Roland, since even before MS was elected, he has been threatening members with lawsuits apparently as a form of intimidation. His recent comments directly state he intends to destroy POCA as an organization, I assume for his own pleasure or personal gain. I was not present on the call and did not hear the context of such a ban, but if any one person's actions were to not warrant such an outcome of being banned, what other behavior would have to take place before it would reach that level? That is an open question for everybody to decide personally. Is it more civil to degrade and intimidate in order to get others to quit or to set standards for expected behavior and let those standards apply to all members? The third option is to allow toxic behavior to fracture the club which is what has been happening the past 7 months. MS added me to his list of people to sue along the way as I was called a "Backstabbing Motherf$!@er". I can live with those petty threats, I just choose not to. Setting standards of decency that do not allow bullying and threats seems like a good idea to me, but I am just one opinion. On Aug 12, 2016 3:59 AM, "Roland" <willibillie@live.de> wrote:
First of all, i don't like the actions MS did ! But banning MS for life? Isn't banning for life a relict from the dark
age? What about his supporters? Send them out with a sign "I'm guilty" ? MS was voted by many for his promisises making Poca great again ( didn't i hear this very often lataly) What about his voters? Are they ashamed, for what he has done? No ! I haven't heard of one !
Roland
Am 11.08.2016 um 22:42 schrieb Ed Mendez <edducati@mac.com>:
He should have used PST, because Joe lives in AZ where they have no DST. At the moment AZ time and CA time are the same.
Sorry
It lasted until 7.58, but it was a great meeting, it was so much less tense. In a nutshell. Bob publicly announced and made a commitment that we will not be returning to pre-2016 BOD ways, keeping all the MS changes, keeping finances and BOD meetings open, etc. Waiting 1 week on Mike Burnett for a decision on his VP position Board appointments: Les is Past President Mike H is Profiles Jack D is Newsletter Josette is Store manager (non-board) Talked about the store and the website Talked about banning MS for life. Ed
Roland, since even before MS was elected, he has been threatening members with lawsuits apparently as a form of intimidation. His recentA comments directly state he intends to destroy POCA as an organization, I assume for his own pleasure or personal gain. I was not present on the call and did not hear the context of such a ban, but if any one person's actions were to not warrant such an outcome of being banned, what other behavior would have to take place before it would reach that level? That is an open question for everybody to decide personally. Is it more civil to degrade and intimidate in order to get others to quit or to set standards for expected behavior and let those standards apply to all members? The third option is to allow toxic behavior to fracture the club which is what has been happening the past 7 months. MS added me to his list of people to sueA along the way as I was called a "Backstabbing Motherf$!@er". I can live with those petty threats, I just choose not to.A Setting standards of decency that do not allow bullying and threats seems like a good idea to me, but I am just one opinion. On Aug 12, 2016 3:59 AM, "Roland" <[1]willibillie@live.de> wrote:
First of all, i don't like the actions MS did ! But banning MS for life? Isn't banning for life a relict from the
dark age? What about his supporters? Send them out with a sign "I'm guilty" ? MS was voted by many for his promisises making Poca great again ( didn't i hear this very often lataly) What about his voters? Are they ashamed, for what he has done? No ! I haven't heard of one !
Roland
Am 11.08.2016 um 22:42 schrieb Ed Mendez <[2]edducati@mac.com>:
A A He should have used PST, because Joe lives in AZ where they
A A DST. At the moment AZ time and CA time are the same.
A A Sorry
A A It lasted until 7.58, but it was a great meeting, it was so much less A A tense. A A In a nutshell. A A Bob publicly announced and made a commitment that we will not be A A returning to pre-2016 BOD ways, keeping all the MS changes, keeping A A finances and BOD meetings open, etc. A A Waiting 1 week on Mike Burnett for a decision on his VP
have no position
A A Board appointments: A A Les is Past President A A Mike H is Profiles A A Jack D is Newsletter A A Josette is Store manager (non-board) A A Talked about the store and the website A A Talked about banning MS for life. A A Ed
References 1. mailto:willibillie@live.de 2. mailto:edducati@mac.com