months after the Fun Rally we are now > > hearing that Shortt's bid for printing did not include shipping. Shortt > > is a lot of things but a mistake like this...? > > I was listening in on this meeting also and I know what I heard. > > Apparently, the board convinced 'some' members of this so-called > > discrepancy month's ago. Why wasn't this information, if it exists, > > relayed to ALL of us in a timely manner? > > Marshall > > > > -------------------------------------------- > > On Mon, 8/15/16, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso > > <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote: > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations > > To: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > Date: Monday, August 15, 2016, 9:57 AM > > > > Dear AJ, > > > > I have always respected you and your > > opinions but in this case you are > > incorrect as far as the resignation of > > Jack DeRyke. I was on the Board > > of Directors' conference call where he was > > asked to stay and he > > adamantly refused to if the printer > > changed. Jack's resignation was > > specifically because of the change in > > printer! You can go research > > that phone conference call, or the minutes > > of the meeting, as the facts > > are saved. As far as Mike Haney's > > resignation, that was done by his > > Mrs. for their reasons which most likely > > were aligned with their > > parents. > > > > Laurie > > > > In a message dated 8/13/2016 > > 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? > > [1]asajay@asajay.com > > writes: > > The last? I heard (and I may have > > heard wrong), the board was > > interested > > in doing a? -real- accounting > > comparison of printing costs, so for > > me, > > it's a wait and? see kind of > > thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing > > out on > > full-color? and paying $8,000 more > > for B/W then something is amiss.? > > However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt > > didn't account for all costs > > properly.? I? have more faith that > > the present board members will > > properly investigate? and sort it > > out for everyone. > > I am on-board with electronic > > delivery,? though I do admit it's nice > > to > > just sit back and read a paper > > copy? too.? It's also easier to > > hand-off > > to Sam so he can read it? later.? > > How do you really fix that? > > I would think (and I don't? know), > > that the ClubExpress membership > > database might be able to include > > a? "preference" as part of the > > member's > > profile or details.? Just as I? can > > set an address and phone number, > > if I > > could check a box for Electronic? > > delivery or paper copies, or both, > > and > > select whatever I wanted for each? > > item (Profiles versus > > Newsletter), > > that might be ideal. > > However,? I'm also familiar with > > quantity discounting.? It very well > > could be? that it costs the same > > amount to print 500 as it does to > > print > > 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I > > imagine those are considerations the > > board will? look at as well. > > Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie > > has claimed, I have? heard (from > > more > > than one person), that Jack and > > Mike did not resign? "because POCA > > changed printers;" it was over > > "control" of newsletter? content that > > in > > essence fell outside the bounds of > > the by-laws.? For? a guy that > > appeared > > to try very hard to get everyone > > else to follow the? by-laws (and > > it's > > unwritten code of ethics), Mr. > > Shortt certainly didn't? feel they > > applied > > to him. > > For the record, as I understand it, > > POCA? has changed printers > > -twice- > > since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were > > related? to the DeRykes) got out > > of > > the business.? So the "family > > tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not > > a > > factor in the resignations. > > Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted > > for inflation) > > Asa? Jay > > Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, > > USAFR, Retired > > &? Shelley? Mar > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: detomaso-request <detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com> > > To: detomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> > > Sent: Mon, Aug 15, 2016 9:00 am > > Subject: DeTomaso Digest, Vol 146, Issue > > 20 > > Send DeTomaso mailing list submissions to > > [2]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World > > Wide Web, visit > > [3]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/ listinfo/detomaso > > or, via email, send a message with subject > > or body 'help' to > > detomaso-[4]request@server.detomasolist.com > > You can reach the person managing the list > > at > > detomaso-[5]owner@server.detomasolist.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject > > line so it is more specific > > than "Re: Contents of DeTomaso digest..." > > Daily Detomaso List Digest > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. > > electronic (marshallgsmith) > > 2. Re: De Tomaso Pantera GTS on eBay! > > again $250K!! (Michael Cox) > > 3. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. > > electronic (Stephen) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > --- > > Message: 1 > > Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:27:43 -0700 > > From: marshallgsmith <[6]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> > > To: [7]P6746@aol.com, [8]asajay@asajay.com, > > [9]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, > > paper vs. electronic > > Message-ID: > > <[10]sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I have a couple questions Bob: > >> Calling this situation "multiple dues > > levels" seems to be making the > > issue too complex. There are some members > > that are opting to not have > > printed magazines mailed which should make > > those members eligible for a > > discount because of the savings. > >> What is your estimate of the length > > of time that it would take the > > board to arrange for a vote of the > > membership to change the bylaws to > > allow for this discount? > >> Who specifically made that > > apples-to-apples comparison you refer to? > >> I agree that the editors should have > > the most influence ?on the > > process. ?However, our editors of both > > publications seem to have a hard > > time reporting to the members about ANY > > issues pertaining to the > > publication's themselves. Might that > > change in the near future or will > > radio silence be the norm here? > > Marshall Smith > > Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone > > -------- Original message -------- > > From: P6746--- via DeTomaso <[11]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> > > Date: 8/14/16 3:10 PM (GMT-08:00) > > To: [12]asajay@asajay.com, > > [13]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, > > paper vs. electronic > > To use a cliche, we're working on it.? > > Most of what has been mentioned is in the > > pipeline.?? However, there > > are > > restrictions, particularly with the > > By-Laws as they currently? stand.? > > There > > are no provisions for multiple dues > > levels,? particularly pertaining to > > how a > > member elects to have their club? > > publications delivered, etc.? That > > will > > take time as any changes or? amendments > > must be approved by the whole > > membership. > > The consensus seems to be that the > > Profiles would? continue as a print > > publication for all except foreign members > > who elect to? receive it > > digitally.? > > As far as printing is concerned, it is > > that first copy that is? so > > expensive, it is the subsequent copies > > that bring down the per unit? > > cost.? So as > > fewer units are produced and shipped, the > > cost per unit? increases but > > not > > proportionately.?? > > An apples to apples comparison was made > > between an online? printer and > > the > > current printer for both printing and > > mailing and the difference? was > > pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but > > for the whole run.? > > As far as I am concerned, it is the > > editors who should have? the most > > influence as to how and where their > > product is produced.? They are? the > > ones who > > must work with the printers and mailing > > houses on a regular? basis. > > Bob Reid? > > In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. > > Eastern Daylight Time,? > > [14]asajay@asajay.com > > writes: > > The last? I heard (and I may have heard > > wrong), the board was > > interested > > in doing a? -real- accounting comparison > > of printing costs, so for me, > > it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I > > agree, if POCA was missing out > > on > > full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W > > then something is amiss.? > > However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't > > account for all costs > > properly.? I? have more faith that the > > present board members will > > properly investigate? and sort it out for > > everyone. > > I am on-board with electronic delivery,? > > though I do admit it's nice to > > just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? > > It's also easier to hand-off > > to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do > > you really fix that? > > I would think (and I don't? know), that > > the ClubExpress membership > > database might be able to include a? > > "preference" as part of the > > member's > > profile or details.? Just as I? can set an > > address and phone number, if > > I > > could check a box for Electronic? delivery > > or paper copies, or both, > > and > > select whatever I wanted for each? item > > (Profiles versus Newsletter), > > that might be ideal. > > However,? I'm also familiar with quantity > > discounting.? It very well > > could be? that it costs the same amount to > > print 500 as it does to > > print > > 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine > > those are considerations the > > board will? look at as well. > > Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has > > claimed, I have? heard (from > > more > > than one person), that Jack and Mike did > > not resign? "because POCA > > changed printers;" it was over "control" > > of newsletter? content that in > > essence fell outside the bounds of the > > by-laws.? For? a guy that > > appeared > > to try very hard to get everyone else to > > follow the? by-laws (and it's > > unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt > > certainly didn't? feel they > > applied > > to him. > > For the record, as I understand it, POCA? > > has changed printers -twice- > > since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were > > related? to the DeRykes) got out of > > the business.? So the "family tie-in"? > > previously eluded to, was not a > > factor in the resignations. > > Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for > > inflation) > > Asa? Jay > > Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, > > Retired > > &? Shelley? Marie > > Spokane,? WA > > ****************************** > > [15]http://w7tsc.org > > [16]http://www.teampanteraracing.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Detomaso? Email List is not managed by > > POCA > > Posted emails must not exceed 1.5? > > Megabytes > > DeTomaso mailing? list > > [17]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > [18]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/ detomaso > > To? manage your subscription (change email > > address, unsubscribe, etc.) > > use > > the? links above. > > Members who post to this list grant > > license to the list to? forward any > > message posted here to all past, current, > > or future members of the? > > list. They > > also grant the list owner permission to > > maintain an archive or? approve > > the > > archiving of list? messages. > > ?? To use a cliche, we're working on it. > > ?? Most of what has been mentioned is in > > the pipeline.? However, there > > are > > ?? restrictions, particularly with the > > By-Laws as they currently stand. > > ?? There are no provisions for multiple > > dues levels, > > ?? particularly pertaining to how a member > > elects to have their club > > ?? publications delivered, etc.? That will > > take time as any changes or > > ?? amendments must be approved by the > > whole membership. > > ?? The consensus seems to be that the > > Profiles would continue as a > > print > > ?? publication for all except foreign > > members who elect to receive it > > ?? digitally. > > ?? As far as printing is concerned, it is > > that first copy that is so > > ?? expensive, it is the subsequent copies > > that bring down the per unit > > ?? cost.? So as fewer units are produced > > and shipped, the cost per unit > > ?? increases but not proportionately. > > ?? An apples to apples comparison was made > > between an online printer > > and > > ?? the current printer for both printing > > and mailing and the difference > > ?? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per > > unit but for the whole run. > > ?? As far as I am concerned, it is the > > editors who should have the most > > ?? influence as to how and where their > > product is produced.? They are > > the > > ?? ones who must work with the printers > > and mailing houses on a regular > > ?? basis. > > ?? Bob Reid > > ?? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 > > P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > > ?? [19]asajay@asajay.com > > writes: > > ???? The last I heard (and I may have > > heard wrong), the board was > > ???? interested > > ???? in doing a -real- accounting > > comparison of printing costs, so for > > ???? me, > > ???? it's a wait and see kind of thing.? I > > agree, if POCA was missing > > out > > ???? on > > ???? full-color and paying $8,000 more for > > B/W then something is amiss. > > ???? However, I also believe Mr. Shortt > > didn't account for all costs > > ???? properly.? I have more faith that the > > present board members will > > ???? properly investigate and sort it out > > for everyone. > > ???? I am on-board with electronic > > delivery, though I do admit it's > > nice > > ???? to > > ???? just sit back and read a paper copy > > too.? It's also easier to > > ???? hand-off > > ???? to Sam so he can read it later.? How > > do you really fix that? > > ???? I would think (and I don't know), > > that the ClubExpress membership > > ???? database might be able to include a > > "preference" as part of the > > ???? member's > > ???? profile or details.? Just as I can > > set an address and phone > > number, > > ???? if I > > ???? could check a box for Electronic > > delivery or paper copies, or > > both, > > ???? and > > ???? select whatever I wanted for each > > item (Profiles versus > > Newsletter), > > ???? that might be ideal. > > ???? However, I'm also familiar with > > quantity discounting.? It very > > well > > ???? could be that it costs the same > > amount to print 500 as it does to > > ???? print > > ???? 50, or 10 (but I doubt it).? I > > imagine those are considerations > > the > > ???? board will look at as well. > > ???? Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie > > has claimed, I have heard (from > > ???? more > > ???? than one person), that Jack and Mike > > did not resign "because POCA > > ???? changed printers;" it was over > > "control" of newsletter content > > that > > ???? in > > ???? essence fell outside the bounds of > > the by-laws.? For a guy that > > ???? appeared > > ???? to try very hard to get everyone else > > to follow the by-laws (and > > ???? it's > > ???? unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt > > certainly didn't feel they > > ???? applied > > ???? to him. > > ???? For the record, as I understand it, > > POCA has changed printers > > ???? -twice- > > ???? since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were > > related to the DeRykes) got > > out > > ???? of > > ???? the business.? So the "family tie-in" > > previously eluded to, was > > not > > ???? a > > ???? factor in the resignations. > > ???? Just my $1.50? (two cents adjusted > > for inflation) > > ???? Asa? Jay > > ???? Asa Jay Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, > > USAFR, Retired > > ???? &? Shelley Marie > > ???? Spokane, WA > > ???? ****************************** > > ???? [20]http://w7tsc.org > > ???? [21]http://www.teampanteraracing.com > > ???? > > _______________________________________________ > > ???? Detomaso Email List is not managed by > > POCA > > ???? Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 > > Megabytes > > ???? DeTomaso mailing list > > ???? [22]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > ???? [23]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso > > ???? To manage your subscription (change > > email address, unsubscribe, > > ???? etc.) use the links above. > > ???? Members who post to this list grant > > license to the list to forward > > ???? any message posted here to all past, > > current, or future members of > > ???? the list. They also grant the list > > owner permission to maintain an > > ???? archive or approve the archiving of > > list messages. > > _______________________________________________ > > Detomaso Email List is not managed by > > POCA > > Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 > > Megabytes > > DeTomaso mailing list > > [24]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > [25]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/ detomaso > > To manage your subscription (change email > > address, unsubscribe, etc.) > > use the links above. > > Members who post to this list grant > > license to the list to forward any > > message posted here to all past, current, > > or future members of the > > list. They also grant the list owner > > permission to maintain an archive > > or approve the archiving of list > > messages. > >

All of the financials are available. This isn't rocket science. The BOD should be able to do the research to get to the bottom of it. Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 16, 2016, at 6:13 AM, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote:
To Charles,
Sorry but just hard to believe. There was no benefit to MS to change.. he was a bargain hunter. How could a digital on line printer cost the same? The way I understood it there were to be templates to use to facilitate layouts and thus save time and money; the plus was color! I'm not as convinced as you considering the resistance to change through the years, and another sharing that he had quotes for half as much for his event printing, and said the Board refused to entertain it. I am sorry to be this skeptical but I just don't believe that such a great amount of savings from the new printer was a false and made up figure or carelessly misquoted. That would have been out of character. If no one brought it up, all would go along in the merry old way, paying the same, and getting the same product as we've had. You have to admit that seeing our cars in all color would be beautiful, even though you and I are white. I really believe this should be researched fairly. L. -----Original Message----- From: Charles McCall <charlesmccall@gmail.com> To: marshallgsmith <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> Cc: Michael Haney <paso750@gmail.com>; Judith McCartney <jpoca2@hotmail.com>; Effie Richards <erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>; Julian Kift <julian_kift@hotmail.com>; detomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>; laurie Basile <laurieferrari@aol.com> Sent: Tue, Aug 16, 2016 2:22 am Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations PS - if you read the attachment, you'll see that there is basically NO savings by changing printers. According to the quotes received, the $8000 savings was not correct. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Charles McCall <charlesmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
You did all read the info sent by Judy McCartney last week with Jack's explanation? Re-sent here in case you didn't see it. Please open the attachment - I promise no viruses are included
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:20 AM, marshallgsmith <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Hey Michael, I think the best way to put this controversy to bed is if you or your dad could speak about not being cooperative in regards to the the use of another printer that supposedly afforded the club an $8,000 savings. That really seems to be the only issue that continues this controversy and I still haven't heard either of you discuss the allegation. I'm sure your response will cut this thread for good and allow us all to move on with the rebuilding of this great club. Marshall Smith President, San Diego Panteras Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message --------
From: erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:43:43 -0700 To: julian_kift@hotmail.com CC: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurieferrari@aol.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
Julian these are the same questions some of us have had and have been waiting for a reply or statement. I'm willing to give the board some time to come up with one.
Sent from Effie's iPad
On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Julian Kift <julian_kift@hotmail.com> wrote:
I have digested all the emails on this topic and to be honest it still doesn't sit well in my gut.
Presumably the BOD voted in favor of changing printers based upon the quotes presented. Did they not have all the facts and if not why did they not question further? Did Jack have all
hen he resigned or were his and Mike Haney's resignations simply an outright stand against changing printer?
Why did Michael push to change printer if he knew there was only pennies between it?
Julian
__________________________________________________________________
From: DeTomaso <detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> on
behalf of
marshall smith <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:11 AM To: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurieferrari@aol.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
I find it funny that three months after the Fun Rally we are now hearing that Shortt's bid for printing did not include shipping. Shortt is a lot of things but a mistake like this...? I was listening in on this meeting also and I know what I heard. Apparently, the board convinced 'some' members of this so-called discrepancy month's ago. Why wasn't this information, if it exists, relayed to ALL of us in a timely manner? Marshall
-------------------------------------------- On Mon, 8/15/16, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote: Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations To: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Date: Monday, August 15, 2016, 9:57 AM
Dear AJ,
I have always respected you and your opinions but in this case you are incorrect as far as the resignation of Jack DeRyke. I was on the Board of Directors' conference call where he was asked to stay and he adamantly refused to if the printer changed. Jack's resignation was specifically because of the change in printer! You can go research that phone conference call, or the minutes of the meeting, as the facts are saved. As far as Mike Haney's resignation, that was done by his Mrs. for their reasons which most likely were aligned with their parents.
Laurie
In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? [1]asajay@asajay.com writes: The last? I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was interested in doing a? -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for me, it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out on full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss.? However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs properly.? I? have more faith that the present board members will properly investigate? and sort it out for everyone. I am on-board with electronic delivery,? though I do admit it's nice to just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? It's also easier to hand-off to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do you really fix that? I would think (and I don't? know), that the ClubExpress membership database might be able to include a? "preference" as part of the member's profile or details.? Just as I? can set an address and phone number, if I could check a box for Electronic? delivery or paper copies, or both, and select whatever I wanted for each? item (Profiles versus Newsletter), that might be ideal. However,? I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well could be? that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to print 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the board will? look at as well. Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have? heard (from more than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign? "because POCA changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter? content that in essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For? a guy that appeared to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the? by-laws (and it's unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't? feel they applied to him. For the record, as I understand it, POCA? has changed printers -twice- since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related? to the DeRykes) got out of the business.? So the "family tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not a factor in the resignations. Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) Asa? Jay Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired &? Shelley? Mar
-----Original Message----- From: detomaso-request <detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com> To: detomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> Sent: Mon, Aug 15, 2016 9:00 am Subject: DeTomaso Digest, Vol 146, Issue 20 Send DeTomaso mailing list submissions to [2]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit [3]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/
From: Michael Haney <paso750@gmail.com> Date: 8/15/16 10:36 PM (GMT-08:00) To: 'Judith McCartney' <jpoca2@hotmail.com>, 'Effie Richards' <erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>, 'Julian Kift' <julian_kift@hotmail.com> Cc: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com, 'laurie Basile' <laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Thank you very much, Judy. I really wish this thread would just die. I know that this isn't the answer you're fishing for, but it'll have to do since it's the truth. Nancy quit and took her associate (me) with her because she was tired of hearing from me all about Shortt's efforts to take over every aspect of POCA. I didn't fight her decision because I was in turn tired of Shortt's intimidation and bullying tactics. Frankly, being on the Board wasn't fun anymore and I was also very tired of Shortt's constant preening. As a matter of record, I resigned from the Board BEFORE Profiles #3 even went to the printer. I had nearly finished it and decided that I didn't want to let the POCA members down. I really didn't want to contribute any more to Shortt's regime, but my conscience won. Even after I sent the magazine in, I still had to deal with Shortt. He decided to interfere with the printer, sent them a database with a whole bunch of problematic info and threaten nonpayment if he didn't get preliminary proofs. How do I know this? I received a call while I was at work from the woman working in Allegra Printing's mail room. She called Shortt and he wouldn't help her with the database and ignored her questions. Having no one else to call, she called me. I in turn contacted Judy, our Membership Director, who fixed the problems that Shortt created. Regarding Shortt's allegations of graft, if anyone can find a connection between my family and anyone who EVER worked at Allegra Printing in Reno, Nevada, (or indeed any of Allegra's branches) please let me know. My Dad might respond as well, but he's been pretty busy caring for my SERIOUSLY ill Mom who was in the hospital for the last two weeks and who might finally be able to come back home in a couple more. Now, can we finally put this "controversy" to rest? Mike Haney -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Judith McCartney Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 PM To: Effie Richards; Julian Kift Cc: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Mike Haney gave his resignation months way head of Jacks, two diff reasons. Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator. the facts w listinfo/detomaso
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to detomaso-[4]request@server.detomasolist.com You can reach the person managing the list at detomaso-[5]owner@server.detomasolist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of DeTomaso digest..." Daily Detomaso List Digest Today's Topics: 1. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic (marshallgsmith) 2. Re: De Tomaso Pantera GTS on eBay! again $250K!! (Michael Cox) 3. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic (Stephen)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
--- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:27:43 -0700 From: marshallgsmith <[6]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> To: [7]P6746@aol.com, [8]asajay@asajay.com, [9]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic Message-ID:
<[10]sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com>
Calling this situation "multiple dues levels" seems to be making the issue too complex. There are some members
What is your estimate of the length of time that it would take the board to arrange for a vote of the membership to change the bylaws to allow for this discount? Who specifically made that apples-to-apples comparison you refer to? I agree that the editors should have
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I have a couple questions Bob: that are opting to not have printed magazines mailed which should make those members eligible for a discount because of the savings. the most influence ?on the process. ?However, our editors of both publications seem to have a hard time reporting to the members about ANY issues pertaining to the publication's themselves. Might that change in the near future or will radio silence be the norm here? Marshall Smith Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: P6746--- via DeTomaso
<[11]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>
Date: 8/14/16 3:10 PM (GMT-08:00) To: [12]asajay@asajay.com, [13]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic To use a cliche, we're working on it.? Most of what has been mentioned is in the pipeline.?? However, there are restrictions, particularly with the By-Laws as they currently? stand.? There are no provisions for multiple dues levels,? particularly pertaining to how a member elects to have their club? publications delivered, etc.? That will take time as any changes or? amendments must be approved by the whole membership. The consensus seems to be that the Profiles would? continue as a print publication for all except foreign members who elect to? receive it digitally.? As far as printing is concerned, it is that first copy that is? so expensive, it is the subsequent copies that bring down the per unit? cost.? So as fewer units are produced and shipped, the cost per unit? increases but not proportionately.?? An apples to apples comparison was made between an online? printer and the current printer for both printing and mailing and the difference? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but for the whole run.? As far as I am concerned, it is the editors who should have? the most influence as to how and where their product is produced.? They are? the ones who must work with the printers and mailing houses on a regular? basis. Bob Reid? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? [14]asajay@asajay.com writes: The last? I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was interested in doing a? -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for me, it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out on full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss.? However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs properly.? I? have more faith that the present board members will properly investigate? and sort it out for everyone. I am on-board with electronic delivery,? though I do admit it's nice to just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? It's also easier to hand-off to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do you really fix that? I would think (and I don't? know), that the ClubExpress membership database might be able to include a? "preference" as part of the member's profile or details.? Just as I? can set an address and phone number, if I could check a box for Electronic? delivery or paper copies, or both, and select whatever I wanted for each? item (Profiles versus Newsletter), that might be ideal. However,? I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well could be? that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to print 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the board will? look at as well. Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have? heard (from more than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign? "because POCA changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter? content that in essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For? a guy that appeared to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the? by-laws (and it's unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't? feel they applied to him. For the record, as I understand it, POCA? has changed printers -twice- since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related? to the DeRykes) got out of the business.? So the "family tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not a factor in the resignations. Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) Asa? Jay Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired &? Shelley? Marie Spokane,? WA ****************************** [15]http://w7tsc.org [16]http://www.teampanteraracing.com _______________________________________________ Detomaso? Email List is not managed by POCA Posted emails must not exceed 1.5? Megabytes DeTomaso mailing? list [17]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com [18]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/
detomaso
To? manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) use the? links above. Members who post to this list grant license to the list to? forward any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of the? list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an archive or? approve the archiving of list? messages. ?? To use a cliche, we're working on it. ?? Most of what has been mentioned is in the pipeline.? However, there are ?? restrictions, particularly with the By-Laws as they currently stand. ?? There are no provisions for multiple dues levels, ?? particularly pertaining to how a member elects to have their club ?? publications delivered, etc.? That will take time as any changes or ?? amendments must be approved by the whole membership. ?? The consensus seems to be that the Profiles would continue as a print ?? publication for all except foreign members who elect to receive it ?? digitally. ?? As far as printing is concerned, it is that first copy that is so ?? expensive, it is the subsequent copies that bring down the per unit ?? cost.? So as fewer units are produced and shipped, the cost per unit ?? increases but not proportionately. ?? An apples to apples comparison was made between an online printer and ?? the current printer for both printing and mailing and the difference ?? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but for the whole run. ?? As far as I am concerned, it is the editors who should have the most ?? influence as to how and where their product is produced.? They are the ?? ones who must work with the printers and mailing houses on a regular ?? basis. ?? Bob Reid ?? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, ?? [19]asajay@asajay.com writes: ???? The last I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was ???? interested ???? in doing a -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for ???? me, ???? it's a wait and see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out ???? on ???? full-color and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss. ???? However, I also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs ???? properly.? I have more faith that the present board members will ???? properly investigate and sort it out for everyone. ???? I am on-board with electronic delivery, though I do admit it's nice ???? to ???? just sit back and read a paper copy too.? It's also easier to ???? hand-off ???? to Sam so he can read it later.? How do you really fix that? ???? I would think (and I don't know), that the ClubExpress membership ???? database might be able to include a "preference" as part of the ???? member's ???? profile or details.? Just as I can set an address and phone number, ???? if I ???? could check a box for Electronic delivery or paper copies, or both, ???? and ???? select whatever I wanted for each item (Profiles versus Newsletter), ???? that might be ideal. ???? However, I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well ???? could be that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to ???? print ???? 50, or 10 (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the ???? board will look at as well. ???? Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have heard (from ???? more ???? than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign "because POCA ???? changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter content that ???? in ???? essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For a guy that ???? appeared ???? to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the by-laws (and ???? it's ???? unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't feel they ???? applied ???? to him. ???? For the record, as I understand it, POCA has changed printers ???? -twice- ???? since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related to the DeRykes) got out ???? of ???? the business.? So the "family tie-in" previously eluded to, was not ???? a ???? factor in the resignations. ???? Just my $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) ???? Asa? Jay ???? Asa Jay Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired ???? &? Shelley Marie ???? Spokane, WA ???? ****************************** ???? [20]http://w7tsc.org ???? [21]http://www.teampanteraracing.com ???? _______________________________________________ ???? Detomaso Email List is not managed by POCA ???? Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes ???? DeTomaso mailing list ???? [22]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com ????
[23]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
???? To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, ???? etc.) use the links above. ???? Members who post to this list grant license to the list to forward ???? any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of ???? the list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an ???? archive or approve the archiving of list messages. _______________________________________________ Detomaso Email List is not managed by POCA Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes DeTomaso mailing list [24]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com [25]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/
detomaso
To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) use the links above. Members who post to this list grant license to the list to forward any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of the list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an archive or approve the archiving of list messages.

Please clarify if I misunderstood, but wasn’t the MS printer going to produce a full color Profiles? Even if the costs remained the same, that is a big step up from the current version which appears to be a conventional off-set printed cover (and inside spread) with the remaining pages printed on a digital (laser) machine. Not the best print production values out there. I hope that the new BOD shares the outcomes of a fair and open bid pro printing and mailing. Even more, I hope that we don’t lose a printed version of Profiles. I am disappointed that the last survey was so brief as to not explore many of the possible scenarios to improve quality while reducing costs. For example: • 4 printed Profiles mailed and 12 DIGITAL Newsletters emailed. • 6 combined printed Profiles/newsletters mailed (and available for download via website) I know that advertising revenues requires work to attract, but find it hard to believe that most of “our” vendors would not prefer to have a printed ad that can last for years on a reference shelf as compared to a transient on-line or digital/PDF advert. Has the BOD explored Profiles ad rates and whether they are appropriate for the highly targeted audience it reaches? Mark Charlton pantera01826@rogers.com
On Aug 16, 2016, at 9:46 AM, Will Kooiman <will.kooiman@gmail.com> wrote:
All of the financials are available.
This isn't rocket science. The BOD should be able to do the research to get to the bottom of it.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 16, 2016, at 6:13 AM, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote:
To Charles,
Sorry but just hard to believe. There was no benefit to MS to change.. he was a bargain hunter. How could a digital on line printer cost the same? The way I understood it there were to be templates to use to facilitate layouts and thus save time and money; the plus was color! I'm not as convinced as you considering the resistance to change through the years, and another sharing that he had quotes for half as much for his event printing, and said the Board refused to entertain it. I am sorry to be this skeptical but I just don't believe that such a great amount of savings from the new printer was a false and made up figure or carelessly misquoted. That would have been out of character. If no one brought it up, all would go along in the merry old way, paying the same, and getting the same product as we've had. You have to admit that seeing our cars in all color would be beautiful, even though you and I are white. I really believe this should be researched fairly. L.

From: erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:43:43 -0700 To: julian_kift@hotmail.com CC: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurieferrari@aol.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
Julian these are the same questions some of us have had and have been waiting for a reply or statement. I'm willing to give the board some time to come up with one.
Sent from Effie's iPad
On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Julian Kift <julian_kift@hotmail.com> wrote:
I have digested all the emails on this topic and to be honest it still doesn't sit well in my gut.
Presumably the BOD voted in favor of changing printers based upon
I read the attachment, why wasn’t it made public, if it’s a true one, it should have been. From: Charles McCall [mailto:charlesmccall@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 2:22 AM To: marshallgsmith Cc: Michael Haney; Judith McCartney; Effie Richards; Julian Kift; detomaso; laurie Basile Subject: -- SPAM --Re: [DeTomaso] resignations PS - if you read the attachment, you'll see that there is basically NO savings by changing printers. According to the quotes received, the $8000 savings was not correct. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Charles McCall <charlesmccall@gmail.com> wrote: You did all read the info sent by Judy McCartney last week with Jack's explanation? Re-sent here in case you didn't see it. Please open the attachment - I promise no viruses are included On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:20 AM, marshallgsmith <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Hey Michael, I think the best way to put this controversy to bed is if you or your dad could speak about not being cooperative in regards to the the use of another printer that supposedly afforded the club an $8,000 savings. That really seems to be the only issue that continues this controversy and I still haven't heard either of you discuss the allegation. I'm sure your response will cut this thread for good and allow us all to move on with the rebuilding of this great club. Marshall Smith President, San Diego Panteras Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Michael Haney <paso750@gmail.com> Date: 8/15/16 10:36 PM (GMT-08:00) To: 'Judith McCartney' <jpoca2@hotmail.com>, 'Effie Richards' <erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>, 'Julian Kift' <julian_kift@hotmail.com> Cc: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com, 'laurie Basile' <laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Thank you very much, Judy. I really wish this thread would just die. I know that this isn't the answer you're fishing for, but it'll have to do since it's the truth. Nancy quit and took her associate (me) with her because she was tired of hearing from me all about Shortt's efforts to take over every aspect of POCA. I didn't fight her decision because I was in turn tired of Shortt's intimidation and bullying tactics. Frankly, being on the Board wasn't fun anymore and I was also very tired of Shortt's constant preening. As a matter of record, I resigned from the Board BEFORE Profiles #3 even went to the printer. I had nearly finished it and decided that I didn't want to let the POCA members down. I really didn't want to contribute any more to Shortt's regime, but my conscience won. Even after I sent the magazine in, I still had to deal with Shortt. He decided to interfere with the printer, sent them a database with a whole bunch of problematic info and threaten nonpayment if he didn't get preliminary proofs. How do I know this? I received a call while I was at work from the woman working in Allegra Printing's mail room. She called Shortt and he wouldn't help her with the database and ignored her questions. Having no one else to call, she called me. I in turn contacted Judy, our Membership Director, who fixed the problems that Shortt created. Regarding Shortt's allegations of graft, if anyone can find a connection between my family and anyone who EVER worked at Allegra Printing in Reno, Nevada, (or indeed any of Allegra's branches) please let me know. My Dad might respond as well, but he's been pretty busy caring for my SERIOUSLY ill Mom who was in the hospital for the last two weeks and who might finally be able to come back home in a couple more. Now, can we finally put this "controversy" to rest? Mike Haney -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Judith McCartney Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 PM To: Effie Richards; Julian Kift Cc: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Mike Haney gave his resignation months way head of Jacks, two diff reasons. Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator. the
quotes presented. Did they not have all the facts and if not why did they not question further? Did Jack have all the facts w hen he resigned or were his and Mike Haney's resignations simply an outright stand against changing printer?
Why did Michael push to change printer if he knew there was only pennies between it?
Julian
From: DeTomaso <detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> on
behalf of
marshall smith <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:11 AM To: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurieferrari@aol.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
I find it funny that three months after the Fun Rally we are now hearing that Shortt's bid for printing did not include shipping. Shortt is a lot of things but a mistake like this...? I was listening in on this meeting also and I know what I heard. Apparently, the board convinced 'some' members of this so-called discrepancy month's ago. Why wasn't this information, if it exists, relayed to ALL of us in a timely manner? Marshall
-------------------------------------------- On Mon, 8/15/16, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote: Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations To: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Date: Monday, August 15, 2016, 9:57 AM
Dear AJ,
I have always respected you and your opinions but in this case you are incorrect as far as the resignation of Jack DeRyke. I was on the Board of Directors' conference call where he was asked to stay and he adamantly refused to if the printer changed. Jack's resignation was specifically because of the change in printer! You can go research that phone conference call, or the minutes of the meeting, as the facts are saved. As far as Mike Haney's resignation, that was done by his Mrs. for their reasons which most likely were aligned with their parents.
Laurie
In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? [1]asajay@asajay.com writes: The last? I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was interested in doing a? -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for me, it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out on full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss.? However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs properly.? I? have more faith that the present board members will properly investigate? and sort it out for everyone. I am on-board with electronic delivery,? though I do admit it's nice to just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? It's also easier to hand-off to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do you really fix that? I would think (and I don't? know), that the ClubExpress membership database might be able to include a? "preference" as part of the member's profile or details.? Just as I? can set an address and phone number, if I could check a box for Electronic? delivery or paper copies, or both, and select whatever I wanted for each? item (Profiles versus Newsletter), that might be ideal. However,? I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well could be? that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to print 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the board will? look at as well. Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have? heard (from more than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign? "because POCA changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter? content that in essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For? a guy that appeared to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the? by-laws (and it's unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't? feel they applied to him. For the record, as I understand it, POCA? has changed printers -twice- since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related? to the DeRykes) got out of the business.? So the "family tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not a factor in the resignations. Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) Asa? Jay Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired &? Shelley? Mar
-----Original Message----- From: detomaso-request <detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com> To: detomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> Sent: Mon, Aug 15, 2016 9:00 am Subject: DeTomaso Digest, Vol 146, Issue 20 Send DeTomaso mailing list submissions to [2]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit [3]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to detomaso-[4]request@server.detomasolist.com You can reach the person managing the list at detomaso-[5]owner@server.detomasolist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of DeTomaso digest..." Daily Detomaso List Digest Today's Topics: 1. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic (marshallgsmith) 2. Re: De Tomaso Pantera GTS on eBay! again $250K!! (Michael Cox) 3. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic (Stephen)
--- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:27:43 -0700 From: marshallgsmith <[6]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> To: [7]P6746@aol.com, [8]asajay@asajay.com, [9]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic Message-ID:
<[10]sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com>
Calling this situation "multiple dues levels" seems to be making the issue too complex. There are some members
What is your estimate of the length of time that it would take the board to arrange for a vote of the membership to change the bylaws to allow for this discount? Who specifically made that apples-to-apples comparison you refer to? I agree that the editors should have
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I have a couple questions Bob: that are opting to not have printed magazines mailed which should make those members eligible for a discount because of the savings. the most influence ?on the process. ?However, our editors of both publications seem to have a hard time reporting to the members about ANY issues pertaining to the publication's themselves. Might that change in the near future or will radio silence be the norm here? Marshall Smith Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: P6746--- via DeTomaso
<[11]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>
Date: 8/14/16 3:10 PM (GMT-08:00) To: [12]asajay@asajay.com, [13]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic To use a cliche, we're working on it.? Most of what has been mentioned is in the pipeline.?? However, there are restrictions, particularly with the By-Laws as they currently? stand.? There are no provisions for multiple dues levels,? particularly pertaining to how a member elects to have their club? publications delivered, etc.? That will take time as any changes or? amendments must be approved by the whole membership. The consensus seems to be that the Profiles would? continue as a print publication for all except foreign members who elect to? receive it digitally.? As far as printing is concerned, it is that first copy that is? so expensive, it is the subsequent copies that bring down the per unit? cost.? So as fewer units are produced and shipped, the cost per unit? increases but not proportionately.?? An apples to apples comparison was made between an online? printer and the current printer for both printing and mailing and the difference? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but for the whole run.? As far as I am concerned, it is the editors who should have? the most influence as to how and where their product is produced.? They are? the ones who must work with the printers and mailing houses on a regular? basis. Bob Reid? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? [14]asajay@asajay.com writes: The last? I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was interested in doing a? -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for me, it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out on full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss.? However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs properly.? I? have more faith that the present board members will properly investigate? and sort it out for everyone. I am on-board with electronic delivery,? though I do admit it's nice to just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? It's also easier to hand-off to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do you really fix that? I would think (and I don't? know), that the ClubExpress membership database might be able to include a? "preference" as part of the member's profile or details.? Just as I? can set an address and phone number, if I could check a box for Electronic? delivery or paper copies, or both, and select whatever I wanted for each? item (Profiles versus Newsletter), that might be ideal. However,? I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well could be? that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to print 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the board will? look at as well. Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have? heard (from more than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign? "because POCA changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter? content that in essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For? a guy that appeared to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the? by-laws (and it's unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't? feel they applied to him. For the record, as I understand it, POCA? has changed printers -twice- since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related? to the DeRykes) got out of the business.? So the "family tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not a factor in the resignations. Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) Asa? Jay Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired &? Shelley? Marie Spokane,? WA ****************************** [15]http://w7tsc.org [16]http://www.teampanteraracing.com _______________________________________________ Detomaso? Email List is not managed by POCA Posted emails must not exceed 1.5? Megabytes DeTomaso mailing? list [17]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com [18]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso To? manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) use the? links above. Members who post to this list grant license to the list to? forward any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of the? list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an archive or? approve the archiving of list? messages. ?? To use a cliche, we're working on it. ?? Most of what has been mentioned is in the pipeline.? However, there are ?? restrictions, particularly with the By-Laws as they currently stand. ?? There are no provisions for multiple dues levels, ?? particularly pertaining to how a member elects to have their club ?? publications delivered, etc.? That will take time as any changes or ?? amendments must be approved by the whole membership. ?? The consensus seems to be that the Profiles would continue as a print ?? publication for all except foreign members who elect to receive it ?? digitally. ?? As far as printing is concerned, it is that first copy that is so ?? expensive, it is the subsequent copies that bring down the per unit ?? cost.? So as fewer units are produced and shipped, the cost per unit ?? increases but not proportionately. ?? An apples to apples comparison was made between an online printer and ?? the current printer for both printing and mailing and the difference ?? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but for the whole run. ?? As far as I am concerned, it is the editors who should have the most ?? influence as to how and where their product is produced.? They are the ?? ones who must work with the printers and mailing houses on a regular ?? basis. ?? Bob Reid ?? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, ?? [19]asajay@asajay.com writes: ???? The last I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was ???? interested ???? in doing a -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for ???? me, ???? it's a wait and see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out ???? on ???? full-color and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss. ???? However, I also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs ???? properly.? I have more faith that the present board members will ???? properly investigate and sort it out for everyone. ???? I am on-board with electronic delivery, though I do admit it's nice ???? to ???? just sit back and read a paper copy too.? It's also easier to ???? hand-off ???? to Sam so he can read it later.? How do you really fix that? ???? I would think (and I don't know), that the ClubExpress membership ???? database might be able to include a "preference" as part of the ???? member's ???? profile or details.? Just as I can set an address and phone number, ???? if I ???? could check a box for Electronic delivery or paper copies, or both, ???? and ???? select whatever I wanted for each item (Profiles versus Newsletter), ???? that might be ideal. ???? However, I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well ???? could be that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to ???? print ???? 50, or 10 (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the ???? board will look at as well. ???? Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have heard (from ???? more ???? than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign "because POCA ???? changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter content that ???? in ???? essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For a guy that ???? appeared ???? to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the by-laws (and ???? it's ???? unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't feel they ???? applied ???? to him. ???? For the record, as I understand it, POCA has changed printers ???? -twice- ???? since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related to the DeRykes) got out ???? of ???? the business.? So the "family tie-in" previously eluded to, was not ???? a ???? factor in the resignations. ???? Just my $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) ???? Asa? Jay ???? Asa Jay Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired ???? &? Shelley Marie ???? Spokane, WA ???? ****************************** ???? [20]http://w7tsc.org ???? [21]http://www.teampanteraracing.com ???? _______________________________________________ ???? Detomaso Email List is not managed by POCA ???? Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes ???? DeTomaso mailing list ???? [22]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com ????
[23]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
???? To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, ???? etc.) use the links above. ???? Members who post to this list grant license to the list to forward ???? any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of ???? the list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an ???? archive or approve the archiving of list messages. _______________________________________________ Detomaso Email List is not managed by POCA Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes DeTomaso mailing list [24]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com [25]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) use the links above. Members who post to this list grant license to the list to forward any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of the list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an archive or approve the archiving of list messages.
I read the attachment, why wasn't it made public, if it's a true one, it should have been. From: Charles McCall [mailto:charlesmccall@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 2:22 AM To: marshallgsmith Cc: Michael Haney; Judith McCartney; Effie Richards; Julian Kift; detomaso; laurie Basile Subject: -- SPAM --Re: [DeTomaso] resignations PS - if you read the attachment, you'll see that there is basically NO savings by changing printers. According to the quotes received, the $8000 savings was not correct. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Charles McCall <[1]charlesmccall@gmail.com> wrote: You did all read the info sent by Judy McCartney last week with Jack's explanation? Re-sent here in case you didn't see it. Please open the attachment - I promise no viruses are included On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:20 AM, marshallgsmith <[2]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Hey Michael, I think the best way to put this controversy to bed is if you or your dad could speak about not being cooperative in regards to the the use of another printer that supposedly afforded the club an $8,000 savings. That really seems to be the only issue that continues this controversy and I still haven't heard either of you discuss the allegation. I'm sure your response will cut this thread for good and allow us all to move on with the rebuilding of this great club. Marshall Smith President, San Diego Panteras Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Michael Haney <[3]paso750@gmail.com> Date: 8/15/16 10:36 PM (GMT-08:00) To: 'Judith McCartney' <[4]jpoca2@hotmail.com>, 'Effie Richards' <[5]erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>, 'Julian Kift' <[6]julian_kift@hotmail.com> Cc: [7]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com, 'laurie Basile' <[8]laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Thank you very much, Judy. I really wish this thread would just die. I know that this isn't the answer you're fishing for, but it'll have to do since it's the truth. Nancy quit and took her associate (me) with her because she was tired of hearing from me all about Shortt's efforts to take over every aspect of POCA. I didn't fight her decision because I was in turn tired of Shortt's intimidation and bullying tactics. Frankly, being on the Board wasn't fun anymore and I was also very tired of Shortt's constant preening. As a matter of record, I resigned from the Board BEFORE Profiles #3 even went to the printer. I had nearly finished it and decided that I didn't want to let the POCA members down. I really didn't want to contribute any more to Shortt's regime, but my conscience won. Even after I sent the magazine in, I still had to deal with Shortt. He decided to interfere with the printer, sent them a database with a whole bunch of problematic info and threaten nonpayment if he didn't get preliminary proofs. How do I know this? I received a call while I was at work from the woman working in Allegra Printing's mail room. She called Shortt and he wouldn't help her with the database and ignored her questions. Having no one else to call, she called me. I in turn contacted Judy, our Membership Director, who fixed the problems that Shortt created. Regarding Shortt's allegations of graft, if anyone can find a connection between my family and anyone who EVER worked at Allegra Printing in Reno, Nevada, (or indeed any of Allegra's branches) please let me know. My Dad might respond as well, but he's been pretty busy caring for my SERIOUSLY ill Mom who was in the hospital for the last two weeks and who might finally be able to come back home in a couple more. Now, can we finally put this "controversy" to rest? Mike Haney -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [mailto:[9]detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Judith McCartney Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 PM To: Effie Richards; Julian Kift Cc: [10]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Mike Haney gave his resignation months way head of Jacks, two diff reasons. Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator. > From: [11]erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com > Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:43:43 -0700 > To: [12]julian_kift@hotmail.com > CC: [13]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; [14]laurieferrari@aol.com > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations > > Julian these are the same questions some of us have had and have been waiting for a reply or statement. I'm willing to give the board some time to come up with one. > > Sent from Effie's iPad > > > On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Julian Kift <[15]julian_kift@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > I have digested all the emails on this topic and to be honest it still > > doesn't sit well in my gut. > > > > > > Presumably the BOD voted in favor of changing printers based upon the > > quotes presented. Did they not have all the facts and > > if not why did they not question further? Did Jack have all the facts w > > hen he resigned or were his and Mike Haney's resignations simply an > > outright stand against changing printer? > > > > > > Why did Michael push to change printer if he knew there was only > > pennies between it? > > > > > > Julian > > __________________________________________________________________ > > > > From: DeTomaso <[16]detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> on behalf of > > marshall smith <[17]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> > > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:11 AM > > To: [18]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; [19]laurieferrari@aol.com > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations > > > > I find it funny that three months after the Fun Rally we are now > > hearing that Shortt's bid for printing did not include shipping. Shortt > > is a lot of things but a mistake like this...? > > I was listening in on this meeting also and I know what I heard. > > Apparently, the board convinced 'some' members of this so-called > > discrepancy month's ago. Why wasn't this information, if it exists, > > relayed to ALL of us in a timely manner? > > Marshall > > > > -------------------------------------------- > > On Mon, 8/15/16, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso > > <[20]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote: > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations > > To: [21]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > Date: Monday, August 15, 2016, 9:57 AM > > > > Dear AJ, > > > > I have always respected you and your > > opinions but in this case you are > > incorrect as far as the resignation of > > Jack DeRyke. I was on the Board > > of Directors' conference call where he was > > asked to stay and he > > adamantly refused to if the printer > > changed. Jack's resignation was > > specifically because of the change in > > printer! You can go research > > that phone conference call, or the minutes > > of the meeting, as the facts > > are saved. As far as Mike Haney's > > resignation, that was done by his > > Mrs. for their reasons which most likely > > were aligned with their > > parents. > > > > Laurie > > > > In a message dated 8/13/2016 > > 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? > > [1][22]asajay@asajay.com > > writes: > > The last? I heard (and I may have > > heard wrong), the board was > > interested > > in doing a? -real- accounting > > comparison of printing costs, so for > > me, > > it's a wait and? see kind of > > thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing > > out on > > full-color? and paying $8,000 more > > for B/W then something is amiss.? > > However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt > > didn't account for all costs > > properly.? I? have more faith that > > the present board members will > > properly investigate? and sort it > > out for everyone. > > I am on-board with electronic > > delivery,? though I do admit it's nice > > to > > just sit back and read a paper > > copy? too.? It's also easier to > > hand-off > > to Sam so he can read it? later.? > > How do you really fix that? > > I would think (and I don't? know), > > that the ClubExpress membership > > database might be able to include > > a? "preference" as part of the > > member's > > profile or details.? Just as I? can > > set an address and phone number, > > if I > > could check a box for Electronic? > > delivery or paper copies, or both, > > and > > select whatever I wanted for each? > > item (Profiles versus > > Newsletter), > > that might be ideal. > > However,? I'm also familiar with > > quantity discounting.? It very well > > could be? that it costs the same > > amount to print 500 as it does to > > print > > 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I > > imagine those are considerations the > > board will? look at as well. > > Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie > > has claimed, I have? heard (from > > more > > than one person), that Jack and > > Mike did not resign? "because POCA > > changed printers;" it was over > > "control" of newsletter? content that > > in > > essence fell outside the bounds of > > the by-laws.? For? a guy that > > appeared > > to try very hard to get everyone > > else to follow the? by-laws (and > > it's > > unwritten code of ethics), Mr. > > Shortt certainly didn't? feel they > > applied > > to him. > > For the record, as I understand it, > > POCA? has changed printers > > -twice- > > since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were > > related? to the DeRykes) got out > > of > > the business.? So the "family > > tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not > > a > > factor in the resignations. > > Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted > > for inflation) > > Asa? Jay > > Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, > > USAFR, Retired > > &? Shelley? Mar > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: detomaso-request <[23]detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com> > > To: detomaso <[24]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> > > Sent: Mon, Aug 15, 2016 9:00 am > > Subject: DeTomaso Digest, Vol 146, Issue > > 20 > > Send DeTomaso mailing list submissions to > > [2][25]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World > > Wide Web, visit > > [3][26]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso > > or, via email, send a message with subject > > or body 'help' to > > detomaso-[4][27]request@server.detomasolist.com > > You can reach the person managing the list > > at > > detomaso-[5][28]owner@server.detomasolist.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject > > line so it is more specific > > than "Re: Contents of DeTomaso digest..." > > Daily Detomaso List Digest > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. > > electronic (marshallgsmith) > > 2. Re: De Tomaso Pantera GTS on eBay! > > again $250K!! (Michael Cox) > > 3. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. > > electronic (Stephen) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > --- > > Message: 1 > > Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:27:43 -0700 > > From: marshallgsmith <[6][29]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> > > To: [7][30]P6746@aol.com, [8][31]asajay@asajay.com, > > [9][32]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, > > paper vs. electronic > > Message-ID: > > <[10][33]sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I have a couple questions Bob: > >> Calling this situation "multiple dues > > levels" seems to be making the > > issue too complex. There are some members > > that are opting to not have > > printed magazines mailed which should make > > those members eligible for a > > discount because of the savings. > >> What is your estimate of the length > > of time that it would take the > > board to arrange for a vote of the > > membership to change the bylaws to > > allow for this discount? > >> Who specifically made that > > apples-to-apples comparison you refer to? > >> I agree that the editors should have > > the most influence ?on the > > process. ?However, our editors of both > > publications seem to have a hard > > time reporting to the members about ANY > > issues pertaining to the > > publication's themselves. Might that > > change in the near future or will > > radio silence be the norm here? > > Marshall Smith > > Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone > > -------- Original message -------- > > From: P6746--- via DeTomaso <[11][34]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> > > Date: 8/14/16 3:10 PM (GMT-08:00) > > To: [12][35]asajay@asajay.com, > > [13][36]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, > > paper vs. electronic > > To use a cliche, we're working on it.? > > Most of what has been mentioned is in the > > pipeline.?? However, there > > are > > restrictions, particularly with the > > By-Laws as they currently? stand.? > > There > > are no provisions for multiple dues > > levels,? particularly pertaining to > > how a > > member elects to have their club? > > publications delivered, etc.? That > > will > > take time as any changes or? amendments > > must be approved by the whole > > membership. > > The consensus seems to be that the > > Profiles would? continue as a print > > publication for all except foreign members > > who elect to? receive it > > digitally.? > > As far as printing is concerned, it is > > that first copy that is? so > > expensive, it is the subsequent copies > > that bring down the per unit? > > cost.? So as > > fewer units are produced and shipped, the > > cost per unit? increases but > > not > > proportionately.?? > > An apples to apples comparison was made > > between an online? printer and > > the > > current printer for both printing and > > mailing and the difference? was > > pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but > > for the whole run.? > > As far as I am concerned, it is the > > editors who should have? the most > > influence as to how and where their > > product is produced.? They are? the > > ones who > > must work with the printers and mailing > > houses on a regular? basis. > > Bob Reid? > > In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. > > Eastern Daylight Time,? > > [14][37]asajay@asajay.com > > writes: > > The last? I heard (and I may have heard > > wrong), the board was > > interested > > in doing a? -real- accounting comparison > > of printing costs, so for me, > > it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I > > agree, if POCA was missing out > > on > > full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W > > then something is amiss.? > > However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't > > account for all costs > > properly.? I? have more faith that the > > present board members will > > properly investigate? and sort it out for > > everyone. > > I am on-board with electronic delivery,? > > though I do admit it's nice to > > just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? > > It's also easier to hand-off > > to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do > > you really fix that? > > I would think (and I don't? know), that > > the ClubExpress membership > > database might be able to include a? > > "preference" as part of the > > member's > > profile or details.? Just as I? can set an > > address and phone number, if > > I > > could check a box for Electronic? delivery > > or paper copies, or both, > > and > > select whatever I wanted for each? item > > (Profiles versus Newsletter), > > that might be ideal. > > However,? I'm also familiar with quantity > > discounting.? It very well > > could be? that it costs the same amount to > > print 500 as it does to > > print > > 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine > > those are considerations the > > board will? look at as well. > > Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has > > claimed, I have? heard (from > > more > > than one person), that Jack and Mike did > > not resign? "because POCA > > changed printers;" it was over "control" > > of newsletter? content that in > > essence fell outside the bounds of the > > by-laws.? For? a guy that > > appeared > > to try very hard to get everyone else to > > follow the? by-laws (and it's > > unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt > > certainly didn't? feel they > > applied > > to him. > > For the record, as I understand it, POCA? > > has changed printers -twice- > > since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were > > related? to the DeRykes) got out of > > the business.? So the "family tie-in"? > > previously eluded to, was not a > > factor in the resignations. > > Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for > > inflation) > > Asa? Jay > > Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, > > Retired > > &? Shelley? Marie > > Spokane,? WA > > ****************************** > > [15][38]http://w7tsc.org > > [16][39]http://www.teampanteraracing.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Detomaso? Email List is not managed by > > POCA > > Posted emails must not exceed 1.5? > > Megabytes > > DeTomaso mailing? list > > [17][40]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > [18][41]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso > > To? manage your subscription (change email > > address, unsubscribe, etc.) > > use > > the? links above. > > Members who post to this list grant > > license to the list to? forward any > > message posted here to all past, current, > > or future members of the? > > list. They > > also grant the list owner permission to > > maintain an archive or? approve > > the > > archiving of list? messages. > > ?? To use a cliche, we're working on it. > > ?? Most of what has been mentioned is in > > the pipeline.? However, there > > are > > ?? restrictions, particularly with the > > By-Laws as they currently stand. > > ?? There are no provisions for multiple > > dues levels, > > ?? particularly pertaining to how a member > > elects to have their club > > ?? publications delivered, etc.? That will > > take time as any changes or > > ?? amendments must be approved by the > > whole membership. > > ?? The consensus seems to be that the > > Profiles would continue as a > > print > > ?? publication for all except foreign > > members who elect to receive it > > ?? digitally. > > ?? As far as printing is concerned, it is > > that first copy that is so > > ?? expensive, it is the subsequent copies > > that bring down the per unit > > ?? cost.? So as fewer units are produced > > and shipped, the cost per unit > > ?? increases but not proportionately. > > ?? An apples to apples comparison was made > > between an online printer > > and > > ?? the current printer for both printing > > and mailing and the difference > > ?? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per > > unit but for the whole run. > > ?? As far as I am concerned, it is the > > editors who should have the most > > ?? influence as to how and where their > > product is produced.? They are > > the > > ?? ones who must work with the printers > > and mailing houses on a regular > > ?? basis. > > ?? Bob Reid > > ?? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 > > P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > > ?? [19][42]asajay@asajay.com > > writes: > > ???? The last I heard (and I may have > > heard wrong), the board was > > ???? interested > > ???? in doing a -real- accounting > > comparison of printing costs, so for > > ???? me, > > ???? it's a wait and see kind of thing.? I > > agree, if POCA was missing > > out > > ???? on > > ???? full-color and paying $8,000 more for > > B/W then something is amiss. > > ???? However, I also believe Mr. Shortt > > didn't account for all costs > > ???? properly.? I have more faith that the > > present board members will > > ???? properly investigate and sort it out > > for everyone. > > ???? I am on-board with electronic > > delivery, though I do admit it's > > nice > > ???? to > > ???? just sit back and read a paper copy > > too.? It's also easier to > > ???? hand-off > > ???? to Sam so he can read it later.? How > > do you really fix that? > > ???? I would think (and I don't know), > > that the ClubExpress membership > > ???? database might be able to include a > > "preference" as part of the > > ???? member's > > ???? profile or details.? Just as I can > > set an address and phone > > number, > > ???? if I > > ???? could check a box for Electronic > > delivery or paper copies, or > > both, > > ???? and > > ???? select whatever I wanted for each > > item (Profiles versus > > Newsletter), > > ???? that might be ideal. > > ???? However, I'm also familiar with > > quantity discounting.? It very > > well > > ???? could be that it costs the same > > amount to print 500 as it does to > > ???? print > > ???? 50, or 10 (but I doubt it).? I > > imagine those are considerations > > the > > ???? board will look at as well. > > ???? Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie > > has claimed, I have heard (from > > ???? more > > ???? than one person), that Jack and Mike > > did not resign "because POCA > > ???? changed printers;" it was over > > "control" of newsletter content > > that > > ???? in > > ???? essence fell outside the bounds of > > the by-laws.? For a guy that > > ???? appeared > > ???? to try very hard to get everyone else > > to follow the by-laws (and > > ???? it's > > ???? unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt > > certainly didn't feel they > > ???? applied > > ???? to him. > > ???? For the record, as I understand it, > > POCA has changed printers > > ???? -twice- > > ???? since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were > > related to the DeRykes) got > > out > > ???? of > > ???? the business.? So the "family tie-in" > > previously eluded to, was > > not > > ???? a > > ???? factor in the resignations. > > ???? Just my $1.50? (two cents adjusted > > for inflation) > > ???? Asa? Jay > > ???? Asa Jay Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, > > USAFR, Retired > > ???? &? Shelley Marie > > ???? Spokane, WA > > ???? ****************************** > > ???? [20][43]http://w7tsc.org > > ???? [21][44]http://www.teampanteraracing.com > > ???? > > _______________________________________________ > > ???? Detomaso Email List is not managed by > > POCA > > ???? Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 > > Megabytes > > ???? DeTomaso mailing list > > ???? [22][45]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > ???? [23][46]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso > > ???? To manage your subscription (change > > email address, unsubscribe, > > ???? etc.) use the links above. > > ???? Members who post to this list grant > > license to the list to forward > > ???? any message posted here to all past, > > current, or future members of > > ???? the list. They also grant the list > > owner permission to maintain an > > ???? archive or approve the archiving of > > list messages. > > _______________________________________________ > > Detomaso Email List is not managed by > > POCA > > Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 > > Megabytes > > DeTomaso mailing list > > [24][47]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > [25][48]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso > > To manage your subscription (change email > > address, unsubscribe, etc.) > > use the links above. > > Members who post to this list grant > > license to the list to forward any > > message posted here to all past, current, > > or future members of the > > list. They also grant the list owner > > permission to maintain an archive > > or approve the archiving of list > > messages. > >

From: erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:43:43 -0700 To: julian_kift@hotmail.com CC: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurieferrari@aol.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
Julian these are the same questions some of us have had and have been waiting for a reply or statement. I'm willing to give the board some time to come up with one.
Sent from Effie's iPad
On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Julian Kift <julian_kift@hotmail.com> wrote:
I have digested all the emails on this topic and to be honest it still doesn't sit well in my gut.
Presumably the BOD voted in favor of changing printers based upon
Where are the actual proposals/quotes from the printers, not the ones the editor posted here. Those as they appear, could have been manipulated – I’m not accusing anyone, I am just saying, as any court would say – an experienced editor like Jack could add or delete to create and post what he did here. Since there are many still questioning the printer cost, let’s see the actual bids. From: Charles McCall [mailto:charlesmccall@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 12:08 AM To: marshallgsmith Cc: Michael Haney; Judith McCartney; Effie Richards; Julian Kift; detomaso; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations You did all read the info sent by Judy McCartney last week with Jack's explanation? Re-sent here in case you didn't see it. Please open the attachment - I promise no viruses are included On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:20 AM, marshallgsmith <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Hey Michael, I think the best way to put this controversy to bed is if you or your dad could speak about not being cooperative in regards to the the use of another printer that supposedly afforded the club an $8,000 savings. That really seems to be the only issue that continues this controversy and I still haven't heard either of you discuss the allegation. I'm sure your response will cut this thread for good and allow us all to move on with the rebuilding of this great club. Marshall Smith President, San Diego Panteras Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Michael Haney <paso750@gmail.com> Date: 8/15/16 10:36 PM (GMT-08:00) To: 'Judith McCartney' <jpoca2@hotmail.com>, 'Effie Richards' <erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>, 'Julian Kift' <julian_kift@hotmail.com> Cc: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com, 'laurie Basile' <laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Thank you very much, Judy. I really wish this thread would just die. I know that this isn't the answer you're fishing for, but it'll have to do since it's the truth. Nancy quit and took her associate (me) with her because she was tired of hearing from me all about Shortt's efforts to take over every aspect of POCA. I didn't fight her decision because I was in turn tired of Shortt's intimidation and bullying tactics. Frankly, being on the Board wasn't fun anymore and I was also very tired of Shortt's constant preening. As a matter of record, I resigned from the Board BEFORE Profiles #3 even went to the printer. I had nearly finished it and decided that I didn't want to let the POCA members down. I really didn't want to contribute any more to Shortt's regime, but my conscience won. Even after I sent the magazine in, I still had to deal with Shortt. He decided to interfere with the printer, sent them a database with a whole bunch of problematic info and threaten nonpayment if he didn't get preliminary proofs. How do I know this? I received a call while I was at work from the woman working in Allegra Printing's mail room. She called Shortt and he wouldn't help her with the database and ignored her questions. Having no one else to call, she called me. I in turn contacted Judy, our Membership Director, who fixed the problems that Shortt created. Regarding Shortt's allegations of graft, if anyone can find a connection between my family and anyone who EVER worked at Allegra Printing in Reno, Nevada, (or indeed any of Allegra's branches) please let me know. My Dad might respond as well, but he's been pretty busy caring for my SERIOUSLY ill Mom who was in the hospital for the last two weeks and who might finally be able to come back home in a couple more. Now, can we finally put this "controversy" to rest? Mike Haney -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Judith McCartney Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 PM To: Effie Richards; Julian Kift Cc: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Mike Haney gave his resignation months way head of Jacks, two diff reasons. Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator. the
quotes presented. Did they not have all the facts and if not why did they not question further? Did Jack have all the facts w hen he resigned or were his and Mike Haney's resignations simply an outright stand against changing printer?
Why did Michael push to change printer if he knew there was only pennies between it?
Julian
From: DeTomaso <detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> on
behalf of
marshall smith <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:11 AM To: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurieferrari@aol.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
I find it funny that three months after the Fun Rally we are now hearing that Shortt's bid for printing did not include shipping. Shortt is a lot of things but a mistake like this...? I was listening in on this meeting also and I know what I heard. Apparently, the board convinced 'some' members of this so-called discrepancy month's ago. Why wasn't this information, if it exists, relayed to ALL of us in a timely manner? Marshall
-------------------------------------------- On Mon, 8/15/16, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote: Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations To: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Date: Monday, August 15, 2016, 9:57 AM
Dear AJ,
I have always respected you and your opinions but in this case you are incorrect as far as the resignation of Jack DeRyke. I was on the Board of Directors' conference call where he was asked to stay and he adamantly refused to if the printer changed. Jack's resignation was specifically because of the change in printer! You can go research that phone conference call, or the minutes of the meeting, as the facts are saved. As far as Mike Haney's resignation, that was done by his Mrs. for their reasons which most likely were aligned with their parents.
Laurie
In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? [1]asajay@asajay.com writes: The last? I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was interested in doing a? -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for me, it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out on full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss.? However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs properly.? I? have more faith that the present board members will properly investigate? and sort it out for everyone. I am on-board with electronic delivery,? though I do admit it's nice to just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? It's also easier to hand-off to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do you really fix that? I would think (and I don't? know), that the ClubExpress membership database might be able to include a? "preference" as part of the member's profile or details.? Just as I? can set an address and phone number, if I could check a box for Electronic? delivery or paper copies, or both, and select whatever I wanted for each? item (Profiles versus Newsletter), that might be ideal. However,? I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well could be? that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to print 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the board will? look at as well. Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have? heard (from more than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign? "because POCA changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter? content that in essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For? a guy that appeared to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the? by-laws (and it's unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't? feel they applied to him. For the record, as I understand it, POCA? has changed printers -twice- since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related? to the DeRykes) got out of the business.? So the "family tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not a factor in the resignations. Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) Asa? Jay Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired &? Shelley? Mar
-----Original Message----- From: detomaso-request <detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com> To: detomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> Sent: Mon, Aug 15, 2016 9:00 am Subject: DeTomaso Digest, Vol 146, Issue 20 Send DeTomaso mailing list submissions to [2]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit [3]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to detomaso-[4]request@server.detomasolist.com You can reach the person managing the list at detomaso-[5]owner@server.detomasolist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of DeTomaso digest..." Daily Detomaso List Digest Today's Topics: 1. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic (marshallgsmith) 2. Re: De Tomaso Pantera GTS on eBay! again $250K!! (Michael Cox) 3. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic (Stephen)
--- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:27:43 -0700 From: marshallgsmith <[6]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> To: [7]P6746@aol.com, [8]asajay@asajay.com, [9]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic Message-ID:
<[10]sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com>
Calling this situation "multiple dues levels" seems to be making the issue too complex. There are some members
What is your estimate of the length of time that it would take the board to arrange for a vote of the membership to change the bylaws to allow for this discount? Who specifically made that apples-to-apples comparison you refer to? I agree that the editors should have
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I have a couple questions Bob: that are opting to not have printed magazines mailed which should make those members eligible for a discount because of the savings. the most influence ?on the process. ?However, our editors of both publications seem to have a hard time reporting to the members about ANY issues pertaining to the publication's themselves. Might that change in the near future or will radio silence be the norm here? Marshall Smith Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: P6746--- via DeTomaso
<[11]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>
Date: 8/14/16 3:10 PM (GMT-08:00) To: [12]asajay@asajay.com, [13]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic To use a cliche, we're working on it.? Most of what has been mentioned is in the pipeline.?? However, there are restrictions, particularly with the By-Laws as they currently? stand.? There are no provisions for multiple dues levels,? particularly pertaining to how a member elects to have their club? publications delivered, etc.? That will take time as any changes or? amendments must be approved by the whole membership. The consensus seems to be that the Profiles would? continue as a print publication for all except foreign members who elect to? receive it digitally.? As far as printing is concerned, it is that first copy that is? so expensive, it is the subsequent copies that bring down the per unit? cost.? So as fewer units are produced and shipped, the cost per unit? increases but not proportionately.?? An apples to apples comparison was made between an online? printer and the current printer for both printing and mailing and the difference? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but for the whole run.? As far as I am concerned, it is the editors who should have? the most influence as to how and where their product is produced.? They are? the ones who must work with the printers and mailing houses on a regular? basis. Bob Reid? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? [14]asajay@asajay.com writes: The last? I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was interested in doing a? -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for me, it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out on full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss.? However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs properly.? I? have more faith that the present board members will properly investigate? and sort it out for everyone. I am on-board with electronic delivery,? though I do admit it's nice to just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? It's also easier to hand-off to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do you really fix that? I would think (and I don't? know), that the ClubExpress membership database might be able to include a? "preference" as part of the member's profile or details.? Just as I? can set an address and phone number, if I could check a box for Electronic? delivery or paper copies, or both, and select whatever I wanted for each? item (Profiles versus Newsletter), that might be ideal. However,? I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well could be? that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to print 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the board will? look at as well. Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have? heard (from more than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign? "because POCA changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter? content that in essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For? a guy that appeared to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the? by-laws (and it's unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't? feel they applied to him. For the record, as I understand it, POCA? has changed printers -twice- since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related? to the DeRykes) got out of the business.? So the "family tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not a factor in the resignations. Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) Asa? Jay Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired &? Shelley? Marie Spokane,? WA ****************************** [15]http://w7tsc.org [16]http://www.teampanteraracing.com _______________________________________________ Detomaso? Email List is not managed by POCA Posted emails must not exceed 1.5? Megabytes DeTomaso mailing? list [17]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com [18]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso To? manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) use the? links above. Members who post to this list grant license to the list to? forward any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of the? list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an archive or? approve the archiving of list? messages. ?? To use a cliche, we're working on it. ?? Most of what has been mentioned is in the pipeline.? However, there are ?? restrictions, particularly with the By-Laws as they currently stand. ?? There are no provisions for multiple dues levels, ?? particularly pertaining to how a member elects to have their club ?? publications delivered, etc.? That will take time as any changes or ?? amendments must be approved by the whole membership. ?? The consensus seems to be that the Profiles would continue as a print ?? publication for all except foreign members who elect to receive it ?? digitally. ?? As far as printing is concerned, it is that first copy that is so ?? expensive, it is the subsequent copies that bring down the per unit ?? cost.? So as fewer units are produced and shipped, the cost per unit ?? increases but not proportionately. ?? An apples to apples comparison was made between an online printer and ?? the current printer for both printing and mailing and the difference ?? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but for the whole run. ?? As far as I am concerned, it is the editors who should have the most ?? influence as to how and where their product is produced.? They are the ?? ones who must work with the printers and mailing houses on a regular ?? basis. ?? Bob Reid ?? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, ?? [19]asajay@asajay.com writes: ???? The last I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was ???? interested ???? in doing a -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for ???? me, ???? it's a wait and see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out ???? on ???? full-color and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss. ???? However, I also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs ???? properly.? I have more faith that the present board members will ???? properly investigate and sort it out for everyone. ???? I am on-board with electronic delivery, though I do admit it's nice ???? to ???? just sit back and read a paper copy too.? It's also easier to ???? hand-off ???? to Sam so he can read it later.? How do you really fix that? ???? I would think (and I don't know), that the ClubExpress membership ???? database might be able to include a "preference" as part of the ???? member's ???? profile or details.? Just as I can set an address and phone number, ???? if I ???? could check a box for Electronic delivery or paper copies, or both, ???? and ???? select whatever I wanted for each item (Profiles versus Newsletter), ???? that might be ideal. ???? However, I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well ???? could be that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to ???? print ???? 50, or 10 (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the ???? board will look at as well. ???? Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have heard (from ???? more ???? than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign "because POCA ???? changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter content that ???? in ???? essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For a guy that ???? appeared ???? to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the by-laws (and ???? it's ???? unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't feel they ???? applied ???? to him. ???? For the record, as I understand it, POCA has changed printers ???? -twice- ???? since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related to the DeRykes) got out ???? of ???? the business.? So the "family tie-in" previously eluded to, was not ???? a ???? factor in the resignations. ???? Just my $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) ???? Asa? Jay ???? Asa Jay Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired ???? &? Shelley Marie ???? Spokane, WA ???? ****************************** ???? [20]http://w7tsc.org ???? [21]http://www.teampanteraracing.com ???? _______________________________________________ ???? Detomaso Email List is not managed by POCA ???? Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes ???? DeTomaso mailing list ???? [22]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com ????
[23]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
???? To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, ???? etc.) use the links above. ???? Members who post to this list grant license to the list to forward ???? any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of ???? the list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an ???? archive or approve the archiving of list messages. _______________________________________________ Detomaso Email List is not managed by POCA Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes DeTomaso mailing list [24]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com [25]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) use the links above. Members who post to this list grant license to the list to forward any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of the list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an archive or approve the archiving of list messages.
Where are the actual proposals/quotes from the printers, not the ones the editor posted here. Those as they appear, could have been manipulated - I'm not accusing anyone, I am just saying, as any court would say - an experienced editor like Jack could add or delete to create and post what he did here. Since there are many still questioning the printer cost, let's see the actual bids. From: Charles McCall [mailto:charlesmccall@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 12:08 AM To: marshallgsmith Cc: Michael Haney; Judith McCartney; Effie Richards; Julian Kift; detomaso; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations You did all read the info sent by Judy McCartney last week with Jack's explanation? Re-sent here in case you didn't see it. Please open the attachment - I promise no viruses are included On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:20 AM, marshallgsmith <[1]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Hey Michael, I think the best way to put this controversy to bed is if you or your dad could speak about not being cooperative in regards to the the use of another printer that supposedly afforded the club an $8,000 savings. That really seems to be the only issue that continues this controversy and I still haven't heard either of you discuss the allegation. I'm sure your response will cut this thread for good and allow us all to move on with the rebuilding of this great club. Marshall Smith President, San Diego Panteras Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Michael Haney <[2]paso750@gmail.com> Date: 8/15/16 10:36 PM (GMT-08:00) To: 'Judith McCartney' <[3]jpoca2@hotmail.com>, 'Effie Richards' <[4]erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>, 'Julian Kift' <[5]julian_kift@hotmail.com> Cc: [6]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com, 'laurie Basile' <[7]laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Thank you very much, Judy. I really wish this thread would just die. I know that this isn't the answer you're fishing for, but it'll have to do since it's the truth. Nancy quit and took her associate (me) with her because she was tired of hearing from me all about Shortt's efforts to take over every aspect of POCA. I didn't fight her decision because I was in turn tired of Shortt's intimidation and bullying tactics. Frankly, being on the Board wasn't fun anymore and I was also very tired of Shortt's constant preening. As a matter of record, I resigned from the Board BEFORE Profiles #3 even went to the printer. I had nearly finished it and decided that I didn't want to let the POCA members down. I really didn't want to contribute any more to Shortt's regime, but my conscience won. Even after I sent the magazine in, I still had to deal with Shortt. He decided to interfere with the printer, sent them a database with a whole bunch of problematic info and threaten nonpayment if he didn't get preliminary proofs. How do I know this? I received a call while I was at work from the woman working in Allegra Printing's mail room. She called Shortt and he wouldn't help her with the database and ignored her questions. Having no one else to call, she called me. I in turn contacted Judy, our Membership Director, who fixed the problems that Shortt created. Regarding Shortt's allegations of graft, if anyone can find a connection between my family and anyone who EVER worked at Allegra Printing in Reno, Nevada, (or indeed any of Allegra's branches) please let me know. My Dad might respond as well, but he's been pretty busy caring for my SERIOUSLY ill Mom who was in the hospital for the last two weeks and who might finally be able to come back home in a couple more. Now, can we finally put this "controversy" to rest? Mike Haney -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [mailto:[8]detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Judith McCartney Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 PM To: Effie Richards; Julian Kift Cc: [9]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Mike Haney gave his resignation months way head of Jacks, two diff reasons. Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator. > From: [10]erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com > Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:43:43 -0700 > To: [11]julian_kift@hotmail.com > CC: [12]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; [13]laurieferrari@aol.com > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations > > Julian these are the same questions some of us have had and have been waiting for a reply or statement. I'm willing to give the board some time to come up with one. > > Sent from Effie's iPad > > > On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Julian Kift <[14]julian_kift@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > I have digested all the emails on this topic and to be honest it still > > doesn't sit well in my gut. > > > > > > Presumably the BOD voted in favor of changing printers based upon the > > quotes presented. Did they not have all the facts and > > if not why did they not question further? Did Jack have all the facts w > > hen he resigned or were his and Mike Haney's resignations simply an > > outright stand against changing printer? > > > > > > Why did Michael push to change printer if he knew there was only > > pennies between it? > > > > > > Julian > > __________________________________________________________________ > > > > From: DeTomaso <[15]detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> on behalf of > > marshall smith <[16]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> > > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:11 AM > > To: [17]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; [18]laurieferrari@aol.com > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations > > > > I find it funny that three months after the Fun Rally we are now > > hearing that Shortt's bid for printing did not include shipping. Shortt > > is a lot of things but a mistake like this...? > > I was listening in on this meeting also and I know what I heard. > > Apparently, the board convinced 'some' members of this so-called > > discrepancy month's ago. Why wasn't this information, if it exists, > > relayed to ALL of us in a timely manner? > > Marshall > > > > -------------------------------------------- > > On Mon, 8/15/16, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso > > <[19]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote: > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations > > To: [20]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > Date: Monday, August 15, 2016, 9:57 AM > > > > Dear AJ, > > > > I have always respected you and your > > opinions but in this case you are > > incorrect as far as the resignation of > > Jack DeRyke. I was on the Board > > of Directors' conference call where he was > > asked to stay and he > > adamantly refused to if the printer > > changed. Jack's resignation was > > specifically because of the change in > > printer! You can go research > > that phone conference call, or the minutes > > of the meeting, as the facts > > are saved. As far as Mike Haney's > > resignation, that was done by his > > Mrs. for their reasons which most likely > > were aligned with their > > parents. > > > > Laurie > > > > In a message dated 8/13/2016 > > 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? > > [1][21]asajay@asajay.com > > writes: > > The last? I heard (and I may have > > heard wrong), the board was > > interested > > in doing a? -real- accounting > > comparison of printing costs, so for > > me, > > it's a wait and? see kind of > > thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing > > out on > > full-color? and paying $8,000 more > > for B/W then something is amiss.? > > However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt > > didn't account for all costs > > properly.? I? have more faith that > > the present board members will > > properly investigate? and sort it > > out for everyone. > > I am on-board with electronic > > delivery,? though I do admit it's nice > > to > > just sit back and read a paper > > copy? too.? It's also easier to > > hand-off > > to Sam so he can read it? later.? > > How do you really fix that? > > I would think (and I don't? know), > > that the ClubExpress membership > > database might be able to include > > a? "preference" as part of the > > member's > > profile or details.? Just as I? can > > set an address and phone number, > > if I > > could check a box for Electronic? > > delivery or paper copies, or both, > > and > > select whatever I wanted for each? > > item (Profiles versus > > Newsletter), > > that might be ideal. > > However,? I'm also familiar with > > quantity discounting.? It very well > > could be? that it costs the same > > amount to print 500 as it does to > > print > > 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I > > imagine those are considerations the > > board will? look at as well. > > Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie > > has claimed, I have? heard (from > > more > > than one person), that Jack and > > Mike did not resign? "because POCA > > changed printers;" it was over > > "control" of newsletter? content that > > in > > essence fell outside the bounds of > > the by-laws.? For? a guy that > > appeared > > to try very hard to get everyone > > else to follow the? by-laws (and > > it's > > unwritten code of ethics), Mr. > > Shortt certainly didn't? feel they > > applied > > to him. > > For the record, as I understand it, > > POCA? has changed printers > > -twice- > > since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were > > related? to the DeRykes) got out > > of > > the business.? So the "family > > tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not > > a > > factor in the resignations. > > Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted > > for inflation) > > Asa? Jay > > Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, > > USAFR, Retired > > &? Shelley? Mar > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: detomaso-request <[22]detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com> > > To: detomaso <[23]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> > > Sent: Mon, Aug 15, 2016 9:00 am > > Subject: DeTomaso Digest, Vol 146, Issue > > 20 > > Send DeTomaso mailing list submissions to > > [2][24]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World > > Wide Web, visit > > [3][25]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso > > or, via email, send a message with subject > > or body 'help' to > > detomaso-[4][26]request@server.detomasolist.com > > You can reach the person managing the list > > at > > detomaso-[5][27]owner@server.detomasolist.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject > > line so it is more specific > > than "Re: Contents of DeTomaso digest..." > > Daily Detomaso List Digest > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. > > electronic (marshallgsmith) > > 2. Re: De Tomaso Pantera GTS on eBay! > > again $250K!! (Michael Cox) > > 3. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. > > electronic (Stephen) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > --- > > Message: 1 > > Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:27:43 -0700 > > From: marshallgsmith <[6][28]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> > > To: [7][29]P6746@aol.com, [8][30]asajay@asajay.com, > > [9][31]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, > > paper vs. electronic > > Message-ID: > > <[10][32]sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I have a couple questions Bob: > >> Calling this situation "multiple dues > > levels" seems to be making the > > issue too complex. There are some members > > that are opting to not have > > printed magazines mailed which should make > > those members eligible for a > > discount because of the savings. > >> What is your estimate of the length > > of time that it would take the > > board to arrange for a vote of the > > membership to change the bylaws to > > allow for this discount? > >> Who specifically made that > > apples-to-apples comparison you refer to? > >> I agree that the editors should have > > the most influence ?on the > > process. ?However, our editors of both > > publications seem to have a hard > > time reporting to the members about ANY > > issues pertaining to the > > publication's themselves. Might that > > change in the near future or will > > radio silence be the norm here? > > Marshall Smith > > Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone > > -------- Original message -------- > > From: P6746--- via DeTomaso <[11][33]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> > > Date: 8/14/16 3:10 PM (GMT-08:00) > > To: [12][34]asajay@asajay.com, > > [13][35]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, > > paper vs. electronic > > To use a cliche, we're working on it.? > > Most of what has been mentioned is in the > > pipeline.?? However, there > > are > > restrictions, particularly with the > > By-Laws as they currently? stand.? > > There > > are no provisions for multiple dues > > levels,? particularly pertaining to > > how a > > member elects to have their club? > > publications delivered, etc.? That > > will > > take time as any changes or? amendments > > must be approved by the whole > > membership. > > The consensus seems to be that the > > Profiles would? continue as a print > > publication for all except foreign members > > who elect to? receive it > > digitally.? > > As far as printing is concerned, it is > > that first copy that is? so > > expensive, it is the subsequent copies > > that bring down the per unit? > > cost.? So as > > fewer units are produced and shipped, the > > cost per unit? increases but > > not > > proportionately.?? > > An apples to apples comparison was made > > between an online? printer and > > the > > current printer for both printing and > > mailing and the difference? was > > pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but > > for the whole run.? > > As far as I am concerned, it is the > > editors who should have? the most > > influence as to how and where their > > product is produced.? They are? the > > ones who > > must work with the printers and mailing > > houses on a regular? basis. > > Bob Reid? > > In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. > > Eastern Daylight Time,? > > [14][36]asajay@asajay.com > > writes: > > The last? I heard (and I may have heard > > wrong), the board was > > interested > > in doing a? -real- accounting comparison > > of printing costs, so for me, > > it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I > > agree, if POCA was missing out > > on > > full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W > > then something is amiss.? > > However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't > > account for all costs > > properly.? I? have more faith that the > > present board members will > > properly investigate? and sort it out for > > everyone. > > I am on-board with electronic delivery,? > > though I do admit it's nice to > > just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? > > It's also easier to hand-off > > to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do > > you really fix that? > > I would think (and I don't? know), that > > the ClubExpress membership > > database might be able to include a? > > "preference" as part of the > > member's > > profile or details.? Just as I? can set an > > address and phone number, if > > I > > could check a box for Electronic? delivery > > or paper copies, or both, > > and > > select whatever I wanted for each? item > > (Profiles versus Newsletter), > > that might be ideal. > > However,? I'm also familiar with quantity > > discounting.? It very well > > could be? that it costs the same amount to > > print 500 as it does to > > print > > 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine > > those are considerations the > > board will? look at as well. > > Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has > > claimed, I have? heard (from > > more > > than one person), that Jack and Mike did > > not resign? "because POCA > > changed printers;" it was over "control" > > of newsletter? content that in > > essence fell outside the bounds of the > > by-laws.? For? a guy that > > appeared > > to try very hard to get everyone else to > > follow the? by-laws (and it's > > unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt > > certainly didn't? feel they > > applied > > to him. > > For the record, as I understand it, POCA? > > has changed printers -twice- > > since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were > > related? to the DeRykes) got out of > > the business.? So the "family tie-in"? > > previously eluded to, was not a > > factor in the resignations. > > Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for > > inflation) > > Asa? Jay > > Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, > > Retired > > &? Shelley? Marie > > Spokane,? WA > > ****************************** > > [15][37]http://w7tsc.org > > [16][38]http://www.teampanteraracing.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Detomaso? Email List is not managed by > > POCA > > Posted emails must not exceed 1.5? > > Megabytes > > DeTomaso mailing? list > > [17][39]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > [18][40]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso > > To? manage your subscription (change email > > address, unsubscribe, etc.) > > use > > the? links above. > > Members who post to this list grant > > license to the list to? forward any > > message posted here to all past, current, > > or future members of the? > > list. They > > also grant the list owner permission to > > maintain an archive or? approve > > the > > archiving of list? messages. > > ?? To use a cliche, we're working on it. > > ?? Most of what has been mentioned is in > > the pipeline.? However, there > > are > > ?? restrictions, particularly with the > > By-Laws as they currently stand. > > ?? There are no provisions for multiple > > dues levels, > > ?? particularly pertaining to how a member > > elects to have their club > > ?? publications delivered, etc.? That will > > take time as any changes or > > ?? amendments must be approved by the > > whole membership. > > ?? The consensus seems to be that the > > Profiles would continue as a > > print > > ?? publication for all except foreign > > members who elect to receive it > > ?? digitally. > > ?? As far as printing is concerned, it is > > that first copy that is so > > ?? expensive, it is the subsequent copies > > that bring down the per unit > > ?? cost.? So as fewer units are produced > > and shipped, the cost per unit > > ?? increases but not proportionately. > > ?? An apples to apples comparison was made > > between an online printer > > and > > ?? the current printer for both printing > > and mailing and the difference > > ?? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per > > unit but for the whole run. > > ?? As far as I am concerned, it is the > > editors who should have the most > > ?? influence as to how and where their > > product is produced.? They are > > the > > ?? ones who must work with the printers > > and mailing houses on a regular > > ?? basis. > > ?? Bob Reid > > ?? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 > > P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > > ?? [19][41]asajay@asajay.com > > writes: > > ???? The last I heard (and I may have > > heard wrong), the board was > > ???? interested > > ???? in doing a -real- accounting > > comparison of printing costs, so for > > ???? me, > > ???? it's a wait and see kind of thing.? I > > agree, if POCA was missing > > out > > ???? on > > ???? full-color and paying $8,000 more for > > B/W then something is amiss. > > ???? However, I also believe Mr. Shortt > > didn't account for all costs > > ???? properly.? I have more faith that the > > present board members will > > ???? properly investigate and sort it out > > for everyone. > > ???? I am on-board with electronic > > delivery, though I do admit it's > > nice > > ???? to > > ???? just sit back and read a paper copy > > too.? It's also easier to > > ???? hand-off > > ???? to Sam so he can read it later.? How > > do you really fix that? > > ???? I would think (and I don't know), > > that the ClubExpress membership > > ???? database might be able to include a > > "preference" as part of the > > ???? member's > > ???? profile or details.? Just as I can > > set an address and phone > > number, > > ???? if I > > ???? could check a box for Electronic > > delivery or paper copies, or > > both, > > ???? and > > ???? select whatever I wanted for each > > item (Profiles versus > > Newsletter), > > ???? that might be ideal. > > ???? However, I'm also familiar with > > quantity discounting.? It very > > well > > ???? could be that it costs the same > > amount to print 500 as it does to > > ???? print > > ???? 50, or 10 (but I doubt it).? I > > imagine those are considerations > > the > > ???? board will look at as well. > > ???? Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie > > has claimed, I have heard (from > > ???? more > > ???? than one person), that Jack and Mike > > did not resign "because POCA > > ???? changed printers;" it was over > > "control" of newsletter content > > that > > ???? in > > ???? essence fell outside the bounds of > > the by-laws.? For a guy that > > ???? appeared > > ???? to try very hard to get everyone else > > to follow the by-laws (and > > ???? it's > > ???? unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt > > certainly didn't feel they > > ???? applied > > ???? to him. > > ???? For the record, as I understand it, > > POCA has changed printers > > ???? -twice- > > ???? since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were > > related to the DeRykes) got > > out > > ???? of > > ???? the business.? So the "family tie-in" > > previously eluded to, was > > not > > ???? a > > ???? factor in the resignations. > > ???? Just my $1.50? (two cents adjusted > > for inflation) > > ???? Asa? Jay > > ???? Asa Jay Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, > > USAFR, Retired > > ???? &? Shelley Marie > > ???? Spokane, WA > > ???? ****************************** > > ???? [20][42]http://w7tsc.org > > ???? [21][43]http://www.teampanteraracing.com > > ???? > > _______________________________________________ > > ???? Detomaso Email List is not managed by > > POCA > > ???? Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 > > Megabytes > > ???? DeTomaso mailing list > > ???? [22][44]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > ???? [23][45]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso > > ???? To manage your subscription (change > > email address, unsubscribe, > > ???? etc.) use the links above. > > ???? Members who post to this list grant > > license to the list to forward > > ???? any message posted here to all past, > > current, or future members of > > ???? the list. They also grant the list > > owner permission to maintain an > > ???? archive or approve the archiving of > > list messages. > > _______________________________________________ > > Detomaso Email List is not managed by > > POCA > > Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 > > Megabytes > > DeTomaso mailing list > > [24][46]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > [25][47]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso > > To manage your subscription (change email > > address, unsubscribe, etc.) > > use the links above. > > Members who post to this list grant > > license to the list to forward any > > message posted here to all past, current, > > or future members of the > > list. They also grant the list owner > > permission to maintain an archive > > or approve the archiving of list > > messages. > >

So, when, exactly, did we stop beating our spouses??? Effie - gads - you have the names of the printers! Call them - short of that I can assure you any good photographer can modify a document so you will not be able to know what is real and what is not. Let's stop the witch hunt - look at the folks who stood up to the shortt. Think about how long they have been a part of POCA. Are they out for personal gain in standing up to a person who made way too many folks want to quit? If you or others wish to continue the witch hunt - please start a new thread, with the initials MS in front of the subject. That way I can route all e-mails associated with the thread to my trash bin. I’m going to go back to working on 5332 and hope this whole nightmare will just go away. Stephen Nelson -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Effie Richards Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 10:30 AM To: 'Charles McCall' <charlesmccall@gmail.com>; 'marshallgsmith' <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> Cc: 'detomaso' <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>; 'laurie Basile' <laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Where are the actual proposals/quotes from the printers, not the ones the editor posted here. Those as they appear, could have been manipulated – I’m not accusing anyone, I am just saying, as any court would say – an experienced editor like Jack could add or delete to create and post what he did here. Since there are many still questioning the printer cost, let’s see the actual bids. From: Charles McCall [ <mailto:charlesmccall@gmail.com> mailto:charlesmccall@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 12:08 AM To: marshallgsmith Cc: Michael Haney; Judith McCartney; Effie Richards; Julian Kift; detomaso; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations You did all read the info sent by Judy McCartney last week with Jack's explanation? Re-sent here in case you didn't see it. Please open the attachment - I promise no viruses are included On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:20 AM, marshallgsmith < <mailto:marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Hey Michael, I think the best way to put this controversy to bed is if you or your dad could speak about not being cooperative in regards to the the use of another printer that supposedly afforded the club an $8,000 savings. That really seems to be the only issue that continues this controversy and I still haven't heard either of you discuss the allegation. I'm sure your response will cut this thread for good and allow us all to move on with the rebuilding of this great club. Marshall Smith President, San Diego Panteras Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Michael Haney < <mailto:paso750@gmail.com> paso750@gmail.com> Date: 8/15/16 10:36 PM (GMT-08:00) To: 'Judith McCartney' < <mailto:jpoca2@hotmail.com> jpoca2@hotmail.com>, 'Effie Richards' < <mailto:erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com> erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>, 'Julian Kift' < <mailto:julian_kift@hotmail.com> julian_kift@hotmail.com> Cc: <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com, 'laurie Basile' < <mailto:laurieferrari@aol.com> laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Thank you very much, Judy. I really wish this thread would just die. I know that this isn't the answer you're fishing for, but it'll have to do since it's the truth. Nancy quit and took her associate (me) with her because she was tired of hearing from me all about Shortt's efforts to take over every aspect of POCA. I didn't fight her decision because I was in turn tired of Shortt's intimidation and bullying tactics. Frankly, being on the Board wasn't fun anymore and I was also very tired of Shortt's constant preening. As a matter of record, I resigned from the Board BEFORE Profiles #3 even went to the printer. I had nearly finished it and decided that I didn't want to let the POCA members down. I really didn't want to contribute any more to Shortt's regime, but my conscience won. Even after I sent the magazine in, I still had to deal with Shortt. He decided to interfere with the printer, sent them a database with a whole bunch of problematic info and threaten nonpayment if he didn't get preliminary proofs. How do I know this? I received a call while I was at work from the woman working in Allegra Printing's mail room. She called Shortt and he wouldn't help her with the database and ignored her questions. Having no one else to call, she called me. I in turn contacted Judy, our Membership Director, who fixed the problems that Shortt created. Regarding Shortt's allegations of graft, if anyone can find a connection between my family and anyone who EVER worked at Allegra Printing in Reno, Nevada, (or indeed any of Allegra's branches) please let me know. My Dad might respond as well, but he's been pretty busy caring for my SERIOUSLY ill Mom who was in the hospital for the last two weeks and who might finally be able to come back home in a couple more. Now, can we finally put this "controversy" to rest? Mike Haney -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [ <mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Judith McCartney Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 PM To: Effie Richards; Julian Kift Cc: <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Mike Haney gave his resignation months way head of Jacks, two diff reasons. Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator.
From: <mailto:erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com> erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:43:43 -0700
To: <mailto:julian_kift@hotmail.com> julian_kift@hotmail.com
CC: <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; <mailto:laurieferrari@aol.com> laurieferrari@aol.com
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
Julian these are the same questions some of us have had and have been
waiting for a reply or statement. I'm willing to give the board some time to come up with one.
Sent from Effie's iPad
On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Julian Kift < <mailto:julian_kift@hotmail.com> julian_kift@hotmail.com>
wrote:
I have digested all the emails on this topic and to be honest it
still
doesn't sit well in my gut.
Presumably the BOD voted in favor of changing printers based upon
the
quotes presented. Did they not have all the facts and
if not why did they not question further? Did Jack have all the
facts w
hen he resigned or were his and Mike Haney's resignations simply
an
outright stand against changing printer?
Why did Michael push to change printer if he knew there was only
pennies between it?
Julian
__________________________________________________________________
From: DeTomaso < <mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> on
behalf of
marshall smith < <mailto:marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net>
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:11 AM
To: <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; <mailto:laurieferrari@aol.com> laurieferrari@aol.com
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
I find it funny that three months after the Fun Rally we are now
hearing that Shortt's bid for printing did not include shipping.
Shortt
is a lot of things but a mistake like this...?
I was listening in on this meeting also and I know what I heard.
Apparently, the board convinced 'some' members of this so-called
discrepancy month's ago. Why wasn't this information, if it
exists,
relayed to ALL of us in a timely manner?
Marshall
--------------------------------------------
On Mon, 8/15/16, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso
< <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
To: <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com
Date: Monday, August 15, 2016, 9:57 AM
Dear AJ,
I have always respected you and your
opinions but in this case you are
incorrect as far as the resignation of
Jack DeRyke. I was on the Board
of Directors' conference call where he was
asked to stay and he
adamantly refused to if the printer
changed. Jack's resignation was
specifically because of the change in
printer! You can go research
that phone conference call, or the minutes
of the meeting, as the facts
are saved. As far as Mike Haney's
resignation, that was done by his
Mrs. for their reasons which most likely
were aligned with their
parents.
Laurie
In a message dated 8/13/2016
9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,?
[1] <mailto:asajay@asajay.com> asajay@asajay.com
writes:
The last? I heard (and I may have
heard wrong), the board was
interested
in doing a? -real- accounting
comparison of printing costs, so for
me,
it's a wait and? see kind of
thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing
out on
full-color? and paying $8,000 more
for B/W then something is amiss.?
However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt
didn't account for all costs
properly.? I? have more faith that
the present board members will
properly investigate? and sort it
out for everyone.
I am on-board with electronic
delivery,? though I do admit it's nice
to
just sit back and read a paper
copy? too.? It's also easier to
hand-off
to Sam so he can read it? later.?
How do you really fix that?
I would think (and I don't? know),
that the ClubExpress membership
database might be able to include
a? "preference" as part of the
member's
profile or details.? Just as I? can
set an address and phone number,
if I
could check a box for Electronic?
delivery or paper copies, or both,
and
select whatever I wanted for each?
item (Profiles versus
Newsletter),
that might be ideal.
However,? I'm also familiar with
quantity discounting.? It very well
could be? that it costs the same
amount to print 500 as it does to
50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I
imagine those are considerations the
board will? look at as well.
Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie
has claimed, I have? heard (from
more
than one person), that Jack and
Mike did not resign? "because POCA
changed printers;" it was over
"control" of newsletter? content that
in
essence fell outside the bounds of
the by-laws.? For? a guy that
appeared
to try very hard to get everyone
else to follow the? by-laws (and
it's
unwritten code of ethics), Mr.
Shortt certainly didn't? feel they
applied
to him.
For the record, as I understand it,
POCA? has changed printers
-twice-
since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were
related? to the DeRykes) got out
of
the business.? So the "family
tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not
a
factor in the resignations.
Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted
for inflation)
Asa? Jay
Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt,
USAFR, Retired
&? Shelley? Mar
-----Original Message-----
From: detomaso-request
< <mailto:detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com>
To: detomaso < <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>
Sent: Mon, Aug 15, 2016 9:00 am
Subject: DeTomaso Digest, Vol 146, Issue
20
Send DeTomaso mailing list submissions to
[2] <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World
Wide Web, visit
[3] <http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso> http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
or, via email, send a message with subject
or body 'help' to
detomaso-[4] <mailto:request@server.detomasolist.com> request@server.detomasolist.com
You can reach the person managing the list
at
detomaso-[5] <mailto:owner@server.detomasolist.com> owner@server.detomasolist.com
When replying, please edit your Subject
line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of DeTomaso digest..."
Daily Detomaso List Digest
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs.
electronic (marshallgsmith)
2. Re: De Tomaso Pantera GTS on eBay!
again $250K!! (Michael Cox)
3. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs.
electronic (Stephen)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:27:43 -0700
From: marshallgsmith <[6] <mailto:marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net>
To: [7] <mailto:P6746@aol.com> P6746@aol.com, [8] <mailto:asajay@asajay.com> asajay@asajay.com,
[9] <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost,
paper vs. electronic
Message-ID:
<[10] <mailto:sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com> sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I have a couple questions Bob:
Calling this situation "multiple dues
levels" seems to be making the
issue too complex. There are some members
that are opting to not have
printed magazines mailed which should make
those members eligible for a
discount because of the savings.
What is your estimate of the length
of time that it would take the
board to arrange for a vote of the
membership to change the bylaws to
allow for this discount?
Who specifically made that
apples-to-apples comparison you refer to?
I agree that the editors should have
the most influence ?on the
process. ?However, our editors of both
publications seem to have a hard
time reporting to the members about ANY
issues pertaining to the
publication's themselves. Might that
change in the near future or will
radio silence be the norm here?
Marshall Smith
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: P6746--- via DeTomaso
<[11] <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>
Date: 8/14/16 3:10 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: [12] <mailto:asajay@asajay.com> asajay@asajay.com,
[13] <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost,
paper vs. electronic
To use a cliche, we're working on it.?
Most of what has been mentioned is in the
pipeline.?? However, there
are
restrictions, particularly with the
By-Laws as they currently? stand.?
There
are no provisions for multiple dues
levels,? particularly pertaining to
how a
member elects to have their club?
publications delivered, etc.? That
will
take time as any changes or? amendments
must be approved by the whole
membership.
The consensus seems to be that the
Profiles would? continue as a print
publication for all except foreign members
who elect to? receive it
digitally.?
As far as printing is concerned, it is
that first copy that is? so
expensive, it is the subsequent copies
that bring down the per unit?
cost.? So as
fewer units are produced and shipped, the
cost per unit? increases but
not
proportionately.??
An apples to apples comparison was made
between an online? printer and
the
current printer for both printing and
mailing and the difference? was
pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but
for the whole run.?
As far as I am concerned, it is the
editors who should have? the most
influence as to how and where their
product is produced.? They are? the
ones who
must work with the printers and mailing
houses on a regular? basis.
Bob Reid?
In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M.
Eastern Daylight Time,?
[14] <mailto:asajay@asajay.com> asajay@asajay.com
writes:
The last? I heard (and I may have heard
wrong), the board was
interested
in doing a? -real- accounting comparison
of printing costs, so for me,
it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I
agree, if POCA was missing out
on
full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W
then something is amiss.?
However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't
account for all costs
properly.? I? have more faith that the
present board members will
properly investigate? and sort it out for
everyone.
I am on-board with electronic delivery,?
though I do admit it's nice to
just sit back and read a paper copy? too.?
It's also easier to hand-off
to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do
you really fix that?
I would think (and I don't? know), that
the ClubExpress membership
database might be able to include a?
"preference" as part of the
member's
profile or details.? Just as I? can set an
address and phone number, if
I
could check a box for Electronic? delivery
or paper copies, or both,
and
select whatever I wanted for each? item
(Profiles versus Newsletter),
that might be ideal.
However,? I'm also familiar with quantity
discounting.? It very well
could be? that it costs the same amount to
print 500 as it does to
50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine
those are considerations the
board will? look at as well.
Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has
claimed, I have? heard (from
more
than one person), that Jack and Mike did
not resign? "because POCA
changed printers;" it was over "control"
of newsletter? content that in
essence fell outside the bounds of the
by-laws.? For? a guy that
appeared
to try very hard to get everyone else to
follow the? by-laws (and it's
unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt
certainly didn't? feel they
applied
to him.
For the record, as I understand it, POCA?
has changed printers -twice-
since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were
related? to the DeRykes) got out of
the business.? So the "family tie-in"?
previously eluded to, was not a
factor in the resignations.
Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for
inflation)
Asa? Jay
Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR,
Retired
&? Shelley? Marie
Spokane,? WA
******************************
[16] <http://www.teampanteraracing.com> http://www.teampanteraracing.com
_______________________________________________
Detomaso? Email List is not managed by
POCA
Posted emails must not exceed 1.5?
Megabytes
DeTomaso mailing? list
[17] <mailto:DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com> DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com
[18] <http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso> http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
To? manage your subscription (change email
address, unsubscribe, etc.)
use
the? links above.
Members who post to this list grant
license to the list to? forward any
message posted here to all past, current,
or future members of the?
list. They
also grant the list owner permission to
maintain an archive or? approve
the
archiving of list? messages.
?? To use a cliche, we're working on it.
?? Most of what has been mentioned is in
the pipeline.? However, there
are
?? restrictions, particularly with the
By-Laws as they currently stand.
?? There are no provisions for multiple
dues levels,
?? particularly pertaining to how a member
elects to have their club
?? publications delivered, etc.? That will
take time as any changes or
?? amendments must be approved by the
whole membership.
?? The consensus seems to be that the
Profiles would continue as a
?? publication for all except foreign
members who elect to receive it
?? digitally.
?? As far as printing is concerned, it is
that first copy that is so
?? expensive, it is the subsequent copies
that bring down the per unit
?? cost.? So as fewer units are produced
and shipped, the cost per unit
?? increases but not proportionately.
?? An apples to apples comparison was made
between an online printer
and
?? the current printer for both printing
and mailing and the difference
?? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per
unit but for the whole run.
?? As far as I am concerned, it is the
editors who should have the most
?? influence as to how and where their
product is produced.? They are
the
?? ones who must work with the printers
and mailing houses on a regular
?? basis.
?? Bob Reid
?? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24
P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
?? [19] <mailto:asajay@asajay.com> asajay@asajay.com
writes:
???? The last I heard (and I may have
heard wrong), the board was
???? interested
???? in doing a -real- accounting
comparison of printing costs, so for
???? me,
???? it's a wait and see kind of thing.? I
agree, if POCA was missing
out
???? on
???? full-color and paying $8,000 more for
B/W then something is amiss.
???? However, I also believe Mr. Shortt
didn't account for all costs
???? properly.? I have more faith that the
present board members will
???? properly investigate and sort it out
for everyone.
???? I am on-board with electronic
delivery, though I do admit it's
nice
???? to
???? just sit back and read a paper copy
too.? It's also easier to
???? hand-off
???? to Sam so he can read it later.? How
do you really fix that?
???? I would think (and I don't know),
that the ClubExpress membership
???? database might be able to include a
"preference" as part of the
???? member's
???? profile or details.? Just as I can
set an address and phone
number,
???? if I
???? could check a box for Electronic
delivery or paper copies, or
both,
???? and
???? select whatever I wanted for each
item (Profiles versus
Newsletter),
???? that might be ideal.
???? However, I'm also familiar with
quantity discounting.? It very
well
???? could be that it costs the same
amount to print 500 as it does to
???? 50, or 10 (but I doubt it).? I
imagine those are considerations
the
???? board will look at as well.
???? Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie
has claimed, I have heard (from
???? more
???? than one person), that Jack and Mike
did not resign "because POCA
???? changed printers;" it was over
"control" of newsletter content
that
???? in
???? essence fell outside the bounds of
the by-laws.? For a guy that
???? appeared
???? to try very hard to get everyone else
to follow the by-laws (and
???? it's
???? unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt
certainly didn't feel they
???? applied
???? to him.
???? For the record, as I understand it,
POCA has changed printers
???? -twice-
???? since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were
related to the DeRykes) got
out
???? of
???? the business.? So the "family tie-in"
previously eluded to, was
not
???? a
???? factor in the resignations.
???? Just my $1.50? (two cents adjusted
for inflation)
???? Asa? Jay
???? Asa Jay Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt,
USAFR, Retired
???? &? Shelley Marie
???? Spokane, WA
???? ******************************
???? [20] <http://w7tsc.org> http://w7tsc.org
???? [21] <http://www.teampanteraracing.com> http://www.teampanteraracing.com
????
_______________________________________________
???? Detomaso Email List is not managed by
POCA
???? Posted emails must not exceed 1.5
Megabytes
???? DeTomaso mailing list
???? [22] <mailto:DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com> DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com
????
[23] <http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso> http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
???? To manage your subscription (change
email address, unsubscribe,
???? etc.) use the links above.
???? Members who post to this list grant
license to the list to forward
???? any message posted here to all past,
current, or future members of
???? the list. They also grant the list
owner permission to maintain an
???? archive or approve the archiving of
list messages.
_______________________________________________
Detomaso Email List is not managed by
POCA
Posted emails must not exceed 1.5
Megabytes
DeTomaso mailing list
[24] <mailto:DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com> DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com
[25] <http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso> http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
To manage your subscription (change email
address, unsubscribe, etc.)
use the links above.
Members who post to this list grant
license to the list to forward any
message posted here to all past, current,
or future members of the
list. They also grant the list owner
permission to maintain an archive
or approve the archiving of list
messages.
So, when, exactly, did we stop beating our spouses??? Effie - gads - you have the names of the printers! Call them - short of that I can assure you any good photographer can modify a document so you will not be able to know what is real and what is not. Let's stop the witch hunt - look at the folks who stood up to the shortt. Think about how long they have been a part of POCA. Are they out for personal gain in standing up to a person who made way too many folks want to quit? If you or others wish to continue the witch hunt - please start a new thread, with the initials MS in front of the subject. That way I can route all e-mails associated with the thread to my trash bin. I'm going to go back to working on 5332 and hope this whole nightmare will just go away. Stephen Nelson -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Effie Richards Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 10:30 AM To: 'Charles McCall' <charlesmccall@gmail.com>; 'marshallgsmith' <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> Cc: 'detomaso' <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>; 'laurie Basile' <laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Where are the actual proposals/quotes from the printers, not the ones the editor posted here. Those as they appear, could have been manipulated - I'm not accusing anyone, I am just saying, as any court would say - an experienced editor like Jack could add or delete to create and post what he did here. Since there are many still questioning the printer cost, let's see the actual bids. From: Charles McCall [[1]mailto:charlesmccall@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 12:08 AM To: marshallgsmith Cc: Michael Haney; Judith McCartney; Effie Richards; Julian Kift; detomaso; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations You did all read the info sent by Judy McCartney last week with Jack's explanation? Re-sent here in case you didn't see it. Please open the attachment - I promise no viruses are included On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:20 AM, marshallgsmith <[2]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Hey Michael, I think the best way to put this controversy to bed is if you or your dad could speak about not being cooperative in regards to the the use of another printer that supposedly afforded the club an $8,000 savings. That really seems to be the only issue that continues this controversy and I still haven't heard either of you discuss the allegation. I'm sure your response will cut this thread for good and allow us all to move on with the rebuilding of this great club. Marshall Smith President, San Diego Panteras Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Michael Haney <[3]paso750@gmail.com> Date: 8/15/16 10:36 PM (GMT-08:00) To: 'Judith McCartney' <[4]jpoca2@hotmail.com>, 'Effie Richards' <[5]erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>, 'Julian Kift' <[6]julian_kift@hotmail.com> Cc: [7]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com, 'laurie Basile' <[8]laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Thank you very much, Judy. I really wish this thread would just die. I know that this isn't the answer you're fishing for, but it'll have to do since it's the truth. Nancy quit and took her associate (me) with her because she was tired of hearing from me all about Shortt's efforts to take over every aspect of POCA. I didn't fight her decision because I was in turn tired of Shortt's intimidation and bullying tactics. Frankly, being on the Board wasn't fun anymore and I was also very tired of Shortt's constant preening. As a matter of record, I resigned from the Board BEFORE Profiles #3 even went to the printer. I had nearly finished it and decided that I didn't want to let the POCA members down. I really didn't want to contribute any more to Shortt's regime, but my conscience won. Even after I sent the magazine in, I still had to deal with Shortt. He decided to interfere with the printer, sent them a database with a whole bunch of problematic info and threaten nonpayment if he didn't get preliminary proofs. How do I know this? I received a call while I was at work from the woman working in Allegra Printing's mail room. She called Shortt and he wouldn't help her with the database and ignored her questions. Having no one else to call, she called me. I in turn contacted Judy, our Membership Director, who fixed the problems that Shortt created. Regarding Shortt's allegations of graft, if anyone can find a connection between my family and anyone who EVER worked at Allegra Printing in Reno, Nevada, (or indeed any of Allegra's branches) please let me know. My Dad might respond as well, but he's been pretty busy caring for my SERIOUSLY ill Mom who was in the hospital for the last two weeks and who might finally be able to come back home in a couple more. Now, can we finally put this "controversy" to rest? Mike Haney -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [[9]mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Judith McCartney Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 PM To: Effie Richards; Julian Kift Cc: [10]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Mike Haney gave his resignation months way head of Jacks, two diff reasons. Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator. > From: [11]erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com > Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:43:43 -0700 > To: [12]julian_kift@hotmail.com > CC: [13]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; [14]laurieferrari@aol.com > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations > > Julian these are the same questions some of us have had and have been waiting for a reply or statement. I'm willing to give the board some time to come up with one. > > Sent from Effie's iPad > > > On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Julian Kift <[15]julian_kift@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > I have digested all the emails on this topic and to be honest it still > > doesn't sit well in my gut. > > > > > > Presumably the BOD voted in favor of changing printers based upon the > > quotes presented. Did they not have all the facts and > > if not why did they not question further? Did Jack have all the facts w > > hen he resigned or were his and Mike Haney's resignations simply an > > outright stand against changing printer? > > > > > > Why did Michael push to change printer if he knew there was only > > pennies between it? > > > > > > Julian > > __________________________________________________________________ > > > > From: DeTomaso <[16]detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> on behalf of > > marshall smith <[17]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> > > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:11 AM > > To: [18]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; [19]laurieferrari@aol.com > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations > > > > I find it funny that three months after the Fun Rally we are now > > hearing that Shortt's bid for printing did not include shipping. Shortt > > is a lot of things but a mistake like this...? > > I was listening in on this meeting also and I know what I heard. > > Apparently, the board convinced 'some' members of this so-called > > discrepancy month's ago. Why wasn't this information, if it exists, > > relayed to ALL of us in a timely manner? > > Marshall > > > > -------------------------------------------- > > On Mon, 8/15/16, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso > > <[20]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote: > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations > > To: [21]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > Date: Monday, August 15, 2016, 9:57 AM > > > > Dear AJ, > > > > I have always respected you and your > > opinions but in this case you are > > incorrect as far as the resignation of > > Jack DeRyke. I was on the Board > > of Directors' conference call where he was > > asked to stay and he > > adamantly refused to if the printer > > changed. Jack's resignation was > > specifically because of the change in > > printer! You can go research > > that phone conference call, or the minutes > > of the meeting, as the facts > > are saved. As far as Mike Haney's > > resignation, that was done by his > > Mrs. for their reasons which most likely > > were aligned with their > > parents. > > > > Laurie > > > > In a message dated 8/13/2016 > > 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? > > [1][22]asajay@asajay.com > > writes: > > The last? I heard (and I may have > > heard wrong), the board was > > interested > > in doing a? -real- accounting > > comparison of printing costs, so for > > me, > > it's a wait and? see kind of > > thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing > > out on > > full-color? and paying $8,000 more > > for B/W then something is amiss.? > > However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt > > didn't account for all costs > > properly.? I? have more faith that > > the present board members will > > properly investigate? and sort it > > out for everyone. > > I am on-board with electronic > > delivery,? though I do admit it's nice > > to > > just sit back and read a paper > > copy? too.? It's also easier to > > hand-off > > to Sam so he can read it? later.? > > How do you really fix that? > > I would think (and I don't? know), > > that the ClubExpress membership > > database might be able to include > > a? "preference" as part of the > > member's > > profile or details.? Just as I? can > > set an address and phone number, > > if I > > could check a box for Electronic? > > delivery or paper copies, or both, > > and > > select whatever I wanted for each? > > item (Profiles versus > > Newsletter), > > that might be ideal. > > However,? I'm also familiar with > > quantity discounting.? It very well > > could be? that it costs the same > > amount to print 500 as it does to > > print > > 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I > > imagine those are considerations the > > board will? look at as well. > > Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie > > has claimed, I have? heard (from > > more > > than one person), that Jack and > > Mike did not resign? "because POCA > > changed printers;" it was over > > "control" of newsletter? content that > > in > > essence fell outside the bounds of > > the by-laws.? For? a guy that > > appeared > > to try very hard to get everyone > > else to follow the? by-laws (and > > it's > > unwritten code of ethics), Mr. > > Shortt certainly didn't? feel they > > applied > > to him. > > For the record, as I understand it, > > POCA? has changed printers > > -twice- > > since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were > > related? to the DeRykes) got out > > of > > the business.? So the "family > > tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not > > a > > factor in the resignations. > > Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted > > for inflation) > > Asa? Jay > > Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, > > USAFR, Retired > > &? Shelley? Mar > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: detomaso-request <[23]detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com> > > To: detomaso <[24]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> > > Sent: Mon, Aug 15, 2016 9:00 am > > Subject: DeTomaso Digest, Vol 146, Issue > > 20 > > Send DeTomaso mailing list submissions to > > [2][25]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World > > Wide Web, visit > > [3][26]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso > > or, via email, send a message with subject > > or body 'help' to > > detomaso-[4][27]request@server.detomasolist.com > > You can reach the person managing the list > > at > > detomaso-[5][28]owner@server.detomasolist.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject > > line so it is more specific > > than "Re: Contents of DeTomaso digest..." > > Daily Detomaso List Digest > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. > > electronic (marshallgsmith) > > 2. Re: De Tomaso Pantera GTS on eBay! > > again $250K!! (Michael Cox) > > 3. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. > > electronic (Stephen) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > --- > > Message: 1 > > Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:27:43 -0700 > > From: marshallgsmith <[6][29]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> > > To: [7][30]P6746@aol.com, [8][31]asajay@asajay.com, > > [9][32]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, > > paper vs. electronic > > Message-ID: > > <[10][33]sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I have a couple questions Bob: > >> Calling this situation "multiple dues > > levels" seems to be making the > > issue too complex. There are some members > > that are opting to not have > > printed magazines mailed which should make > > those members eligible for a > > discount because of the savings. > >> What is your estimate of the length > > of time that it would take the > > board to arrange for a vote of the > > membership to change the bylaws to > > allow for this discount? > >> Who specifically made that > > apples-to-apples comparison you refer to? > >> I agree that the editors should have > > the most influence ?on the > > process. ?However, our editors of both > > publications seem to have a hard > > time reporting to the members about ANY > > issues pertaining to the > > publication's themselves. Might that > > change in the near future or will > > radio silence be the norm here? > > Marshall Smith > > Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone > > -------- Original message -------- > > From: P6746--- via DeTomaso <[11][34]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> > > Date: 8/14/16 3:10 PM (GMT-08:00) > > To: [12][35]asajay@asajay.com, > > [13][36]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, > > paper vs. electronic > > To use a cliche, we're working on it.? > > Most of what has been mentioned is in the > > pipeline.?? However, there > > are > > restrictions, particularly with the > > By-Laws as they currently? stand.? > > There > > are no provisions for multiple dues > > levels,? particularly pertaining to > > how a > > member elects to have their club? > > publications delivered, etc.? That > > will > > take time as any changes or? amendments > > must be approved by the whole > > membership. > > The consensus seems to be that the > > Profiles would? continue as a print > > publication for all except foreign members > > who elect to? receive it > > digitally.? > > As far as printing is concerned, it is > > that first copy that is? so > > expensive, it is the subsequent copies > > that bring down the per unit? > > cost.? So as > > fewer units are produced and shipped, the > > cost per unit? increases but > > not > > proportionately.?? > > An apples to apples comparison was made > > between an online? printer and > > the > > current printer for both printing and > > mailing and the difference? was > > pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but > > for the whole run.? > > As far as I am concerned, it is the > > editors who should have? the most > > influence as to how and where their > > product is produced.? They are? the > > ones who > > must work with the printers and mailing > > houses on a regular? basis. > > Bob Reid? > > In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. > > Eastern Daylight Time,? > > [14][37]asajay@asajay.com > > writes: > > The last? I heard (and I may have heard > > wrong), the board was > > interested > > in doing a? -real- accounting comparison > > of printing costs, so for me, > > it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I > > agree, if POCA was missing out > > on > > full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W > > then something is amiss.? > > However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't > > account for all costs > > properly.? I? have more faith that the > > present board members will > > properly investigate? and sort it out for > > everyone. > > I am on-board with electronic delivery,? > > though I do admit it's nice to > > just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? > > It's also easier to hand-off > > to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do > > you really fix that? > > I would think (and I don't? know), that > > the ClubExpress membership > > database might be able to include a? > > "preference" as part of the > > member's > > profile or details.? Just as I? can set an > > address and phone number, if > > I > > could check a box for Electronic? delivery > > or paper copies, or both, > > and > > select whatever I wanted for each? item > > (Profiles versus Newsletter), > > that might be ideal. > > However,? I'm also familiar with quantity > > discounting.? It very well > > could be? that it costs the same amount to > > print 500 as it does to > > print > > 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine > > those are considerations the > > board will? look at as well. > > Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has > > claimed, I have? heard (from > > more > > than one person), that Jack and Mike did > > not resign? "because POCA > > changed printers;" it was over "control" > > of newsletter? content that in > > essence fell outside the bounds of the > > by-laws.? For? a guy that > > appeared > > to try very hard to get everyone else to > > follow the? by-laws (and it's > > unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt > > certainly didn't? feel they > > applied > > to him. > > For the record, as I understand it, POCA? > > has changed printers -twice- > > since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were > > related? to the DeRykes) got out of > > the business.? So the "family tie-in"? > > previously eluded to, was not a > > factor in the resignations. > > Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for > > inflation) > > Asa? Jay > > Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, > > Retired > > &? Shelley? Marie > > Spokane,? WA > > ****************************** > > [15][38]http://w7tsc.org > > [16][39]http://www.teampanteraracing.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Detomaso? Email List is not managed by > > POCA > > Posted emails must not exceed 1.5? > > Megabytes > > DeTomaso mailing? list > > [17][40]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > [18][41]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso > > To? manage your subscription (change email > > address, unsubscribe, etc.) > > use > > the? links above. > > Members who post to this list grant > > license to the list to? forward any > > message posted here to all past, current, > > or future members of the? > > list. They > > also grant the list owner permission to > > maintain an archive or? approve > > the > > archiving of list? messages. > > ?? To use a cliche, we're working on it. > > ?? Most of what has been mentioned is in > > the pipeline.? However, there > > are > > ?? restrictions, particularly with the > > By-Laws as they currently stand. > > ?? There are no provisions for multiple > > dues levels, > > ?? particularly pertaining to how a member > > elects to have their club > > ?? publications delivered, etc.? That will > > take time as any changes or > > ?? amendments must be approved by the > > whole membership. > > ?? The consensus seems to be that the > > Profiles would continue as a > > print > > ?? publication for all except foreign > > members who elect to receive it > > ?? digitally. > > ?? As far as printing is concerned, it is > > that first copy that is so > > ?? expensive, it is the subsequent copies > > that bring down the per unit > > ?? cost.? So as fewer units are produced > > and shipped, the cost per unit > > ?? increases but not proportionately. > > ?? An apples to apples comparison was made > > between an online printer > > and > > ?? the current printer for both printing > > and mailing and the difference > > ?? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per > > unit but for the whole run. > > ?? As far as I am concerned, it is the > > editors who should have the most > > ?? influence as to how and where their > > product is produced.? They are > > the > > ?? ones who must work with the printers > > and mailing houses on a regular > > ?? basis. > > ?? Bob Reid > > ?? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 > > P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > > ?? [19][42]asajay@asajay.com > > writes: > > ???? The last I heard (and I may have > > heard wrong), the board was > > ???? interested > > ???? in doing a -real- accounting > > comparison of printing costs, so for > > ???? me, > > ???? it's a wait and see kind of thing.? I > > agree, if POCA was missing > > out > > ???? on > > ???? full-color and paying $8,000 more for > > B/W then something is amiss. > > ???? However, I also believe Mr. Shortt > > didn't account for all costs > > ???? properly.? I have more faith that the > > present board members will > > ???? properly investigate and sort it out > > for everyone. > > ???? I am on-board with electronic > > delivery, though I do admit it's > > nice > > ???? to > > ???? just sit back and read a paper copy > > too.? It's also easier to > > ???? hand-off > > ???? to Sam so he can read it later.? How > > do you really fix that? > > ???? I would think (and I don't know), > > that the ClubExpress membership > > ???? database might be able to include a > > "preference" as part of the > > ???? member's > > ???? profile or details.? Just as I can > > set an address and phone > > number, > > ???? if I > > ???? could check a box for Electronic > > delivery or paper copies, or > > both, > > ???? and > > ???? select whatever I wanted for each > > item (Profiles versus > > Newsletter), > > ???? that might be ideal. > > ???? However, I'm also familiar with > > quantity discounting.? It very > > well > > ???? could be that it costs the same > > amount to print 500 as it does to > > ???? print > > ???? 50, or 10 (but I doubt it).? I > > imagine those are considerations > > the > > ???? board will look at as well. > > ???? Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie > > has claimed, I have heard (from > > ???? more > > ???? than one person), that Jack and Mike > > did not resign "because POCA > > ???? changed printers;" it was over > > "control" of newsletter content > > that > > ???? in > > ???? essence fell outside the bounds of > > the by-laws.? For a guy that > > ???? appeared > > ???? to try very hard to get everyone else > > to follow the by-laws (and > > ???? it's > > ???? unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt > > certainly didn't feel they > > ???? applied > > ???? to him. > > ???? For the record, as I understand it, > > POCA has changed printers > > ???? -twice- > > ???? since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were > > related to the DeRykes) got > > out > > ???? of > > ???? the business.? So the "family tie-in" > > previously eluded to, was > > not > > ???? a > > ???? factor in the resignations. > > ???? Just my $1.50? (two cents adjusted > > for inflation) > > ???? Asa? Jay > > ???? Asa Jay Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, > > USAFR, Retired > > ???? &? Shelley Marie > > ???? Spokane, WA > > ???? ****************************** > > ???? [20][43]http://w7tsc.org > > ???? [21][44]http://www.teampanteraracing.com > > ???? > > _______________________________________________ > > ???? Detomaso Email List is not managed by > > POCA > > ???? Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 > > Megabytes > > ???? DeTomaso mailing list > > ???? [22][45]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > ???? [23][46]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso > > ???? To manage your subscription (change > > email address, unsubscribe, > > ???? etc.) use the links above. > > ???? Members who post to this list grant > > license to the list to forward > > ???? any message posted here to all past, > > current, or future members of > > ???? the list. They also grant the list > > owner permission to maintain an > > ???? archive or approve the archiving of > > list messages. > > _______________________________________________ > > Detomaso Email List is not managed by > > POCA > > Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 > > Megabytes > > DeTomaso mailing list > > [24][47]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > [25][48]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso > > To manage your subscription (change email > > address, unsubscribe, etc.) > > use the links above. > > Members who post to this list grant > > license to the list to forward any > > message posted here to all past, current, > > or future members of the > > list. They also grant the list owner > > permission to maintain an archive > > or approve the archiving of list > > messages. > >

Stephen, As I just responded to a private message from Judy Mc, I don’t wish to call anyone (printers) myself – I feel that is the POCA board’s job, when they have the time, to reach out and explain the printer matter and why, if there was never an $8K savings, why was that NEVER communicated to the members way back, why keep it a private secret and make the board look suspicious for “not cooperating in saving the club $8K”…. This is a simple and common sense question, I have and many have. The answer is somewhere, but that answer is not “ we just didn’t want to cause drama”… because drama was caused. Also, Stephen, I am not starting a “witch hunt” (that’s insulting and not democratic) - I am asking a simple question, to which there is a true answer. It appears you have all the answers, which is great, but I don’t. I didn’t get your “So, when exactly, did we stop beating our spouses???” comment below. Is it related to the rest of your message? I couldn’t make the connection, but then, English is my second language, please explain. E From: Stephen [mailto:steve@snclocks.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 11:29 AM To: 'Effie Richards'; 'Charles McCall'; 'marshallgsmith' Cc: 'detomaso'; 'laurie Basile' Subject: RE: [DeTomaso] resignations So, when, exactly, did we stop beating our spouses??? Effie - gads - you have the names of the printers! Call them - short of that I can assure you any good photographer can modify a document so you will not be able to know what is real and what is not. Let's stop the witch hunt - look at the folks who stood up to the shortt. Think about how long they have been a part of POCA. Are they out for personal gain in standing up to a person who made way too many folks want to quit? If you or others wish to continue the witch hunt - please start a new thread, with the initials MS in front of the subject. That way I can route all e-mails associated with the thread to my trash bin. I’m going to go back to working on 5332 and hope this whole nightmare will just go away. Stephen Nelson -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Effie Richards Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 10:30 AM To: 'Charles McCall' <charlesmccall@gmail.com>; 'marshallgsmith' <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> Cc: 'detomaso' <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>; 'laurie Basile' <laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Where are the actual proposals/quotes from the printers, not the ones the editor posted here. Those as they appear, could have been manipulated – I’m not accusing anyone, I am just saying, as any court would say – an experienced editor like Jack could add or delete to create and post what he did here. Since there are many still questioning the printer cost, let’s see the actual bids. From: Charles McCall [ <mailto:charlesmccall@gmail.com> mailto:charlesmccall@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 12:08 AM To: marshallgsmith Cc: Michael Haney; Judith McCartney; Effie Richards; Julian Kift; detomaso; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations You did all read the info sent by Judy McCartney last week with Jack's explanation? Re-sent here in case you didn't see it. Please open the attachment - I promise no viruses are included On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:20 AM, marshallgsmith < <mailto:marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Hey Michael, I think the best way to put this controversy to bed is if you or your dad could speak about not being cooperative in regards to the the use of another printer that supposedly afforded the club an $8,000 savings. That really seems to be the only issue that continues this controversy and I still haven't heard either of you discuss the allegation. I'm sure your response will cut this thread for good and allow us all to move on with the rebuilding of this great club. Marshall Smith President, San Diego Panteras Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Michael Haney < <mailto:paso750@gmail.com> paso750@gmail.com> Date: 8/15/16 10:36 PM (GMT-08:00) To: 'Judith McCartney' < <mailto:jpoca2@hotmail.com> jpoca2@hotmail.com>, 'Effie Richards' < <mailto:erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com> erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>, 'Julian Kift' < <mailto:julian_kift@hotmail.com> julian_kift@hotmail.com> Cc: <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com, 'laurie Basile' < <mailto:laurieferrari@aol.com> laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Thank you very much, Judy. I really wish this thread would just die. I know that this isn't the answer you're fishing for, but it'll have to do since it's the truth. Nancy quit and took her associate (me) with her because she was tired of hearing from me all about Shortt's efforts to take over every aspect of POCA. I didn't fight her decision because I was in turn tired of Shortt's intimidation and bullying tactics. Frankly, being on the Board wasn't fun anymore and I was also very tired of Shortt's constant preening. As a matter of record, I resigned from the Board BEFORE Profiles #3 even went to the printer. I had nearly finished it and decided that I didn't want to let the POCA members down. I really didn't want to contribute any more to Shortt's regime, but my conscience won. Even after I sent the magazine in, I still had to deal with Shortt. He decided to interfere with the printer, sent them a database with a whole bunch of problematic info and threaten nonpayment if he didn't get preliminary proofs. How do I know this? I received a call while I was at work from the woman working in Allegra Printing's mail room. She called Shortt and he wouldn't help her with the database and ignored her questions. Having no one else to call, she called me. I in turn contacted Judy, our Membership Director, who fixed the problems that Shortt created. Regarding Shortt's allegations of graft, if anyone can find a connection between my family and anyone who EVER worked at Allegra Printing in Reno, Nevada, (or indeed any of Allegra's branches) please let me know. My Dad might respond as well, but he's been pretty busy caring for my SERIOUSLY ill Mom who was in the hospital for the last two weeks and who might finally be able to come back home in a couple more. Now, can we finally put this "controversy" to rest? Mike Haney -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [ <mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Judith McCartney Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 PM To: Effie Richards; Julian Kift Cc: <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Mike Haney gave his resignation months way head of Jacks, two diff reasons. Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator.
From: <mailto:erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com> erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:43:43 -0700
To: <mailto:julian_kift@hotmail.com> julian_kift@hotmail.com
CC: <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; <mailto:laurieferrari@aol.com> laurieferrari@aol.com
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
Julian these are the same questions some of us have had and have been
waiting for a reply or statement. I'm willing to give the board some time to come up with one.
Sent from Effie's iPad
On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Julian Kift < <mailto:julian_kift@hotmail.com> julian_kift@hotmail.com>
wrote:
I have digested all the emails on this topic and to be honest it
still
doesn't sit well in my gut.
Presumably the BOD voted in favor of changing printers based upon
the
quotes presented. Did they not have all the facts and
if not why did they not question further? Did Jack have all the
facts w
hen he resigned or were his and Mike Haney's resignations simply
an
outright stand against changing printer?
Why did Michael push to change printer if he knew there was only
pennies between it?
Julian
__________________________________________________________________
From: DeTomaso < <mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> on
behalf of
marshall smith < <mailto:marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net>
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:11 AM
To: <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; <mailto:laurieferrari@aol.com> laurieferrari@aol.com
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
I find it funny that three months after the Fun Rally we are now
hearing that Shortt's bid for printing did not include shipping.
Shortt
is a lot of things but a mistake like this...?
I was listening in on this meeting also and I know what I heard.
Apparently, the board convinced 'some' members of this so-called
discrepancy month's ago. Why wasn't this information, if it
exists,
relayed to ALL of us in a timely manner?
Marshall
--------------------------------------------
On Mon, 8/15/16, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso
< <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
To: <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com
Date: Monday, August 15, 2016, 9:57 AM
Dear AJ,
I have always respected you and your
opinions but in this case you are
incorrect as far as the resignation of
Jack DeRyke. I was on the Board
of Directors' conference call where he was
asked to stay and he
adamantly refused to if the printer
changed. Jack's resignation was
specifically because of the change in
printer! You can go research
that phone conference call, or the minutes
of the meeting, as the facts
are saved. As far as Mike Haney's
resignation, that was done by his
Mrs. for their reasons which most likely
were aligned with their
parents.
Laurie
In a message dated 8/13/2016
9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,?
[1] <mailto:asajay@asajay.com> asajay@asajay.com
writes:
The last? I heard (and I may have
heard wrong), the board was
interested
in doing a? -real- accounting
comparison of printing costs, so for
me,
it's a wait and? see kind of
thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing
out on
full-color? and paying $8,000 more
for B/W then something is amiss.?
However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt
didn't account for all costs
properly.? I? have more faith that
the present board members will
properly investigate? and sort it
out for everyone.
I am on-board with electronic
delivery,? though I do admit it's nice
to
just sit back and read a paper
copy? too.? It's also easier to
hand-off
to Sam so he can read it? later.?
How do you really fix that?
I would think (and I don't? know),
that the ClubExpress membership
database might be able to include
a? "preference" as part of the
member's
profile or details.? Just as I? can
set an address and phone number,
if I
could check a box for Electronic?
delivery or paper copies, or both,
and
select whatever I wanted for each?
item (Profiles versus
Newsletter),
that might be ideal.
However,? I'm also familiar with
quantity discounting.? It very well
could be? that it costs the same
amount to print 500 as it does to
50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I
imagine those are considerations the
board will? look at as well.
Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie
has claimed, I have? heard (from
more
than one person), that Jack and
Mike did not resign? "because POCA
changed printers;" it was over
"control" of newsletter? content that
in
essence fell outside the bounds of
the by-laws.? For? a guy that
appeared
to try very hard to get everyone
else to follow the? by-laws (and
it's
unwritten code of ethics), Mr.
Shortt certainly didn't? feel they
applied
to him.
For the record, as I understand it,
POCA? has changed printers
-twice-
since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were
related? to the DeRykes) got out
of
the business.? So the "family
tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not
a
factor in the resignations.
Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted
for inflation)
Asa? Jay
Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt,
USAFR, Retired
&? Shelley? Mar
-----Original Message-----
From: detomaso-request
< <mailto:detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com>
To: detomaso < <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>
Sent: Mon, Aug 15, 2016 9:00 am
Subject: DeTomaso Digest, Vol 146, Issue
20
Send DeTomaso mailing list submissions to
[2] <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World
Wide Web, visit
[3] <http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso> http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
or, via email, send a message with subject
or body 'help' to
detomaso-[4] <mailto:request@server.detomasolist.com> request@server.detomasolist.com
You can reach the person managing the list
at
detomaso-[5] <mailto:owner@server.detomasolist.com> owner@server.detomasolist.com
When replying, please edit your Subject
line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of DeTomaso digest..."
Daily Detomaso List Digest
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs.
electronic (marshallgsmith)
2. Re: De Tomaso Pantera GTS on eBay!
again $250K!! (Michael Cox)
3. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs.
electronic (Stephen)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:27:43 -0700
From: marshallgsmith <[6] <mailto:marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net>
To: [7] <mailto:P6746@aol.com> P6746@aol.com, [8] <mailto:asajay@asajay.com> asajay@asajay.com,
[9] <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost,
paper vs. electronic
Message-ID:
<[10] <mailto:sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com> sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I have a couple questions Bob:
Calling this situation "multiple dues
levels" seems to be making the
issue too complex. There are some members
that are opting to not have
printed magazines mailed which should make
those members eligible for a
discount because of the savings.
What is your estimate of the length
of time that it would take the
board to arrange for a vote of the
membership to change the bylaws to
allow for this discount?
Who specifically made that
apples-to-apples comparison you refer to?
I agree that the editors should have
the most influence ?on the
process. ?However, our editors of both
publications seem to have a hard
time reporting to the members about ANY
issues pertaining to the
publication's themselves. Might that
change in the near future or will
radio silence be the norm here?
Marshall Smith
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: P6746--- via DeTomaso
<[11] <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>
Date: 8/14/16 3:10 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: [12] <mailto:asajay@asajay.com> asajay@asajay.com,
[13] <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost,
paper vs. electronic
To use a cliche, we're working on it.?
Most of what has been mentioned is in the
pipeline.?? However, there
are
restrictions, particularly with the
By-Laws as they currently? stand.?
There
are no provisions for multiple dues
levels,? particularly pertaining to
how a
member elects to have their club?
publications delivered, etc.? That
will
take time as any changes or? amendments
must be approved by the whole
membership.
The consensus seems to be that the
Profiles would? continue as a print
publication for all except foreign members
who elect to? receive it
digitally.?
As far as printing is concerned, it is
that first copy that is? so
expensive, it is the subsequent copies
that bring down the per unit?
cost.? So as
fewer units are produced and shipped, the
cost per unit? increases but
not
proportionately.??
An apples to apples comparison was made
between an online? printer and
the
current printer for both printing and
mailing and the difference? was
pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but
for the whole run.?
As far as I am concerned, it is the
editors who should have? the most
influence as to how and where their
product is produced.? They are? the
ones who
must work with the printers and mailing
houses on a regular? basis.
Bob Reid?
In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M.
Eastern Daylight Time,?
[14] <mailto:asajay@asajay.com> asajay@asajay.com
writes:
The last? I heard (and I may have heard
wrong), the board was
interested
in doing a? -real- accounting comparison
of printing costs, so for me,
it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I
agree, if POCA was missing out
on
full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W
then something is amiss.?
However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't
account for all costs
properly.? I? have more faith that the
present board members will
properly investigate? and sort it out for
everyone.
I am on-board with electronic delivery,?
though I do admit it's nice to
just sit back and read a paper copy? too.?
It's also easier to hand-off
to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do
you really fix that?
I would think (and I don't? know), that
the ClubExpress membership
database might be able to include a?
"preference" as part of the
member's
profile or details.? Just as I? can set an
address and phone number, if
I
could check a box for Electronic? delivery
or paper copies, or both,
and
select whatever I wanted for each? item
(Profiles versus Newsletter),
that might be ideal.
However,? I'm also familiar with quantity
discounting.? It very well
could be? that it costs the same amount to
print 500 as it does to
50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine
those are considerations the
board will? look at as well.
Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has
claimed, I have? heard (from
more
than one person), that Jack and Mike did
not resign? "because POCA
changed printers;" it was over "control"
of newsletter? content that in
essence fell outside the bounds of the
by-laws.? For? a guy that
appeared
to try very hard to get everyone else to
follow the? by-laws (and it's
unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt
certainly didn't? feel they
applied
to him.
For the record, as I understand it, POCA?
has changed printers -twice-
since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were
related? to the DeRykes) got out of
the business.? So the "family tie-in"?
previously eluded to, was not a
factor in the resignations.
Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for
inflation)
Asa? Jay
Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR,
Retired
&? Shelley? Marie
Spokane,? WA
******************************
[16] <http://www.teampanteraracing.com> http://www.teampanteraracing.com
_______________________________________________
Detomaso? Email List is not managed by
POCA
Posted emails must not exceed 1.5?
Megabytes
DeTomaso mailing? list
[17] <mailto:DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com> DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com
[18] <http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso> http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
To? manage your subscription (change email
address, unsubscribe, etc.)
use
the? links above.
Members who post to this list grant
license to the list to? forward any
message posted here to all past, current,
or future members of the?
list. They
also grant the list owner permission to
maintain an archive or? approve
the
archiving of list? messages.
?? To use a cliche, we're working on it.
?? Most of what has been mentioned is in
the pipeline.? However, there
are
?? restrictions, particularly with the
By-Laws as they currently stand.
?? There are no provisions for multiple
dues levels,
?? particularly pertaining to how a member
elects to have their club
?? publications delivered, etc.? That will
take time as any changes or
?? amendments must be approved by the
whole membership.
?? The consensus seems to be that the
Profiles would continue as a
?? publication for all except foreign
members who elect to receive it
?? digitally.
?? As far as printing is concerned, it is
that first copy that is so
?? expensive, it is the subsequent copies
that bring down the per unit
?? cost.? So as fewer units are produced
and shipped, the cost per unit
?? increases but not proportionately.
?? An apples to apples comparison was made
between an online printer
and
?? the current printer for both printing
and mailing and the difference
?? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per
unit but for the whole run.
?? As far as I am concerned, it is the
editors who should have the most
?? influence as to how and where their
product is produced.? They are
the
?? ones who must work with the printers
and mailing houses on a regular
?? basis.
?? Bob Reid
?? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24
P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
?? [19] <mailto:asajay@asajay.com> asajay@asajay.com
writes:
???? The last I heard (and I may have
heard wrong), the board was
???? interested
???? in doing a -real- accounting
comparison of printing costs, so for
???? me,
???? it's a wait and see kind of thing.? I
agree, if POCA was missing
out
???? on
???? full-color and paying $8,000 more for
B/W then something is amiss.
???? However, I also believe Mr. Shortt
didn't account for all costs
???? properly.? I have more faith that the
present board members will
???? properly investigate and sort it out
for everyone.
???? I am on-board with electronic
delivery, though I do admit it's
nice
???? to
???? just sit back and read a paper copy
too.? It's also easier to
???? hand-off
???? to Sam so he can read it later.? How
do you really fix that?
???? I would think (and I don't know),
that the ClubExpress membership
???? database might be able to include a
"preference" as part of the
???? member's
???? profile or details.? Just as I can
set an address and phone
number,
???? if I
???? could check a box for Electronic
delivery or paper copies, or
both,
???? and
???? select whatever I wanted for each
item (Profiles versus
Newsletter),
???? that might be ideal.
???? However, I'm also familiar with
quantity discounting.? It very
well
???? could be that it costs the same
amount to print 500 as it does to
???? 50, or 10 (but I doubt it).? I
imagine those are considerations
the
???? board will look at as well.
???? Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie
has claimed, I have heard (from
???? more
???? than one person), that Jack and Mike
did not resign "because POCA
???? changed printers;" it was over
"control" of newsletter content
that
???? in
???? essence fell outside the bounds of
the by-laws.? For a guy that
???? appeared
???? to try very hard to get everyone else
to follow the by-laws (and
???? it's
???? unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt
certainly didn't feel they
???? applied
???? to him.
???? For the record, as I understand it,
POCA has changed printers
???? -twice-
???? since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were
related to the DeRykes) got
out
???? of
???? the business.? So the "family tie-in"
previously eluded to, was
not
???? a
???? factor in the resignations.
???? Just my $1.50? (two cents adjusted
for inflation)
???? Asa? Jay
???? Asa Jay Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt,
USAFR, Retired
???? &? Shelley Marie
???? Spokane, WA
???? ******************************
???? [20] <http://w7tsc.org> http://w7tsc.org
???? [21] <http://www.teampanteraracing.com> http://www.teampanteraracing.com
????
_______________________________________________
???? Detomaso Email List is not managed by
POCA
???? Posted emails must not exceed 1.5
Megabytes
???? DeTomaso mailing list
???? [22] <mailto:DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com> DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com
????
[23] <http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso> http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
???? To manage your subscription (change
email address, unsubscribe,
???? etc.) use the links above.
???? Members who post to this list grant
license to the list to forward
???? any message posted here to all past,
current, or future members of
???? the list. They also grant the list
owner permission to maintain an
???? archive or approve the archiving of
list messages.
_______________________________________________
Detomaso Email List is not managed by
POCA
Posted emails must not exceed 1.5
Megabytes
DeTomaso mailing list
[24] <mailto:DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com> DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com
[25] <http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso> http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
To manage your subscription (change email
address, unsubscribe, etc.)
use the links above.
Members who post to this list grant
license to the list to forward any
message posted here to all past, current,
or future members of the
list. They also grant the list owner
permission to maintain an archive
or approve the archiving of list
messages.
Stephen, As I just responded to a private message from Judy Mc, I don't wish to call anyone (printers) myself - I feel that is the POCA board's job, when they have the time, to reach out and explain the printer matter and why, if there was never an $8K savings, why was that NEVER communicated to the members way back, why keep it a private secret and make the board look suspicious for "not cooperating in saving the club $8K".... This is a simple and common sense question, I have and many have. The answer is somewhere, but that answer is not " we just didn't want to cause drama"... because drama was caused. Also, Stephen, I am not starting a "witch hunt" (that's insulting and not democratic) - I am asking a simple question, to which there is a true answer. It appears you have all the answers, which is great, but I don't. I didn't get your "So, when exactly, did we stop beating our spouses???" comment below. Is it related to the rest of your message? I couldn't make the connection, but then, English is my second language, please explain. E From: Stephen [mailto:steve@snclocks.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 11:29 AM To: 'Effie Richards'; 'Charles McCall'; 'marshallgsmith' Cc: 'detomaso'; 'laurie Basile' Subject: RE: [DeTomaso] resignations So, when, exactly, did we stop beating our spouses??? Effie - gads - you have the names of the printers! Call them - short of that I can assure you any good photographer can modify a document so you will not be able to know what is real and what is not. Let's stop the witch hunt - look at the folks who stood up to the shortt. Think about how long they have been a part of POCA. Are they out for personal gain in standing up to a person who made way too many folks want to quit? If you or others wish to continue the witch hunt - please start a new thread, with the initials MS in front of the subject. That way I can route all e-mails associated with the thread to my trash bin. I'm going to go back to working on 5332 and hope this whole nightmare will just go away. Stephen Nelson -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [[1]mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Effie Richards Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 10:30 AM To: 'Charles McCall' <[2]charlesmccall@gmail.com>; 'marshallgsmith' <[3]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> Cc: 'detomaso' <[4]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>; 'laurie Basile' <[5]laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Where are the actual proposals/quotes from the printers, not the ones the editor posted here. Those as they appear, could have been manipulated - I'm not accusing anyone, I am just saying, as any court would say - an experienced editor like Jack could add or delete to create and post what he did here. Since there are many still questioning the printer cost, let's see the actual bids. From: Charles McCall [[6]mailto:charlesmccall@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 12:08 AM To: marshallgsmith Cc: Michael Haney; Judith McCartney; Effie Richards; Julian Kift; detomaso; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations You did all read the info sent by Judy McCartney last week with Jack's explanation? Re-sent here in case you didn't see it. Please open the attachment - I promise no viruses are included On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:20 AM, marshallgsmith <[7]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Hey Michael, I think the best way to put this controversy to bed is if you or your dad could speak about not being cooperative in regards to the the use of another printer that supposedly afforded the club an $8,000 savings. That really seems to be the only issue that continues this controversy and I still haven't heard either of you discuss the allegation. I'm sure your response will cut this thread for good and allow us all to move on with the rebuilding of this great club. Marshall Smith President, San Diego Panteras Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Michael Haney <[8]paso750@gmail.com> Date: 8/15/16 10:36 PM (GMT-08:00) To: 'Judith McCartney' <[9]jpoca2@hotmail.com>, 'Effie Richards' <[10]erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>, 'Julian Kift' <[11]julian_kift@hotmail.com> Cc: [12]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com, 'laurie Basile' <[13]laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Thank you very much, Judy. I really wish this thread would just die. I know that this isn't the answer you're fishing for, but it'll have to do since it's the truth. Nancy quit and took her associate (me) with her because she was tired of hearing from me all about Shortt's efforts to take over every aspect of POCA. I didn't fight her decision because I was in turn tired of Shortt's intimidation and bullying tactics. Frankly, being on the Board wasn't fun anymore and I was also very tired of Shortt's constant preening. As a matter of record, I resigned from the Board BEFORE Profiles #3 even went to the printer. I had nearly finished it and decided that I didn't want to let the POCA members down. I really didn't want to contribute any more to Shortt's regime, but my conscience won. Even after I sent the magazine in, I still had to deal with Shortt. He decided to interfere with the printer, sent them a database with a whole bunch of problematic info and threaten nonpayment if he didn't get preliminary proofs. How do I know this? I received a call while I was at work from the woman working in Allegra Printing's mail room. She called Shortt and he wouldn't help her with the database and ignored her questions. Having no one else to call, she called me. I in turn contacted Judy, our Membership Director, who fixed the problems that Shortt created. Regarding Shortt's allegations of graft, if anyone can find a connection between my family and anyone who EVER worked at Allegra Printing in Reno, Nevada, (or indeed any of Allegra's branches) please let me know. My Dad might respond as well, but he's been pretty busy caring for my SERIOUSLY ill Mom who was in the hospital for the last two weeks and who might finally be able to come back home in a couple more. Now, can we finally put this "controversy" to rest? Mike Haney -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [[14]mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Judith McCartney Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 PM To: Effie Richards; Julian Kift Cc: [15]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Mike Haney gave his resignation months way head of Jacks, two diff reasons. Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator. > From: [16]erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com > Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:43:43 -0700 > To: [17]julian_kift@hotmail.com > CC: [18]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; [19]laurieferrari@aol.com > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations > > Julian these are the same questions some of us have had and have been waiting for a reply or statement. I'm willing to give the board some time to come up with one. > > Sent from Effie's iPad > > > On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Julian Kift <[20]julian_kift@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > I have digested all the emails on this topic and to be honest it still > > doesn't sit well in my gut. > > > > > > Presumably the BOD voted in favor of changing printers based upon the > > quotes presented. Did they not have all the facts and > > if not why did they not question further? Did Jack have all the facts w > > hen he resigned or were his and Mike Haney's resignations simply an > > outright stand against changing printer? > > > > > > Why did Michael push to change printer if he knew there was only > > pennies between it? > > > > > > Julian > > __________________________________________________________________ > > > > From: DeTomaso <[21]detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> on behalf of > > marshall smith <[22]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> > > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:11 AM > > To: [23]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; [24]laurieferrari@aol.com > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations > > > > I find it funny that three months after the Fun Rally we are now > > hearing that Shortt's bid for printing did not include shipping. Shortt > > is a lot of things but a mistake like this...? > > I was listening in on this meeting also and I know what I heard. > > Apparently, the board convinced 'some' members of this so-called > > discrepancy month's ago. Why wasn't this information, if it exists, > > relayed to ALL of us in a timely manner? > > Marshall > > > > -------------------------------------------- > > On Mon, 8/15/16, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso > > <[25]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote: > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations > > To: [26]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > Date: Monday, August 15, 2016, 9:57 AM > > > > Dear AJ, > > > > I have always respected you and your > > opinions but in this case you are > > incorrect as far as the resignation of > > Jack DeRyke. I was on the Board > > of Directors' conference call where he was > > asked to stay and he > > adamantly refused to if the printer > > changed. Jack's resignation was > > specifically because of the change in > > printer! You can go research > > that phone conference call, or the minutes > > of the meeting, as the facts > > are saved. As far as Mike Haney's > > resignation, that was done by his > > Mrs. for their reasons which most likely > > were aligned with their > > parents. > > > > Laurie > > > > In a message dated 8/13/2016 > > 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? > > [1][27]asajay@asajay.com > > writes: > > The last? I heard (and I may have > > heard wrong), the board was > > interested > > in doing a? -real- accounting > > comparison of printing costs, so for > > me, > > it's a wait and? see kind of > > thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing > > out on > > full-color? and paying $8,000 more > > for B/W then something is amiss.? > > However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt > > didn't account for all costs > > properly.? I? have more faith that > > the present board members will > > properly investigate? and sort it > > out for everyone. > > I am on-board with electronic > > delivery,? though I do admit it's nice > > to > > just sit back and read a paper > > copy? too.? It's also easier to > > hand-off > > to Sam so he can read it? later.? > > How do you really fix that? > > I would think (and I don't? know), > > that the ClubExpress membership > > database might be able to include > > a? "preference" as part of the > > member's > > profile or details.? Just as I? can > > set an address and phone number, > > if I > > could check a box for Electronic? > > delivery or paper copies, or both, > > and > > select whatever I wanted for each? > > item (Profiles versus > > Newsletter), > > that might be ideal. > > However,? I'm also familiar with > > quantity discounting.? It very well > > could be? that it costs the same > > amount to print 500 as it does to > > print > > 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I > > imagine those are considerations the > > board will? look at as well. > > Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie > > has claimed, I have? heard (from > > more > > than one person), that Jack and > > Mike did not resign? "because POCA > > changed printers;" it was over > > "control" of newsletter? content that > > in > > essence fell outside the bounds of > > the by-laws.? For? a guy that > > appeared > > to try very hard to get everyone > > else to follow the? by-laws (and > > it's > > unwritten code of ethics), Mr. > > Shortt certainly didn't? feel they > > applied > > to him. > > For the record, as I understand it, > > POCA? has changed printers > > -twice- > > since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were > > related? to the DeRykes) got out > > of > > the business.? So the "family > > tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not > > a > > factor in the resignations. > > Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted > > for inflation) > > Asa? Jay > > Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, > > USAFR, Retired > > &? Shelley? Mar > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: detomaso-request <[28]detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com> > > To: detomaso <[29]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> > > Sent: Mon, Aug 15, 2016 9:00 am > > Subject: DeTomaso Digest, Vol 146, Issue > > 20 > > Send DeTomaso mailing list submissions to > > [2][30]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World > > Wide Web, visit > > [3][31]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso > > or, via email, send a message with subject > > or body 'help' to > > detomaso-[4][32]request@server.detomasolist.com > > You can reach the person managing the list > > at > > detomaso-[5][33]owner@server.detomasolist.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject > > line so it is more specific > > than "Re: Contents of DeTomaso digest..." > > Daily Detomaso List Digest > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. > > electronic (marshallgsmith) > > 2. Re: De Tomaso Pantera GTS on eBay! > > again $250K!! (Michael Cox) > > 3. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. > > electronic (Stephen) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > --- > > Message: 1 > > Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:27:43 -0700 > > From: marshallgsmith <[6][34]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> > > To: [7][35]P6746@aol.com, [8][36]asajay@asajay.com, > > [9][37]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, > > paper vs. electronic > > Message-ID: > > <[10][38]sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I have a couple questions Bob: > >> Calling this situation "multiple dues > > levels" seems to be making the > > issue too complex. There are some members > > that are opting to not have > > printed magazines mailed which should make > > those members eligible for a > > discount because of the savings. > >> What is your estimate of the length > > of time that it would take the > > board to arrange for a vote of the > > membership to change the bylaws to > > allow for this discount? > >> Who specifically made that > > apples-to-apples comparison you refer to? > >> I agree that the editors should have > > the most influence ?on the > > process. ?However, our editors of both > > publications seem to have a hard > > time reporting to the members about ANY > > issues pertaining to the > > publication's themselves. Might that > > change in the near future or will > > radio silence be the norm here? > > Marshall Smith > > Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone > > -------- Original message -------- > > From: P6746--- via DeTomaso <[11][39]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> > > Date: 8/14/16 3:10 PM (GMT-08:00) > > To: [12][40]asajay@asajay.com, > > [13][41]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, > > paper vs. electronic > > To use a cliche, we're working on it.? > > Most of what has been mentioned is in the > > pipeline.?? However, there > > are > > restrictions, particularly with the > > By-Laws as they currently? stand.? > > There > > are no provisions for multiple dues > > levels,? particularly pertaining to > > how a > > member elects to have their club? > > publications delivered, etc.? That > > will > > take time as any changes or? amendments > > must be approved by the whole > > membership. > > The consensus seems to be that the > > Profiles would? continue as a print > > publication for all except foreign members > > who elect to? receive it > > digitally.? > > As far as printing is concerned, it is > > that first copy that is? so > > expensive, it is the subsequent copies > > that bring down the per unit? > > cost.? So as > > fewer units are produced and shipped, the > > cost per unit? increases but > > not > > proportionately.?? > > An apples to apples comparison was made > > between an online? printer and > > the > > current printer for both printing and > > mailing and the difference? was > > pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but > > for the whole run.? > > As far as I am concerned, it is the > > editors who should have? the most > > influence as to how and where their > > product is produced.? They are? the > > ones who > > must work with the printers and mailing > > houses on a regular? basis. > > Bob Reid? > > In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. > > Eastern Daylight Time,? > > [14][42]asajay@asajay.com > > writes: > > The last? I heard (and I may have heard > > wrong), the board was > > interested > > in doing a? -real- accounting comparison > > of printing costs, so for me, > > it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I > > agree, if POCA was missing out > > on > > full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W > > then something is amiss.? > > However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't > > account for all costs > > properly.? I? have more faith that the > > present board members will > > properly investigate? and sort it out for > > everyone. > > I am on-board with electronic delivery,? > > though I do admit it's nice to > > just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? > > It's also easier to hand-off > > to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do > > you really fix that? > > I would think (and I don't? know), that > > the ClubExpress membership > > database might be able to include a? > > "preference" as part of the > > member's > > profile or details.? Just as I? can set an > > address and phone number, if > > I > > could check a box for Electronic? delivery > > or paper copies, or both, > > and > > select whatever I wanted for each? item > > (Profiles versus Newsletter), > > that might be ideal. > > However,? I'm also familiar with quantity > > discounting.? It very well > > could be? that it costs the same amount to > > print 500 as it does to > > print > > 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine > > those are considerations the > > board will? look at as well. > > Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has > > claimed, I have? heard (from > > more > > than one person), that Jack and Mike did > > not resign? "because POCA > > changed printers;" it was over "control" > > of newsletter? content that in > > essence fell outside the bounds of the > > by-laws.? For? a guy that > > appeared > > to try very hard to get everyone else to > > follow the? by-laws (and it's > > unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt > > certainly didn't? feel they > > applied > > to him. > > For the record, as I understand it, POCA? > > has changed printers -twice- > > since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were > > related? to the DeRykes) got out of > > the business.? So the "family tie-in"? > > previously eluded to, was not a > > factor in the resignations. > > Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for > > inflation) > > Asa? Jay > > Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, > > Retired > > &? Shelley? Marie > > Spokane,? WA > > ****************************** > > [15][43]http://w7tsc.org > > [16][44]http://www.teampanteraracing.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Detomaso? Email List is not managed by > > POCA > > Posted emails must not exceed 1.5? > > Megabytes > > DeTomaso mailing? list > > [17][45]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > [18][46]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso > > To? manage your subscription (change email > > address, unsubscribe, etc.) > > use > > the? links above. > > Members who post to this list grant > > license to the list to? forward any > > message posted here to all past, current, > > or future members of the? > > list. They > > also grant the list owner permission to > > maintain an archive or? approve > > the > > archiving of list? messages. > > ?? To use a cliche, we're working on it. > > ?? Most of what has been mentioned is in > > the pipeline.? However, there > > are > > ?? restrictions, particularly with the > > By-Laws as they currently stand. > > ?? There are no provisions for multiple > > dues levels, > > ?? particularly pertaining to how a member > > elects to have their club > > ?? publications delivered, etc.? That will > > take time as any changes or > > ?? amendments must be approved by the > > whole membership. > > ?? The consensus seems to be that the > > Profiles would continue as a > > print > > ?? publication for all except foreign > > members who elect to receive it > > ?? digitally. > > ?? As far as printing is concerned, it is > > that first copy that is so > > ?? expensive, it is the subsequent copies > > that bring down the per unit > > ?? cost.? So as fewer units are produced > > and shipped, the cost per unit > > ?? increases but not proportionately. > > ?? An apples to apples comparison was made > > between an online printer > > and > > ?? the current printer for both printing > > and mailing and the difference > > ?? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per > > unit but for the whole run. > > ?? As far as I am concerned, it is the > > editors who should have the most > > ?? influence as to how and where their > > product is produced.? They are > > the > > ?? ones who must work with the printers > > and mailing houses on a regular > > ?? basis. > > ?? Bob Reid > > ?? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 > > P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > > ?? [19][47]asajay@asajay.com > > writes: > > ???? The last I heard (and I may have > > heard wrong), the board was > > ???? interested > > ???? in doing a -real- accounting > > comparison of printing costs, so for > > ???? me, > > ???? it's a wait and see kind of thing.? I > > agree, if POCA was missing > > out > > ???? on > > ???? full-color and paying $8,000 more for > > B/W then something is amiss. > > ???? However, I also believe Mr. Shortt > > didn't account for all costs > > ???? properly.? I have more faith that the > > present board members will > > ???? properly investigate and sort it out > > for everyone. > > ???? I am on-board with electronic > > delivery, though I do admit it's > > nice > > ???? to > > ???? just sit back and read a paper copy > > too.? It's also easier to > > ???? hand-off > > ???? to Sam so he can read it later.? How > > do you really fix that? > > ???? I would think (and I don't know), > > that the ClubExpress membership > > ???? database might be able to include a > > "preference" as part of the > > ???? member's > > ???? profile or details.? Just as I can > > set an address and phone > > number, > > ???? if I > > ???? could check a box for Electronic > > delivery or paper copies, or > > both, > > ???? and > > ???? select whatever I wanted for each > > item (Profiles versus > > Newsletter), > > ???? that might be ideal. > > ???? However, I'm also familiar with > > quantity discounting.? It very > > well > > ???? could be that it costs the same > > amount to print 500 as it does to > > ???? print > > ???? 50, or 10 (but I doubt it).? I > > imagine those are considerations > > the > > ???? board will look at as well. > > ???? Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie > > has claimed, I have heard (from > > ???? more > > ???? than one person), that Jack and Mike > > did not resign "because POCA > > ???? changed printers;" it was over > > "control" of newsletter content > > that > > ???? in > > ???? essence fell outside the bounds of > > the by-laws.? For a guy that > > ???? appeared > > ???? to try very hard to get everyone else > > to follow the by-laws (and > > ???? it's > > ???? unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt > > certainly didn't feel they > > ???? applied > > ???? to him. > > ???? For the record, as I understand it, > > POCA has changed printers > > ???? -twice- > > ???? since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were > > related to the DeRykes) got > > out > > ???? of > > ???? the business.? So the "family tie-in" > > previously eluded to, was > > not > > ???? a > > ???? factor in the resignations. > > ???? Just my $1.50? (two cents adjusted > > for inflation) > > ???? Asa? Jay > > ???? Asa Jay Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, > > USAFR, Retired > > ???? &? Shelley Marie > > ???? Spokane, WA > > ???? ****************************** > > ???? [20][48]http://w7tsc.org > > ???? [21][49]http://www.teampanteraracing.com > > ???? > > _______________________________________________ > > ???? Detomaso Email List is not managed by > > POCA > > ???? Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 > > Megabytes > > ???? DeTomaso mailing list > > ???? [22][50]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > ???? [23][51]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso > > ???? To manage your subscription (change > > email address, unsubscribe, > > ???? etc.) use the links above. > > ???? Members who post to this list grant > > license to the list to forward > > ???? any message posted here to all past, > > current, or future members of > > ???? the list. They also grant the list > > owner permission to maintain an > > ???? archive or approve the archiving of > > list messages. > > _______________________________________________ > > Detomaso Email List is not managed by > > POCA > > Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 > > Megabytes > > DeTomaso mailing list > > [24][52]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > [25][53]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso > > To manage your subscription (change email > > address, unsubscribe, etc.) > > use the links above. > > Members who post to this list grant > > license to the list to forward any > > message posted here to all past, current, > > or future members of the > > list. They also grant the list owner > > permission to maintain an archive > > or approve the archiving of list > > messages. > >

The $8,000 was Michael talking we don't know where he got information from. But words are distroying the club. How are we to prove anything, we don't know where he got his information from. Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator. From: erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com To: steve@snclocks.com; charlesmccall@gmail.com; marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:32:15 -0700 CC: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurieferrari@aol.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Stephen, As I just responded to a private message from Judy Mc, I don’t wish to call anyone (printers) myself – I feel that is the POCA board’s job, when they have the time, to reach out and explain the printer matter and why, if there was never an $8K savings, why was that NEVER communicated to the members way back, why keep it a private secret and make the board look suspicious for “not cooperating in saving the club $8K”…. This is a simple and common sense question, I have and many have. The answer is somewhere, but that answer is not “ we just didn’t want to cause drama”… because drama was caused. Also, Stephen, I am not starting a “witch hunt” (that’s insulting and not democratic) - I am asking a simple question, to which there is a true answer. It appears you have all the answers, which is great, but I don’t. I didn’t get your “So, when exactly, did we stop beating our spouses???” comment below. Is it related to the rest of your message? I couldn’t make the connection, but then, English is my second language, please explain. E From: Stephen [mailto:steve@snclocks.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 11:29 AM To: 'Effie Richards'; 'Charles McCall'; 'marshallgsmith' Cc: 'detomaso'; 'laurie Basile' Subject: RE: [DeTomaso] resignations So, when, exactly, did we stop beating our spouses??? Effie - gads - you have the names of the printers! Call them - short of that I can assure you any good photographer can modify a document so you will not be able to know what is real and what is not. Let's stop the witch hunt - look at the folks who stood up to the shortt. Think about how long they have been a part of POCA. Are they out for personal gain in standing up to a person who made way too many folks want to quit? If you or others wish to continue the witch hunt - please start a new thread, with the initials MS in front of the subject. That way I can route all e-mails associated with the thread to my trash bin. I’m going to go back to working on 5332 and hope this whole nightmare will just go away. Stephen Nelson -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Effie Richards Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 10:30 AM To: 'Charles McCall' <charlesmccall@gmail.com>; 'marshallgsmith' <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> Cc: 'detomaso' <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>; 'laurie Basile' <laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Where are the actual proposals/quotes from the printers, not the ones the editor posted here. Those as they appear, could have been manipulated – I’m not accusing anyone, I am just saying, as any court would say – an experienced editor like Jack could add or delete to create and post what he did here. Since there are many still questioning the printer cost, let’s see the actual bids. From: Charles McCall [ <mailto:charlesmccall@gmail.com> mailto:charlesmccall@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 12:08 AM To: marshallgsmith Cc: Michael Haney; Judith McCartney; Effie Richards; Julian Kift; detomaso; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations You did all read the info sent by Judy McCartney last week with Jack's explanation? Re-sent here in case you didn't see it. Please open the attachment - I promise no viruses are included On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:20 AM, marshallgsmith < <mailto:marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Hey Michael, I think the best way to put this controversy to bed is if you or your dad could speak about not being cooperative in regards to the the use of another printer that supposedly afforded the club an $8,000 savings. That really seems to be the only issue that continues this controversy and I still haven't heard either of you discuss the allegation. I'm sure your response will cut this thread for good and allow us all to move on with the rebuilding of this great club. Marshall Smith President, San Diego Panteras Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Michael Haney < <mailto:paso750@gmail.com> paso750@gmail.com> Date: 8/15/16 10:36 PM (GMT-08:00) To: 'Judith McCartney' < <mailto:jpoca2@hotmail.com> jpoca2@hotmail.com>, 'Effie Richards' < <mailto:erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com> erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>, 'Julian Kift' < <mailto:julian_kift@hotmail.com> julian_kift@hotmail.com> Cc: <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com, 'laurie Basile' < <mailto:laurieferrari@aol.com> laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Thank you very much, Judy. I really wish this thread would just die. I know that this isn't the answer you're fishing for, but it'll have to do since it's the truth. Nancy quit and took her associate (me) with her because she was tired of hearing from me all about Shortt's efforts to take over every aspect of POCA. I didn't fight her decision because I was in turn tired of Shortt's intimidation and bullying tactics. Frankly, being on the Board wasn't fun anymore and I was also very tired of Shortt's constant preening. As a matter of record, I resigned from the Board BEFORE Profiles #3 even went to the printer. I had nearly finished it and decided that I didn't want to let the POCA members down. I really didn't want to contribute any more to Shortt's regime, but my conscience won. Even after I sent the magazine in, I still had to deal with Shortt. He decided to interfere with the printer, sent them a database with a whole bunch of problematic info and threaten nonpayment if he didn't get preliminary proofs. How do I know this? I received a call while I was at work from the woman working in Allegra Printing's mail room. She called Shortt and he wouldn't help her with the database and ignored her questions. Having no one else to call, she called me. I in turn contacted Judy, our Membership Director, who fixed the problems that Shortt created. Regarding Shortt's allegations of graft, if anyone can find a connection between my family and anyone who EVER worked at Allegra Printing in Reno, Nevada, (or indeed any of Allegra's branches) please let me know. My Dad might respond as well, but he's been pretty busy caring for my SERIOUSLY ill Mom who was in the hospital for the last two weeks and who might finally be able to come back home in a couple more. Now, can we finally put this "controversy" to rest? Mike Haney -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [ <mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Judith McCartney Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 PM To: Effie Richards; Julian Kift Cc: <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Mike Haney gave his resignation months way head of Jacks, two diff reasons. Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator.
From: <mailto:erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com> erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:43:43 -0700
To: <mailto:julian_kift@hotmail.com> julian_kift@hotmail.com
CC: <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; <mailto:laurieferrari@aol.com> laurieferrari@aol.com
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
Julian these are the same questions some of us have had and have been
waiting for a reply or statement. I'm willing to give the board some time to come up with one.
Sent from Effie's iPad
On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Julian Kift < <mailto:julian_kift@hotmail.com> julian_kift@hotmail.com>
wrote:
I have digested all the emails on this topic and to be honest it
still
doesn't sit well in my gut.
Presumably the BOD voted in favor of changing printers based upon
the
quotes presented. Did they not have all the facts and
if not why did they not question further? Did Jack have all the
facts w
hen he resigned or were his and Mike Haney's resignations simply
an
outright stand against changing printer?
Why did Michael push to change printer if he knew there was only
pennies between it?
Julian
__________________________________________________________________
From: DeTomaso < <mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> on
behalf of
marshall smith < <mailto:marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net>
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:11 AM
To: <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; <mailto:laurieferrari@aol.com> laurieferrari@aol.com
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
I find it funny that three months after the Fun Rally we are now
hearing that Shortt's bid for printing did not include shipping.
Shortt
is a lot of things but a mistake like this...?
I was listening in on this meeting also and I know what I heard.
Apparently, the board convinced 'some' members of this so-called
discrepancy month's ago. Why wasn't this information, if it
exists,
relayed to ALL of us in a timely manner?
Marshall
--------------------------------------------
On Mon, 8/15/16, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso
< <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
To: <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com
Date: Monday, August 15, 2016, 9:57 AM
Dear AJ,
I have always respected you and your
opinions but in this case you are
incorrect as far as the resignation of
Jack DeRyke. I was on the Board
of Directors' conference call where he was
asked to stay and he
adamantly refused to if the printer
changed. Jack's resignation was
specifically because of the change in
printer! You can go research
that phone conference call, or the minutes
of the meeting, as the facts
are saved. As far as Mike Haney's
resignation, that was done by his
Mrs. for their reasons which most likely
were aligned with their
parents.
Laurie
In a message dated 8/13/2016
9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,?
[1] <mailto:asajay@asajay.com> asajay@asajay.com
writes:
The last? I heard (and I may have
heard wrong), the board was
interested
in doing a? -real- accounting
comparison of printing costs, so for
me,
it's a wait and? see kind of
thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing
out on
full-color? and paying $8,000 more
for B/W then something is amiss.?
However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt
didn't account for all costs
properly.? I? have more faith that
the present board members will
properly investigate? and sort it
out for everyone.
I am on-board with electronic
delivery,? though I do admit it's nice
to
just sit back and read a paper
copy? too.? It's also easier to
hand-off
to Sam so he can read it? later.?
How do you really fix that?
I would think (and I don't? know),
that the ClubExpress membership
database might be able to include
a? "preference" as part of the
member's
profile or details.? Just as I? can
set an address and phone number,
if I
could check a box for Electronic?
delivery or paper copies, or both,
and
select whatever I wanted for each?
item (Profiles versus
Newsletter),
that might be ideal.
However,? I'm also familiar with
quantity discounting.? It very well
could be? that it costs the same
amount to print 500 as it does to
50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I
imagine those are considerations the
board will? look at as well.
Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie
has claimed, I have? heard (from
more
than one person), that Jack and
Mike did not resign? "because POCA
changed printers;" it was over
"control" of newsletter? content that
in
essence fell outside the bounds of
the by-laws.? For? a guy that
appeared
to try very hard to get everyone
else to follow the? by-laws (and
it's
unwritten code of ethics), Mr.
Shortt certainly didn't? feel they
applied
to him.
For the record, as I understand it,
POCA? has changed printers
-twice-
since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were
related? to the DeRykes) got out
of
the business.? So the "family
tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not
a
factor in the resignations.
Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted
for inflation)
Asa? Jay
Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt,
USAFR, Retired
&? Shelley? Mar
-----Original Message-----
From: detomaso-request
< <mailto:detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com>
To: detomaso < <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>
Sent: Mon, Aug 15, 2016 9:00 am
Subject: DeTomaso Digest, Vol 146, Issue
20
Send DeTomaso mailing list submissions to
[2] <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World
Wide Web, visit
[3] <http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso> http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
or, via email, send a message with subject
or body 'help' to
detomaso-[4] <mailto:request@server.detomasolist.com> request@server.detomasolist.com
You can reach the person managing the list
at
detomaso-[5] <mailto:owner@server.detomasolist.com> owner@server.detomasolist.com
When replying, please edit your Subject
line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of DeTomaso digest..."
Daily Detomaso List Digest
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs.
electronic (marshallgsmith)
2. Re: De Tomaso Pantera GTS on eBay!
again $250K!! (Michael Cox)
3. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs.
electronic (Stephen)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:27:43 -0700
From: marshallgsmith <[6] <mailto:marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net>
To: [7] <mailto:P6746@aol.com> P6746@aol.com, [8] <mailto:asajay@asajay.com> asajay@asajay.com,
[9] <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost,
paper vs. electronic
Message-ID:
<[10] <mailto:sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com> sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I have a couple questions Bob:
Calling this situation "multiple dues
levels" seems to be making the
issue too complex. There are some members
that are opting to not have
printed magazines mailed which should make
those members eligible for a
discount because of the savings.
What is your estimate of the length
of time that it would take the
board to arrange for a vote of the
membership to change the bylaws to
allow for this discount?
Who specifically made that
apples-to-apples comparison you refer to?
I agree that the editors should have
the most influence ?on the
process. ?However, our editors of both
publications seem to have a hard
time reporting to the members about ANY
issues pertaining to the
publication's themselves. Might that
change in the near future or will
radio silence be the norm here?
Marshall Smith
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: P6746--- via DeTomaso
<[11] <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>
Date: 8/14/16 3:10 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: [12] <mailto:asajay@asajay.com> asajay@asajay.com,
[13] <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.com
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost,
paper vs. electronic
To use a cliche, we're working on it.?
Most of what has been mentioned is in the
pipeline.?? However, there
are
restrictions, particularly with the
By-Laws as they currently? stand.?
There
are no provisions for multiple dues
levels,? particularly pertaining to
how a
member elects to have their club?
publications delivered, etc.? That
will
take time as any changes or? amendments
must be approved by the whole
membership.
The consensus seems to be that the
Profiles would? continue as a print
publication for all except foreign members
who elect to? receive it
digitally.?
As far as printing is concerned, it is
that first copy that is? so
expensive, it is the subsequent copies
that bring down the per unit?
cost.? So as
fewer units are produced and shipped, the
cost per unit? increases but
not
proportionately.??
An apples to apples comparison was made
between an online? printer and
the
current printer for both printing and
mailing and the difference? was
pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but
for the whole run.?
As far as I am concerned, it is the
editors who should have? the most
influence as to how and where their
product is produced.? They are? the
ones who
must work with the printers and mailing
houses on a regular? basis.
Bob Reid?
In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M.
Eastern Daylight Time,?
[14] <mailto:asajay@asajay.com> asajay@asajay.com
writes:
The last? I heard (and I may have heard
wrong), the board was
interested
in doing a? -real- accounting comparison
of printing costs, so for me,
it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I
agree, if POCA was missing out
on
full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W
then something is amiss.?
However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't
account for all costs
properly.? I? have more faith that the
present board members will
properly investigate? and sort it out for
everyone.
I am on-board with electronic delivery,?
though I do admit it's nice to
just sit back and read a paper copy? too.?
It's also easier to hand-off
to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do
you really fix that?
I would think (and I don't? know), that
the ClubExpress membership
database might be able to include a?
"preference" as part of the
member's
profile or details.? Just as I? can set an
address and phone number, if
I
could check a box for Electronic? delivery
or paper copies, or both,
and
select whatever I wanted for each? item
(Profiles versus Newsletter),
that might be ideal.
However,? I'm also familiar with quantity
discounting.? It very well
could be? that it costs the same amount to
print 500 as it does to
50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine
those are considerations the
board will? look at as well.
Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has
claimed, I have? heard (from
more
than one person), that Jack and Mike did
not resign? "because POCA
changed printers;" it was over "control"
of newsletter? content that in
essence fell outside the bounds of the
by-laws.? For? a guy that
appeared
to try very hard to get everyone else to
follow the? by-laws (and it's
unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt
certainly didn't? feel they
applied
to him.
For the record, as I understand it, POCA?
has changed printers -twice-
since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were
related? to the DeRykes) got out of
the business.? So the "family tie-in"?
previously eluded to, was not a
factor in the resignations.
Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for
inflation)
Asa? Jay
Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR,
Retired
&? Shelley? Marie
Spokane,? WA
******************************
[16] <http://www.teampanteraracing.com> http://www.teampanteraracing.com
_______________________________________________
Detomaso? Email List is not managed by
POCA
Posted emails must not exceed 1.5?
Megabytes
DeTomaso mailing? list
[17] <mailto:DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com> DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com
[18] <http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso> http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
To? manage your subscription (change email
address, unsubscribe, etc.)
use
the? links above.
Members who post to this list grant
license to the list to? forward any
message posted here to all past, current,
or future members of the?
list. They
also grant the list owner permission to
maintain an archive or? approve
the
archiving of list? messages.
?? To use a cliche, we're working on it.
?? Most of what has been mentioned is in
the pipeline.? However, there
are
?? restrictions, particularly with the
By-Laws as they currently stand.
?? There are no provisions for multiple
dues levels,
?? particularly pertaining to how a member
elects to have their club
?? publications delivered, etc.? That will
take time as any changes or
?? amendments must be approved by the
whole membership.
?? The consensus seems to be that the
Profiles would continue as a
?? publication for all except foreign
members who elect to receive it
?? digitally.
?? As far as printing is concerned, it is
that first copy that is so
?? expensive, it is the subsequent copies
that bring down the per unit
?? cost.? So as fewer units are produced
and shipped, the cost per unit
?? increases but not proportionately.
?? An apples to apples comparison was made
between an online printer
and
?? the current printer for both printing
and mailing and the difference
?? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per
unit but for the whole run.
?? As far as I am concerned, it is the
editors who should have the most
?? influence as to how and where their
product is produced.? They are
the
?? ones who must work with the printers
and mailing houses on a regular
?? basis.
?? Bob Reid
?? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24
P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
?? [19] <mailto:asajay@asajay.com> asajay@asajay.com
writes:
???? The last I heard (and I may have
heard wrong), the board was
???? interested
???? in doing a -real- accounting
comparison of printing costs, so for
???? me,
???? it's a wait and see kind of thing.? I
agree, if POCA was missing
out
???? on
???? full-color and paying $8,000 more for
B/W then something is amiss.
???? However, I also believe Mr. Shortt
didn't account for all costs
???? properly.? I have more faith that the
present board members will
???? properly investigate and sort it out
for everyone.
???? I am on-board with electronic
delivery, though I do admit it's
nice
???? to
???? just sit back and read a paper copy
too.? It's also easier to
???? hand-off
???? to Sam so he can read it later.? How
do you really fix that?
???? I would think (and I don't know),
that the ClubExpress membership
???? database might be able to include a
"preference" as part of the
???? member's
???? profile or details.? Just as I can
set an address and phone
number,
???? if I
???? could check a box for Electronic
delivery or paper copies, or
both,
???? and
???? select whatever I wanted for each
item (Profiles versus
Newsletter),
???? that might be ideal.
???? However, I'm also familiar with
quantity discounting.? It very
well
???? could be that it costs the same
amount to print 500 as it does to
???? 50, or 10 (but I doubt it).? I
imagine those are considerations
the
???? board will look at as well.
???? Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie
has claimed, I have heard (from
???? more
???? than one person), that Jack and Mike
did not resign "because POCA
???? changed printers;" it was over
"control" of newsletter content
that
???? in
???? essence fell outside the bounds of
the by-laws.? For a guy that
???? appeared
???? to try very hard to get everyone else
to follow the by-laws (and
???? it's
???? unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt
certainly didn't feel they
???? applied
???? to him.
???? For the record, as I understand it,
POCA has changed printers
???? -twice-
???? since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were
related to the DeRykes) got
out
???? of
???? the business.? So the "family tie-in"
previously eluded to, was
not
???? a
???? factor in the resignations.
???? Just my $1.50? (two cents adjusted
for inflation)
???? Asa? Jay
???? Asa Jay Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt,
USAFR, Retired
???? &? Shelley Marie
???? Spokane, WA
???? ******************************
???? [20] <http://w7tsc.org> http://w7tsc.org
???? [21] <http://www.teampanteraracing.com> http://www.teampanteraracing.com
????
_______________________________________________
???? Detomaso Email List is not managed by
POCA
???? Posted emails must not exceed 1.5
Megabytes
???? DeTomaso mailing list
???? [22] <mailto:DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com> DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com
????
[23] <http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso> http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
???? To manage your subscription (change
email address, unsubscribe,
???? etc.) use the links above.
???? Members who post to this list grant
license to the list to forward
???? any message posted here to all past,
current, or future members of
???? the list. They also grant the list
owner permission to maintain an
???? archive or approve the archiving of
list messages.
_______________________________________________
Detomaso Email List is not managed by
POCA
Posted emails must not exceed 1.5
Megabytes
DeTomaso mailing list
[24] <mailto:DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com> DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com
[25] <http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso> http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
To manage your subscription (change email
address, unsubscribe, etc.)
use the links above.
Members who post to this list grant
license to the list to forward any
message posted here to all past, current,
or future members of the
list. They also grant the list owner
permission to maintain an archive
or approve the archiving of list
messages.
The $8,000 was Michael talking we don't know where he got information from. But words are distroying the club. How are we to prove anything, we don't know where he got his information from. Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator. From: erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com To: steve@snclocks.com; charlesmccall@gmail.com; marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:32:15 -0700 CC: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurieferrari@aol.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Stephen, As I just responded to a private message from Judy Mc, I dont wish to call anyon e (printers) myself I feel that is the POCA boards job, when they have the time , to reach out and explain the printer matter and why, if there was never an $8K savings, why was that NEVER communicated to the members way back, why keep it a private secret and make the board look suspicious for not cooperating in savin g the club $8K. This is a simple and common sense question, I have and many have. The answer is somewhere, but that answer is not we just didnt want to cause dra ma because drama was caused. Also, Stephen, I am not starting a witch hunt (thats insulting and not democrati c) - I am asking a simple question, to which there is a true answer. It appear s you have all the answers, which is great, but I dont. I didnt get your So, when exactly, did we stop beating our spouses??? comment be low. Is it related to the rest of your message? I couldnt make the connection, but then, English is my second language, please explain. E From: Stephen [mailto:steve@snclocks.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 11:29 AM To: 'Effie Richards'; 'Charles McCall'; 'marshallgsmith' Cc: 'detomaso'; 'laurie Basile' Subject: RE: [DeTomaso] resignations So, when, exactly, did we stop beating our spouses??? Effie - gads - you have the names of the printers! Call them - short of that I can assure you any good photographer can modify a document so you will not be ab le to know what is real and what is not. Let's stop the witch hunt - look at the folks who stood up to the shortt. Think about how long they have been a part of POCA. Are they out for personal gain i n standing up to a person who made way too many folks want to quit? If you or others wish to continue the witch hunt - please start a new thread, wi th the initials MS in front of the subject. That way I can route all e-mails as sociated with the thread to my trash bin. Im going to go back to working on 5332 and hope this whole nightmare will just g o away. Stephen Nelson -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Ef fie Richards Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 10:30 AM To: 'Charles McCall' <charlesmccall@gmail.com>; 'marshallgsmith' <marshallgsmith @sbcglobal.net> Cc: 'detomaso' <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>; 'laurie Basile' <laurieferrar i@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Where are the actual proposals/quotes from the printers, not the ones the editor posted here. Those as they appear, could have been manipulated Im not accusin g anyone, I am just saying, as any court would say an experienced editor like J ack could add or delete to create and post what he did here. Since there are ma ny still questioning the printer cost, lets see the actual bids. From: Charles McCall [ <mailto:charlesmccall@gmail.com> mailto:charlesmccall@gma il.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 12:08 AM To: marshallgsmith Cc: Michael Haney; Judith McCartney; Effie Richards; Julian Kift; detomaso; laur ie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations You did all read the info sent by Judy McCartney last week with Jack's explanati on? Re-sent here in case you didn't see it. Please open the attachment - I promise n o viruses are included On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:20 AM, marshallgsmith < <mailto:marshallgsmith@sbcglob al.net> marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Hey Michael, I think the best way to put this controversy to bed is if you or your dad could speak about not being cooperative in regards to the the use of another printer that supposedly afforded the club an $8,000 savings. That really seems to be the only issue that continues this controversy and I still haven't heard either of you discuss the allegation. I'm sure your response will cut this thread for good and allow us all to move on with the rebuilding of this great club. Marshall Smith President, San Diego Panteras Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Michael Haney < <mailto:paso750@gmail.com> paso750@gmail.com> Date: 8/15/16 10:36 PM (GMT-08:00) To: 'Judith McCartney' < <mailto:jpoca2@hotmail.com> jpoca2@hotmail.com>, 'Ef fie Richards' < <mailto:erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com> erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>, 'Jul ian Kift' < <mailto:julian_kift@hotmail.com> julian_kift@hotmail.com> Cc: <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.c om, 'laurie Basile' < <mailto:laurieferrari@aol.com> laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Thank you very much, Judy. I really wish this thread would just die. I know that this isn't the answer you're fishing for, but it'll have to do since it's the truth. Nancy quit and took her associate (me) with her because she was tired of hearing from me all about Shortt's efforts to take over every aspect of POCA. I didn't fight her decision because I was in turn tired of Shortt's intimidation and bullying tactics. Frankly, being on the Board wasn't fun anymore and I was also very tired of Shortt's constant preening. As a matter of record, I resigned from the Board BEFORE Profiles #3 even went to the printer. I had nearly finished it and decided that I didn't want to let the POCA members down. I really didn't want to contribute any more to Shortt's regime, but my conscience won. Even after I sent the magazine in, I still had to deal with Shortt. He decided to interfere with the printer, sent them a database with a whole bunch of problematic info and threaten nonpayment if he didn't get preliminary proofs. How do I know this? I received a call while I was at work from the woman working in Allegra Printing's mail room. She called Shortt and he wouldn't help her with the database and ignored her questions. Having no one else to call, she called me. I in turn contacted Judy, our Membership Director, who fixed the problems that Shortt created. Regarding Shortt's allegations of graft, if anyone can find a connection between my family and anyone who EVER worked at Allegra Printing in Reno, Nevada, (or indeed any of Allegra's branches) please let me know. My Dad might respond as well, but he's been pretty busy caring for my SERIOUSLY ill Mom who was in the hospital for the last two weeks and who might finally be able to come back home in a couple more. Now, can we finally put this "controversy" to rest? Mike Haney -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [ <mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> mailto:det omaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Judith McCartney Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 PM To: Effie Richards; Julian Kift Cc: <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist.c om; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Mike Haney gave his resignation months way head of Jacks, two diff reasons. Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator.
From: <mailto:erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com> erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:43:43 -0700
To: <mailto:julian_kift@hotmail.com> julian_kift@hotmail.com
CC: <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist .com; <mailto:laurieferrari@aol.com> laurieferrari@aol.com
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
Julian these are the same questions some of us have had and have been
waiting for a reply or statement. I'm willing to give the board some time to come up with one.
Sent from Effie's iPad
On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Julian Kift < <mailto:julian_kift@hotmail.co m> julian_kift@hotmail.com>
wrote:
I have digested all the emails on this topic and to be honest it
still
doesn't sit well in my gut.
Presumably the BOD voted in favor of changing printers based upon
the
quotes presented. Did they not have all the facts and
if not why did they not question further? Did Jack have all the
facts w
hen he resigned or were his and Mike Haney's resignations simply
an
outright stand against changing printer?
Why did Michael push to change printer if he knew there was only
pennies between it?
Julian
__________________________________________________________________
From: DeTomaso < <mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> deto maso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> on
behalf of
marshall smith < <mailto:marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> marshallgsmith@s bcglobal.net>
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:11 AM
To: <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomaso list.com; <mailto:laurieferrari@aol.com> laurieferrari@aol.com
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
I find it funny that three months after the Fun Rally we are now
hearing that Shortt's bid for printing did not include shipping.
Shortt
is a lot of things but a mistake like this...?
I was listening in on this meeting also and I know what I heard.
Apparently, the board convinced 'some' members of this so-called
discrepancy month's ago. Why wasn't this information, if it
exists,
relayed to ALL of us in a timely manner?
Marshall
--------------------------------------------
On Mon, 8/15/16, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso
< <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolis t.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
To: <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomas olist.com
Date: Monday, August 15, 2016, 9:57 AM
Dear AJ,
I have always respected you and your
opinions but in this case you are
incorrect as far as the resignation of
Jack DeRyke. I was on the Board
of Directors' conference call where he was
asked to stay and he
adamantly refused to if the printer
changed. Jack's resignation was
specifically because of the change in
printer! You can go research
that phone conference call, or the minutes
of the meeting, as the facts
are saved. As far as Mike Haney's
resignation, that was done by his
Mrs. for their reasons which most likely
were aligned with their
parents.
Laurie
In a message dated 8/13/2016
9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,?
[1] <mailto:asajay@asajay.com> asajay@asajay.com
writes:
The last? I heard (and I may have
heard wrong), the board was
interested
in doing a? -real- accounting
comparison of printing costs, so for
me,
it's a wait and? see kind of
thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing
out on
full-color? and paying $8,000 more
for B/W then something is amiss.?
However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt
didn't account for all costs
properly.? I? have more faith that
the present board members will
properly investigate? and sort it
out for everyone.
I am on-board with electronic
delivery,? though I do admit it's nice
to
just sit back and read a paper
copy? too.? It's also easier to
hand-off
to Sam so he can read it? later.?
How do you really fix that?
I would think (and I don't? know),
that the ClubExpress membership
database might be able to include
a? "preference" as part of the
member's
profile or details.? Just as I? can
set an address and phone number,
if I
could check a box for Electronic?
delivery or paper copies, or both,
and
select whatever I wanted for each?
item (Profiles versus
Newsletter),
that might be ideal.
However,? I'm also familiar with
quantity discounting.? It very well
could be? that it costs the same
amount to print 500 as it does to
50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I
imagine those are considerations the
board will? look at as well.
Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie
has claimed, I have? heard (from
more
than one person), that Jack and
Mike did not resign? "because POCA
changed printers;" it was over
"control" of newsletter? content that
in
essence fell outside the bounds of
the by-laws.? For? a guy that
appeared
to try very hard to get everyone
else to follow the? by-laws (and
it's
unwritten code of ethics), Mr.
Shortt certainly didn't? feel they
applied
to him.
For the record, as I understand it,
POCA? has changed printers
-twice-
since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were
related? to the DeRykes) got out
of
the business.? So the "family
tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not
a
factor in the resignations.
Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted
for inflation)
Asa? Jay
Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt,
USAFR, Retired
&? Shelley? Mar
-----Original Message-----
From: detomaso-request
< <mailto:detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso-request@server.d etomasolist.com>
To: detomaso < <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@s
erver.detomasolist.com>
Sent: Mon, Aug 15, 2016 9:00 am
Subject: DeTomaso Digest, Vol 146, Issue
20
Send DeTomaso mailing list submissions to
[2] <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detom
asolist.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World
Wide Web, visit
[3] <[1]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso> [
or, via email, send a message with subject
or body 'help' to
detomaso-[4] <mailto:request@server.detomasolist.com> request@serve
r.detomasolist.com
You can reach the person managing the list
at
detomaso-[5] <mailto:owner@server.detomasolist.com> owner@server.de
tomasolist.com
When replying, please edit your Subject
line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of DeTomaso digest..."
Daily Detomaso List Digest
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs.
electronic (marshallgsmith)
2. Re: De Tomaso Pantera GTS on eBay!
again $250K!! (Michael Cox)
3. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs.
electronic (Stephen)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:27:43 -0700
From: marshallgsmith <[6] <mailto:marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> mar
shallgsmith@sbcglobal.net>
To: [7] <mailto:P6746@aol.com> P6746@aol.com, [8] <mailto:asajay@as
ajay.com> asajay@asajay.com,
[9] <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detom
asolist.com
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost,
paper vs. electronic
Message-ID:
<[10] <mailto:sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com> sdxpj 9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I have a couple questions Bob:
Calling this situation "multiple dues
levels" seems to be making the
issue too complex. There are some members
that are opting to not have
printed magazines mailed which should make
those members eligible for a
discount because of the savings.
What is your estimate of the length
of time that it would take the
board to arrange for a vote of the
membership to change the bylaws to
allow for this discount?
Who specifically made that
apples-to-apples comparison you refer to?
I agree that the editors should have
the most influence ?on the
process. ?However, our editors of both
publications seem to have a hard
time reporting to the members about ANY
issues pertaining to the
publication's themselves. Might that
change in the near future or will
radio silence be the norm here?
Marshall Smith
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: P6746--- via DeTomaso
<[11] <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomasolist. com>
Date: 8/14/16 3:10 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: [12] <mailto:asajay@asajay.com> asajay@asajay.com,
[13] <mailto:detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> detomaso@server.detomas olist.com
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost,
paper vs. electronic
To use a cliche, we're working on it.?
Most of what has been mentioned is in the
pipeline.?? However, there
are
restrictions, particularly with the
By-Laws as they currently? stand.?
There
are no provisions for multiple dues
levels,? particularly pertaining to
how a
member elects to have their club?
publications delivered, etc.? That
will
take time as any changes or? amendments
must be approved by the whole
membership.
The consensus seems to be that the
Profiles would? continue as a print
publication for all except foreign members
who elect to? receive it
digitally.?
As far as printing is concerned, it is
that first copy that is? so
expensive, it is the subsequent copies
that bring down the per unit?
cost.? So as
fewer units are produced and shipped, the
cost per unit? increases but
not
proportionately.??
An apples to apples comparison was made
between an online? printer and
the
current printer for both printing and
mailing and the difference? was
pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but
for the whole run.?
As far as I am concerned, it is the
editors who should have? the most
influence as to how and where their
product is produced.? They are? the
ones who
must work with the printers and mailing
houses on a regular? basis.
Bob Reid?
In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M.
Eastern Daylight Time,?
[14] <mailto:asajay@asajay.com> asajay@asajay.com
writes:
The last? I heard (and I may have heard
wrong), the board was
interested
in doing a? -real- accounting comparison
of printing costs, so for me,
it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I
agree, if POCA was missing out
on
full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W
then something is amiss.?
However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't
account for all costs
properly.? I? have more faith that the
present board members will
properly investigate? and sort it out for
everyone.
I am on-board with electronic delivery,?
though I do admit it's nice to
just sit back and read a paper copy? too.?
It's also easier to hand-off
to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do
you really fix that?
I would think (and I don't? know), that
the ClubExpress membership
database might be able to include a?
"preference" as part of the
member's
profile or details.? Just as I? can set an
address and phone number, if
I
could check a box for Electronic? delivery
or paper copies, or both,
and
select whatever I wanted for each? item
(Profiles versus Newsletter),
that might be ideal.
However,? I'm also familiar with quantity
discounting.? It very well
could be? that it costs the same amount to
print 500 as it does to
50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine
those are considerations the
board will? look at as well.
Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has
claimed, I have? heard (from
more
than one person), that Jack and Mike did
not resign? "because POCA
changed printers;" it was over "control"
of newsletter? content that in
essence fell outside the bounds of the
by-laws.? For? a guy that
appeared
to try very hard to get everyone else to
follow the? by-laws (and it's
unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt
certainly didn't? feel they
applied
to him.
For the record, as I understand it, POCA?
has changed printers -twice-
since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were
related? to the DeRykes) got out of
the business.? So the "family tie-in"?
previously eluded to, was not a
factor in the resignations.
Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for
inflation)
Asa? Jay
Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR,
Retired
&? Shelley? Marie
Spokane,? WA
******************************
[15] <[3]http://w7tsc.org> [4]http://w7tsc.org
[16] <[5]http://www.teampanteraracing.com> [6]http://www.teampanter
aracing.com
_______________________________________________
Detomaso? Email List is not managed by
POCA
Posted emails must not exceed 1.5?
Megabytes
DeTomaso mailing? list
[17] <mailto:DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com> DeTomaso@server.deto
masolist.com
[18] <[7]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso>
To? manage your subscription (change email
address, unsubscribe, etc.)
use
the? links above.
Members who post to this list grant
license to the list to? forward any
message posted here to all past, current,
or future members of the?
list. They
also grant the list owner permission to
maintain an archive or? approve
the
archiving of list? messages.
?? To use a cliche, we're working on it.
?? Most of what has been mentioned is in
the pipeline.? However, there
are
?? restrictions, particularly with the
By-Laws as they currently stand.
?? There are no provisions for multiple
dues levels,
?? particularly pertaining to how a member
elects to have their club
?? publications delivered, etc.? That will
take time as any changes or
?? amendments must be approved by the
whole membership.
?? The consensus seems to be that the
Profiles would continue as a
?? publication for all except foreign
members who elect to receive it
?? digitally.
?? As far as printing is concerned, it is
that first copy that is so
?? expensive, it is the subsequent copies
that bring down the per unit
?? cost.? So as fewer units are produced
and shipped, the cost per unit
?? increases but not proportionately.
?? An apples to apples comparison was made
between an online printer
and
?? the current printer for both printing
and mailing and the difference
?? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per
unit but for the whole run.
?? As far as I am concerned, it is the
editors who should have the most
?? influence as to how and where their
product is produced.? They are
the
?? ones who must work with the printers
and mailing houses on a regular
?? basis.
?? Bob Reid
?? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24
P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
?? [19] <mailto:asajay@asajay.com> asajay@asajay.com
writes:
???? The last I heard (and I may have
heard wrong), the board was
???? interested
???? in doing a -real- accounting
comparison of printing costs, so for
???? me,
???? it's a wait and see kind of thing.? I
agree, if POCA was missing
out
???? on
???? full-color and paying $8,000 more for
B/W then something is amiss.
???? However, I also believe Mr. Shortt
didn't account for all costs
???? properly.? I have more faith that the
present board members will
???? properly investigate and sort it out
for everyone.
???? I am on-board with electronic
delivery, though I do admit it's
nice
???? to
???? just sit back and read a paper copy
too.? It's also easier to
???? hand-off
???? to Sam so he can read it later.? How
do you really fix that?
???? I would think (and I don't know),
that the ClubExpress membership
???? database might be able to include a
"preference" as part of the
???? member's
???? profile or details.? Just as I can
set an address and phone
number,
???? if I
???? could check a box for Electronic
delivery or paper copies, or
both,
???? and
???? select whatever I wanted for each
item (Profiles versus
Newsletter),
???? that might be ideal.
???? However, I'm also familiar with
quantity discounting.? It very
well
???? could be that it costs the same
amount to print 500 as it does to
???? 50, or 10 (but I doubt it).? I
imagine those are considerations
the
???? board will look at as well.
???? Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie
has claimed, I have heard (from
???? more
???? than one person), that Jack and Mike
did not resign "because POCA
???? changed printers;" it was over
"control" of newsletter content
that
???? in
???? essence fell outside the bounds of
the by-laws.? For a guy that
???? appeared
???? to try very hard to get everyone else
to follow the by-laws (and
???? it's
???? unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt
certainly didn't feel they
???? applied
???? to him.
???? For the record, as I understand it,
POCA has changed printers
???? -twice-
???? since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were
related to the DeRykes) got
out
???? of
???? the business.? So the "family tie-in"
previously eluded to, was
not
???? a
???? factor in the resignations.
???? Just my $1.50? (two cents adjusted
for inflation)
???? Asa? Jay
???? Asa Jay Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt,
USAFR, Retired
???? &? Shelley Marie
???? Spokane, WA
???? ******************************
???? [20] <[9]http://w7tsc.org> [10]http://w7tsc.org
???? [21] <[11]http://www.teampanteraracing.com> [12]http://www.tea
mpanteraracing.com
????
_______________________________________________
???? Detomaso Email List is not managed by
POCA
???? Posted emails must not exceed 1.5
Megabytes
???? DeTomaso mailing list
???? [22] <mailto:DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com> DeTomaso@server
.detomasolist.com
????
[23] <[13]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso> [14]http: //server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
???? To manage your subscription (change
email address, unsubscribe,
???? etc.) use the links above.
???? Members who post to this list grant
license to the list to forward
???? any message posted here to all past,
current, or future members of
???? the list. They also grant the list
owner permission to maintain an
???? archive or approve the archiving of
list messages.
_______________________________________________
Detomaso Email List is not managed by
POCA
Posted emails must not exceed 1.5
Megabytes
DeTomaso mailing list
[24] <mailto:DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com> DeTomaso@server.deto
masolist.com
[25] <[15]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso>
[16]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
To manage your subscription (change email
address, unsubscribe, etc.)
use the links above.
Members who post to this list grant
license to the list to forward any
message posted here to all past, current,
or future members of the
list. They also grant the list owner
permission to maintain an archive
or approve the archiving of list
messages.

Stephen, thank you for saying what I was about to say. If folks want to continue to rant about this, do the courteous thing, do it offline and don't burden the rest of the world with a subject that the BOD will hopefully sort out and do the right thing, putting personality conflicts aside and implementing the needed changes to improve the club. Dick Koch - Atlanta On Aug 16, 2016 2:28 PM, "Stephen" <steve@snclocks.com> wrote:
So, when, exactly, did we stop beating our spouses???
Effie - gads - you have the names of the printers! Call them - short of that I can assure you any good photographer can modify a document so you will not be able to know what is real and what is not.
Let's stop the witch hunt - look at the folks who stood up to the shortt. Think about how long they have been a part of POCA. Are they out for personal gain in standing up to a person who made way too many folks want to quit?
If you or others wish to continue the witch hunt - please start a new thread, with the initials MS in front of the subject. That way I can route all e-mails associated with the thread to my trash bin.
I'm going to go back to working on 5332 and hope this whole nightmare will just go away.
Stephen Nelson
-----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Effie Richards Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 10:30 AM To: 'Charles McCall' <charlesmccall@gmail.com>; 'marshallgsmith' <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> Cc: 'detomaso' <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>; 'laurie Basile' <laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
Where are the actual proposals/quotes from the printers, not the ones the editor posted here. Those as they appear, could have been manipulated - I'm not accusing anyone, I am just saying, as any court would say - an experienced editor like Jack could add or delete to create and post what he did here. Since there are many still questioning the printer cost, let's see the actual bids.
From: Charles McCall [[1]mailto:charlesmccall@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 12:08 AM
To: marshallgsmith
Cc: Michael Haney; Judith McCartney; Effie Richards; Julian Kift; detomaso; laurie Basile
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
You did all read the info sent by Judy McCartney last week with Jack's explanation?
Re-sent here in case you didn't see it. Please open the attachment - I promise no viruses are included
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:20 AM, marshallgsmith <[2]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Hey Michael,
I think the best way to put this controversy to bed is if you or your
dad could speak about not being cooperative in regards to the the use
of another printer that supposedly afforded the club an $8,000 savings.
That really seems to be the only issue that continues this controversy
and I still haven't heard either of you discuss the allegation. I'm
sure your response will cut this thread for good and allow us all to
move on with the rebuilding of this great club.
Marshall Smith
President, San Diego Panteras
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: Michael Haney <[3]paso750@gmail.com>
Date: 8/15/16 10:36 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: 'Judith McCartney' <[4]jpoca2@hotmail.com>, 'Effie Richards'
<[5]erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>, 'Julian Kift'
<[6]julian_kift@hotmail.com>
Cc: [7]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com, 'laurie Basile'
<[8]laurieferrari@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
Thank you very much, Judy.
I really wish this thread would just die.
I know that this isn't the answer you're fishing for, but it'll have to
do
since it's the truth.
Nancy quit and took her associate (me) with her because she was tired
of
hearing from me all about Shortt's efforts to take over every aspect of
POCA.
I didn't fight her decision because I was in turn tired of Shortt's
intimidation and bullying tactics. Frankly, being on the Board wasn't
fun
anymore and I was also very tired of Shortt's constant preening.
As a matter of record, I resigned from the Board BEFORE Profiles #3
even
went to the printer. I had nearly finished it and decided that I didn't
want
to let the POCA members down. I really didn't want to contribute any
more to
Shortt's regime, but my conscience won.
Even after I sent the magazine in, I still had to deal with Shortt. He
decided to interfere with the printer, sent them a database with a
whole
bunch of problematic info and threaten nonpayment if he didn't get
preliminary proofs. How do I know this? I received a call while I was
at
work from the woman working in Allegra Printing's mail room. She called
Shortt and he wouldn't help her with the database and ignored her
questions.
Having no one else to call, she called me. I in turn contacted Judy,
our
Membership Director, who fixed the problems that Shortt created.
Regarding Shortt's allegations of graft, if anyone can find a
connection
between my family and anyone who EVER worked at Allegra Printing in
Reno,
Nevada, (or indeed any of Allegra's branches) please let me know.
My Dad might respond as well, but he's been pretty busy caring for my
SERIOUSLY ill Mom who was in the hospital for the last two weeks and
who
might finally be able to come back home in a couple more.
Now, can we finally put this "controversy" to rest?
Mike Haney
-----Original Message-----
From: DeTomaso [[9]mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On
Behalf
Of Judith McCartney
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 PM
To: Effie Richards; Julian Kift
Cc: [10]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurie Basile
Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
Mike Haney gave his resignation months way head of Jacks, two diff
reasons.
Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator.
> From: [11]erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com
> Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:43:43 -0700
> To: [12]julian_kift@hotmail.com
> CC: [13]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; [14]laurieferrari@aol.com
> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
>
> Julian these are the same questions some of us have had and have been
waiting for a reply or statement. I'm willing to give the board some
time to
come up with one.
>
> Sent from Effie's iPad
>
> > On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Julian Kift <[15]julian_kift@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> >
> > I have digested all the emails on this topic and to be honest it
still
> > doesn't sit well in my gut.
> >
> >
> > Presumably the BOD voted in favor of changing printers based upon
the
> > quotes presented. Did they not have all the facts and
> > if not why did they not question further? Did Jack have all the
facts
w
> > hen he resigned or were his and Mike Haney's resignations simply
an
> > outright stand against changing printer?
> >
> >
> > Why did Michael push to change printer if he knew there was only
> > pennies between it?
> >
> >
> > Julian
> >
__________________________________________________________________
> >
> > From: DeTomaso <[16]detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> on
behalf of
> > marshall smith <[17]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net>
> > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:11 AM
> > To: [18]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; [19]laurieferrari@aol.com
> > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
> >
> > I find it funny that three months after the Fun Rally we are now
> > hearing that Shortt's bid for printing did not include shipping.
Shortt
> > is a lot of things but a mistake like this...?
> > I was listening in on this meeting also and I know what I heard.
> > Apparently, the board convinced 'some' members of this so-called
> > discrepancy month's ago. Why wasn't this information, if it
exists,
> > relayed to ALL of us in a timely manner?
> > Marshall
> >
> > --------------------------------------------
> > On Mon, 8/15/16, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso
> > <[20]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
> > To: [21]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com
> > Date: Monday, August 15, 2016, 9:57 AM
> >
> > Dear AJ,
> >
> > I have always respected you and your
> > opinions but in this case you are
> > incorrect as far as the resignation of
> > Jack DeRyke. I was on the Board
> > of Directors' conference call where he was
> > asked to stay and he
> > adamantly refused to if the printer
> > changed. Jack's resignation was
> > specifically because of the change in
> > printer! You can go research
> > that phone conference call, or the minutes
> > of the meeting, as the facts
> > are saved. As far as Mike Haney's
> > resignation, that was done by his
> > Mrs. for their reasons which most likely
> > were aligned with their
> > parents.
> >
> > Laurie
> >
> > In a message dated 8/13/2016
> > 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,?
> > [1][22]asajay@asajay.com
> > writes:
> > The last? I heard (and I may have
> > heard wrong), the board was
> > interested
> > in doing a? -real- accounting
> > comparison of printing costs, so for
> > me,
> > it's a wait and? see kind of
> > thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing
> > out on
> > full-color? and paying $8,000 more
> > for B/W then something is amiss.?
> > However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt
> > didn't account for all costs
> > properly.? I? have more faith that
> > the present board members will
> > properly investigate? and sort it
> > out for everyone.
> > I am on-board with electronic
> > delivery,? though I do admit it's nice
> > to
> > just sit back and read a paper
> > copy? too.? It's also easier to
> > hand-off
> > to Sam so he can read it? later.?
> > How do you really fix that?
> > I would think (and I don't? know),
> > that the ClubExpress membership
> > database might be able to include
> > a? "preference" as part of the
> > member's
> > profile or details.? Just as I? can
> > set an address and phone number,
> > if I
> > could check a box for Electronic?
> > delivery or paper copies, or both,
> > and
> > select whatever I wanted for each?
> > item (Profiles versus
> > Newsletter),
> > that might be ideal.
> > However,? I'm also familiar with
> > quantity discounting.? It very well
> > could be? that it costs the same
> > amount to print 500 as it does to
> > 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I
> > imagine those are considerations the
> > board will? look at as well.
> > Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie
> > has claimed, I have? heard (from
> > more
> > than one person), that Jack and
> > Mike did not resign? "because POCA
> > changed printers;" it was over
> > "control" of newsletter? content that
> > in
> > essence fell outside the bounds of
> > the by-laws.? For? a guy that
> > appeared
> > to try very hard to get everyone
> > else to follow the? by-laws (and
> > it's
> > unwritten code of ethics), Mr.
> > Shortt certainly didn't? feel they
> > applied
> > to him.
> > For the record, as I understand it,
> > POCA? has changed printers
> > -twice-
> > since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were
> > related? to the DeRykes) got out
> > of
> > the business.? So the "family
> > tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not
> > a
> > factor in the resignations.
> > Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted
> > for inflation)
> > Asa? Jay
> > Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt,
> > USAFR, Retired
> > &? Shelley? Mar
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: detomaso-request
<[23]detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com>
> > To: detomaso <[24]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>
> > Sent: Mon, Aug 15, 2016 9:00 am
> > Subject: DeTomaso Digest, Vol 146, Issue
> > 20
> > Send DeTomaso mailing list submissions to
> > [2][25]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World
> > Wide Web, visit
> > [3][26]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
> > or, via email, send a message with subject
> > or body 'help' to
> > detomaso-[4][27]request@server.detomasolist.com
> > You can reach the person managing the list
> > at
> > detomaso-[5][28]owner@server.detomasolist.com
> > When replying, please edit your Subject
> > line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of DeTomaso digest..."
> > Daily Detomaso List Digest
> > Today's Topics:
> > 1. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs.
> > electronic (marshallgsmith)
> > 2. Re: De Tomaso Pantera GTS on eBay!
> > again $250K!! (Michael Cox)
> > 3. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs.
> > electronic (Stephen)
> >
-------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:27:43 -0700
> > From: marshallgsmith <[6][29]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net>
> > To: [7][30]P6746@aol.com, [8][31]asajay@asajay.com,
> > [9][32]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com
> > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost,
> > paper vs. electronic
> > Message-ID:
> >
<[10][33]sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> > I have a couple questions Bob:
> >> Calling this situation "multiple dues
> > levels" seems to be making the
> > issue too complex. There are some members
> > that are opting to not have
> > printed magazines mailed which should make
> > those members eligible for a
> > discount because of the savings.
> >> What is your estimate of the length
> > of time that it would take the
> > board to arrange for a vote of the
> > membership to change the bylaws to
> > allow for this discount?
> >> Who specifically made that
> > apples-to-apples comparison you refer to?
> >> I agree that the editors should have
> > the most influence ?on the
> > process. ?However, our editors of both
> > publications seem to have a hard
> > time reporting to the members about ANY
> > issues pertaining to the
> > publication's themselves. Might that
> > change in the near future or will
> > radio silence be the norm here?
> > Marshall Smith
> > Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone
> > -------- Original message --------
> > From: P6746--- via DeTomaso
<[11][34]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>
> > Date: 8/14/16 3:10 PM (GMT-08:00)
> > To: [12][35]asajay@asajay.com,
> > [13][36]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com
> > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost,
> > paper vs. electronic
> > To use a cliche, we're working on it.?
> > Most of what has been mentioned is in the
> > pipeline.?? However, there
> > are
> > restrictions, particularly with the
> > By-Laws as they currently? stand.?
> > There
> > are no provisions for multiple dues
> > levels,? particularly pertaining to
> > how a
> > member elects to have their club?
> > publications delivered, etc.? That
> > will
> > take time as any changes or? amendments
> > must be approved by the whole
> > membership.
> > The consensus seems to be that the
> > Profiles would? continue as a print
> > publication for all except foreign members
> > who elect to? receive it
> > digitally.?
> > As far as printing is concerned, it is
> > that first copy that is? so
> > expensive, it is the subsequent copies
> > that bring down the per unit?
> > cost.? So as
> > fewer units are produced and shipped, the
> > cost per unit? increases but
> > not
> > proportionately.??
> > An apples to apples comparison was made
> > between an online? printer and
> > the
> > current printer for both printing and
> > mailing and the difference? was
> > pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but
> > for the whole run.?
> > As far as I am concerned, it is the
> > editors who should have? the most
> > influence as to how and where their
> > product is produced.? They are? the
> > ones who
> > must work with the printers and mailing
> > houses on a regular? basis.
> > Bob Reid?
> > In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M.
> > Eastern Daylight Time,?
> > [14][37]asajay@asajay.com
> > writes:
> > The last? I heard (and I may have heard
> > wrong), the board was
> > interested
> > in doing a? -real- accounting comparison
> > of printing costs, so for me,
> > it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I
> > agree, if POCA was missing out
> > on
> > full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W
> > then something is amiss.?
> > However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't
> > account for all costs
> > properly.? I? have more faith that the
> > present board members will
> > properly investigate? and sort it out for
> > everyone.
> > I am on-board with electronic delivery,?
> > though I do admit it's nice to
> > just sit back and read a paper copy? too.?
> > It's also easier to hand-off
> > to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do
> > you really fix that?
> > I would think (and I don't? know), that
> > the ClubExpress membership
> > database might be able to include a?
> > "preference" as part of the
> > member's
> > profile or details.? Just as I? can set an
> > address and phone number, if
> > I
> > could check a box for Electronic? delivery
> > or paper copies, or both,
> > and
> > select whatever I wanted for each? item
> > (Profiles versus Newsletter),
> > that might be ideal.
> > However,? I'm also familiar with quantity
> > discounting.? It very well
> > could be? that it costs the same amount to
> > print 500 as it does to
> > 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine
> > those are considerations the
> > board will? look at as well.
> > Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has
> > claimed, I have? heard (from
> > more
> > than one person), that Jack and Mike did
> > not resign? "because POCA
> > changed printers;" it was over "control"
> > of newsletter? content that in
> > essence fell outside the bounds of the
> > by-laws.? For? a guy that
> > appeared
> > to try very hard to get everyone else to
> > follow the? by-laws (and it's
> > unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt
> > certainly didn't? feel they
> > applied
> > to him.
> > For the record, as I understand it, POCA?
> > has changed printers -twice-
> > since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were
> > related? to the DeRykes) got out of
> > the business.? So the "family tie-in"?
> > previously eluded to, was not a
> > factor in the resignations.
> > Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for
> > inflation)
> > Asa? Jay
> > Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR,
> > Retired
> > &? Shelley? Marie
> > Spokane,? WA
> > ******************************
> > [15][38]http://w7tsc.org
> > [16][39]http://www.teampanteraracing.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Detomaso? Email List is not managed by
> > POCA
> > Posted emails must not exceed 1.5?
> > Megabytes
> > DeTomaso mailing? list
> > [17][40]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com
> > [18][41]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
> > To? manage your subscription (change email
> > address, unsubscribe, etc.)
> > use
> > the? links above.
> > Members who post to this list grant
> > license to the list to? forward any
> > message posted here to all past, current,
> > or future members of the?
> > list. They
> > also grant the list owner permission to
> > maintain an archive or? approve
> > the
> > archiving of list? messages.
> > ?? To use a cliche, we're working on it.
> > ?? Most of what has been mentioned is in
> > the pipeline.? However, there
> > are
> > ?? restrictions, particularly with the
> > By-Laws as they currently stand.
> > ?? There are no provisions for multiple
> > dues levels,
> > ?? particularly pertaining to how a member
> > elects to have their club
> > ?? publications delivered, etc.? That will
> > take time as any changes or
> > ?? amendments must be approved by the
> > whole membership.
> > ?? The consensus seems to be that the
> > Profiles would continue as a
> > ?? publication for all except foreign
> > members who elect to receive it
> > ?? digitally.
> > ?? As far as printing is concerned, it is
> > that first copy that is so
> > ?? expensive, it is the subsequent copies
> > that bring down the per unit
> > ?? cost.? So as fewer units are produced
> > and shipped, the cost per unit
> > ?? increases but not proportionately.
> > ?? An apples to apples comparison was made
> > between an online printer
> > and
> > ?? the current printer for both printing
> > and mailing and the difference
> > ?? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per
> > unit but for the whole run.
> > ?? As far as I am concerned, it is the
> > editors who should have the most
> > ?? influence as to how and where their
> > product is produced.? They are
> > the
> > ?? ones who must work with the printers
> > and mailing houses on a regular
> > ?? basis.
> > ?? Bob Reid
> > ?? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24
> > P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> > ?? [19][42]asajay@asajay.com
> > writes:
> > ???? The last I heard (and I may have
> > heard wrong), the board was
> > ???? interested
> > ???? in doing a -real- accounting
> > comparison of printing costs, so for
> > ???? me,
> > ???? it's a wait and see kind of thing.? I
> > agree, if POCA was missing
> > out
> > ???? on
> > ???? full-color and paying $8,000 more for
> > B/W then something is amiss.
> > ???? However, I also believe Mr. Shortt
> > didn't account for all costs
> > ???? properly.? I have more faith that the
> > present board members will
> > ???? properly investigate and sort it out
> > for everyone.
> > ???? I am on-board with electronic
> > delivery, though I do admit it's
> > nice
> > ???? to
> > ???? just sit back and read a paper copy
> > too.? It's also easier to
> > ???? hand-off
> > ???? to Sam so he can read it later.? How
> > do you really fix that?
> > ???? I would think (and I don't know),
> > that the ClubExpress membership
> > ???? database might be able to include a
> > "preference" as part of the
> > ???? member's
> > ???? profile or details.? Just as I can
> > set an address and phone
> > number,
> > ???? if I
> > ???? could check a box for Electronic
> > delivery or paper copies, or
> > both,
> > ???? and
> > ???? select whatever I wanted for each
> > item (Profiles versus
> > Newsletter),
> > ???? that might be ideal.
> > ???? However, I'm also familiar with
> > quantity discounting.? It very
> > well
> > ???? could be that it costs the same
> > amount to print 500 as it does to
> > ???? 50, or 10 (but I doubt it).? I
> > imagine those are considerations
> > the
> > ???? board will look at as well.
> > ???? Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie
> > has claimed, I have heard (from
> > ???? more
> > ???? than one person), that Jack and Mike
> > did not resign "because POCA
> > ???? changed printers;" it was over
> > "control" of newsletter content
> > that
> > ???? in
> > ???? essence fell outside the bounds of
> > the by-laws.? For a guy that
> > ???? appeared
> > ???? to try very hard to get everyone else
> > to follow the by-laws (and
> > ???? it's
> > ???? unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt
> > certainly didn't feel they
> > ???? applied
> > ???? to him.
> > ???? For the record, as I understand it,
> > POCA has changed printers
> > ???? -twice-
> > ???? since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were
> > related to the DeRykes) got
> > out
> > ???? of
> > ???? the business.? So the "family tie-in"
> > previously eluded to, was
> > not
> > ???? a
> > ???? factor in the resignations.
> > ???? Just my $1.50? (two cents adjusted
> > for inflation)
> > ???? Asa? Jay
> > ???? Asa Jay Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt,
> > USAFR, Retired
> > ???? &? Shelley Marie
> > ???? Spokane, WA
> > ???? ******************************
> > ???? [20][43]http://w7tsc.org
> > ???? [21][44]http://www.teampanteraracing.com
> > ????
> > _______________________________________________
> > ???? Detomaso Email List is not managed by
> > POCA
> > ???? Posted emails must not exceed 1.5
> > Megabytes
> > ???? DeTomaso mailing list
> > ???? [22][45]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com
> > ????
[23][46]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
> > ???? To manage your subscription (change
> > email address, unsubscribe,
> > ???? etc.) use the links above.
> > ???? Members who post to this list grant
> > license to the list to forward
> > ???? any message posted here to all past,
> > current, or future members of
> > ???? the list. They also grant the list
> > owner permission to maintain an
> > ???? archive or approve the archiving of
> > list messages.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Detomaso Email List is not managed by
> > POCA
> > Posted emails must not exceed 1.5
> > Megabytes
> > DeTomaso mailing list
> > [24][47]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com
> > [25][48]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
> > To manage your subscription (change email
> > address, unsubscribe, etc.)
> > use the links above.
> > Members who post to this list grant
> > license to the list to forward any
> > message posted here to all past, current,
> > or future members of the
> > list. They also grant the list owner
> > permission to maintain an archive
> > or approve the archiving of list
> > messages.
> >
Stephen, thank you for saying what I was about to say. If folks want to continue to rant about this, do the courteous thing, do it offline and don't burden the rest of the world with a subject that the BOD will hopefully sort out and do the right thing, putting personality conflicts aside and implementing the needed changes to improve the club. Dick Koch - Atlanta On Aug 16, 2016 2:28 PM, "Stephen" <[1]steve@snclocks.com> wrote: A A So, when, exactly, did we stop beating our spouses??? A A Effie - gads - you have the names of the printers!A Call them - short A A of that I can assure you any good photographer can modify a document so A A you will not be able to know what is real and what is not. A A Let's stop the witch hunt - look at the folks who stood up to the A A shortt.A Think about how long they have been a part of POCA.A Are they A A out for personal gain in standing up to a person who made way too many A A folks want to quit? A A If you or others wish to continue the witch hunt - please start a new A A thread, with the initials MS in front of the subject.A That way I can A A route all e-mails associated with the thread to my trash bin. A A I'm going to go back to working on 5332 and hope this whole nightmare A A will just go away. A A Stephen Nelson A A -----Original Message----- A A From: DeTomaso [mailto:[2]detomaso-bounces@ server.detomasolist.com] On A A Behalf Of Effie Richards A A Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 10:30 AM A A To: 'Charles McCall' <[3]charlesmccall@gmail.com>; 'marshallgsmith' A A <[4]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> A A Cc: 'detomaso' <[5]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>; 'laurie Basile' A A <[6]laurieferrari@aol.com> A A Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations A A Where are the actual proposals/quotes from the printers, not the ones A A the editor posted here.A Those as they appear, could have been A A manipulated - I'm not accusing anyone, I am just saying, as any court A A would say - an experienced editor like Jack could add or delete to A A create and post what he did here.A Since there are many still A A questioning the printer cost, let's see the actual bids. A A From: Charles McCall [[1]mailto:[7]charlesmccall@gmail.com] A A Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 12:08 AM A A To: marshallgsmith A A Cc: Michael Haney; Judith McCartney; Effie Richards; Julian Kift; A A detomaso; laurie Basile A A Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations A A You did all read the info sent by Judy McCartney last week with Jack's A A explanation? A A Re-sent here in case you didn't see it. Please open the attachment - I A A promise no viruses are included A A On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:20 AM, marshallgsmith A A <[2][8]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> wrote: A A A Hey Michael, A A A I think the best way to put this controversy to bed is if you or A A your A A A dad could speak about not being cooperative in regards to the the A A use A A A of another printer that supposedly afforded the club an $8,000 A A savings. A A A That really seems to be the only issue that continues this A A controversy A A A and I still haven't heard either of you discuss the allegation. I'm A A A sure your response will cut this thread for good and allow us all to A A A move on with the rebuilding of this great club. A A A Marshall Smith A A A President, San Diego Panteras A A A Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone A A A -------- Original message -------- A A A From: Michael Haney <[3][9]paso750@gmail.com> A A A Date: 8/15/16 10:36 PM (GMT-08:00) A A A To: 'Judith McCartney' <[4][10]jpoca2@hotmail.com>, 'Effie Richards' A A A <[5][11]erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>, 'Julian Kift' A A A <[6][12]julian_kift@hotmail.com> A A A Cc: [7][13]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com, 'laurie Basile' A A A <[8][14]laurieferrari@aol.com> A A A Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations A A A Thank you very much, Judy. A A A I really wish this thread would just die. A A A I know that this isn't the answer you're fishing for, but it'll have A A to A A A do A A A since it's the truth. A A A Nancy quit and took her associate (me) with her because she was A A tired A A A of A A A hearing from me all about Shortt's efforts to take over every aspect A A of A A A POCA. A A A I didn't fight her decision because I was in turn tired of Shortt's A A A intimidation and bullying tactics. Frankly, being on the Board A A wasn't A A A fun A A A anymore and I was also very tired of Shortt's constant preening. A A A As a matter of record, I resigned from the Board BEFORE Profiles #3 A A A even A A A went to the printer. I had nearly finished it and decided that I A A didn't A A A want A A A to let the POCA members down. I really didn't want to contribute any A A A more to A A A Shortt's regime, but my conscience won. A A A Even after I sent the magazine in, I still had to deal with Shortt. A A He A A A decided to interfere with the printer, sent them a database with a A A A whole A A A bunch of problematic info and threaten nonpayment if he didn't get A A A preliminary proofs. How do I know this? I received a call while I A A was A A A at A A A work from the woman working in Allegra Printing's mail room. She A A called A A A Shortt and he wouldn't help her with the database and ignored her A A A questions. A A A Having no one else to call, she called me. I in turn contacted Judy, A A A our A A A Membership Director, who fixed the problems that Shortt created. A A A Regarding Shortt's allegations of graft, if anyone can find a A A A connection A A A between my family and anyone who EVER worked at Allegra Printing in A A A Reno, A A A Nevada, (or indeed any of Allegra's branches) please let me know. A A A My Dad might respond as well, but he's been pretty busy caring for A A my A A A SERIOUSLY ill Mom who was in the hospital for the last two weeks and A A A who A A A might finally be able to come back home in a couple more. A A A Now, can we finally put this "controversy" to rest? A A A Mike Haney A A A -----Original Message----- A A A From: DeTomaso [[9]mailto:[15]detomaso-bounces@ server.detomasolist.com] A A On A A A Behalf A A A Of Judith McCartney A A A Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 PM A A A To: Effie Richards; Julian Kift A A A Cc: [10][16]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurie Basile A A A Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations A A A Mike Haney gave his resignation months way head of Jacks, two diff A A A reasons. A A A Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator. A A A > From: [11][17]erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com A A A > Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:43:43 -0700 A A A > To: [12][18]julian_kift@hotmail.com A A A > CC: [13][19]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; A A [14][20]laurieferrari@aol.com A A A > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations A A A > A A A > Julian these are the same questions some of us have had and have A A been A A A waiting for a reply or statement. I'm willing to give the board some A A A time to A A A come up with one. A A A > A A A > Sent from Effie's iPad A A A > A A A > > On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Julian Kift A A <[15][21]julian_kift@hotmail.com> A A A wrote: A A A > > A A A > >A A I have digested all the emails on this topic and to be honest A A it A A A still A A A > >A A doesn't sit well in my gut. A A A > > A A A > > A A A > >A A Presumably the BOD voted in favor of changing printers based A A upon A A A the A A A > >A A quotes presented. Did they not have all the facts and A A A > >A A if not why did they not question further? Did Jack have all A A the A A A facts A A A w A A A > >A A hen he resigned or were his and Mike Haney's resignations A A simply A A A an A A A > >A A outright stand against changing printer? A A A > > A A A > > A A A > >A A Why did Michael push to change printer if he knew there was A A only A A A > >A A pennies between it? A A A > > A A A > > A A A > >A A Julian A A A > > A A A ______________________________ ____________________________________ A A A > > A A A > >A A From: DeTomaso <[16][22]detomaso-bounces@server. detomasolist.com> A A on A A A behalf of A A A > >A A marshall smith <[17][23]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal. net> A A A > >A A Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:11 AM A A A > >A A To: [18][24]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; A A [19][25]laurieferrari@aol.com A A A > >A A Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations A A A > > A A A > >A A I find it funny that three months after the Fun Rally we are A A now A A A > >A A hearing that Shortt's bid for printing did not include A A shipping. A A A Shortt A A A > >A A is a lot of things but a mistake like this...? A A A > >A A I was listening in on this meeting also and I know what I A A heard. A A A > >A A Apparently, the board convinced 'some' members of this A A so-called A A A > >A A discrepancy month's ago. Why wasn't this information, if it A A A exists, A A A > >A A relayed to ALL of us in a timely manner? A A A > >A A Marshall A A A > > A A A > >A A -------------------------------------------- A A A > >A A On Mon, 8/15/16, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso A A A > >A A <[20][26]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote: A A A > >A A Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations A A A > >A A To: [21][27]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com A A A > >A A Date: Monday, August 15, 2016, 9:57 AM A A A > > A A A > >A A A A Dear AJ, A A A > > A A A > >A A A A I have always respected you and your A A A > >A A opinions but in this case you are A A A > >A A A A incorrect as far as the resignation of A A A > >A A Jack DeRyke.A I was on the Board A A A > >A A A A of Directors' conference call where he was A A A > >A A asked to stay and he A A A > >A A A A adamantly refused to if the printer A A A > >A A changed.A Jack's resignation was A A A > >A A A A specifically because of the change in A A A > >A A printer!A You can go research A A A > >A A A A that phone conference call, or the minutes A A A > >A A of the meeting, as the facts A A A > >A A A A are saved.A As far as Mike Haney's A A A > >A A resignation, that was done by his A A A > >A A A A Mrs. for their reasons which most likely A A A > >A A were aligned with their A A A > >A A A A parents. A A A > > A A A > >A A A A Laurie A A A > > A A A > >A A A A A In a message dated 8/13/2016 A A A > >A A 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? A A A > >A A A A A [1][22][28]asajay@asajay.com A A A > >A A writes: A A A > >A A A A A The last? I heard (and I may have A A A > >A A heard wrong), the board was A A A > >A A A A A interested A A A > >A A A A A in doing a? -real- accounting A A A > >A A comparison of printing costs, so for A A A > >A A A A A me, A A A > >A A A A A it's a wait and? see kind of A A A > >A A thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing A A A > >A A A A A out on A A A > >A A A A A full-color? and paying $8,000 more A A A > >A A for B/W then something is amiss.? A A A > >A A A A A However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt A A A > >A A didn't account for all costs A A A > >A A A A A properly.? I? have more faith that A A A > >A A the present board members will A A A > >A A A A A properly investigate? and sort it A A A > >A A out for everyone. A A A > >A A A A A I am on-board with electronic A A A > >A A delivery,? though I do admit it's nice A A A > >A A A A A to A A A > >A A A A A just sit back and read a paper A A A > >A A copy? too.? It's also easier to A A A > >A A A A A hand-off A A A > >A A A A A to Sam so he can read it? later.? A A A > >A A How do you really fix that? A A A > >A A A A A I would think (and I don't? know), A A A > >A A that the ClubExpress membership A A A > >A A A A A database might be able to include A A A > >A A a? "preference" as part of the A A A > >A A A A A member's A A A > >A A A A A profile or details.? Just as I? can A A A > >A A set an address and phone number, A A A > >A A A A A if I A A A > >A A A A A could check a box for Electronic? A A A > >A A delivery or paper copies, or both, A A A > >A A A A A and A A A > >A A A A A select whatever I wanted for each? A A A > >A A item (Profiles versus A A A > >A A A A A Newsletter), A A A > >A A A A A that might be ideal. A A A > >A A A A A However,? I'm also familiar with A A A > >A A quantity discounting.? It very well A A A > >A A A A A could be? that it costs the same A A A > >A A amount to print 500 as it does to A A A > >A A A A A print A A A > >A A A A A 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I A A A > >A A imagine those are considerations the A A A > >A A A A A board will? look at as well. A A A > >A A A A A Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie A A A > >A A has claimed, I have? heard (from A A A > >A A A A A more A A A > >A A A A A than one person), that Jack and A A A > >A A Mike did not resign? "because POCA A A A > >A A A A A changed printers;" it was over A A A > >A A "control" of newsletter? content that A A A > >A A A A A in A A A > >A A A A A essence fell outside the bounds of A A A > >A A the by-laws.? For? a guy that A A A > >A A A A A appeared A A A > >A A A A A to try very hard to get everyone A A A > >A A else to follow the? by-laws (and A A A > >A A A A A it's A A A > >A A A A A unwritten code of ethics), Mr. A A A > >A A Shortt certainly didn't? feel they A A A > >A A A A A applied A A A > >A A A A A to him. A A A > >A A A A A For the record, as I understand it, A A A > >A A POCA? has changed printers A A A > >A A A A A -twice- A A A > >A A A A A since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were A A A > >A A related? to the DeRykes) got out A A A > >A A A A A of A A A > >A A A A A the business.? So the "family A A A > >A A tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not A A A > >A A A A A a A A A > >A A A A A factor in the resignations. A A A > >A A A A A Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted A A A > >A A for inflation) A A A > >A A A A A Asa? Jay A A A > >A A A A A Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, A A A > >A A USAFR, Retired A A A > >A A A A A &? Shelley? Mar A A A > > A A A > >A A A A -----Original Message----- A A A > >A A A A From: detomaso-request A A A <[23][29]detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com> A A A > >A A A A To: detomaso <[24][30]detomaso@server. detomasolist.com> A A A > >A A A A Sent: Mon, Aug 15, 2016 9:00 am A A A > >A A A A Subject: DeTomaso Digest, Vol 146, Issue A A A > >A A 20 A A A > >A A A A Send DeTomaso mailing list submissions to A A A > >A A A A [2][25][31]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com A A A > >A A A A To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World A A A > >A A Wide Web, visit A A A > > A A [3][26][32]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/ listinfo/detomaso A A A > >A A A A or, via email, send a message with subject A A A > >A A or body 'help' to A A A > >A A A A detomaso-[4][27][33]request@ server.detomasolist.com A A A > >A A A A You can reach the person managing the list A A A > >A A at A A A > >A A A A detomaso-[5][28][34]owner@server. detomasolist.com A A A > >A A A A When replying, please edit your Subject A A A > >A A line so it is more specific A A A > >A A A A than "Re: Contents of DeTomaso digest..." A A A > >A A A A Daily Detomaso List Digest A A A > >A A A A Today's Topics: A A A > >A A A A 1. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. A A A > >A A electronic (marshallgsmith) A A A > >A A A A 2. Re: De Tomaso Pantera GTS on eBay! A A A > >A A again $250K!! (Michael Cox) A A A > >A A A A 3. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. A A A > >A A electronic (Stephen) A A A > > A A A ------------------------------ ------------------------------------- A A A > >A A --- A A A > >A A A A Message: 1 A A A > >A A A A Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:27:43 -0700 A A A > >A A A A From: marshallgsmith <[6][29][35]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> A A A > >A A A A To: [7][30][36]P6746@aol.com, [8][31][37]asajay@asajay.com, A A A > >A A A A [9][32][38]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com A A A > >A A A A Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, A A A > >A A paper vs. electronic A A A > >A A A A Message-ID: A A A > > A A A <[10][33][39]sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email. android.com> A A A > >A A A A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" A A A > >A A A A I have a couple questions Bob: A A A > >> Calling this situation "multiple dues A A A > >A A levels" seems to be making the A A A > >A A A A issue too complex. There are some members A A A > >A A that are opting to not have A A A > >A A A A printed magazines mailed which should make A A A > >A A those members eligible for a A A A > >A A A A discount because of the savings. A A A > >> What is your estimate of the length A A A > >A A of time that it would take the A A A > >A A A A board to arrange for a vote of the A A A > >A A membership to change the bylaws to A A A > >A A A A allow for this discount? A A A > >> Who specifically made that A A A > >A A apples-to-apples comparison you refer to? A A A > >> I agree that the editors should have A A A > >A A the most influence ?on the A A A > >A A A A process. ?However, our editors of both A A A > >A A publications seem to have a hard A A A > >A A A A time reporting to the members about ANY A A A > >A A issues pertaining to the A A A > >A A A A publication's themselves. Might that A A A > >A A change in the near future or will A A A > >A A A A radio silence be the norm here? A A A > >A A A A Marshall Smith A A A > >A A A A Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone A A A > >A A A A -------- Original message -------- A A A > >A A A A From: P6746--- via DeTomaso A A A <[11][34][40]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> A A A > >A A A A Date: 8/14/16 3:10 PM (GMT-08:00) A A A > >A A A A To: [12][35][41]asajay@asajay.com, A A A > >A A [13][36][42]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com A A A > >A A A A Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, A A A > >A A paper vs. electronic A A A > >A A A A To use a cliche, we're working on it.? A A A > >A A A A Most of what has been mentioned is in the A A A > >A A pipeline.?? However, there A A A > >A A A A are A A A > >A A A A restrictions, particularly with the A A A > >A A By-Laws as they currently? stand.? A A A > >A A A A There A A A > >A A A A are no provisions for multiple dues A A A > >A A levels,? particularly pertaining to A A A > >A A A A how a A A A > >A A A A member elects to have their club? A A A > >A A publications delivered, etc.? That A A A > >A A A A will A A A > >A A A A take time as any changes or? amendments A A A > >A A must be approved by the whole A A A > >A A A A membership. A A A > >A A A A The consensus seems to be that the A A A > >A A Profiles would? continue as a print A A A > >A A A A publication for all except foreign members A A A > >A A who elect to? receive it A A A > >A A A A digitally.? A A A > >A A A A As far as printing is concerned, it is A A A > >A A that first copy that is? so A A A > >A A A A expensive, it is the subsequent copies A A A > >A A that bring down the per unit? A A A > >A A A A cost.? So as A A A > >A A A A fewer units are produced and shipped, the A A A > >A A cost per unit? increases but A A A > >A A A A not A A A > >A A A A proportionately.?? A A A > >A A A A An apples to apples comparison was made A A A > >A A between an online? printer and A A A > >A A A A the A A A > >A A A A current printer for both printing and A A A > >A A mailing and the difference? was A A A > >A A A A pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but A A A > >A A for the whole run.? A A A > >A A A A As far as I am concerned, it is the A A A > >A A editors who should have? the most A A A > >A A A A influence as to how and where their A A A > >A A product is produced.? They are? the A A A > >A A A A ones who A A A > >A A A A must work with the printers and mailing A A A > >A A houses on a regular? basis. A A A > >A A A A Bob Reid? A A A > >A A A A In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. A A A > >A A Eastern Daylight Time,? A A A > >A A A A [14][37][43]asajay@asajay.com A A A > >A A writes: A A A > >A A A A The last? I heard (and I may have heard A A A > >A A wrong), the board was A A A > >A A A A interested A A A > >A A A A in doing a? -real- accounting comparison A A A > >A A of printing costs, so for me, A A A > >A A A A it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I A A A > >A A agree, if POCA was missing out A A A > >A A A A on A A A > >A A A A full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W A A A > >A A then something is amiss.? A A A > >A A A A However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't A A A > >A A account for all costs A A A > >A A A A properly.? I? have more faith that the A A A > >A A present board members will A A A > >A A A A properly investigate? and sort it out for A A A > >A A everyone. A A A > >A A A A I am on-board with electronic delivery,? A A A > >A A though I do admit it's nice to A A A > >A A A A just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? A A A > >A A It's also easier to hand-off A A A > >A A A A to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do A A A > >A A you really fix that? A A A > >A A A A I would think (and I don't? know), that A A A > >A A the ClubExpress membership A A A > >A A A A database might be able to include a? A A A > >A A "preference" as part of the A A A > >A A A A member's A A A > >A A A A profile or details.? Just as I? can set an A A A > >A A address and phone number, if A A A > >A A A A I A A A > >A A A A could check a box for Electronic? delivery A A A > >A A or paper copies, or both, A A A > >A A A A and A A A > >A A A A select whatever I wanted for each? item A A A > >A A (Profiles versus Newsletter), A A A > >A A A A that might be ideal. A A A > >A A A A However,? I'm also familiar with quantity A A A > >A A discounting.? It very well A A A > >A A A A could be? that it costs the same amount to A A A > >A A print 500 as it does to A A A > >A A A A print A A A > >A A A A 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine A A A > >A A those are considerations the A A A > >A A A A board will? look at as well. A A A > >A A A A Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has A A A > >A A claimed, I have? heard (from A A A > >A A A A more A A A > >A A A A than one person), that Jack and Mike did A A A > >A A not resign? "because POCA A A A > >A A A A changed printers;" it was over "control" A A A > >A A of newsletter? content that in A A A > >A A A A essence fell outside the bounds of the A A A > >A A by-laws.? For? a guy that A A A > >A A A A appeared A A A > >A A A A to try very hard to get everyone else to A A A > >A A follow the? by-laws (and it's A A A > >A A A A unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt A A A > >A A certainly didn't? feel they A A A > >A A A A applied A A A > >A A A A to him. A A A > >A A A A For the record, as I understand it, POCA? A A A > >A A has changed printers -twice- A A A > >A A A A since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were A A A > >A A related? to the DeRykes) got out of A A A > >A A A A the business.? So the "family tie-in"? A A A > >A A previously eluded to, was not a A A A > >A A A A factor in the resignations. A A A > >A A A A Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for A A A > >A A inflation) A A A > >A A A A Asa? Jay A A A > >A A A A Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, A A A > >A A Retired A A A > >A A A A &? Shelley? Marie A A A > >A A A A Spokane,? WA A A A > >A A A A ****************************** A A A > >A A A A [15][38][44]http://w7tsc.org A A A > >A A A A [16][39][45]http://www.teampanteraracing.com A A A > >A A A A ______________________________ _________________ A A A > >A A A A Detomaso? Email List is not managed by A A A > >A A POCA A A A > >A A A A Posted emails must not exceed 1.5? A A A > >A A Megabytes A A A > >A A A A DeTomaso mailing? list A A A > >A A A A [17][40][46]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com A A A > > A A [18][41][47]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/ listinfo/detomaso A A A > >A A A A To? manage your subscription (change email A A A > >A A address, unsubscribe, etc.) A A A > >A A A A use A A A > >A A A A the? links above. A A A > >A A A A Members who post to this list grant A A A > >A A license to the list to? forward any A A A > >A A A A message posted here to all past, current, A A A > >A A or future members of the? A A A > >A A A A list. They A A A > >A A A A also grant the list owner permission to A A A > >A A maintain an archive or? approve A A A > >A A A A the A A A > >A A A A archiving of list? messages. A A A > >A A A A ?? To use a cliche, we're working on it. A A A > >A A A A ?? Most of what has been mentioned is in A A A > >A A the pipeline.? However, there A A A > >A A A A are A A A > >A A A A ?? restrictions, particularly with the A A A > >A A By-Laws as they currently stand. A A A > >A A A A ?? There are no provisions for multiple A A A > >A A dues levels, A A A > >A A A A ?? particularly pertaining to how a member A A A > >A A elects to have their club A A A > >A A A A ?? publications delivered, etc.? That will A A A > >A A take time as any changes or A A A > >A A A A ?? amendments must be approved by the A A A > >A A whole membership. A A A > >A A A A ?? The consensus seems to be that the A A A > >A A Profiles would continue as a A A A > >A A A A print A A A > >A A A A ?? publication for all except foreign A A A > >A A members who elect to receive it A A A > >A A A A ?? digitally. A A A > >A A A A ?? As far as printing is concerned, it is A A A > >A A that first copy that is so A A A > >A A A A ?? expensive, it is the subsequent copies A A A > >A A that bring down the per unit A A A > >A A A A ?? cost.? So as fewer units are produced A A A > >A A and shipped, the cost per unit A A A > >A A A A ?? increases but not proportionately. A A A > >A A A A ?? An apples to apples comparison was made A A A > >A A between an online printer A A A > >A A A A and A A A > >A A A A ?? the current printer for both printing A A A > >A A and mailing and the difference A A A > >A A A A ?? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per A A A > >A A unit but for the whole run. A A A > >A A A A ?? As far as I am concerned, it is the A A A > >A A editors who should have the most A A A > >A A A A ?? influence as to how and where their A A A > >A A product is produced.? They are A A A > >A A A A the A A A > >A A A A ?? ones who must work with the printers A A A > >A A and mailing houses on a regular A A A > >A A A A ?? basis. A A A > >A A A A ?? Bob Reid A A A > >A A A A ?? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 A A A > >A A P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, A A A > >A A A A ?? [19][42][48]asajay@asajay.com A A A > >A A writes: A A A > >A A A A ???? The last I heard (and I may have A A A > >A A heard wrong), the board was A A A > >A A A A ???? interested A A A > >A A A A ???? in doing a -real- accounting A A A > >A A comparison of printing costs, so for A A A > >A A A A ???? me, A A A > >A A A A ???? it's a wait and see kind of thing.? I A A A > >A A agree, if POCA was missing A A A > >A A A A out A A A > >A A A A ???? on A A A > >A A A A ???? full-color and paying $8,000 more for A A A > >A A B/W then something is amiss. A A A > >A A A A ???? However, I also believe Mr. Shortt A A A > >A A didn't account for all costs A A A > >A A A A ???? properly.? I have more faith that the A A A > >A A present board members will A A A > >A A A A ???? properly investigate and sort it out A A A > >A A for everyone. A A A > >A A A A ???? I am on-board with electronic A A A > >A A delivery, though I do admit it's A A A > >A A A A nice A A A > >A A A A ???? to A A A > >A A A A ???? just sit back and read a paper copy A A A > >A A too.? It's also easier to A A A > >A A A A ???? hand-off A A A > >A A A A ???? to Sam so he can read it later.? How A A A > >A A do you really fix that? A A A > >A A A A ???? I would think (and I don't know), A A A > >A A that the ClubExpress membership A A A > >A A A A ???? database might be able to include a A A A > >A A "preference" as part of the A A A > >A A A A ???? member's A A A > >A A A A ???? profile or details.? Just as I can A A A > >A A set an address and phone A A A > >A A A A number, A A A > >A A A A ???? if I A A A > >A A A A ???? could check a box for Electronic A A A > >A A delivery or paper copies, or A A A > >A A A A both, A A A > >A A A A ???? and A A A > >A A A A ???? select whatever I wanted for each A A A > >A A item (Profiles versus A A A > >A A A A Newsletter), A A A > >A A A A ???? that might be ideal. A A A > >A A A A ???? However, I'm also familiar with A A A > >A A quantity discounting.? It very A A A > >A A A A well A A A > >A A A A ???? could be that it costs the same A A A > >A A amount to print 500 as it does to A A A > >A A A A ???? print A A A > >A A A A ???? 50, or 10 (but I doubt it).? I A A A > >A A imagine those are considerations A A A > >A A A A the A A A > >A A A A ???? board will look at as well. A A A > >A A A A ???? Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie A A A > >A A has claimed, I have heard (from A A A > >A A A A ???? more A A A > >A A A A ???? than one person), that Jack and Mike A A A > >A A did not resign "because POCA A A A > >A A A A ???? changed printers;" it was over A A A > >A A "control" of newsletter content A A A > >A A A A that A A A > >A A A A ???? in A A A > >A A A A ???? essence fell outside the bounds of A A A > >A A the by-laws.? For a guy that A A A > >A A A A ???? appeared A A A > >A A A A ???? to try very hard to get everyone else A A A > >A A to follow the by-laws (and A A A > >A A A A ???? it's A A A > >A A A A ???? unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt A A A > >A A certainly didn't feel they A A A > >A A A A ???? applied A A A > >A A A A ???? to him. A A A > >A A A A ???? For the record, as I understand it, A A A > >A A POCA has changed printers A A A > >A A A A ???? -twice- A A A > >A A A A ???? since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were A A A > >A A related to the DeRykes) got A A A > >A A A A out A A A > >A A A A ???? of A A A > >A A A A ???? the business.? So the "family tie-in" A A A > >A A previously eluded to, was A A A > >A A A A not A A A > >A A A A ???? a A A A > >A A A A ???? factor in the resignations. A A A > >A A A A ???? Just my $1.50? (two cents adjusted A A A > >A A for inflation) A A A > >A A A A ???? Asa? Jay A A A > >A A A A ???? Asa Jay Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, A A A > >A A USAFR, Retired A A A > >A A A A ???? &? Shelley Marie A A A > >A A A A ???? Spokane, WA A A A > >A A A A ???? ****************************** A A A > >A A A A ???? [20][43][49]http://w7tsc.org A A A > >A A A A ???? [21][44][50]http://www. teampanteraracing.com A A A > >A A A A ???? A A A > >A A _______________________________________________ A A A > >A A A A ???? Detomaso Email List is not managed by A A A > >A A POCA A A A > >A A A A ???? Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 A A A > >A A Megabytes A A A > >A A A A ???? DeTomaso mailing list A A A > >A A A A ???? [22][45][51]DeTomaso@server. detomasolist.com A A A > >A A A A ???? A A A [23][46][52]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/ listinfo/detomaso A A A > >A A A A ???? To manage your subscription (change A A A > >A A email address, unsubscribe, A A A > >A A A A ???? etc.) use the links above. A A A > >A A A A ???? Members who post to this list grant A A A > >A A license to the list to forward A A A > >A A A A ???? any message posted here to all past, A A A > >A A current, or future members of A A A > >A A A A ???? the list. They also grant the list A A A > >A A owner permission to maintain an A A A > >A A A A ???? archive or approve the archiving of A A A > >A A list messages. A A A > >A A A A ______________________________ _________________ A A A > >A A A A Detomaso Email List is not managed by A A A > >A A POCA A A A > >A A A A Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 A A A > >A A Megabytes A A A > >A A A A DeTomaso mailing list A A A > >A A A A [24][47][53]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com A A A > > A A [25][48][54]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/ listinfo/detomaso A A A > >A A A A To manage your subscription (change email A A A > >A A address, unsubscribe, etc.) A A A > >A A A A use the links above. A A A > >A A A A Members who post to this list grant A A A > >A A license to the list to forward any A A A > >A A A A message posted here to all past, current, A A A > >A A or future members of the A A A > >A A A A list. They also grant the list owner A A A > >A A permission to maintain an archive A A A > >A A A A or approve the archiving of list A A A > >A A messages. A A A > >A A A A

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Dick Koch <redcatman74@gmail.com> wrote: BOD will hopefully sort out I hope the BOD will use this as an opportunity to explore alternatives in the printing process, to include color, better resolution, thinner magazine-style page stock, etc. And it will have to evaluated under varying circumstances, ie, different levels of members who choose to receive electronic delivery of the Newsletter. I personally agree that Profiles needs to be paper only, but if we are evaluating costs, I suppose that will add another dimension to the cost comparison. Jeff 6559 On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Dick Koch <[1]redcatman74@gmail.com> wrote: BOD will hopefully sort out A A A I hope the BOD will use this as an opportunity to explore alternatives in the printing process, to include color, better resolution, thinner magazine-style page stock, etc. And it will have to evaluated under varying circumstances, ie, different levels of members who choose to receive electronic delivery of the Newsletter. I personally agree that Profiles needs to be paper only, but if we are evaluating costs, I suppose that will add another dimension to the cost comparison. Jeff 6559 References 1. mailto:redcatman74@gmail.com
participants (10)
-
Charles McCall
-
Dick Koch
-
Effie Richards
-
Jeff Detrich
-
Judith McCartney
-
laurieferrari@aol.com
-
Mark Charlton
-
marshallgsmith
-
Stephen
-
Will Kooiman