From: erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:43:43 -0700 To: julian_kift@hotmail.com CC: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurieferrari@aol.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
Julian these are the same questions some of us have had and have been waiting for a reply or statement. I'm willing to give the board some time to come up with one.
Sent from Effie's iPad
On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Julian Kift <julian_kift@hotmail.com> wrote:
I have digested all the emails on this topic and to be honest it still doesn't sit well in my gut.
Presumably the BOD voted in favor of changing printers based upon
I read the attachment, why wasn’t it made public, if it’s a true one, it should have been. From: Charles McCall [mailto:charlesmccall@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 2:22 AM To: marshallgsmith Cc: Michael Haney; Judith McCartney; Effie Richards; Julian Kift; detomaso; laurie Basile Subject: -- SPAM --Re: [DeTomaso] resignations PS - if you read the attachment, you'll see that there is basically NO savings by changing printers. According to the quotes received, the $8000 savings was not correct. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Charles McCall <charlesmccall@gmail.com> wrote: You did all read the info sent by Judy McCartney last week with Jack's explanation? Re-sent here in case you didn't see it. Please open the attachment - I promise no viruses are included On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:20 AM, marshallgsmith <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Hey Michael, I think the best way to put this controversy to bed is if you or your dad could speak about not being cooperative in regards to the the use of another printer that supposedly afforded the club an $8,000 savings. That really seems to be the only issue that continues this controversy and I still haven't heard either of you discuss the allegation. I'm sure your response will cut this thread for good and allow us all to move on with the rebuilding of this great club. Marshall Smith President, San Diego Panteras Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Michael Haney <paso750@gmail.com> Date: 8/15/16 10:36 PM (GMT-08:00) To: 'Judith McCartney' <jpoca2@hotmail.com>, 'Effie Richards' <erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>, 'Julian Kift' <julian_kift@hotmail.com> Cc: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com, 'laurie Basile' <laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Thank you very much, Judy. I really wish this thread would just die. I know that this isn't the answer you're fishing for, but it'll have to do since it's the truth. Nancy quit and took her associate (me) with her because she was tired of hearing from me all about Shortt's efforts to take over every aspect of POCA. I didn't fight her decision because I was in turn tired of Shortt's intimidation and bullying tactics. Frankly, being on the Board wasn't fun anymore and I was also very tired of Shortt's constant preening. As a matter of record, I resigned from the Board BEFORE Profiles #3 even went to the printer. I had nearly finished it and decided that I didn't want to let the POCA members down. I really didn't want to contribute any more to Shortt's regime, but my conscience won. Even after I sent the magazine in, I still had to deal with Shortt. He decided to interfere with the printer, sent them a database with a whole bunch of problematic info and threaten nonpayment if he didn't get preliminary proofs. How do I know this? I received a call while I was at work from the woman working in Allegra Printing's mail room. She called Shortt and he wouldn't help her with the database and ignored her questions. Having no one else to call, she called me. I in turn contacted Judy, our Membership Director, who fixed the problems that Shortt created. Regarding Shortt's allegations of graft, if anyone can find a connection between my family and anyone who EVER worked at Allegra Printing in Reno, Nevada, (or indeed any of Allegra's branches) please let me know. My Dad might respond as well, but he's been pretty busy caring for my SERIOUSLY ill Mom who was in the hospital for the last two weeks and who might finally be able to come back home in a couple more. Now, can we finally put this "controversy" to rest? Mike Haney -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [mailto:detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Judith McCartney Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 PM To: Effie Richards; Julian Kift Cc: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Mike Haney gave his resignation months way head of Jacks, two diff reasons. Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator. the
quotes presented. Did they not have all the facts and if not why did they not question further? Did Jack have all the facts w hen he resigned or were his and Mike Haney's resignations simply an outright stand against changing printer?
Why did Michael push to change printer if he knew there was only pennies between it?
Julian
From: DeTomaso <detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> on
behalf of
marshall smith <marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:11 AM To: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurieferrari@aol.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations
I find it funny that three months after the Fun Rally we are now hearing that Shortt's bid for printing did not include shipping. Shortt is a lot of things but a mistake like this...? I was listening in on this meeting also and I know what I heard. Apparently, the board convinced 'some' members of this so-called discrepancy month's ago. Why wasn't this information, if it exists, relayed to ALL of us in a timely manner? Marshall
-------------------------------------------- On Mon, 8/15/16, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote: Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations To: detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Date: Monday, August 15, 2016, 9:57 AM
Dear AJ,
I have always respected you and your opinions but in this case you are incorrect as far as the resignation of Jack DeRyke. I was on the Board of Directors' conference call where he was asked to stay and he adamantly refused to if the printer changed. Jack's resignation was specifically because of the change in printer! You can go research that phone conference call, or the minutes of the meeting, as the facts are saved. As far as Mike Haney's resignation, that was done by his Mrs. for their reasons which most likely were aligned with their parents.
Laurie
In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? [1]asajay@asajay.com writes: The last? I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was interested in doing a? -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for me, it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out on full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss.? However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs properly.? I? have more faith that the present board members will properly investigate? and sort it out for everyone. I am on-board with electronic delivery,? though I do admit it's nice to just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? It's also easier to hand-off to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do you really fix that? I would think (and I don't? know), that the ClubExpress membership database might be able to include a? "preference" as part of the member's profile or details.? Just as I? can set an address and phone number, if I could check a box for Electronic? delivery or paper copies, or both, and select whatever I wanted for each? item (Profiles versus Newsletter), that might be ideal. However,? I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well could be? that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to print 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the board will? look at as well. Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have? heard (from more than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign? "because POCA changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter? content that in essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For? a guy that appeared to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the? by-laws (and it's unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't? feel they applied to him. For the record, as I understand it, POCA? has changed printers -twice- since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related? to the DeRykes) got out of the business.? So the "family tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not a factor in the resignations. Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) Asa? Jay Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired &? Shelley? Mar
-----Original Message----- From: detomaso-request <detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com> To: detomaso <detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> Sent: Mon, Aug 15, 2016 9:00 am Subject: DeTomaso Digest, Vol 146, Issue 20 Send DeTomaso mailing list submissions to [2]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit [3]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to detomaso-[4]request@server.detomasolist.com You can reach the person managing the list at detomaso-[5]owner@server.detomasolist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of DeTomaso digest..." Daily Detomaso List Digest Today's Topics: 1. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic (marshallgsmith) 2. Re: De Tomaso Pantera GTS on eBay! again $250K!! (Michael Cox) 3. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic (Stephen)
--- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:27:43 -0700 From: marshallgsmith <[6]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> To: [7]P6746@aol.com, [8]asajay@asajay.com, [9]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic Message-ID:
<[10]sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com>
Calling this situation "multiple dues levels" seems to be making the issue too complex. There are some members
What is your estimate of the length of time that it would take the board to arrange for a vote of the membership to change the bylaws to allow for this discount? Who specifically made that apples-to-apples comparison you refer to? I agree that the editors should have
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I have a couple questions Bob: that are opting to not have printed magazines mailed which should make those members eligible for a discount because of the savings. the most influence ?on the process. ?However, our editors of both publications seem to have a hard time reporting to the members about ANY issues pertaining to the publication's themselves. Might that change in the near future or will radio silence be the norm here? Marshall Smith Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: P6746--- via DeTomaso
<[11]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com>
Date: 8/14/16 3:10 PM (GMT-08:00) To: [12]asajay@asajay.com, [13]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, paper vs. electronic To use a cliche, we're working on it.? Most of what has been mentioned is in the pipeline.?? However, there are restrictions, particularly with the By-Laws as they currently? stand.? There are no provisions for multiple dues levels,? particularly pertaining to how a member elects to have their club? publications delivered, etc.? That will take time as any changes or? amendments must be approved by the whole membership. The consensus seems to be that the Profiles would? continue as a print publication for all except foreign members who elect to? receive it digitally.? As far as printing is concerned, it is that first copy that is? so expensive, it is the subsequent copies that bring down the per unit? cost.? So as fewer units are produced and shipped, the cost per unit? increases but not proportionately.?? An apples to apples comparison was made between an online? printer and the current printer for both printing and mailing and the difference? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but for the whole run.? As far as I am concerned, it is the editors who should have? the most influence as to how and where their product is produced.? They are? the ones who must work with the printers and mailing houses on a regular? basis. Bob Reid? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? [14]asajay@asajay.com writes: The last? I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was interested in doing a? -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for me, it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out on full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss.? However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs properly.? I? have more faith that the present board members will properly investigate? and sort it out for everyone. I am on-board with electronic delivery,? though I do admit it's nice to just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? It's also easier to hand-off to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do you really fix that? I would think (and I don't? know), that the ClubExpress membership database might be able to include a? "preference" as part of the member's profile or details.? Just as I? can set an address and phone number, if I could check a box for Electronic? delivery or paper copies, or both, and select whatever I wanted for each? item (Profiles versus Newsletter), that might be ideal. However,? I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well could be? that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to print 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the board will? look at as well. Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have? heard (from more than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign? "because POCA changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter? content that in essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For? a guy that appeared to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the? by-laws (and it's unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't? feel they applied to him. For the record, as I understand it, POCA? has changed printers -twice- since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related? to the DeRykes) got out of the business.? So the "family tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not a factor in the resignations. Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) Asa? Jay Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired &? Shelley? Marie Spokane,? WA ****************************** [15]http://w7tsc.org [16]http://www.teampanteraracing.com _______________________________________________ Detomaso? Email List is not managed by POCA Posted emails must not exceed 1.5? Megabytes DeTomaso mailing? list [17]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com [18]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso To? manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) use the? links above. Members who post to this list grant license to the list to? forward any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of the? list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an archive or? approve the archiving of list? messages. ?? To use a cliche, we're working on it. ?? Most of what has been mentioned is in the pipeline.? However, there are ?? restrictions, particularly with the By-Laws as they currently stand. ?? There are no provisions for multiple dues levels, ?? particularly pertaining to how a member elects to have their club ?? publications delivered, etc.? That will take time as any changes or ?? amendments must be approved by the whole membership. ?? The consensus seems to be that the Profiles would continue as a print ?? publication for all except foreign members who elect to receive it ?? digitally. ?? As far as printing is concerned, it is that first copy that is so ?? expensive, it is the subsequent copies that bring down the per unit ?? cost.? So as fewer units are produced and shipped, the cost per unit ?? increases but not proportionately. ?? An apples to apples comparison was made between an online printer and ?? the current printer for both printing and mailing and the difference ?? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but for the whole run. ?? As far as I am concerned, it is the editors who should have the most ?? influence as to how and where their product is produced.? They are the ?? ones who must work with the printers and mailing houses on a regular ?? basis. ?? Bob Reid ?? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, ?? [19]asajay@asajay.com writes: ???? The last I heard (and I may have heard wrong), the board was ???? interested ???? in doing a -real- accounting comparison of printing costs, so for ???? me, ???? it's a wait and see kind of thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing out ???? on ???? full-color and paying $8,000 more for B/W then something is amiss. ???? However, I also believe Mr. Shortt didn't account for all costs ???? properly.? I have more faith that the present board members will ???? properly investigate and sort it out for everyone. ???? I am on-board with electronic delivery, though I do admit it's nice ???? to ???? just sit back and read a paper copy too.? It's also easier to ???? hand-off ???? to Sam so he can read it later.? How do you really fix that? ???? I would think (and I don't know), that the ClubExpress membership ???? database might be able to include a "preference" as part of the ???? member's ???? profile or details.? Just as I can set an address and phone number, ???? if I ???? could check a box for Electronic delivery or paper copies, or both, ???? and ???? select whatever I wanted for each item (Profiles versus Newsletter), ???? that might be ideal. ???? However, I'm also familiar with quantity discounting.? It very well ???? could be that it costs the same amount to print 500 as it does to ???? print ???? 50, or 10 (but I doubt it).? I imagine those are considerations the ???? board will look at as well. ???? Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has claimed, I have heard (from ???? more ???? than one person), that Jack and Mike did not resign "because POCA ???? changed printers;" it was over "control" of newsletter content that ???? in ???? essence fell outside the bounds of the by-laws.? For a guy that ???? appeared ???? to try very hard to get everyone else to follow the by-laws (and ???? it's ???? unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt certainly didn't feel they ???? applied ???? to him. ???? For the record, as I understand it, POCA has changed printers ???? -twice- ???? since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were related to the DeRykes) got out ???? of ???? the business.? So the "family tie-in" previously eluded to, was not ???? a ???? factor in the resignations. ???? Just my $1.50? (two cents adjusted for inflation) ???? Asa? Jay ???? Asa Jay Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, Retired ???? &? Shelley Marie ???? Spokane, WA ???? ****************************** ???? [20]http://w7tsc.org ???? [21]http://www.teampanteraracing.com ???? _______________________________________________ ???? Detomaso Email List is not managed by POCA ???? Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes ???? DeTomaso mailing list ???? [22]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com ????
[23]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso
???? To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, ???? etc.) use the links above. ???? Members who post to this list grant license to the list to forward ???? any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of ???? the list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an ???? archive or approve the archiving of list messages. _______________________________________________ Detomaso Email List is not managed by POCA Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 Megabytes DeTomaso mailing list [24]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com [25]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso To manage your subscription (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) use the links above. Members who post to this list grant license to the list to forward any message posted here to all past, current, or future members of the list. They also grant the list owner permission to maintain an archive or approve the archiving of list messages.
I read the attachment, why wasn't it made public, if it's a true one, it should have been. From: Charles McCall [mailto:charlesmccall@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 2:22 AM To: marshallgsmith Cc: Michael Haney; Judith McCartney; Effie Richards; Julian Kift; detomaso; laurie Basile Subject: -- SPAM --Re: [DeTomaso] resignations PS - if you read the attachment, you'll see that there is basically NO savings by changing printers. According to the quotes received, the $8000 savings was not correct. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Charles McCall <[1]charlesmccall@gmail.com> wrote: You did all read the info sent by Judy McCartney last week with Jack's explanation? Re-sent here in case you didn't see it. Please open the attachment - I promise no viruses are included On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:20 AM, marshallgsmith <[2]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Hey Michael, I think the best way to put this controversy to bed is if you or your dad could speak about not being cooperative in regards to the the use of another printer that supposedly afforded the club an $8,000 savings. That really seems to be the only issue that continues this controversy and I still haven't heard either of you discuss the allegation. I'm sure your response will cut this thread for good and allow us all to move on with the rebuilding of this great club. Marshall Smith President, San Diego Panteras Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Michael Haney <[3]paso750@gmail.com> Date: 8/15/16 10:36 PM (GMT-08:00) To: 'Judith McCartney' <[4]jpoca2@hotmail.com>, 'Effie Richards' <[5]erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com>, 'Julian Kift' <[6]julian_kift@hotmail.com> Cc: [7]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com, 'laurie Basile' <[8]laurieferrari@aol.com> Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Thank you very much, Judy. I really wish this thread would just die. I know that this isn't the answer you're fishing for, but it'll have to do since it's the truth. Nancy quit and took her associate (me) with her because she was tired of hearing from me all about Shortt's efforts to take over every aspect of POCA. I didn't fight her decision because I was in turn tired of Shortt's intimidation and bullying tactics. Frankly, being on the Board wasn't fun anymore and I was also very tired of Shortt's constant preening. As a matter of record, I resigned from the Board BEFORE Profiles #3 even went to the printer. I had nearly finished it and decided that I didn't want to let the POCA members down. I really didn't want to contribute any more to Shortt's regime, but my conscience won. Even after I sent the magazine in, I still had to deal with Shortt. He decided to interfere with the printer, sent them a database with a whole bunch of problematic info and threaten nonpayment if he didn't get preliminary proofs. How do I know this? I received a call while I was at work from the woman working in Allegra Printing's mail room. She called Shortt and he wouldn't help her with the database and ignored her questions. Having no one else to call, she called me. I in turn contacted Judy, our Membership Director, who fixed the problems that Shortt created. Regarding Shortt's allegations of graft, if anyone can find a connection between my family and anyone who EVER worked at Allegra Printing in Reno, Nevada, (or indeed any of Allegra's branches) please let me know. My Dad might respond as well, but he's been pretty busy caring for my SERIOUSLY ill Mom who was in the hospital for the last two weeks and who might finally be able to come back home in a couple more. Now, can we finally put this "controversy" to rest? Mike Haney -----Original Message----- From: DeTomaso [mailto:[9]detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com] On Behalf Of Judith McCartney Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 8:44 PM To: Effie Richards; Julian Kift Cc: [10]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; laurie Basile Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations Mike Haney gave his resignation months way head of Jacks, two diff reasons. Judith McCartney, Membership Director & Fun Rally coordinator. > From: [11]erichards@zogob.sdcoxmail.com > Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:43:43 -0700 > To: [12]julian_kift@hotmail.com > CC: [13]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; [14]laurieferrari@aol.com > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations > > Julian these are the same questions some of us have had and have been waiting for a reply or statement. I'm willing to give the board some time to come up with one. > > Sent from Effie's iPad > > > On Aug 15, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Julian Kift <[15]julian_kift@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > I have digested all the emails on this topic and to be honest it still > > doesn't sit well in my gut. > > > > > > Presumably the BOD voted in favor of changing printers based upon the > > quotes presented. Did they not have all the facts and > > if not why did they not question further? Did Jack have all the facts w > > hen he resigned or were his and Mike Haney's resignations simply an > > outright stand against changing printer? > > > > > > Why did Michael push to change printer if he knew there was only > > pennies between it? > > > > > > Julian > > __________________________________________________________________ > > > > From: DeTomaso <[16]detomaso-bounces@server.detomasolist.com> on behalf of > > marshall smith <[17]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> > > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:11 AM > > To: [18]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com; [19]laurieferrari@aol.com > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations > > > > I find it funny that three months after the Fun Rally we are now > > hearing that Shortt's bid for printing did not include shipping. Shortt > > is a lot of things but a mistake like this...? > > I was listening in on this meeting also and I know what I heard. > > Apparently, the board convinced 'some' members of this so-called > > discrepancy month's ago. Why wasn't this information, if it exists, > > relayed to ALL of us in a timely manner? > > Marshall > > > > -------------------------------------------- > > On Mon, 8/15/16, Laurie Ferrari via DeTomaso > > <[20]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> wrote: > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] resignations > > To: [21]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > Date: Monday, August 15, 2016, 9:57 AM > > > > Dear AJ, > > > > I have always respected you and your > > opinions but in this case you are > > incorrect as far as the resignation of > > Jack DeRyke. I was on the Board > > of Directors' conference call where he was > > asked to stay and he > > adamantly refused to if the printer > > changed. Jack's resignation was > > specifically because of the change in > > printer! You can go research > > that phone conference call, or the minutes > > of the meeting, as the facts > > are saved. As far as Mike Haney's > > resignation, that was done by his > > Mrs. for their reasons which most likely > > were aligned with their > > parents. > > > > Laurie > > > > In a message dated 8/13/2016 > > 9:54:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,? > > [1][22]asajay@asajay.com > > writes: > > The last? I heard (and I may have > > heard wrong), the board was > > interested > > in doing a? -real- accounting > > comparison of printing costs, so for > > me, > > it's a wait and? see kind of > > thing.? I agree, if POCA was missing > > out on > > full-color? and paying $8,000 more > > for B/W then something is amiss.? > > However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt > > didn't account for all costs > > properly.? I? have more faith that > > the present board members will > > properly investigate? and sort it > > out for everyone. > > I am on-board with electronic > > delivery,? though I do admit it's nice > > to > > just sit back and read a paper > > copy? too.? It's also easier to > > hand-off > > to Sam so he can read it? later.? > > How do you really fix that? > > I would think (and I don't? know), > > that the ClubExpress membership > > database might be able to include > > a? "preference" as part of the > > member's > > profile or details.? Just as I? can > > set an address and phone number, > > if I > > could check a box for Electronic? > > delivery or paper copies, or both, > > and > > select whatever I wanted for each? > > item (Profiles versus > > Newsletter), > > that might be ideal. > > However,? I'm also familiar with > > quantity discounting.? It very well > > could be? that it costs the same > > amount to print 500 as it does to > > print > > 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I > > imagine those are considerations the > > board will? look at as well. > > Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie > > has claimed, I have? heard (from > > more > > than one person), that Jack and > > Mike did not resign? "because POCA > > changed printers;" it was over > > "control" of newsletter? content that > > in > > essence fell outside the bounds of > > the by-laws.? For? a guy that > > appeared > > to try very hard to get everyone > > else to follow the? by-laws (and > > it's > > unwritten code of ethics), Mr. > > Shortt certainly didn't? feel they > > applied > > to him. > > For the record, as I understand it, > > POCA? has changed printers > > -twice- > > since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were > > related? to the DeRykes) got out > > of > > the business.? So the "family > > tie-in"? previously eluded to, was not > > a > > factor in the resignations. > > Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted > > for inflation) > > Asa? Jay > > Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, > > USAFR, Retired > > &? Shelley? Mar > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: detomaso-request <[23]detomaso-request@server.detomasolist.com> > > To: detomaso <[24]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> > > Sent: Mon, Aug 15, 2016 9:00 am > > Subject: DeTomaso Digest, Vol 146, Issue > > 20 > > Send DeTomaso mailing list submissions to > > [2][25]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World > > Wide Web, visit > > [3][26]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso > > or, via email, send a message with subject > > or body 'help' to > > detomaso-[4][27]request@server.detomasolist.com > > You can reach the person managing the list > > at > > detomaso-[5][28]owner@server.detomasolist.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject > > line so it is more specific > > than "Re: Contents of DeTomaso digest..." > > Daily Detomaso List Digest > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. > > electronic (marshallgsmith) > > 2. Re: De Tomaso Pantera GTS on eBay! > > again $250K!! (Michael Cox) > > 3. Re: Newsletters, cost, paper vs. > > electronic (Stephen) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > --- > > Message: 1 > > Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:27:43 -0700 > > From: marshallgsmith <[6][29]marshallgsmith@sbcglobal.net> > > To: [7][30]P6746@aol.com, [8][31]asajay@asajay.com, > > [9][32]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, > > paper vs. electronic > > Message-ID: > > <[10][33]sdxpj9k7caacwyvlamgw7uly.1471231663405@email.android.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I have a couple questions Bob: > >> Calling this situation "multiple dues > > levels" seems to be making the > > issue too complex. There are some members > > that are opting to not have > > printed magazines mailed which should make > > those members eligible for a > > discount because of the savings. > >> What is your estimate of the length > > of time that it would take the > > board to arrange for a vote of the > > membership to change the bylaws to > > allow for this discount? > >> Who specifically made that > > apples-to-apples comparison you refer to? > >> I agree that the editors should have > > the most influence ?on the > > process. ?However, our editors of both > > publications seem to have a hard > > time reporting to the members about ANY > > issues pertaining to the > > publication's themselves. Might that > > change in the near future or will > > radio silence be the norm here? > > Marshall Smith > > Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone > > -------- Original message -------- > > From: P6746--- via DeTomaso <[11][34]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com> > > Date: 8/14/16 3:10 PM (GMT-08:00) > > To: [12][35]asajay@asajay.com, > > [13][36]detomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > Subject: Re: [DeTomaso] Newsletters, cost, > > paper vs. electronic > > To use a cliche, we're working on it.? > > Most of what has been mentioned is in the > > pipeline.?? However, there > > are > > restrictions, particularly with the > > By-Laws as they currently? stand.? > > There > > are no provisions for multiple dues > > levels,? particularly pertaining to > > how a > > member elects to have their club? > > publications delivered, etc.? That > > will > > take time as any changes or? amendments > > must be approved by the whole > > membership. > > The consensus seems to be that the > > Profiles would? continue as a print > > publication for all except foreign members > > who elect to? receive it > > digitally.? > > As far as printing is concerned, it is > > that first copy that is? so > > expensive, it is the subsequent copies > > that bring down the per unit? > > cost.? So as > > fewer units are produced and shipped, the > > cost per unit? increases but > > not > > proportionately.?? > > An apples to apples comparison was made > > between an online? printer and > > the > > current printer for both printing and > > mailing and the difference? was > > pennies.? That wasn't pennies per unit but > > for the whole run.? > > As far as I am concerned, it is the > > editors who should have? the most > > influence as to how and where their > > product is produced.? They are? the > > ones who > > must work with the printers and mailing > > houses on a regular? basis. > > Bob Reid? > > In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 P.M. > > Eastern Daylight Time,? > > [14][37]asajay@asajay.com > > writes: > > The last? I heard (and I may have heard > > wrong), the board was > > interested > > in doing a? -real- accounting comparison > > of printing costs, so for me, > > it's a wait and? see kind of thing.? I > > agree, if POCA was missing out > > on > > full-color? and paying $8,000 more for B/W > > then something is amiss.? > > However, I? also believe Mr. Shortt didn't > > account for all costs > > properly.? I? have more faith that the > > present board members will > > properly investigate? and sort it out for > > everyone. > > I am on-board with electronic delivery,? > > though I do admit it's nice to > > just sit back and read a paper copy? too.? > > It's also easier to hand-off > > to Sam so he can read it? later.? How do > > you really fix that? > > I would think (and I don't? know), that > > the ClubExpress membership > > database might be able to include a? > > "preference" as part of the > > member's > > profile or details.? Just as I? can set an > > address and phone number, if > > I > > could check a box for Electronic? delivery > > or paper copies, or both, > > and > > select whatever I wanted for each? item > > (Profiles versus Newsletter), > > that might be ideal. > > However,? I'm also familiar with quantity > > discounting.? It very well > > could be? that it costs the same amount to > > print 500 as it does to > > print > > 50, or 10? (but I doubt it).? I imagine > > those are considerations the > > board will? look at as well. > > Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie has > > claimed, I have? heard (from > > more > > than one person), that Jack and Mike did > > not resign? "because POCA > > changed printers;" it was over "control" > > of newsletter? content that in > > essence fell outside the bounds of the > > by-laws.? For? a guy that > > appeared > > to try very hard to get everyone else to > > follow the? by-laws (and it's > > unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt > > certainly didn't? feel they > > applied > > to him. > > For the record, as I understand it, POCA? > > has changed printers -twice- > > since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were > > related? to the DeRykes) got out of > > the business.? So the "family tie-in"? > > previously eluded to, was not a > > factor in the resignations. > > Just my? $1.50? (two cents adjusted for > > inflation) > > Asa? Jay > > Asa Jay? Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, USAFR, > > Retired > > &? Shelley? Marie > > Spokane,? WA > > ****************************** > > [15][38]http://w7tsc.org > > [16][39]http://www.teampanteraracing.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Detomaso? Email List is not managed by > > POCA > > Posted emails must not exceed 1.5? > > Megabytes > > DeTomaso mailing? list > > [17][40]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > [18][41]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso > > To? manage your subscription (change email > > address, unsubscribe, etc.) > > use > > the? links above. > > Members who post to this list grant > > license to the list to? forward any > > message posted here to all past, current, > > or future members of the? > > list. They > > also grant the list owner permission to > > maintain an archive or? approve > > the > > archiving of list? messages. > > ?? To use a cliche, we're working on it. > > ?? Most of what has been mentioned is in > > the pipeline.? However, there > > are > > ?? restrictions, particularly with the > > By-Laws as they currently stand. > > ?? There are no provisions for multiple > > dues levels, > > ?? particularly pertaining to how a member > > elects to have their club > > ?? publications delivered, etc.? That will > > take time as any changes or > > ?? amendments must be approved by the > > whole membership. > > ?? The consensus seems to be that the > > Profiles would continue as a > > print > > ?? publication for all except foreign > > members who elect to receive it > > ?? digitally. > > ?? As far as printing is concerned, it is > > that first copy that is so > > ?? expensive, it is the subsequent copies > > that bring down the per unit > > ?? cost.? So as fewer units are produced > > and shipped, the cost per unit > > ?? increases but not proportionately. > > ?? An apples to apples comparison was made > > between an online printer > > and > > ?? the current printer for both printing > > and mailing and the difference > > ?? was pennies.? That wasn't pennies per > > unit but for the whole run. > > ?? As far as I am concerned, it is the > > editors who should have the most > > ?? influence as to how and where their > > product is produced.? They are > > the > > ?? ones who must work with the printers > > and mailing houses on a regular > > ?? basis. > > ?? Bob Reid > > ?? In a message dated 8/13/2016 9:54:24 > > P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > > ?? [19][42]asajay@asajay.com > > writes: > > ???? The last I heard (and I may have > > heard wrong), the board was > > ???? interested > > ???? in doing a -real- accounting > > comparison of printing costs, so for > > ???? me, > > ???? it's a wait and see kind of thing.? I > > agree, if POCA was missing > > out > > ???? on > > ???? full-color and paying $8,000 more for > > B/W then something is amiss. > > ???? However, I also believe Mr. Shortt > > didn't account for all costs > > ???? properly.? I have more faith that the > > present board members will > > ???? properly investigate and sort it out > > for everyone. > > ???? I am on-board with electronic > > delivery, though I do admit it's > > nice > > ???? to > > ???? just sit back and read a paper copy > > too.? It's also easier to > > ???? hand-off > > ???? to Sam so he can read it later.? How > > do you really fix that? > > ???? I would think (and I don't know), > > that the ClubExpress membership > > ???? database might be able to include a > > "preference" as part of the > > ???? member's > > ???? profile or details.? Just as I can > > set an address and phone > > number, > > ???? if I > > ???? could check a box for Electronic > > delivery or paper copies, or > > both, > > ???? and > > ???? select whatever I wanted for each > > item (Profiles versus > > Newsletter), > > ???? that might be ideal. > > ???? However, I'm also familiar with > > quantity discounting.? It very > > well > > ???? could be that it costs the same > > amount to print 500 as it does to > > ???? print > > ???? 50, or 10 (but I doubt it).? I > > imagine those are considerations > > the > > ???? board will look at as well. > > ???? Oh, and in contrast to what Laurie > > has claimed, I have heard (from > > ???? more > > ???? than one person), that Jack and Mike > > did not resign "because POCA > > ???? changed printers;" it was over > > "control" of newsletter content > > that > > ???? in > > ???? essence fell outside the bounds of > > the by-laws.? For a guy that > > ???? appeared > > ???? to try very hard to get everyone else > > to follow the by-laws (and > > ???? it's > > ???? unwritten code of ethics), Mr. Shortt > > certainly didn't feel they > > ???? applied > > ???? to him. > > ???? For the record, as I understand it, > > POCA has changed printers > > ???? -twice- > > ???? since the Fertitta's (sp) (who were > > related to the DeRykes) got > > out > > ???? of > > ???? the business.? So the "family tie-in" > > previously eluded to, was > > not > > ???? a > > ???? factor in the resignations. > > ???? Just my $1.50? (two cents adjusted > > for inflation) > > ???? Asa? Jay > > ???? Asa Jay Laughton - W7TSC, MSgt, > > USAFR, Retired > > ???? &? Shelley Marie > > ???? Spokane, WA > > ???? ****************************** > > ???? [20][43]http://w7tsc.org > > ???? [21][44]http://www.teampanteraracing.com > > ???? > > _______________________________________________ > > ???? Detomaso Email List is not managed by > > POCA > > ???? Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 > > Megabytes > > ???? DeTomaso mailing list > > ???? [22][45]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > ???? [23][46]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso > > ???? To manage your subscription (change > > email address, unsubscribe, > > ???? etc.) use the links above. > > ???? Members who post to this list grant > > license to the list to forward > > ???? any message posted here to all past, > > current, or future members of > > ???? the list. They also grant the list > > owner permission to maintain an > > ???? archive or approve the archiving of > > list messages. > > _______________________________________________ > > Detomaso Email List is not managed by > > POCA > > Posted emails must not exceed 1.5 > > Megabytes > > DeTomaso mailing list > > [24][47]DeTomaso@server.detomasolist.com > > [25][48]http://server.detomasolist.com/mailman/listinfo/detomaso > > To manage your subscription (change email > > address, unsubscribe, etc.) > > use the links above. > > Members who post to this list grant > > license to the list to forward any > > message posted here to all past, current, > > or future members of the > > list. They also grant the list owner > > permission to maintain an archive > > or approve the archiving of list > > messages. > >